Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Phase space maximal entropy random walk: Langevin-like ensembles of physical trajectories

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.01239 v4 pith:JWUYRASF submitted 2024-01-02 cond-mat.stat-mech

classification cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords spaceensemblesphaseensemblepathvelocitymerwrandom
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

As written by statistician George Box "All models are wrong, but some are useful", standard diffusion derivation or Feynman path ensembles use nonphysical infinite velocity/kinetic energy nowhere differentiable trajectories - what seems wrong, might be only our approximation to simplify mathematics. This article introduces some basic tools to investigate this issue. To consider ensembles of more physical finite velocity trajectories, we can work in $(x,v)$ phase space like in Langevin equation with velocity controlling spatial steps, here also controlled with spatial potential $V(x)$. There are derived and compared 4 approaches to predict stationary probability distributions: using Boltzmann ensemble of steps/points in space (GRW - generic random walk) or in phase space (psGRW), and analogously Boltzmann ensemble of paths in space (MERW - maximal entropy random walk) and in phase space (psMERW), also generalized to L{\'e}vy flights. Path ensembles generally have much stronger Anderson-like localization, MERW has stationary distribution exactly as quantum ground state. Proposed novel MERW in phase space has some slight differences, which might be distinguished experimentally. For example for 1D infinite potential well: $\rho=1$ stationary distribution for step ensemble, $\rho\sim \sin^2$ for path ensemble (as in QM), and $\rho\sim \sin$ for proposed smooth path ensembles - more frequently approaching the barriers due to randomly gained velocity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools