Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A how-to guide for code-sharing in biology

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.03068 v1 pith:GGKMGYDF submitted 2024-01-05 q-bio.OT

A how-to guide for code-sharing in biology

classification q-bio.OT
keywords code-sharingbiologybiologistscomputationalguidanceaccessibleadditionallyadvantage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Computational biology continues to spread into new fields, becoming more accessible to researchers trained in the wet lab who are eager to take advantage of growing datasets, falling costs, and novel assays that present new opportunities for discovery even outside of the much-discussed developments in artificial intelligence. However, guidance for implementing these techniques is much easier to find than guidance for reporting their use, leaving biologists to guess which details and files are relevant. Here, we provide a set of recommendations for sharing code, with an eye toward guiding those who are comparatively new to applying open science principles to their computational work. Additionally, we review existing literature on the topic, summarize the most common tips, and evaluate the code-sharing policies of the most influential journals in biology, which occasionally encourage code-sharing but seldom require it. Taken together, we provide a user manual for biologists who seek to follow code-sharing best practices but are unsure where to start.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.