Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Robust inference of the Galactic centre gamma-ray excess spatial properties

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.05449 v1 pith:RQDUVI63 submitted 2024-02-08 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEhep-ph

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.COastro-ph.HEhep-ph
keywords galacticbulgeexcessmodelmorphologyemissionmodelsnon-parametric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The gamma-ray Fermi-LAT Galactic centre excess (GCE) has puzzled scientists for over 15 years. Despite ongoing debates about its properties, and especially its spatial distribution, its nature remains elusive. We scrutinize how the estimated spatial morphology of this excess depends on models for the Galactic diffuse emission, focusing particularly on the extent to which the Galactic plane and point sources are masked. Our main aim is to compare a spherically symmetric morphology - potentially arising from the annihilation of dark matter (DM) particles - with a boxy morphology - expected if faint unresolved sources in the Galactic bulge dominate the excess emission. Recent claims favouring a DM-motivated template for the GCE are shown to rely on a specific Galactic bulge template, which performs worse than other templates for the Galactic bulge. We find that a non-parametric model of the Galactic bulge derived from the VVV survey results in a significantly better fit for the GCE than DM-motivated templates. This result is independent of whether a GALPROP-based model or a more non-parametric ring-based model is used to describe the diffuse Galactic emission. This conclusion remains true even when additional freedom is added in the background models, allowing for non-parametric modulation of the model components and substantially improving the fit quality. When adopted, optimized background models provide robust results in terms of preference for a boxy bulge morphology of the GCE, regardless of the mask applied to the Galactic plane.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Producing the GeV Galactic Center Excess via Cosmic Ray-Dark Matter Scattering

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Cosmic ray protons scattering off dark matter produce the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess through inelastic up-scattering followed by decay or direct elastic 2-to-3 photon production.

  2. High-dimensional inference for the $\gamma$-ray sky with differentiable programming

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    A differentiable forward model and likelihood enable probabilistic inference over many spatial morphologies for the Galactic Center gamma-ray Excess using variational methods on GPUs.

  3. High-dimensional inference for the $\gamma$-ray sky with differentiable programming

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A differentiable forward model and likelihood enable fully probabilistic, high-dimensional inference over continuum morphologies of the Galactic Center gamma-ray Excess.

  4. Stellar-like Galactic center excess challenges particle dark matter

    hep-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A mixed stellar-bulge and dark-matter fit to Fermi-LAT Galactic Center data yields upper limits on the annihilation cross section that reach the thermal relic line for masses ≲300 GeV under a contracted NFW halo profile.

  5. Testing Viability of Benchmark Dark Matter Models for the Galactic Center Excess

    hep-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Updated constraints on two simplified dark matter models for the Galactic Center Excess leave unconstrained parameter space after applying recent multi-experiment data.

Pith tools