Pith. sign in

REVIEW

eXplainable Bayesian Multi-Perspective Generative Retrieval

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02418 v1 pith:VMIVSS57 submitted 2024-02-04 cs.IR cs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.LG
keywords retrievaluncertaintyperformancebayesiancalibrationinterpretabilitymethodologiesmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Modern deterministic retrieval pipelines prioritize achieving state-of-the-art performance but often lack interpretability in decision-making. These models face challenges in assessing uncertainty, leading to overconfident predictions. To overcome these limitations, we integrate uncertainty calibration and interpretability into a retrieval pipeline. Specifically, we introduce Bayesian methodologies and multi-perspective retrieval to calibrate uncertainty within a retrieval pipeline. We incorporate techniques such as LIME and SHAP to analyze the behavior of a black-box reranker model. The importance scores derived from these explanation methodologies serve as supplementary relevance scores to enhance the base reranker model. We evaluate the resulting performance enhancements achieved through uncertainty calibration and interpretable reranking on Question Answering and Fact Checking tasks. Our methods demonstrate substantial performance improvements across three KILT datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools