Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Full three-loop Renormalisation of an abelian chiral Gauge Theory with non-anticommuting $\gamma_5$ in the BMHV Scheme

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.11291 v1 pith:SXFK7CKE submitted 2023-12-18 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords gaugegammaschemethree-loopactionbmhvchiralcounterterm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this work we present a complete three-loop renormalisation of an abelian chiral gauge theory within the Breitenlohner-Maison/'t Hooft-Veltman (BMHV) scheme of dimensional regularisation (DReg). In this scheme the $\gamma_5$-matrix appearing in gauge interactions is a non-anticommuting object, leading to a breaking of gauge and BRST invariance. Employing an efficient method based on the quantum action principle, we obtain the complete three-loop counterterm action which serves both to render the theory finite and to restore gauge and BRST invariance. The UV singular counterterms involve not only higher order $\epsilon$-poles but also new counterterm structures emerging at the three-loop level for the first time; the finite symmetry-restoring counterterms are restricted to the same structures as at lower loop orders, just with different coefficients, aligning with our expectations. Both the singular and the finite counterterms include structures which cannot be obtained by the standard multiplicative renormalisation. Our results demonstrate that a rigorous treatment of chiral gauge theories with $\gamma_5$ defined in the BMHV scheme at the multi-loop level is possible and that the obtained counterterm action is suitable for computer implementations, allowing automated calculations without ambiguities caused by $\gamma_5$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools