pith. sign in

arxiv: 2407.16271 · v1 · submitted 2024-07-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · physics.optics

Lasing of Quantum-Dot Micropillar Lasers under Elevated Temperatures

Andrey Babichev , Ivan Makhov , Natalia Kryzhanovskaya , Alexey Blokhin , Yuriy Zadiranov , Yulia Salii , Marina Kulagina , Mikhail Bobrov
show 7 more authors
Alexey Vasiliev Sergey Blokhin Nikolay Maleev Maria Tchernycheva Leonid Karachinsky Innokenty Novikov Anton Egorov
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 23:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall physics.optics
keywords quantum-dot micropillar lasershybrid mirrorquality factorelevated temperaturelasing thresholdgain-cavity detuning
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum-dot micropillar lasers with a hybrid mirror lase up to 220 K at a 2.2 mW threshold.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models the microcavity parameters of quantum-dot micropillar lasers under optical pumping and compares designs with different top mirrors. A hybrid dielectric-semiconductor mirror yields a calculated quality factor of roughly 65000 for a 5 micrometer pillar because of improved vertical confinement. The measured threshold reaches a minimum of about 370 microwatts at 130 K, where gain and cavity resonance are nearly matched, and lasing persists to 220 K at 2.2 mW. A sympathetic reader would care because these results map how temperature shifts the operating point through detuning and show a concrete path to higher-temperature operation without changing the quantum-dot active region.

Core claim

Numerical modeling shows that the hybrid dielectric-semiconductor top mirror raises the quality factor to approximately 65000 for 5 micrometer pillars; this design produces a minimum threshold of 370 microwatts at 130 K near zero detuning and sustains lasing to 220 K with a 2.2 mW threshold.

What carries the argument

The hybrid dielectric-semiconductor top mirror, which improves vertical mode confinement and raises the cavity quality factor relative to all-semiconductor mirrors.

If this is right

  • Threshold temperature dependence follows directly from the calculated gain-cavity detuning curve.
  • The hybrid mirror produces measurably lower thresholds than all-semiconductor mirrors at the same pillar diameter.
  • Lasing persists to 220 K once the detuning is managed by the hybrid design.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same modeling approach could be used to predict performance for other pillar diameters or mirror layer counts without new growth runs.
  • If the detuning can be tuned independently, the operating range might extend beyond 220 K while keeping the same quantum-dot stack.
  • Integration into photonic circuits would benefit from the higher quality factor because it reduces the pump power needed at elevated temperatures.

Load-bearing premise

Numerical modeling of the cavity parameters and the temperature dependence of gain-cavity detuning correctly predicts the observed threshold minimum at 130 K.

What would settle it

Fabricate the 5 micrometer hybrid-mirror pillar, measure its actual quality factor at room temperature, and check whether it is close to the modeled value of 65000 while confirming the threshold minimum occurs at 130 K.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2407.16271 by Alexey Blokhin, Alexey Vasiliev, Andrey Babichev, Anton Egorov, Innokenty Novikov, Ivan Makhov, Leonid Karachinsky, Maria Tchernycheva, Marina Kulagina, Mikhail Bobrov, Natalia Kryzhanovskaya, Nikolay Maleev, Sergey Blokhin, Yulia Salii, Yuriy Zadiranov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Dependence of the Q-factor of a planar 1λ￾microcavity on the number of pairs in the top DBR with a change in the layers composition. (b) Dependence of the Q￾factor of a planar 1λ-microcavity on the number of pairs in the bottom DBR. A. 1D numerical simulation of the planar microcavity Q-factor depending on the number of pairs of the top DBR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The influence of the pillar diameter on: (a) the wavelength of the fundamental vertical mode (λ value), Q-factor and mode volume; (b) PPE, SLE, and BLE values at NA=1; (c) PPE values at different NA values. Insets (b panel): the distributions of the electromagnetic field (E-field) of the fundamental mode in the X-Z plane for microcavities with diameters of 1, 3 and 10 μm. Insets (c panel): the angular dist… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Spectral linewidth versus excitation power for 5 μm pillar determined at different temperatures (77 K, 130 K, 180 K, and 220 K). (b) Excitation power-dependent input￾output characteristics measured at different temperatures. the root-mean-square roughness of the microcavity structure surface to 0.3 nm. The Q-factor of the planar structure, determined at 300 K from a high-resolution reflectance spectrum… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) The laser thresholds for pillars of different diameters measured at 77 K. (b) Temperature dependence of the laser threshold for pillars of different diameters (left Y axis). Reflectance dip and PL positions at different temperatures (right Y axis). lasers with moderate spontaneous emission factor was used to realize energy-efficient RC [4]. In fact, a high β-factor leads to the partial injection lockin… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A comprehensive numerical modelling of microcavity parameters for micropillar lasers with optical pumping was presented. The structure with a hybrid dielectric-semiconductor top mirror has a significantly higher calculated quality-factor (~65000 for 5 $\mu$m pillar) due to better vertical mode confinement. The minimum laser threshold (~370 $\mu$W for 5 $\mu$m pillar) coincided with a temperature of 130 K, which is close to zero gain to cavity detuning. Lasing up to 220 K was demonstrated with a laser threshold of about 2.2 mW.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents numerical modeling of microcavity parameters for quantum-dot micropillar lasers incorporating a hybrid dielectric-semiconductor top mirror, which yields calculated quality factors of ~65000 for 5 μm pillars due to improved vertical confinement. It reports experimental demonstration of lasing up to 220 K with a threshold of ~2.2 mW, noting that the minimum threshold (~370 μW for 5 μm pillars) occurs at 130 K near zero gain-cavity detuning.

Significance. The experimental observation of lasing at elevated temperatures in QD micropillars is of interest for applications beyond cryogenic operation. The modeling of hybrid-mirror structures offers a potential route to higher-Q designs, provided the temperature-dependent detuning calculations are independently validated; such validated modeling could inform optimization of threshold behavior in similar devices.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the attribution of the observed minimum threshold at 130 K to near-zero gain-cavity detuning rests exclusively on the numerical model of refractive-index temperature coefficients and QD gain-peak shift. No direct experimental confirmation (e.g., low-power cavity-resonance spectra versus temperature) is reported to establish that the modeled zero-detuning temperature actually matches the measured threshold minimum rather than being offset by unaccounted material or fabrication parameters.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and experimental sections omit details on error bars, data-exclusion criteria, and full measurement protocols for the reported thresholds, limiting assessment of the precision of the 2.2 mW and 370 μW values.
  2. The modeling description would benefit from explicit listing of the temperature coefficients and material parameters employed, enabling independent reproduction of the Q-factor and detuning calculations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review. The major comment correctly identifies that our attribution of the threshold minimum relies on modeling. We address this point below and agree to revise the manuscript for greater precision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the attribution of the observed minimum threshold at 130 K to near-zero gain-cavity detuning rests exclusively on the numerical model of refractive-index temperature coefficients and QD gain-peak shift. No direct experimental confirmation (e.g., low-power cavity-resonance spectra versus temperature) is reported to establish that the modeled zero-detuning temperature actually matches the measured threshold minimum rather than being offset by unaccounted material or fabrication parameters.

    Authors: We agree that the zero-detuning temperature is determined exclusively from the numerical model, which uses standard literature values for the temperature coefficients of the refractive indices and the QD gain-peak shift. The manuscript does not report direct low-power cavity-resonance spectra versus temperature that would independently confirm the model's zero-detuning point. We will revise the abstract to state that the observed minimum threshold coincides with the temperature at which the model predicts near-zero detuning. We will also add a clarifying sentence in the main text noting the modeling assumptions and the absence of direct experimental verification of the detuning in this study. These changes improve accuracy without altering the experimental data or conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: numerical modeling presented as independent of threshold measurements

full rationale

The paper reports experimental thresholds (minimum ~370 μW at 130 K, lasing to 220 K) alongside separate numerical calculations of quality factor (~65000) and gain-cavity detuning. No quoted equations, fitting procedures, or self-citations show model parameters tuned to force the zero-detuning point to coincide with the observed threshold minimum, nor any reduction of a 'prediction' to the input data by construction. The noted coincidence is observational rather than a load-bearing derivation step. This is the common case of an independent calculation placed next to measurements.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified. Standard cavity modeling assumptions are likely used but details unavailable.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5687 in / 981 out tokens · 21675 ms · 2026-05-23T23:04:39.338563+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Physics and applications of high‐β micro‐ and nanolasers,

    H. Deng, G. L. Lippi, J. Mørk, J. Wiersig, and S. Reitzenstein, “Physics and applications of high‐β micro‐ and nanolasers,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 9, no. 19, Jun. 2021, Art. no. 2100415, doi: 10.1002/adom.202100415

    work page doi:10.1002/adom.202100415 2021

  2. [2]

    Optical pumping of quantum dot micropillar lasers,

    L. Andreoli et al., “Optical pumping of quantum dot micropillar lasers,” Opt. Express , vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 9084 –9097, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1364/oe.417063

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.417063 2021

  3. [3]

    Quantum dots for photonic quantum information technology,

    T. Heindel, J. -H. Kim, N. Gregersen, A. Rastelli, and S. Reitzenstein, “Quantum dots for photonic quantum information technology,” Adv. Opt. Photonics, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 613 –738, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1364/aop.490091

    work page doi:10.1364/aop.490091 2023

  4. [4]

    Development of highly homogenous quantum dot micropillar arrays for optical reservoir computing,

    T. Heuser, J. Grose, S. Holzinger, M. M. Sommer, and S. Reitzenstein, “Development of highly homogenous quantum dot micropillar arrays for optical reservoir computing,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron ., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–9, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1109/jstqe.2019.2925968

    work page doi:10.1109/jstqe.2019.2925968 2020

  5. [5]

    High -performance semiconductor quantum -dot single -photon sources,

    P. Senellart, G. Solomon, and A. White, “High -performance semiconductor quantum -dot single -photon sources,” Nat. Nanotechnol ., vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1026–1039, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1038/nnano.2017.218

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.218 2017

  6. [6]

    Quantum -optical spectroscopy of a two -level system using an electrically driven micropillar laser as a resonant excitation source,

    S. Kreinberg et al., “Quantum -optical spectroscopy of a two -level system using an electrically driven micropillar laser as a resonant excitation source,” Light: Sci. Appl. , vol. 7, no. 1, Jul. 2018, Art. no. 41, doi: 10.1038/s41377-018-0045-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41377-018-0045-6 2018

  7. [7]

    High beta lasing in micropillar cavities with adiabatic layer design,

    M. Lermer et al., “High beta lasing in micropillar cavities with adiabatic layer design,” Appl. Phys. Lett. , vol. 102, no. 5, Feb. 2013, Art. no. 052114, doi: 10.1063/1.4791563

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4791563 2013

  8. [8]

    Emission from quantum -dot high -β microcavities: transition from spontaneous emission to lasing and the effects of superradiant emitter coupling,

    S. Kreinberg et al., “Emission from quantum -dot high -β microcavities: transition from spontaneous emission to lasing and the effects of superradiant emitter coupling,” Light: Sci. Appl. , vol. 6, no. 8, pp. e17030–e17030, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1038/lsa.2017.30

    work page doi:10.1038/lsa.2017.30 2017

  9. [9]

    Nonreciprocal lasing in topological cavities of arbitrary geometries,

    B. Bahari, A. Ndao, F. Vallini, A. El Amili, Y. Fainman, and B. Kanté, “Nonreciprocal lasing in topological cavities of arbitrary geometries,” Science, vol. 358, no. 6363, pp. 636 –640, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1126/science.aao4551

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aao4551 2017

  10. [10]

    Spin‐ lasing in bimodal quantum dot micropillar cavities,

    N. Heermeier et al., “Spin‐lasing in bimodal quantum dot micropillar cavities,” Laser Photonics Rev. , vol. 16, no. 4, Feb. 2022, Art. no. 2100585, doi: 10.1002/lpor.202100585

    work page doi:10.1002/lpor.202100585 2022

  11. [11]

    Experimental reservoir computing with diffractively coupled VCSELs,

    M. Pflüger, D. Brunner, T. Heuser, J. A. Lott, S. Reitzenstein, and I. Fischer, “Experimental reservoir computing with diffractively coupled VCSELs,” Opt. Lett. , vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 2285 –2288, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1364/ol.518946

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.518946 2024

  12. [12]

    Low -threshold lasing of optically pumped micropillar lasers with Al 0.2Ga0.8As/Al0.9Ga0.1As distributed Bragg reflectors,

    C.-W. Shih et al., “Low -threshold lasing of optically pumped micropillar lasers with Al 0.2Ga0.8As/Al0.9Ga0.1As distributed Bragg reflectors,” Appl. Phys. Lett. , vol. 122, no. 15, Apr. 2023, Art. no. 151111, doi: 10.1063/5.0143236

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0143236 2023

  13. [13]

    Design optimization for bright electrically -driven quantum dot single -photon sources emitting in telecom O -band,

    S. A. Blokhin et al., “Design optimization for bright electrically -driven quantum dot single -photon sources emitting in telecom O -band,” Opt. Express, vol. 29, no. 5, p p. 6582 –6598, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1364/oe.415979

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.415979 2021

  14. [14]

    Impact of device topology on the performance of high-speed 1550 nm wafer -fused VCSELs,

    A. Babichev et al., “Impact of device topology on the performance of high-speed 1550 nm wafer -fused VCSELs,” Photonics, vol. 10, no. 6, Jun. 2023, Art. no. 660, doi: 10.3390/photonics10060660

    work page doi:10.3390/photonics10060660 2023

  15. [15]

    High-β lasing in photonic-defect semiconductor-dielectric hybrid microresonators with embedded InGaAs quantum dots,

    K. Gaur et al., “High-β lasing in photonic-defect semiconductor-dielectric hybrid microresonators with embedded InGaAs quantum dots,” Appl. Phys. Lett. , vol. 124, no. 4, Jan. 2024, Art. no. 041104, doi: 10.1063/5.0177393

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0177393 2024

  16. [16]

    Quantum fluctuations and lineshape anomaly in a high ‐β silver‐coated InP‐based metallic nanolaser ,

    A. Koulas‐Simos et al., “Quantum fluctuations and lineshape anomaly in a high‐β silver‐coated InP‐based metallic nanolaser,” Laser Photonics Rev., vol. 16, no. 9, Jul. 2022, Art. no. 2200086, doi: 10.1002/lpor.202200086

    work page doi:10.1002/lpor.202200086 2022

  17. [17]

    High‐β lasing in self‐assembled photonic‐defect microcavities with a transition metal dichalcogenide monolayer as active material,

    A. Koulas‐Simos et al., “High‐β lasing in self‐assembled photonic‐defect microcavities with a transition metal dichalcogenide monolayer as active material,” Laser Photonics Rev ., just accepted, Jun. 2024, Art. no. 2400271, doi: 10.1002/lpor.202400271

    work page doi:10.1002/lpor.202400271 2024

  18. [18]

    Lineshape of a vertical cavity surface emitting laser,

    S. Viciani, M. Gabrysch, F. Marin, F. M. di Sopra, M. Moser, and K. H. Gulden, “Lineshape of a vertical cavity surface emitting laser,” Opt. Commun., vol. 206, no. 1 –3, pp. 89 –97, May 2002, doi: 10.1016/s0030 - 4018(02)01381-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0030 2002

  19. [19]

    Thresholdless transition to coherent emission at telecom wavelengths from coaxial nanolasers with excitation power dependent β‐factors,

    S. Kreinberg et al., “Thresholdless transition to coherent emission at telecom wavelengths from coaxial nanolasers with excitation power dependent β‐factors,” Laser Photonics Rev ., vol. 14, no. 12, Nov. 2020, Art. no. 2000065, doi: 10.1002/lpor.202000065

    work page doi:10.1002/lpor.202000065 2020

  20. [20]

    Injection Locking of quantum -dot microlasers operating in the few -photon regime,

    E. Schlottmann et al., “Injection Locking of quantum -dot microlasers operating in the few -photon regime,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 6, no. 4, Oct. 2016, Art. no. 044023, doi: 10.1103/physrevapplied.6.044023. Andrey Babichev received the Ph.D. degree in condensed matter physics from the Ioffe Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia, in 2014. He has authored or co...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.6.044023 2016

  21. [21]

    He has authored or co -authored over 160 papers and 7 patents. His current research interests include design, modeling and technology of III –V heterostructure devices, including vertical -cavity surface emitting lasers and quantum dot single photon sources. Maria Tchernycheva received the PhD in physics from the University Paris Sud, Orsay (France) in 20...

    work page 2005