Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Cosmological constraints from weak lensing scattering transform using HSC Y1 data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.16085 v1 pith:ORFFMJU5 submitted 2024-04-24 astro-ph.CO

Cosmological constraints from weak lensing scattering transform using HSC Y1 data

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords lensingtextweakconstraintsdataestimationlimitationomega
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

As weak lensing surveys go deeper, there is an increasing need for reliable characterization of non-Gaussian structures at small angular scales. Here we present the first cosmological constraints with weak lensing scattering transform, a statistical estimator that combines efficiency, robustness, and interpretability. With the Hyper Suprime-Cam survey (HSC) year 1 data, we obtain $\Omega_\text{m}=0.29_{-0.03}^{+0.04}$, $S_8\equiv \sigma_8(\Omega_\text{m}/0.3)^{0.5}=0.83\pm0.02$, and intrinsic alignment strength $A_\text{IA}=1.0\pm0.4$ through simulation-based forward modeling. Our constraints are consistent with those derived from Planck. The error bar of $\Omega_\text{m}$ is 2 times tighter than that obtained from the power spectrum when the same scale range is used. This constraining power is on par with that of convolutional neural networks, suggesting that further investment in spatial information extraction may not yield substantial benefits. We also point out an internal tension of $S_8$ estimates linked to a redshift bin around z ~ 1 in the HSC data. We found that discarding that bin leads to a consistent decrease of $S_8$ from 0.83 to 0.79, for all statistical estimators. We argue that photometric redshift estimation is now the main limitation in the estimation of $S_8$ using HSC. This limitation is likely to affect other ground-based weak lensing surveys reaching redshifts greater than one. Alternative redshift estimation techniques, like clustering redshifts, may help alleviate this limitation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Multi-branch classification of diffuse cluster radio emission

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    DualSSN (scattering + SE dual-branch) with beam-normalised cropping and mild uv-tapering reaches ~0.86 accuracy (top-5 ensemble 0.94) on LoTSS-DR2/PSZ2 diffuse-emission labels, beating simple CNNs and fixed FoV/pixel crops.

  2. Replicating weak-lensing summary-statistic covariances with normalizing flows

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0

    Normalizing flows trained on weak-lensing convergence maps reproduce mean and variance of summary statistics to percent level but underestimate off-diagonal covariance by up to 25% unless data augmentation and noise i...