The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2406.10789 · v1 · pith:JUFEJEZU · submitted 2024-06-16 · cs.CV

Learning Traffic Crashes as Language: Datasets, Benchmarks, and What-if Causal Analyses

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:JUFEJEZUrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CV
keywords trafficcrashaccidentsenvironmentalfactorsfurtherlanguagelearning
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The increasing rate of road accidents worldwide results not only in significant loss of life but also imposes billions financial burdens on societies. Current research in traffic crash frequency modeling and analysis has predominantly approached the problem as classification tasks, focusing mainly on learning-based classification or ensemble learning methods. These approaches often overlook the intricate relationships among the complex infrastructure, environmental, human and contextual factors related to traffic crashes and risky situations. In contrast, we initially propose a large-scale traffic crash language dataset, named CrashEvent, summarizing 19,340 real-world crash reports and incorporating infrastructure data, environmental and traffic textual and visual information in Washington State. Leveraging this rich dataset, we further formulate the crash event feature learning as a novel text reasoning problem and further fine-tune various large language models (LLMs) to predict detailed accident outcomes, such as crash types, severity and number of injuries, based on contextual and environmental factors. The proposed model, CrashLLM, distinguishes itself from existing solutions by leveraging the inherent text reasoning capabilities of LLMs to parse and learn from complex, unstructured data, thereby enabling a more nuanced analysis of contributing factors. Our experiments results shows that our LLM-based approach not only predicts the severity of accidents but also classifies different types of accidents and predicts injury outcomes, all with averaged F1 score boosted from 34.9% to 53.8%. Furthermore, CrashLLM can provide valuable insights for numerous open-world what-if situational-awareness traffic safety analyses with learned reasoning features, which existing models cannot offer. We make our benchmark, datasets, and model public available for further exploration.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. An Agentic Workflow for Detecting Personally Identifiable Information in Crash Narratives

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A hybrid agentic workflow using Presidio for structured PII and fine-tuned LLMs plus verification for names, addresses, and identifiers detects PII in crash narratives at 0.82 precision and 0.94 recall.

  2. TrafficRAG: A Multimodal RAG Framework for Traffic Accident Liability Determination

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    TrafficRAG is a multimodal RAG framework that turns accident videos into structured text queries, retrieves legal rules and cases via BM25 plus dense retrieval, and generates liability reports, reporting 77.32% legal ...