Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Improving the Ability of Pre-trained Language Model by Imparting Large Language Model's Experience

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.08553 v2 pith:RTC4YTDP submitted 2024-08-16 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords datallmscodelanguageperformancepre-trainedtasksgeneration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) and pre-trained Language Models (LMs) have achieved impressive success on many software engineering tasks (e.g., code completion and code generation). By leveraging huge existing code corpora (e.g., GitHub), these models can understand the patterns in source code and use these patterns to predict code properties. However, LLMs under few-shot learning perform poorly on non-generative tasks (e.g., fault localization and vulnerability localization), and fine-tuning LLMs is time-consuming and costly for end users and small organizations. Furthermore, the performance of fine-tuning LMs for non-generative tasks is impressive, yet it heavily depends on the amount and quality of data. As a result, the current lack of data and the high cost of collecting it in real-world scenarios further limit the applicability of LMs. In this paper, we leverage the powerful generation capabilities of LLMs to enhance pre-trained LMs. Specifically, we use LLMs to generate domain-specific data, thereby improving the performance of pre-trained LMs on the target tasks. We conduct experiments by combining different LLMs in our generation phase and introducing various LMs to learn from the LLM-generated data. Then, we compare the performance of these LMs before and after learning the data. We find that LLM-generated data significantly enhances the performance of LMs. The improvement can reach up to 58.36% for fault localization and up to 6.09% for clone detection.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What You See Is What You Get: Attention-based Self-guided Automatic Unit Test Generation

    cs.SE 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AUGER steers an LLM's attention toward predicted defective lines and thereby triggers 84 of 723 Defects4J bugs, outperforming five test-generation baselines.

Pith tools