pith. sign in

arxiv: 2402.03714 · v1 · pith:75S65POLnew · submitted 2024-02-06 · 💻 cs.HC · cs.LG

Advancing Location-Invariant and Device-Agnostic Motion Activity Recognition on Wearable Devices

classification 💻 cs.HC cs.LG
keywords activitydatamodelslocation-invariantmotionrecognitionlocationssensor
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Wearable sensors have permeated into people's lives, ushering impactful applications in interactive systems and activity recognition. However, practitioners face significant obstacles when dealing with sensing heterogeneities, requiring custom models for different platforms. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the generalizability of motion models across sensor locations. Our analysis highlights this challenge and identifies key on-body locations for building location-invariant models that can be integrated on any device. For this, we introduce the largest multi-location activity dataset (N=50, 200 cumulative hours), which we make publicly available. We also present deployable on-device motion models reaching 91.41% frame-level F1-score from a single model irrespective of sensor placements. Lastly, we investigate cross-location data synthesis, aiming to alleviate the laborious data collection tasks by synthesizing data in one location given data from another. These contributions advance our vision of low-barrier, location-invariant activity recognition systems, catalyzing research in HCI and ubiquitous computing.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. WEQA: Wearable hEalth Question Answering with Query-Adaptive Agentic Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    WEQA proposes a query-adaptive agent framework combining LLMs with wearable data tools, achieving 24% higher accuracy than baselines on a benchmark from four open datasets, with gains in expert-rated usefulness.