Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Epitaxial RuO$_2$ and IrO$_2$ films by pulsed laser deposition on TiO$_2$(110)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.12878 v1 pith:TYH7MBPF submitted 2024-05-21 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords growthdepositionlaserbalanceepitaxialfilmsmbarpulsed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We present a systematic growth study of epitaxial RuO$_2$(110) and IrO$_2$(110) on TiO$_2$(110) substrates by pulsed laser deposition. We describe the main challenges encountered in the growth process, such as a deteriorating material flux due to laser induced target metallization or the delicate balance of under- vs over-oxidation of the 'stubborn' Ru and Ir metals. We identify growth temperatures and oxygen partial pressures of 700 K, $1\times 10^{-3}$ mbar for RuO$_2$ and 770 K, $5\times 10^{-4}$ mbar for IrO$_2$ to optimally balance between metal oxidation and particle mobility during nucleation. In contrast to IrO$_2$, RuO$_2$ exhibits layer-by-layer growth up to 5 unit cells if grown at high deposition rates. At low deposition rates, the large lattice mismatch between film and substrate fosters initial 3D island growth and cluster formation. In analogy to reports for RuO$_2$ based on physical vapor deposition, we find these islands to eventually merge and growth to continue in a step flow mode, resulting in highly crystalline, flat, stoichiometric films of RuO$_2$(110) (up to 30 nm thickness) and IrO$_2$(110) (up to 13 nm thickness) with well defined line defects.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools