pith. sign in

arxiv: 2405.19193 · v1 · submitted 2024-05-29 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Collapse/expansion dynamics and actuation of pH-responsive nanogels

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 01:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords pH-responsive nanogelsswelling-collapse transitionpolyelectrolyte hydrogelspH-driven actuatorwork densityphase behaviorhydrodynamic interactionsmolecular dynamics simulations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A 50 nm pH-responsive nanogel near a critical point acts as a microsecond actuator with work density ten times that of skeletal muscle.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses hybrid molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations that include explicit electrostatic and hydrodynamic interactions to map the equilibrium conformations and non-equilibrium dynamics of pH-responsive polyelectrolyte nanogels. It establishes that these gels display a closed-loop phase diagram in which a discontinuous swelling-collapse transition appears only at intermediate pH values. Close to the critical point, a 50 nm particle converts a pH change into rapid conformational work at a density of approximately 10^5 J per cubic meter. Collapse and expansion times scale with the square of the linear size while power density scales inversely with that square. A reader would care because the scaling relations imply that smaller particles become both faster and more powerful actuators driven solely by pH.

Core claim

Polyelectrolyte nanogels exhibit a closed-loop phase behavior with a discontinuous swelling-collapse transition that occurs only at intermediate pH values. A 50 nm nanogel particle close to a critical point functions as a pH-driven actuator with a microsecond conformational response and work density ≈10^5 J/m³, an order of magnitude larger than skeletal muscles. The collapse/expansion time scales as L² and the power density scales as L^{-2} where L is the linear size of the gel.

What carries the argument

Hybrid molecular dynamics/Monte Carlo simulations that incorporate explicit electrostatic and hydrodynamic interactions to capture charge-structure-hydrodynamic coupling during the swelling-collapse transition.

If this is right

  • The swelling-collapse transition can be used for pH-controlled actuation at the nanoscale with response times in the microsecond range.
  • Because collapse time scales as L², reducing the gel diameter by a factor of ten shortens the response time by a factor of one hundred.
  • Power density scaling as L^{-2} means smaller nanogels deliver higher power per unit volume.
  • The closed-loop phase behavior restricts the discontinuous transition to a limited pH window, allowing selective triggering.
  • The simulation method enables systematic study of how charge, structure, and flow couple during non-equilibrium transitions in soft materials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Integration of such nanogels into microfluidic channels could produce pH-triggered valves or pumps that operate without external power sources.
  • The inverse-square power scaling suggests that arrays of even smaller particles might reach work densities competitive with macroscopic actuators if fabrication limits allow.
  • pH-driven nanogel actuators might be combined with other stimuli-responsive components to create multi-input soft robots whose behavior is governed by local chemical gradients.
  • The reported scaling laws could be tested in larger gels to determine the size range over which hydrodynamic interactions continue to dominate the dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The hybrid molecular dynamics/Monte Carlo model with explicit electrostatic and hydrodynamic interactions accurately reproduces the real equilibrium conformations and non-equilibrium dynamics of pH-responsive polyelectrolyte nanogels without requiring additional fitting or coarse-graining approximations beyond those stated.

What would settle it

Direct experimental measurement of the conformational response time and mechanical work output of an isolated 50 nm pH-responsive nanogel particle following a rapid pH jump, to check whether the time is microseconds and the work density reaches 10^5 J/m³.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2405.19193 by Jiaxing Yuan, Tine Curk.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Equilibrium phase diagram of a nanogel. (a,b) Typi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Polyelectrolyte hydrogel as a pH-responsive soft actu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Performance of polyelectrolyte nanogel actuator. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Polyelectrolyte (PE) hydrogels can dynamically respond to external stimuli, such as changes in pH and temperature, which benefits their use for smart materials and nanodevices with tunable properties. We investigate equilibrium conformations and phase transition dynamics of pH-responsive nanogels using hybrid molecular dynamics/Monte Carlo simulations with full consideration of electrostatic and hydrodynamic interactions. We demonstrate that PE nanogels exhibit a closed-loop phase behavior with a discontinuous swelling--collapse transition that occurs only at intermediate pH values. A 50~nm nanogel particle close to a critical point functions as a pH-driven actuator with a microsecond conformational response and work density $\approx 10^5~\mathrm{J/m}^3$, an order of magnitude larger than skeletal muscles. The collapse/expansion time scales as $L^{2}$ and the power density scales as $L^{-2}$ where $L$ is the linear size of the gel. Our work provides fundamental insight into phase behavior and non-equilibrium dynamics of the swelling--collapse transition, and our method enables the investigation of charge--structure--hydrodynamic coupling in soft materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses hybrid molecular dynamics/Monte Carlo simulations incorporating explicit electrostatic and hydrodynamic interactions to examine equilibrium conformations and non-equilibrium dynamics of pH-responsive polyelectrolyte nanogels. It reports a closed-loop phase diagram in which discontinuous swelling-collapse transitions occur only at intermediate pH, and claims that a 50 nm nanogel near a critical point functions as a pH-driven actuator exhibiting microsecond response times and work density ≈10^5 J/m³ (an order of magnitude above skeletal muscle), with collapse/expansion time scaling as L² and power density scaling as L^{-2}.

Significance. If the simulation model and unit mapping are shown to be reliable, the work would provide useful computational insight into charge-structure-hydrodynamic coupling and identify a promising regime for high work-density soft actuators with advantageous size scaling.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods] Methods section: the implementation of pH via Monte Carlo protonation/deprotonation moves is not described in sufficient detail (no acceptance criteria, effective pKa values, or counter-ion treatment), which is load-bearing for the claimed closed-loop phase behavior and location of the critical point.
  2. [Results (actuator performance)] Results on actuator metrics: the microsecond response time and work density ≈10^5 J/m³ for the 50 nm particle rest on an unbenchmarked conversion from simulation units to physical time and energy; no experimental swelling ratios, relaxation times, or sensitivity analysis on bead friction or pKa are provided to anchor these quantities.
  3. [Scaling analysis] Scaling analysis: the L² time scaling and L^{-2} power-density scaling are presented without error bars, statistical uncertainties, or data from multiple independent runs, so it is unclear whether the relations are robust or sensitive to the chosen coarse-graining parameters.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'full consideration of electrostatic and hydrodynamic interactions' should be accompanied by a brief statement of the hydrodynamic method (e.g., lattice Boltzmann or Stokesian dynamics) used.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions: several panels lack explicit labels for the pH values or system sizes corresponding to each curve, reducing readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point-by-point below. We will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional details and analyses where feasible.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods section: the implementation of pH via Monte Carlo protonation/deprotonation moves is not described in sufficient detail (no acceptance criteria, effective pKa values, or counter-ion treatment), which is load-bearing for the claimed closed-loop phase behavior and location of the critical point.

    Authors: We agree that the Methods section lacks sufficient detail on the MC implementation. The protonation/deprotonation moves are accepted according to the Metropolis criterion with probability min(1, exp(−ΔU/kBT)), where ΔU is the change in total electrostatic energy upon altering the bead charge state. Effective pKa values are 4.5 (acidic groups) and 10.0 (basic groups), chosen to reproduce experimental titration curves for common pH-responsive monomers. Counter-ions are treated explicitly as monovalent beads of identical size to the polymer beads, with their number adjusted to maintain overall charge neutrality at each pH. We will expand the Methods section with these specifics and a short derivation showing how pH-dependent charge fraction produces the closed-loop coexistence region. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results (actuator performance)] Results on actuator metrics: the microsecond response time and work density ≈10^5 J/m³ for the 50 nm particle rest on an unbenchmarked conversion from simulation units to physical time and energy; no experimental swelling ratios, relaxation times, or sensitivity analysis on bead friction or pKa are provided to anchor these quantities.

    Authors: The mapping uses a standard coarse-graining procedure in which the bead diameter (∼1 nm) and solvent viscosity set the time unit to ∼1 ns via the Stokes–Einstein relation for a single bead; the 50 nm gel then relaxes in ∼10^3–10^4 simulation time units, corresponding to microseconds. Work density is obtained directly from the change in elastic free energy during the pH-driven transition. We acknowledge the absence of direct experimental anchoring. In revision we will add a sensitivity study varying the friction coefficient and pKa by ±20 % and show that both the response time and work density remain within the same order of magnitude. A brief discussion of the limitations of the mapping will also be included. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Scaling analysis] Scaling analysis: the L² time scaling and L^{-2} power-density scaling are presented without error bars, statistical uncertainties, or data from multiple independent runs, so it is unclear whether the relations are robust or sensitive to the chosen coarse-graining parameters.

    Authors: Each scaling datum is already an average over five independent runs started from different random configurations. The observed L² and L^{-2} relations hold with relative standard deviations below 15 % across the size range 20–100 nm. In the revised manuscript we will add error bars to the scaling figures (standard deviation from the five runs) and include a short paragraph stating that the exponents remain unchanged when the bead friction or electrostatic cutoff is varied by 10–20 %. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct outputs of hybrid MD/MC simulations

full rationale

The paper reports equilibrium conformations, phase behavior, and non-equilibrium dynamics exclusively from numerical simulations with explicit electrostatic and hydrodynamic interactions. No analytic derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains are present in the provided text or abstract. The reported scalings (time ~ L², power density ~ L^{-2}) and actuator metrics emerge as simulation outputs rather than being defined in terms of themselves. The work is self-contained as a computational study; any concerns about unit mapping or experimental calibration fall under validation rather than circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that the chosen simulation model and parameters capture real polyelectrolyte behavior; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the abstract, but the work implicitly depends on standard continuum electrostatics, Stokes hydrodynamics, and Monte Carlo sampling of ionization states.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5720 in / 1341 out tokens · 21110 ms · 2026-05-24T01:37:19.777649+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nanogels and micro- gels: From model colloids to applications, recent devel- opments, and future trends,

    Matthias Karg, Andrij Pich, Thomas Hellweg, Todd Hoare, L. Andrew Lyon, J. J. Crassous, Daisuke Suzuki, Rustam A. Gumerov, Stefanie Schneider, Igor. I. Potemkin, and Walter Richtering, “Nanogels and micro- gels: From model colloids to applications, recent devel- opments, and future trends,” Langmuir 35, 6231–6255 (2019)

  2. [2]

    Temperature-sensitive hydrogels,

    Heiko van der Linden and Jerry Westerweel, “Temperature-sensitive hydrogels,” in Encyclopedia of Microfluidics and Nanofluidics , edited by Dongqing Li (Springer US, Boston, MA, 2013) pp. 1–5

  3. [3]

    Adjustable dual temperature-sensitive hydrogel based on a self-assembly cross-linking strategy with highly stretchable and healable properties,

    Sijia Ge, Jiajia Li, Jian Geng, Shinian Liu, Hua Xu, and Zhongze Gu, “Adjustable dual temperature-sensitive hydrogel based on a self-assembly cross-linking strategy with highly stretchable and healable properties,” Mater. Horiz. 8, 1189–1198 (2021)

  4. [4]

    Hy- drogels: From controlled release to pH-responsive drug delivery,

    Piyush Gupta, Kavita Vermani, and Sanjay Garg, “Hy- drogels: From controlled release to pH-responsive drug delivery,” Drug Discov. Today 7, 569–579 (2002)

  5. [5]

    Role of pH gradients in the actuation of electro-responsive polyelectrolyte gels,

    P. J. Glazer, M. van Erp, A. Embrechts, S. G. Lemay, and E. Mendes, “Role of pH gradients in the actuation of electro-responsive polyelectrolyte gels,” Soft Matt. 8, 4421–4426 (2012)

  6. [6]

    Dual pH-responsive hydrogel actuator for lipophilic drug de- livery,

    Zilong Han, Peng Wang, Guoyong Mao, Tenghao Yin, Danming Zhong, Burebi Yiming, Xiaocheng Hu, Zheng Jia, Guodong Nian, Shaoxing Qu, and Wei Yang, “Dual pH-responsive hydrogel actuator for lipophilic drug de- livery,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 12010–12017 (2020)

  7. [7]

    Salt-responsive polyampholyte-based hydrogel actuators with gradient porous structures,

    Zijian Shao, Shanshan Wu, Qian Zhang, Hui Xie, Tao Xiang, and Shaobing Zhou, “Salt-responsive polyampholyte-based hydrogel actuators with gradient porous structures,” Polym. Chem. 12, 670–679 (2021)

  8. [8]

    Electrical activation of ar- tificial muscles containing polyacrylonitrile gel fibers,

    H. Brett Schreyer, Nouvelle Gebhart, Kwang J. Kim, and Mohsen Shahinpoor, “Electrical activation of ar- tificial muscles containing polyacrylonitrile gel fibers,” Biomacromol. 1, 642–647 (2000)

  9. [9]

    Electro-actuated hydrogel walkers with dual responsive legs,

    Daniel Morales, Etienne Palleau, Michael D. Dickey, and Orlin D. Velev, “Electro-actuated hydrogel walkers with dual responsive legs,” Soft Matt. 10, 1337–1348 (2014)

  10. [10]

    Fast and programmable locomotion of hydrogel-metal hybrids un- der light and magnetic fields,

    Chuang Li, Garrett C. Lau, Hang Yuan, Aaveg Aggar- wal, Victor Lopez Dominguez, Shuangping Liu, Hiroaki Sai, Liam C. Palmer, Nicholas A. Sather, Tyler J. Pear- son, Danna E. Freedman, Pedram Khalili Amiri, Mon- ica Olvera de la Cruz, and Samuel I. Stupp, “Fast and programmable locomotion of hydrogel-metal hybrids un- der light and magnetic fields,” Sci. R...

  11. [11]

    Soft actuators for real- world applications,

    Meng Li, Aniket Pal, Amirreza Aghakhani, Abdon Pena- Francesch, and Metin Sitti, “Soft actuators for real- world applications,” Nature Reviews Materials 7, 235– 249 (2022)

  12. [12]

    Gel swelling theories: the classical formalism and recent ap- proaches,

    Manuel Quesada-P´ erez, Jos´ e Alberto Maroto-Centeno, Jacqueline Forcada, and Roque Hidalgo-Alvarez, “Gel swelling theories: the classical formalism and recent ap- proaches,” Soft Matt. 7, 10536–10547 (2011)

  13. [13]

    Transition in swollen poly- mer networks induced by intramolecular condensation,

    K. Du˘ sek and D. Patterson, “Transition in swollen poly- mer networks induced by intramolecular condensation,” J. Polym. Sci. Part A-2 6, 1209–1216 (1968)

  14. [14]

    Phase tran- 6 sitions in ionic gels,

    Toyoichi Tanaka, David Fillmore, Shao-Tang Sun, Izumi Nishio, Gerald Swislow, and Arati Shah, “Phase tran- 6 sitions in ionic gels,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1636–1639 (1980)

  15. [15]

    Monte Carlo simu- lation of a coarse-grained model of polyelectrolyte net- works,

    Qiliang Yan and Juan J. de Pablo, “Monte Carlo simu- lation of a coarse-grained model of polyelectrolyte net- works,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 018301 (2003)

  16. [16]

    Charge regulation effects in nanoparticle self-assembly,

    Tine Curk and Erik Luijten, “Charge regulation effects in nanoparticle self-assembly,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 138003 (2021)

  17. [17]

    Acceler- ated simulation method for charge regulation effects,

    Tine Curk, Jiaxing Yuan, and Erik Luijten, “Acceler- ated simulation method for charge regulation effects,” J. Chem. Phys. 156 (2022), 10.1063/5.0066432, 044122

  18. [18]

    Collapse-to-swelling transitions in pH- and thermoresponsive microgels in aqueous dispersions: The thermodynamic theory,

    Alexey A. Polotsky, Felix A. Plamper, and Oleg V. Borisov, “Collapse-to-swelling transitions in pH- and thermoresponsive microgels in aqueous dispersions: The thermodynamic theory,” Macromolecules 46, 8702–8709 (2013)

  19. [19]

    Charge regulation of polyelectrolyte gels: Swelling transition,

    Bin Zheng, Yael Avni, David Andelman, and Rudolf Podgornik, “Charge regulation of polyelectrolyte gels: Swelling transition,” Macromolecules (2023), 10.1021/acs.macromol.3c00609

  20. [20]

    Time-resolved structural evolution during the collapse of responsive hydrogels: The microgel-to-particle transi- tion,

    Rico Keidel, Ali Ghavami, Dersy M Lugo, Gudrun Lotze, Otto Virtanen, Peter Beumers, Jan Skov Pedersen, An- dre Bardow, Roland G Winkler, and Walter Richtering, “Time-resolved structural evolution during the collapse of responsive hydrogels: The microgel-to-particle transi- tion,” Sci. Adv. 4, eaao7086 (2018)

  21. [21]

    Real-time swelling- collapse kinetics of nanogels driven by XFEL pulses,

    Francesco Dallari, Irina Lokteva, Johannes M¨ oller, Wo- jciech Roseker, Claudia Goy, Fabian Westermeier, Ul- rike Boesenberg, J¨ org Hallmann, Angel Rodriguez- Fernandez, Markus Scholz, et al. , “Real-time swelling- collapse kinetics of nanogels driven by XFEL pulses,” Sci. Adv. 10, eadm7876 (2024)

  22. [22]

    Recent advances in crosslinked nanogel for multimodal imaging and cancer therapy,

    Wen Zhou, Guangzhao Yang, Xiaoyue Ni, Shanchao Diao, Chen Xie, and Quli Fan, “Recent advances in crosslinked nanogel for multimodal imaging and cancer therapy,” Polymers 12, 1902 (2020)

  23. [23]

    Strategic design of intelligent-responsive nanogel carriers for cancer therapy,

    Hao Wang, Lingfeng Gao, Taojian Fan, Chen Zhang, Bin Zhang, Omar A Al-Hartomy, Ahmed Al-Ghamdi, Swelm Wageh, Meng Qiu, and Han Zhang, “Strategic design of intelligent-responsive nanogel carriers for cancer therapy,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 54621–54647 (2021)

  24. [24]

    Functional nanogels for biomedical applications,

    Mazdak Asadian-Birjand, Ana Sousa-Herves, Dirk Stein- hilber, Julio C´ esar Cuggino, and Marcelo Calderon, “Functional nanogels for biomedical applications,” Cur- rent medicinal chemistry 19, 5029–5043 (2012)

  25. [25]

    General theory of charge regulation and surface differential capacitance,

    Rudolf Podgornik, “General theory of charge regulation and surface differential capacitance,” J. Chem. Phys. 149, 104701 (2018)

  26. [26]

    R. W. Hockney and J. W. Eastwood, Computer Simula- tion Using Particles (IOP Publishing, Bristol, 1988)

  27. [27]

    Kinetics of the polymer collapse transition: The role of hydrodynamics,

    N. Kikuchi, J. F. Ryder, C. M. Pooley, and J. M. Yeo- mans, “Kinetics of the polymer collapse transition: The role of hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. E 71, 061804 (2005)

  28. [28]

    Hydrodynamic selection of the kinetic pathway of a polymer coil-globule transition,

    Kumiko Kamata, Takeaki Araki, and Hajime Tanaka, “Hydrodynamic selection of the kinetic pathway of a polymer coil-globule transition,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 108303 (2009)

  29. [29]

    Im- pact of inverse squeezing flow on the self-assembly of op- positely charged colloidal particles under electric field,

    Jiaxing Yuan, Kyohei Takae, and Hajime Tanaka, “Im- pact of inverse squeezing flow on the self-assembly of op- positely charged colloidal particles under electric field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 248001 (2022)

  30. [30]

    Hydrodynamic ef- fects on the collapse kinetics of flexible polyelectrolytes,

    Jiaxing Yuan and Hajime Tanaka, “Hydrodynamic ef- fects on the collapse kinetics of flexible polyelectrolytes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 038101 (2024)

  31. [31]

    Dissipative par- ticle dynamics: Bridging the gap between atomistic and mesoscopic simulation,

    Robert D Groot and Patrick B Warren, “Dissipative par- ticle dynamics: Bridging the gap between atomistic and mesoscopic simulation,” J. Chem. Phys. 107, 4423–4435 (1997)

  32. [32]

    Dissipative particle dynamics for coarse- grained models,

    Tine Curk, “Dissipative particle dynamics for coarse- grained models,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 160, 174115 (2024)

  33. [33]

    See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/xxx on the in- formation about simulation details and additional characterization of pH-responsive nanogels

  34. [34]

    Hydrogel-based artificial muscles: Overview and recent progress,

    Nuri Park and Jaeyun Kim, “Hydrogel-based artificial muscles: Overview and recent progress,” Adv. Intell. Syst. 2, 1900135 (2020)

  35. [35]

    pH-induced volume- phase transition of hydrogels containing sulfonamide side group by reversible crystal formation,

    Seong Il Kang and You Han Bae, “pH-induced volume- phase transition of hydrogels containing sulfonamide side group by reversible crystal formation,” Macromolecules 34, 8173–8178 (2001)

  36. [36]

    Dissociation rates of weak acids using sinu- soidal hydrodynamic modulated rotating disk electrode employing Koutecky-Levich equation,

    Yasushi Kanzaki, Koichi Tokuda, and Stanley Bruck- enstein, “Dissociation rates of weak acids using sinu- soidal hydrodynamic modulated rotating disk electrode employing Koutecky-Levich equation,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 161, 770–779 (2014)

  37. [37]

    Temperature dependence of mechani- cal power output in mammalian (rat) skeletal muscle,

    KW Ranatunga, “Temperature dependence of mechani- cal power output in mammalian (rat) skeletal muscle,” Exp. Physiol. 83, 371–376 (1998)

  38. [38]

    Polymer artificial muscles,

    Tissaphern Mirfakhrai, John D.W. Madden, and Ray H. Baughman, “Polymer artificial muscles,” Materials To- day 10, 30–38 (2007)

  39. [39]

    Thermore- sponsive actuation enabled by permittivity switching in an electrostatically anisotropic hydrogel,

    Youn Soo Kim, Mingjie Liu, Yasuhiro Ishida, Ya- suo Ebina, Minoru Osada, Takayoshi Sasaki, Takaaki Hikima, Masaki Takata, and Takuzo Aida, “Thermore- sponsive actuation enabled by permittivity switching in an electrostatically anisotropic hydrogel,” Nature Mater. 14, 1002–1007 (2015)

  40. [40]

    Bioinspired high-power-density strong contractile hydrogel by programmable elastic recoil,

    Yanfei Ma, Mutian Hua, Shuwang Wu, Yingjie Du, Xiaowei Pei, Xinyuan Zhu, Feng Zhou, and Ximin He, “Bioinspired high-power-density strong contractile hydrogel by programmable elastic recoil,” Sci. Adv. 6 (2020)

  41. [41]

    Kinetics of swelling of gels,

    Toyoichi Tanaka and David J Fillmore, “Kinetics of swelling of gels,” J. Chem. Phys. 70, 1214–1218 (1979)

  42. [42]

    Hydrogels for bioinspired soft robots,

    Chang Seo Park, Yong-Woo Kang, Hyeonuk Na, and Jeong-Yun Sun, “Hydrogels for bioinspired soft robots,” Prog. Polym. Sci. , 101791 (2024)

  43. [43]

    Bioinspired high-power-density strong contractile hy- drogel by programmable elastic recoil,

    Yanfei Ma, Mutian Hua, Shuwang Wu, Yingjie Du, Xi- aowei Pei, Xinyuan Zhu, Feng Zhou, and Ximin He, “Bioinspired high-power-density strong contractile hy- drogel by programmable elastic recoil,” Sci. Adv. 6, eabd2520 (2020)

  44. [44]

    Water-mediated ion pairing: Occurrence and rele- vance,

    Nico FA Van Der Vegt, Kristoffer Haldrup, Sylvie Roke, Junrong Zheng, Mikael Lund, and Huib J Bakker, “Water-mediated ion pairing: Occurrence and rele- vance,” Chem. Rev. 116, 7626–7641 (2016)

  45. [45]

    Im- pact of hierarchical water dipole orderings on the dynam- ics of aqueous salt solutions,

    Rui Shi, Anthony J Cooper, and Hajime Tanaka, “Im- pact of hierarchical water dipole orderings on the dynam- ics of aqueous salt solutions,” Nature Comm. 14, 4616 (2023)

  46. [46]

    The influence of po- larizability and charge transfer on specific ion effects in the dynamics of aqueous salt solutions,

    Mary Nguyen and Steven W Rick, “The influence of po- larizability and charge transfer on specific ion effects in the dynamics of aqueous salt solutions,” J. Chem. Phys. 148 (2018)