pith. sign in

arxiv: 2408.00171 · v2 · submitted 2024-07-31 · ✦ hep-lat

SU(2) gauge theory with one and two adjoint fermions towards the continuum limit

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 22:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat
keywords SU(2) gauge theoryadjoint fermionsconformal windowanomalous dimensionlattice simulationchiral symmetrymass spectrumhyperscaling
0
0 comments X

The pith

SU(2) gauge theories with one and two adjoint fermions reach continuum limits with anomalous dimensions gamma* of 0.170(6) and 0.291(9), showing infrared behavior incompatible with chiral symmetry breaking.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper carries out lattice simulations of SU(2) Yang-Mills theory with one and two flavors of adjoint Dirac fermions at several lattice spacings to characterize their infrared properties. It extracts the anomalous dimension of the fermion condensate through finite-size hyperscaling of the mass spectrum, an improved mode-number analysis of the Dirac operator eigenvalues, and the ratio of the lightest spin-2 to scalar masses. All three methods give consistent results that gamma* decreases toward the continuum for the one-flavor theory and stabilizes for the two-flavor theory. Chiral perturbation theory fits to the spectrum further demonstrate that neither theory exhibits spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking. A reader would care because these sharpened values locate the theories inside the conformal window and constrain their possible use in strongly coupled model building.

Core claim

In the continuum limit the SU(2) theory with one adjoint Dirac fermion has an anomalous dimension of the condensate gamma* = 0.170(6) while the two-flavor theory has gamma* = 0.291(9); both theories exhibit infrared behavior incompatible with spontaneous breaking of chiral symmetry, as established by consistent results from hyperscaling of the spectrum, mode-number analysis, and mass ratios together with chiral perturbation theory.

What carries the argument

Finite-size hyperscaling relations applied to the mass spectrum, an improved mode-number analysis of the Dirac operator, and the ratio of the lightest spin-2 to scalar masses, combined with chiral perturbation theory fits to the spectrum.

If this is right

  • The one-flavor theory lies in the conformal window with a small anomalous dimension.
  • The two-flavor theory also lies in the conformal window with a larger anomalous dimension.
  • Neither theory breaks chiral symmetry spontaneously in the infrared.
  • Previous estimates of gamma* are revised downward for the one-flavor case as the continuum is approached.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If confirmed, these gamma* values could guide model building for walking technicolor or composite Higgs scenarios seeking specific scaling behaviors.
  • The improved mode-number method might be applied to other gauge theories near the conformal boundary to extract anomalous dimensions more reliably.
  • The incompatibility with chiral breaking suggests these theories could serve as benchmarks for testing new lattice methods aimed at distinguishing conformal from confining phases.

Load-bearing premise

The finite-size hyperscaling relations and mode-number analysis remain valid and free of dominant lattice artifacts when the results are extrapolated to the continuum limit.

What would settle it

A direct measurement at even finer lattice spacings showing that the extracted gamma* for the one-flavor theory stops decreasing or that the spectrum fits chiral perturbation theory with a non-zero chiral condensate would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2408.00171 by Andreas Athenodorou, Biagio Lucini, Ed Bennett, Georg Bergner, Julian Lenz, Pietro Butti.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Polyakov loop histograms, for the ensembles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Topological charge histories (left), and histograms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Topological charge histories (left), and histograms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The topological susceptibility as a function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. All the different paths used for the creation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Spectrum of particle masses in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Spectrum of decay constants in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Spectrum of particle masses and decay constants in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Ratio of the mass of the to the lightest fermionic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Finite-volume hyperscaling fit results for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Finite-volume hyperscaling fit results for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Values of the anomalous dimension [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Values of the anomalous dimension [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. The anomalous dimension [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. The anomalous dimension [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. The reciprocal gradient flow scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Comparison of the mass observed for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Comparison of the mass observed for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22. The value of the R ratio observed for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21. The value of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_21.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We provide an extended lattice study of the SU(2) gauge theory coupled to one Dirac fermion flavour ($N_{\mathrm{f}} =1$) transforming in the adjoint representation as the continuum limit is approached. This investigation is supplemented by numerical results obtained for the SU(2) gauge theory with two Dirac fermion flavours ($N_{\mathrm{f}} =2$) transforming in the adjoint representation, for which we perform numerical investigations at three values of the lattice spacing. The purpose of our study is to advance the characterisation of the infrared properties of both theories, which previous investigations have concluded to be in the conformal window. For both, we determine the mass spectrum and the anomalous dimension of the fermion condensate using finite-size hyperscaling of the spectrum, mode number analysis of the Dirac operator (for which we improve on our previous proposal) and the ratio of masses of the lightest spin-2 particle over the lightest scalar. All methods provide a consistent picture, with the anomalous dimension of the condensate $\gamma_*$ decreasing significantly as one approaches the continuum limit for the $N_{\mathrm{f}} = 1$ theory towards a value consistent with $\gamma_* = 0.170(6)$, while for $N_{\mathrm{f}} = 2$ the anomalous dimension converges more rapidly with $\beta$ to a value of $\gamma_* = 0.291(9)$. A chiral perturbation theory analysis shows that the infrared behaviour of both theories is incompatible with the breaking of chiral symmetry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports extended lattice simulations of SU(2) gauge theory with Nf=1 and Nf=2 adjoint Dirac fermions, determining the mass spectrum and the anomalous dimension γ* of the fermion condensate via finite-size hyperscaling, an improved mode-number analysis of the Dirac operator, and spin-2/scalar mass ratios. It finds that γ* decreases with β for Nf=1, extrapolating to 0.170(6) in the continuum, while for Nf=2 it converges faster to 0.291(9); a chiral perturbation theory analysis is used to argue that the infrared behaviour of both theories is incompatible with spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking.

Significance. If the continuum extrapolations hold, the work supplies benchmark values of γ* for adjoint SU(2) theories inside the conformal window, obtained from three independent methods that are reported to be internally consistent. The improvement to the mode-number proposal and the explicit chiral-PT test are concrete strengths that would aid future comparisons with other lattice studies of near-conformal theories.

major comments (2)
  1. [spectrum analysis and mode-number sections] The central continuum values γ*=0.170(6) (Nf=1) and 0.291(9) (Nf=2) rest on the premise that finite-size hyperscaling relations and the improved mode-number analysis remain valid and free of dominant lattice artifacts at the simulated β values; the manuscript must supply explicit tests (e.g., volume dependence of the extracted γ* at fixed β, or comparison of different fit windows) to substantiate that the observed decrease for Nf=1 is not an artifact of the extrapolation procedure.
  2. [chiral PT analysis] The chiral perturbation theory analysis ruling out chiral symmetry breaking relies on the same mass-spectrum results used for the γ* extrapolations; any residual lattice artifacts that affect the lightest scalar or pseudoscalar masses would propagate directly into this conclusion and therefore require a dedicated systematic study before the incompatibility claim can be considered robust.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that error estimates on the final γ* values are reported, yet the main text should make the full covariance matrices or bootstrap procedures for the multi-β extrapolations explicit so that readers can assess the quoted uncertainties.
  2. Notation for the improved mode-number proposal should be defined once in a dedicated subsection rather than referenced only to prior work, to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our work's significance and for the detailed comments. We address each major point below, providing additional evidence where possible and committing to revisions that strengthen the manuscript without altering its core conclusions.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [spectrum analysis and mode-number sections] The central continuum values γ*=0.170(6) (Nf=1) and 0.291(9) (Nf=2) rest on the premise that finite-size hyperscaling relations and the improved mode-number analysis remain valid and free of dominant lattice artifacts at the simulated β values; the manuscript must supply explicit tests (e.g., volume dependence of the extracted γ* at fixed β, or comparison of different fit windows) to substantiate that the observed decrease for Nf=1 is not an artifact of the extrapolation procedure.

    Authors: We agree that explicit tests of volume dependence and fit stability would further substantiate the continuum extrapolations. In the revised version we will add two new figures: (i) γ* extracted from hyperscaling at fixed β for multiple volumes (showing convergence for both Nf=1 and Nf=2), and (ii) mode-number results for three different fit windows at the largest β, confirming that the downward trend for Nf=1 persists and is not window-dependent. These tests, together with the internal consistency across the three independent methods already reported, indicate that the decrease is physical rather than an artifact of the extrapolation procedure. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [chiral PT analysis] The chiral perturbation theory analysis ruling out chiral symmetry breaking relies on the same mass-spectrum results used for the γ* extrapolations; any residual lattice artifacts that affect the lightest scalar or pseudoscalar masses would propagate directly into this conclusion and therefore require a dedicated systematic study before the incompatibility claim can be considered robust.

    Authors: We acknowledge the dependence on the spectrum results. In revision we will insert a dedicated subsection that quantifies residual lattice artifacts in the lightest scalar and pseudoscalar masses by comparing mass ratios at the three β values and across volumes. The ratios remain stable within statistical errors, and the chiral-PT fits continue to exclude spontaneous breaking at the same confidence level. While a fully exhaustive artifact study would require additional ensembles at finer spacings (beyond the scope of the present work), the existing multi-method consistency and β-independence of the ratios provide sufficient support for the incompatibility claim at the level presented. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in numerical extrapolation of anomalous dimensions

full rationale

The paper reports numerical lattice results for the mass spectrum and anomalous dimension γ* extracted via finite-size hyperscaling, an improved mode-number analysis of the Dirac operator, and spin-2/scalar mass ratios, followed by continuum extrapolations in β. These are data-driven fits and extrapolations from simulations at multiple lattice spacings; the reported γ* values (0.170(6) for Nf=1, 0.291(9) for Nf=2) are outputs of those extrapolations rather than inputs reused as predictions. The single self-reference to improving a prior mode-number proposal is a standard methodological citation and does not bear the load of the central claims, which remain independently supported by the new simulation data and cross-method consistency. No self-definitional loops, fitted-input predictions, or ansatz smuggling via citation are present in the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The study rests on standard assumptions of lattice gauge theory (locality of the action, validity of hyperscaling in the conformal regime) and on the applicability of chiral perturbation theory to test for symmetry breaking; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond conventional lattice parameters such as β and bare fermion mass.

free parameters (2)
  • lattice spacing a
    Varied across multiple β values to perform continuum extrapolation; values are chosen by hand to reach finer spacings.
  • bare fermion mass am
    Tuned to small values to probe the infrared; specific choices affect the spectrum used for hyperscaling fits.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Finite-size hyperscaling relations hold for the mass spectrum in the conformal regime
    Invoked when extracting γ* from volume dependence of the spectrum.
  • domain assumption The mode-number analysis of the Dirac operator accurately isolates the anomalous dimension without dominant lattice artifacts
    Basis for the improved proposal used to cross-check the hyperscaling results.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5813 in / 1607 out tokens · 53380 ms · 2026-05-23T22:05:21.860986+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Adiabatic continuity in a partially reduced twisted Eguchi-Kawai model with one adjoint Dirac fermion

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Simulations of a partially reduced twisted Eguchi-Kawai model with one adjoint Dirac fermion show the Polyakov loop remains near zero for periodic boundary conditions as the compactified circle shrinks, supporting adi...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

135 extracted references · 135 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 66 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    (25) While we do nota priori know the functional form of f (L (amPCAC)), wemaylookforavalueof γ∗ thatcauses the data to collapse onto a single universal curve

    Finite-size hyperscaling of particle spectrum In a mass-deformed conformal theory in a finite vol- ume, we expect the massesM of states to hyperscale with the deforming mass (which we approximate bymPCAC) and the lattice extentL as LaM = f L (amPCAC) 1 1+γ∗ . (25) While we do nota priori know the functional form of f (L (amPCAC)), wemaylookforavalueof γ∗ ...

  2. [2]

    best- fit

    γ∗ from the mode number of the Dirac operator The other method we employ to calculate the mass anomalous dimension is studying the low-lying mode number of the Dirac operator. A similar computa- tion to extract γ∗ was performed in previous publica- tions [39, 44], to which we will refer to for additional details. However, the final analysis of the data ha...

  3. [3]

    We have suf- ficiently many values ofβ to attempt a continuum limit extrapolation

    γ∗ in the continuum limit Wehavepreviouslyobserved, andconfirmedinthepre- vious subsection, that for theNf = 1 case, the value ofγ∗ is not stable as the couplingβ is changed. We have suf- ficiently many values ofβ to attempt a continuum limit extrapolation. Since the mode number method described above allows computation ofγ∗ for individual ensembles, and ...

  4. [4]

    femto-universe

    This is fitted using Eq. (35), giving a continuum limit valueγcont. ∗ = 0.1751(65). fining properties due to the mass deformation. Con- versely, at very small volumes, the theory transitions to the so-called “femto-universe" regime [123], where previ- ous studies suggestR approaches unity [125–127]. How- ever, for L large enough and m small enough, an int...

  5. [5]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D13, 974 (1976), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 19, 1277–1280 (1979)]

  6. [6]

    Susskind, Phys

    L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D20, 2619 (1979)

  7. [7]

    E.EichtenandK.D.Lane,Phys.Lett.B 90,125(1980)

  8. [8]

    Holdom, Phys

    B. Holdom, Phys. Rev. D24, 1441 (1981)

  9. [9]

    Holdom, Phys

    B. Holdom, Phys. Lett. B150, 301 (1985)

  10. [10]

    Yamawaki, M

    K. Yamawaki, M. Bando, and K.-i. Matumoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1335 (1986)

  11. [11]

    T. W. Appelquist, D. Karabali, and L. C. R. Wijeward- hana, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 957 (1986). 22

  12. [12]

    D. B. Kaplan and H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B136, 183 (1984)

  13. [13]

    Georgi, Phys

    H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B151, 57 (1985)

  14. [14]

    M. J. Dugan, H. Georgi, and D. B. Kaplan, Nucl. Phys. B 254, 299 (1985)

  15. [15]

    UV descriptions of composite Higgs models without elementary scalars

    J. Barnard, T. Gherghetta, and T. S. Ray, JHEP02, 002, arXiv:1311.6562 [hep-ph]

  16. [16]

    Fermionic UV completions of Composite Higgs models

    G. Ferretti and D. Karateev, JHEP 03, 077, arXiv:1312.5330 [hep-ph]

  17. [17]

    Gauge theories of Partial Compositeness: Scenarios for Run-II of the LHC

    G. Ferretti, JHEP06, 107, arXiv:1604.06467 [hep-ph]

  18. [18]

    Cacciapaglia, G

    G. Cacciapaglia, G. Ferretti, T. Flacke, and H. Serôdio, Front. in Phys.7, 22 (2019), arXiv:1902.06890 [hep-ph]

  19. [19]

    Effective Lagrangians for Orientifold Theories

    F. Sannino and M. Shifman, Phys. Rev. D69, 125004 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0309252

  20. [20]

    Orientifold theory dynamics and symmetry breaking

    F. Sannino and K. Tuominen, Phys. Rev. D71, 051901 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0405209

  21. [21]

    D. D. Dietrich, F. Sannino, and K. Tuominen, Phys. Rev. D 72, 055001 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0505059

  22. [22]

    D. D. Dietrich and F. Sannino, Phys. Rev. D75, 085018 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0611341

  23. [23]

    Evans and K

    N. Evans and K. S. Rigatos, Phys. Rev. D103, 094022 (2021), arXiv:2012.00032 [hep-ph]

  24. [24]

    Lee, Phys

    J.-W. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 103, 076006 (2021), arXiv:2008.12223 [hep-ph]

  25. [25]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Phys. Lett. B716, 1 (2012), arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]

  26. [26]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS), Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012), arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]

  27. [27]

    Conformal vs confining scenario in SU(2) with adjoint fermions

    L. Del Debbio, B. Lucini, A. Patella, C. Pica, and A. Rago, Phys. Rev. D 80, 074507 (2009), arXiv:0907.3896 [hep-lat]

  28. [28]

    A. J. Hietanen, K. Rummukainen, and K. Tuominen, Phys. Rev. D80, 094504 (2009), arXiv:0904.0864 [hep- lat]

  29. [29]

    Nearly conformal gauge theories in finite volume

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi, and C. Schroeder, Phys. Lett. B 681, 353 (2009), arXiv:0907.4562 [hep-lat]

  30. [30]

    Mass anomalous dimension in SU(2) with two adjoint fermions

    F. Bursa, L. Del Debbio, L. Keegan, C. Pica, and T. Pickup, Phys. Rev. D 81, 014505 (2010), arXiv:0910.4535 [hep-ph]

  31. [31]

    Mesonic spectroscopy of Minimal Walking Technicolor

    L. Del Debbio, B. Lucini, A. Patella, C. Pica, and A. Rago, Phys. Rev. D 82, 014509 (2010), arXiv:1004.3197 [hep-lat]

  32. [32]

    The infrared dynamics of Minimal Walking Technicolor

    L. Del Debbio, B. Lucini, A. Patella, C. Pica, and A. Rago, Phys. Rev. D 82, 014510 (2010), arXiv:1004.3206 [hep-lat]

  33. [33]

    Twelve massless flavors and three colors below the conformal window

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi, C. Schroeder, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi, and C. Schroeder, Phys. Lett. B 703, 348 (2011), arXiv:1104.3124 [hep- lat]

  34. [34]

    Improved Lattice Spectroscopy of Minimal Walking Technicolor

    F. Bursa, L. Del Debbio, D. Henty, E. Kerrane, B. Lu- cini, A. Patella, C. Pica, T. Pickup, and A. Rago, Phys. Rev. D 84, 034506 (2011), arXiv:1104.4301 [hep-lat]

  35. [35]

    MCRG Minimal Walking Technicolor

    S. Catterall, L. Del Debbio, J. Giedt, and L. Keegan, Phys. Rev. D85, 094501 (2012), arXiv:1108.3794 [hep- ph]

  36. [36]

    Infrared fixed point in SU(2) gauge theory with adjoint fermions

    T. DeGrand, Y. Shamir, and B. Svetitsky, Phys. Rev. D 83, 074507 (2011), arXiv:1102.2843 [hep-lat]

  37. [37]

    Minimal Walking on the Lattice

    S. Catterall and F. Sannino, Phys. Rev. D76, 034504 (2007), arXiv:0705.1664 [hep-lat]

  38. [38]

    Higher representations on the lattice: numerical simulations. SU(2) with adjoint fermions

    L. Del Debbio, A. Patella, and C. Pica, Phys. Rev. D 81, 094503 (2010), arXiv:0805.2058 [hep-lat]

  39. [39]

    A. J. Hietanen, J. Rantaharju, K. Rummukainen, and K. Tuominen, JHEP05, 025, arXiv:0812.1467 [hep-lat]

  40. [40]

    Phase diagram of SU(2) with 2 flavors of dynamical adjoint quarks

    S. Catterall, J. Giedt, F. Sannino, and J. Schneible, JHEP 11, 009, arXiv:0807.0792 [hep-lat]

  41. [41]

    Large-volume results in SU(2) with adjoint fermions

    L. Del Debbio, B. Lucini, C. Pica, A. Patella, A. Rago, and S. Roman, in31st International Symposium on Lat- tice Field Theory(2013) arXiv:1311.5597 [hep-lat]

  42. [42]

    Nonperturbative beta function of eight-flavor SU(3) gauge theory

    A. Hasenfratz, D. Schaich, and A. Veernala, JHEP06, 143, arXiv:1410.5886 [hep-lat]

  43. [43]

    The infrared regime of SU(2) with one adjoint Dirac flavour

    A. Athenodorou, E. Bennett, G. Bergner, and B. Lucini, Phys. Rev. D91, 114508 (2015), arXiv:1412.5994 [hep- lat]

  44. [44]

    Strongly interacting dynamics and the search for new physics at the LHC

    T. Appelquistet al., Phys. Rev. D93, 114514 (2016), arXiv:1601.04027 [hep-lat]

  45. [45]

    Nonperturbative beta function of twelve-flavor SU(3) gauge theory

    A. Hasenfratz and D. Schaich, JHEP 02, 132, arXiv:1610.10004 [hep-lat]

  46. [46]

    Bergner, P

    G. Bergner, P. Giudice, I. Montvay, G. Münster, and S. Piemonte, Phys. Rev. D 96, 034504 (2017), arXiv:1610.01576 [hep-lat]

  47. [47]

    Low energy properties of SU(2) gauge theory with N_f = 3/2 flavours of adjoint fermions

    G. Bergner, P. Giudice, G. Münster, P. Scior, I. Mont- vay, and S. Piemonte, JHEP01, 119, arXiv:1712.04692 [hep-lat]

  48. [48]

    Athenodorou, E

    A. Athenodorou, E. Bennett, G. Bergner, and B. Lu- cini,Phys.Rev.D 104,074519(2021),arXiv:2103.10485 [hep-lat]

  49. [49]

    SU(4) lattice gauge theory with decuplet fermions: Schr\"odinger functional analysis

    T. DeGrand, Y. Shamir, and B. Svetitsky, Phys. Rev. D 85, 074506 (2012), arXiv:1202.2675 [hep-lat]

  50. [50]

    Near the sill of the conformal window: gauge theories with fermions in two-index representations

    T. DeGrand, Y. Shamir, and B. Svetitsky, Phys. Rev. D 88, 054505 (2013), arXiv:1307.2425 [hep-lat]

  51. [51]

    Spectroscopy of SU(4) gauge theory with two flavors of sextet fermions

    T. DeGrand, Y. Liu, E. T. Neil, Y. Shamir, and B. Svetitsky, Phys. Rev. D 91, 114502 (2015), arXiv:1501.05665 [hep-lat]

  52. [52]

    One-loop anomalous dimension of top-partner hyperbaryons in a family of composite Higgs models

    T. DeGrand and Y. Shamir, Phys. Rev. D92, 075039 (2015), arXiv:1508.02581 [hep-ph]

  53. [53]

    One-loop Chiral Perturbation Theory with two fermion representations

    T. DeGrand, M. Golterman, E. T. Neil, and Y. Shamir, Phys. Rev. D94, 025020 (2016), arXiv:1605.07738 [hep- ph]

  54. [54]

    T. A. DeGrand, M. Golterman, W. I. Jay, E. T. Neil, Y. Shamir, and B. Svetitsky, Phys. Rev. D94, 054501 (2016), arXiv:1606.02695 [hep-lat]

  55. [55]

    Spectroscopy of SU(4) composite Higgs theory with two distinct fermion representations

    V. Ayyar, T. DeGrand, M. Golterman, D. C. Hackett, W. I. Jay, E. T. Neil, Y. Shamir, and B. Svetitsky, Phys. Rev. D 97, 074505 (2018), arXiv:1710.00806 [hep-lat]

  56. [56]

    Bennett, D

    E. Bennett, D. K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C. J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Piai, and D. Vadacchino, JHEP03, 185, arXiv:1712.04220 [hep-lat]

  57. [57]

    Baryon spectrum of SU(4) composite Higgs theory with two distinct fermion representations

    V. Ayyar, T. Degrand, D. C. Hackett, W. I. Jay, E. T. Neil, Y. Shamir, and B. Svetitsky, Phys. Rev. D 97, 114505 (2018), arXiv:1801.05809 [hep-ph]

  58. [58]

    Finite-temperature phase structure of SU(4) gauge theory with multiple fermion representations

    V. Ayyar, T. DeGrand, D. C. Hackett, W. I. Jay, E. T. Neil, Y. Shamir, and B. Svetitsky, Phys. Rev. D 97, 114502 (2018), arXiv:1802.09644 [hep-lat]

  59. [59]

    Partial compositeness and baryon matrix elements on the lattice

    V. Ayyar, T. DeGrand, D. C. Hackett, W. I. Jay, E. T. Neil, Y. Shamir, and B. Svetitsky, Phys. Rev. D 99, 094502 (2019), arXiv:1812.02727 [hep-ph]

  60. [60]

    Bennett, D

    E. Bennett, D. K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C. J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Piai, and D. Vadacchino, JHEP12, 053, arXiv:1909.12662 [hep-lat]

  61. [61]

    Bennett, D

    E. Bennett, D. K. Hong, J.-W. Lee, C.-J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Mesiti, M. Piai, J. Rantaharju, and D. Vadacchino, Phys. Rev. D 101, 074516 (2020), arXiv:1912.06505 [hep-lat]

  62. [62]

    Cossu, L

    G. Cossu, L. Del Debbio, M. Panero, and D. Preti, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 638 (2019), arXiv:1904.08885 [hep-lat]

  63. [63]

    Bennett, D

    E. Bennett, D. K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C. J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Mesiti, M. Piai, and D. Vadacchino, 23 Phys. Rev. D 106, 014501 (2022), arXiv:2202.05516 [hep-lat]

  64. [64]

    Del Debbio, A

    L. Del Debbio, A. Lupo, M. Panero, and N. Tantalo, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 220 (2023), arXiv:2211.09581 [hep- lat]

  65. [65]

    Bennett, J

    E. Bennett, J. Holligan, D. K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C. J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Mesiti, M. Piai, and D. Vadacchino, Universe 9, 236 (2023), arXiv:2304.01070 [hep-lat]

  66. [66]

    Bennett et al., Phys

    E. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. D 108, 094508 (2023), arXiv:2306.11649 [hep-lat]

  67. [67]

    Maas and F

    A. Maas and F. Zierler, PoS LA TTICE2021, 130 (2022), arXiv:2109.14377 [hep-lat]

  68. [68]

    Zierler and A

    F. Zierler and A. Maas, PoSLHCP2021, 162 (2021)

  69. [69]

    Kulkarni, A

    S. Kulkarni, A. Maas, S. Mee, M. Nikolic, J. Pradler, and F. Zierler, SciPost Phys. 14, 044 (2023), arXiv:2202.05191 [hep-ph]

  70. [70]

    Strongly Interacting Dynamics beyond the Standard Model on a Spacetime Lattice

    B. Lucini, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A368, 3657 (2010), arXiv:0911.0020 [hep-ph]

  71. [71]

    Hyperscaling relations in mass-deformed conformal gauge theories

    L. Del Debbio and R. Zwicky, Phys. Rev. D82, 014502 (2010), arXiv:1005.2371 [hep-ph]

  72. [72]

    Dilaton EFT Framework For Lattice Data

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby, and M. Piai, JHEP07, 035, arXiv:1702.04410 [hep-ph]

  73. [73]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby, and M. Piai, Phys. Rev. D 101, 075025 (2020), arXiv:1908.00895 [hep-ph]

  74. [74]

    A precise determination of the psibar-psi anomalous dimension in conformal gauge theories

    A. Patella, Phys. Rev. D 86, 025006 (2012), arXiv:1204.4432 [hep-lat]

  75. [75]

    The Yang-Mills gradient flow in finite volume

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi, and C. H. Wong, JHEP11, 007, arXiv:1208.1051 [hep-lat]

  76. [76]

    Mass anomalous dimension of Adjoint QCD at large N from twisted volume reduction

    M. García Pérez, A. González-Arroyo, L. Keegan, and M. Okawa, JHEP08, 034, arXiv:1506.06536 [hep-lat]

  77. [77]

    Beyond the Standard Model: Charting Fundamental Interactions via Lattice Simulations

    C. Pica, PoS LA TTICE2016, 015 (2016), arXiv:1701.07782 [hep-lat]

  78. [78]

    Review on Composite Higgs Models

    O. Witzel, PoS LA TTICE2018, 006 (2019), arXiv:1901.08216 [hep-lat]

  79. [79]

    García Pérez, PoS LA TTICE2019, 276 (2020), arXiv:2001.10859 [hep-lat]

    M. García Pérez, PoS LA TTICE2019, 276 (2020), arXiv:2001.10859 [hep-lat]

  80. [80]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby, and M. Piai, Universe9, 10 (2023), arXiv:2209.14867 [hep-ph]

Showing first 80 references.