Cyberbullying Detection: Exploring Datasets, Technologies, and Approaches on Social Media Platforms
Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 01:02 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
A systematic review of cyberbullying detection studies catalogs datasets, technologies, approaches, gaps, and recommendations while proposing future solutions.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The paper presents a comprehensive systematic review of studies conducted on cyberbullying detection. It explores existing studies, proposed solutions, identified gaps, datasets, technologies, approaches, challenges, and recommendations, and then proposes effective solutions to address research gaps in future studies.
What carries the argument
The systematic literature review that catalogs detection techniques, datasets, and open problems across social media platforms.
Load-bearing premise
The chosen studies represent the full scope of relevant research and that the recommended solutions will succeed without separate testing of the review's completeness.
What would settle it
An independent search that locates a substantial set of studies on cyberbullying detection omitted from the review and that reveals different primary gaps or challenges.
read the original abstract
Cyberbullying has been a significant challenge in the digital era world, given the huge number of people, especially adolescents, who use social media platforms to communicate and share information. Some individuals exploit these platforms to embarrass others through direct messages, electronic mail, speech, and public posts. This behavior has direct psychological and physical impacts on victims of bullying. While several studies have been conducted in this field and various solutions proposed to detect, prevent, and monitor cyberbullying instances on social media platforms, the problem continues. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct intensive studies and provide effective solutions to address the situation. These solutions should be based on detection, prevention, and prediction criteria methods. This paper presents a comprehensive systematic review of studies conducted on cyberbullying detection. It explores existing studies, proposed solutions, identified gaps, datasets, technologies, approaches, challenges, and recommendations, and then proposes effective solutions to address research gaps in future studies.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper claims to deliver a comprehensive systematic review of cyberbullying detection studies on social media. It surveys existing studies, proposed solutions, datasets, technologies, approaches, challenges, gaps, and recommendations, then proposes solutions for future work.
Significance. A properly documented systematic review on this topic could usefully synthesize a fragmented literature and guide future detection research. The manuscript's central claim of comprehensiveness, however, cannot be evaluated without evidence of a reproducible search and screening process; if that evidence is absent, the identified gaps and proposed solutions rest on an unverified subset of the literature.
major comments (1)
- [Abstract / Methods] Abstract and (presumed) Methods section: the claim of a 'comprehensive systematic review' is made without any description of databases searched, query strings, inclusion/exclusion criteria, screening flow (e.g., PRISMA diagram), or quality assessment. This directly undermines the representativeness of the gaps and recommendations that constitute the paper's main contribution.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] The abstract is repetitive in its description of impacts and solutions; a single concise statement would suffice.
- [Results / Discussion] No mention of how many papers were ultimately included or their distribution across years/platforms; adding a summary table would improve clarity.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their constructive feedback. The primary concern raised is the absence of explicit systematic-review methodology details, which we address below. We agree this information is necessary to support the paper's claims.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract / Methods] Abstract and (presumed) Methods section: the claim of a 'comprehensive systematic review' is made without any description of databases searched, query strings, inclusion/exclusion criteria, screening flow (e.g., PRISMA diagram), or quality assessment. This directly undermines the representativeness of the gaps and recommendations that constitute the paper's main contribution.
Authors: We agree that the manuscript as submitted does not contain a dedicated Methods section or the required details on search strategy, screening process, or quality assessment. This omission weakens the justification for labeling the work a comprehensive systematic review. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new Methods section that specifies: (1) the databases queried (e.g., IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar), (2) the exact Boolean query strings employed, (3) inclusion and exclusion criteria with rationale, (4) a PRISMA flow diagram showing the number of records at each stage, and (5) any quality-assessment criteria applied to the retained studies. These additions will allow readers to evaluate the representativeness of the synthesized gaps and recommendations. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: descriptive survey with no derivations or predictions
full rationale
This is a systematic review paper with no equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivation chain. None of the enumerated circularity patterns (self-definitional, fitted input called prediction, self-citation load-bearing, etc.) can apply because the paper performs no modeling or inference that could reduce to its inputs by construction. The central claim is a literature synthesis whose validity rests on search methodology rather than any self-referential reduction.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Existing studies on cyberbullying detection provide a sufficient and unbiased sample for identifying research gaps and recommending solutions.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Wanda Cassidy, Chantal Faucher, and Margaret Jackson. Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice. School Psychology International, 34:575–612, 12 2013
work page 2013
-
[2]
Cyber bullying and academic performance
Qais Faryadi. Cyber bullying and academic performance. International Journal Of Computational Engineering Research , 1:2250–3005, 2011
work page 2011
-
[3]
Social media-related cybercrimes and techniques for their prevention
Tariq Rahim Soomro and Mumtaz Hussain. Social media-related cybercrimes and techniques for their prevention. Applied Computer Systems, 24:9–17, 5 2019
work page 2019
-
[4]
Idiakose, Chinazo Juliet Onyema, and Charles Van Der Vyver
Nureni Ayofe Azeez, Sunday O. Idiakose, Chinazo Juliet Onyema, and Charles Van Der Vyver. Cyberbullying detection in social networks: Artificial intelligence approach. Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility, 10:745–774, 2021
work page 2021
-
[5]
Silva, Deborah Hall, and Huan Liu
Lu Cheng, Ruocheng Guo, Yasin N. Silva, Deborah Hall, and Huan Liu. Modeling temporal patterns of cyberbullying detection with hierarchical attention networks. ACM/IMS Transactions on Data Science, 2:1–23, 5 2021. 28 Philipo et al
work page 2021
-
[6]
P. Dedeepya, P. Sowmya, T. Deva Saketh, P. Sruthi, P. Abhijit, and S. Phani Praveen. Detecting cyber bullying on twitter using support vector machine. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Energy, ICAIS 2023, pages 817–822. IEEE, 2023
work page 2023
-
[7]
Cyber bullying detection on social media network
P Chindhuja, K Darshini, M Haritha, and J Kowsalya. Cyber bullying detection on social media network. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 11:4182–4186, 4 2023
work page 2023
-
[8]
Cyber bullying detection on social media using machine learning
Aditya Desai, Shashank Kalaskar, Omkar Kumbhar, and Rashmi Dhumal. Cyber bullying detection on social media using machine learning. ITM Web of Conferences, 40:03038, 2021
work page 2021
- [9]
-
[10]
Social media users and statistics in 2024, 2024
Rohit Shewale. Social media users and statistics in 2024, 2024. Accessed on 2024-05-03
work page 2024
-
[11]
Most popular social networks worldwide as of january 2024, ranked by number of monthly active users,
Statista. Most popular social networks worldwide as of january 2024, ranked by number of monthly active users,
work page 2024
-
[13]
The prisma 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie, Patrick M Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C Hoffmann, Cynthia D Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer M Tetzlaff, Elie A Akl, Sue E Brennan, Roger Chou, Julie Glanville, Jeremy M Grimshaw, AsbjÃÿrn HrÃşbjartsson, Manoj M Lalu, Tianjing Li, Elizabeth W Loder, Evan Mayo -Wilson, Steve McDonald, Luke A McGuinness, Lesley A St...
work page 2020
-
[14]
Cyberbullying: Definition, 2024
PACER. Cyberbullying: Definition, 2024. Accessed on 2024-05-03
work page 2024
-
[15]
Cyberbullying: What is it and how to stop it, 2024
UNICEF. Cyberbullying: What is it and how to stop it, 2024. Accessed on 2024-05-03
work page 2024
-
[16]
Cyberbullying: Effect on work place production
Mr James Nambusi. Cyberbullying: Effect on work place production. Africa International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (AIJMR), 2(1):24–39, 2018
work page 2018
-
[17]
The psychosocial effects of social media cyberbullying on students in selected african countries
Precious Chibuike Chukwuere, Joshua Ebere Chukwuere, and Dickson Adom. The psychosocial effects of social media cyberbullying on students in selected african countries. Acta Informatica Malaysia, 5:62–70, 9 2021
work page 2021
-
[18]
A review of automated detection methods for cyberbullying
Thabo Mahlangu. A review of automated detection methods for cyberbullying. DIGITAL SEIGE, pages 1–5, 2018
work page 2018
-
[19]
Cyberbullying in the digital age: A common social phenomenon, 2020
Rafsel Tas, Nurhizrah Gistituati, and Azwar Ananda. Cyberbullying in the digital age: A common social phenomenon, 2020
work page 2020
-
[20]
Cyberbullying in the light of challenges of school-based prevention
Lukasz Tomczyk and Anna Wloch. Cyberbullying in the light of challenges of school-based prevention. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 7:13–26, 2019
work page 2019
-
[21]
Jun Sung Hong, RaÞl Navarro, and Michelle F. Wright. Adolescent Cyberbullying, pages 1–22. IGI Global, USA, 7 2024
work page 2024
-
[22]
An application to detect cyberbullying using machine learning and deep learning techniques
Mitushi Raj, Samridhi Singh, Kanishka Solanki, and Ramani Selvanambi. An application to detect cyberbullying using machine learning and deep learning techniques. SN Computer Science, 3(401):1–13, 9 2022
work page 2022
-
[23]
The effects of cyberbullying on students and schools, 2020
Hannah Beghin. The effects of cyberbullying on students and schools, 2020
work page 2020
-
[24]
Robert Slonje, Peter K. Smith, and Ann FrisÃľn. The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29:26–32, 2013
work page 2013
-
[25]
Sevgi Mestci Sunerli, FÃijsun GÃűkkaya, and Zahide Aliusta Denk. Cyberbullying. IGI Global, pages 433–455, 8 2022
work page 2022
-
[26]
School bullying: Development and some important challenges
Dan Olweus. School bullying: Development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9(1):751–780, 2013. PMID: 23297789
work page 2013
-
[27]
Dana Aizenkot and Gabriela Kashy-Rosenbaum. The effectiveness of safe surfing, an anti-cyberbullying intervention program in reducing online and offline bullying and improving perceived popularity and self -esteem. Cyberpsychology , 14:1–23, 2020
work page 2020
-
[28]
Dooley, Jacek Pyzalski, and Donna Cross
Julian J. Dooley, Jacek Pyzalski, and Donna Cross. Cyberbullying versus face -to-face bullying: A theoretical and conceptual review, 2009
work page 2009
-
[29]
Ghada M. Abaido. Cyberbullying on social media platforms among university students in the united arab emirates. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25:407–420, 12 2020
work page 2020
-
[30]
Cyber-harassment: A study of new method for an old behavior
Tanya Beran and Qing Li. Cyber-harassment: A study of new method for an old behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(3):265–277, 2005
work page 2005
-
[31]
Claire P. Monks and Peter K. Smith. Definitions of bullying: Age differences in understanding of the term, and the role of experience, 11 2006
work page 2006
-
[32]
Nancy Willard. Educator’s guide to cyberbullying-1-educator’s guide to cyberbullying addressing the harm caused by online social cruelty, 2004. Accessed on 2024-05-03
work page 2004
-
[33]
Social media and mobile internet use among teens and young adults, 2010
Amanda Lenhart, Kristen Purcell, Aaron Smith, and Kathryn Zickuhr. Social media and mobile internet use among teens and young adults, 2010
work page 2010
-
[34]
From cyberbullying to electronic aggression: Typology of the phenomenon
Jacek Pyzalski. From cyberbullying to electronic aggression: Typology of the phenomenon. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17:305–317, 9 2012
work page 2012
-
[35]
Sidra Iqbal and Humaira Jami. Exploring definition of cyberbullying and its forms from the perspective of adolescents living in pakistan. Psychological Studies, 67:514–523, 12 2022. Cyberbullying Detection: Exploring Datasets, Technologies, and Approaches on Social Media Platforms 29
work page 2022
-
[36]
Anne Schulz and Patrick Roessler. The spiral of silence and the internet: Selection of online content and the perception of the public opinion climate in computer -mediated communication environments. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24:346–367, 9 2012
work page 2012
-
[37]
All the latest cyberbullying statistics for 2024, 2024
Lyndon Seitz. All the latest cyberbullying statistics for 2024, 2024. Accessed on 2024-05-03
work page 2024
-
[38]
High school students’ perceptions of motivations for cyberbullying: An exploratory study
Kris Varjas, Jasmaine Talley, Joel Meyers, Leandra Parris, and Hayley Cutts. High school students’ perceptions of motivations for cyberbullying: An exploratory study. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 11(3):269–273, 2010
work page 2010
-
[39]
Piotr Plichta, Julia BarliÅĎska, and Jacek PyÅijalski. Cyberbullying and creating one’s own image on the internet - what mechanisms does the disability of young adults change? Interdyscyplinarne Konteksty Pedagogiki Specjalnej, 1(20):101–121, 10 2018
work page 2018
-
[40]
Gunstein Egeberg, Steinar Thorvaldsen, and John A. Ronning. The Impact of Cyberbullying and Cyber Harassment on Academic Achievement, pages 183–204. SensePublishers, Rotterdam, 2016
work page 2016
-
[41]
MÃşnica Ojeda, Esperanza Espino, Paz Elipe, and Rosario del Rey. Even if they don’t say it to you, it hurts too: Internalized homonegativity in lgbtq+ cyberbullying among adolescents. Comunicar, 31:21–35, 4 2023
work page 2023
-
[42]
Online behaviour, life stressors and profit -motivated cybercrime victimisation
Isabella Voce and Anthony Morgan. Online behaviour, life stressors and profit -motivated cybercrime victimisation. Australian Institute of Criminology, Australia, 6 2023
work page 2023
-
[43]
The role of religiosity and spiritual meaningfullness towards cyberbullying behavior
Triantoro Safaria and Khoiruddin Bashori. The role of religiosity and spiritual meaningfullness towards cyberbullying behavior. Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, 10:197, 6 2021
work page 2021
-
[44]
Cyber-syndrome and its formation, classification, recovery and prevention
Huansheng Ning, Sahraoui Dhelim, Mohammed Amine Bouras, Amar Khelloufi, and Ata Ullah. Cyber-syndrome and its formation, classification, recovery and prevention. IEEE Access, 6:35501–35511, 6 2018
work page 2018
-
[45]
Cyber nation (or, la patria cibernetica ) 1 *
Abril Trigo. Cyber nation (or, la patria cibernetica ) 1 *. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, 12:95–117, 3 2003
work page 2003
-
[46]
Differences in cultural perspectives on cyberbullying -related words
Kev Yi Beng and Tan Kim Hua. Differences in cultural perspectives on cyberbullying -related words. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9:22–36, 10 2019
work page 2019
-
[47]
Sara Prot, Craig A. Anderson, Christopher P. Barlett, Sarah M. Coyne, and Muniba Saleem. Content Effects: Violence in the Media, pages 1–19. Wiley, Coventry, 3 2017
work page 2017
-
[48]
Impacts of cyberbullying and its solutions
Binji Ju. Impacts of cyberbullying and its solutions. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 29:254–258, 12 2023
work page 2023
-
[49]
Rohit Pawar and Rajeev R. Raje. Multilingual cyberbullying detection system. In IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology, volume 2019-May, pages 040–044. IEEE Computer Society, 5 2019
work page 2019
-
[50]
Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health
Charisse Nixon. Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 5(1):143–158, 8 2014
work page 2014
-
[51]
Jose H. Marco and M. Pilar Tormo -Irun. Cyber victimization is associated with eating disorder psychopathology in adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:1–7, 6 2018
work page 2018
-
[52]
Cyberbullying in children and youth: Implications for health and clinical practice, 6 2017
Tracy Vaillancourt, Robert Faris, and Faye Mishna. Cyberbullying in children and youth: Implications for health and clinical practice, 6 2017
work page 2017
-
[53]
Ybarra, Marie Diener-West, and Philip J
Michele L. Ybarra, Marie Diener-West, and Philip J. Leaf. Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41:42–50, 12 2007
work page 2007
-
[54]
Effects of social network and cyberbullying on mental health in young adults in thailand, 2018
Chutikarn Saengmas, Kulabutr Komenkul, and Am porn Puapradit. Effects of social network and cyberbullying on mental health in young adults in thailand, 2018
work page 2018
-
[55]
Karanikola, Anne Lyberg, Anne Lise Holm, and Elisabeth Severinsson
Maria N.K. Karanikola, Anne Lyberg, Anne Lise Holm, and Elisabeth Severinsson. The association between deliberate self-harm and school bullying victimization and the mediating effect of depressive symptoms and self -stigma: A systematic review. BioMed Research International, 2018:1–37, 2018
work page 2018
-
[56]
Bullying in social media: An effect study of cyber bullying on the youth, 2017
Sumera Batool, ïĂł Rabia, and Yousaf ïĂłïĂł. Bullying in social media: An effect study of cyber bullying on the youth, 2017
work page 2017
-
[57]
Nazanin Alavi, Taras Reshetukha, Eric Prost, Kristen Antoniak, Charmy Patel, Saad Sajid, and Dianne Groll. Relation- ship between bullying and suicidal behaviour in youth presenting to the emergency department. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 26(2):70âĂŞ77, 2017
work page 2017
-
[58]
The impact of cyberbullying on mental health, 2024
Michael Greenwood. The impact of cyberbullying on mental health, 2024. Accessed on 2024-05-03
work page 2024
-
[59]
Cyberbullying, human rights and bystanders, 2024
Ahrc. Cyberbullying, human rights and bystanders, 2024
work page 2024
-
[60]
Detecting arabic cyberbullying tweets using machine learning
Alanoud Mohammed Alduailaj and Aymen Belghith. Detecting arabic cyberbullying tweets using machine learning. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 5:29–42, 3 2023
work page 2023
-
[61]
Supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms, 2023
Jason Brownlee. Supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms, 2023. Accessed on 2024-05-03
work page 2023
-
[62]
Deep learning techniques for sentiment analysis, 2022
Erjia Fu, Junyuan Xiang, and Chuanhao Xiong. Deep learning techniques for sentiment analysis, 2022
work page 2022
-
[63]
FranÃğois Chollet. Deep Learning with Python. MANNING SHELTER ISLAND, France, 2018
work page 2018
-
[64]
Introduction to deep learning, 2024
Geeksforgeeks. Introduction to deep learning, 2024. Accessed on 2024-05-03
work page 2024
-
[65]
Iqbal H. Sarker. Deep learning: A comprehensive overview on techniques, taxonomy, applications and research directions, 11 2021. 30 Philipo et al
work page 2021
-
[66]
A systematic review of hate speech automatic detection using natural language processing, 8 2023
Md Saroar Jahan and Mourad Oussalah. A systematic review of hate speech automatic detection using natural language processing, 8 2023
work page 2023
-
[67]
Text classification algorithms: A survey, 2019
Kamran Kowsari, Kiana Jafari Meimandi, Mojtaba Heidarysafa, Sanjana Mendu, Laura Barnes, and Donald Brown. Text classification algorithms: A survey, 2019
work page 2019
-
[68]
Deepalakshmi, Jaehyuk Cho, and G
Malliga Subramanian, Veerappampalayam Easwaramoorthy Sathiskumar, G. Deepalakshmi, Jaehyuk Cho, and G. Manikandan. A survey on hate speech detection and sentiment analysis using machine learning and deep learning models, 10 2023
work page 2023
-
[69]
Data acquisition in social networks: Issues and proposals,
Claudia Canali, Michele Colajanni, and Riccardo Lancellotti. Data acquisition in social networks: Issues and proposals,
-
[70]
Accessed on 2024-05-03
work page 2024
-
[71]
Moreno Mancosu and Federico Vegetti. Collecting social media data. Navigating Research Data and Methods, 1:1–11, 7 2023
work page 2023
-
[72]
Eeshita Biswas, K Vijay-Shanker, and Lori Pollock. Exploring word embedding techniques to improve sentiment analysis of software engineering texts, 2019. Accessed on 2024-05-03
work page 2019
-
[73]
Text feature extraction based on deep learning: a review, 12 2017
Hong Liang, Xiao Sun, Yunlei Sun, and Yuan Gao. Text feature extraction based on deep learning: a review, 12 2017
work page 2017
-
[74]
Feature extraction for machine learning-based intrusion detection in iot networks
Mohanad Sarhan, Siamak Layeghy, Nour Moustafa, Marcus Gallagher, and Marius Portmann. Feature extraction for machine learning-based intrusion detection in iot networks. Digital Communications and Networks, 10(1):205âĂŞ216, 8 2021
work page 2021
-
[75]
Cyberbullying detection using machine learning algorithms
Bhagyashree Kadam. Cyberbullying detection using machine learning algorithms. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 11:1326–1328, 5 2023
work page 2023
-
[76]
Cyber bullying detection on social media using machine learning
Gowthami S, Menaka S, Nilani K, Priyadharshini G, Radha Bhuvaneshwari S, and Roshini P. Cyber bullying detection on social media using machine learning. International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering , 4(3):284 –289, 5 2023
work page 2023
-
[77]
Machine learning based intelligent cyberbullying avoidance system
D Dhanalakshmi, Namani Deepika Rani, Keerthi Pendam, Shanmugasundaram Hariharan, Vinay Kukreja, and Pr Jayakshata. Machine learning based intelligent cyberbullying avoidance system. In 2023 International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Smart Systems (ICSCSS), pages 1594–1597. IEEE, 6 2023
work page 2023
-
[78]
Comparing different supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction
Shahadat Uddin, Arif Khan, Md Ekramul Hossain, and Mohammad Ali Moni. Comparing different supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 19(1):1–16, 12 2019
work page 2019
-
[79]
Supervised machine learning algorithms: Classification and comparison
Akinsola Jet and Hinmikaiye J O. Supervised machine learning algorithms: Classification and comparison. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 48:128–138, 2017
work page 2017
-
[80]
Comparison of different supervised machine learning classifiers to predict credit card approvals
Siddhi Bansal and Tushar Punjabi. Comparison of different supervised machine learning classifiers to predict credit card approvals. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 8(3):1339– 1348, 2021
work page 2021
-
[81]
Supervised machine learning algorithms: Classification and comparison
Shweta Chaudhary. Supervised machine learning algorithms: Classification and comparison. GRD Journals-Global Research and Development Journal for Engineering, 5(6):128–138, 2020
work page 2020
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.