REVIEW 3 cited by
The Common Core Ontologies
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The Common Core Ontologies (CCO) are designed as a mid-level ontology suite that extends the Basic Formal Ontology. CCO has since been increasingly adopted by a broad group of users and applications and is proposed as the first standard mid-level ontology. Despite these successes, documentation of the contents and design patterns of the CCO has been comparatively minimal. This paper is a step toward providing enhanced documentation for the mid-level ontology suite through a discussion of the contents of the eleven ontologies that collectively comprise the Common Core Ontology suite.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
How Group Lives Go Well
The authors define group flourishing as the realization of group functions through member roles, extending the counterfactual account of well-being to groups.
-
A Path to Loving
Love is characterized as a temporally extended process of positive sensations, causally correlated with and judged as valuable regarding a directly acquainted beloved, anchored in Basic Formal Ontology.
-
Ontology Enabled Hybrid Modeling and Simulation
A review proposing that separating 'what is modeled' from 'how it is modeled' ontologies improves hybrid simulation interoperability and reusability.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.