pith. sign in

arxiv: 2403.07279 · v1 · pith:GMEJAG3Lnew · submitted 2024-03-12 · 💻 cs.CL

A Survey of Explainable Knowledge Tracing

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords knowledgetracingmethodsexplainablealgorithmsinterpretabilityinterpretablemodels
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

With the long term accumulation of high quality educational data, artificial intelligence has shown excellent performance in knowledge tracing. However, due to the lack of interpretability and transparency of some algorithms, this approach will result in reduced stakeholder trust and a decreased acceptance of intelligent decisions. Therefore, algorithms need to achieve high accuracy, and users need to understand the internal operating mechanism and provide reliable explanations for decisions. This paper thoroughly analyzes the interpretability of KT algorithms. First, the concepts and common methods of explainable artificial intelligence and knowledge tracing are introduced. Next, explainable knowledge tracing models are classified into two categories: transparent models and black box models. Then, the interpretable methods used are reviewed from three stages: ante hoc interpretable methods, post hoc interpretable methods, and other dimensions. It is worth noting that current evaluation methods for explainable knowledge tracing are lacking. Hence, contrast and deletion experiments are conducted to explain the prediction results of the deep knowledge tracing model on the ASSISTment2009 by using three XAI methods. Moreover, this paper offers some insights into evaluation methods from the perspective of educational stakeholders. This paper provides a detailed and comprehensive review of the research on explainable knowledge tracing, aiming to offer some basis and inspiration for researchers interested in the interpretability of knowledge tracing.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MOSAIC: Orchestrating Collaborative Knowledge Tracing with Hierarchical Semantic Alignment

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MOSAIC combines frozen-LLM semantic embeddings with hierarchical consistency objectives to report up to 3.4% AUC gains on knowledge-tracing benchmarks including a new MOOC dataset.