C2P-CLIP: Injecting Category Common Prompt in CLIP to Enhance Generalization in Deepfake Detection
Reviewed by Pithpith:6G7GE3D5open to challenge →
read the original abstract
This work focuses on AIGC detection to develop universal detectors capable of identifying various types of forgery images. Recent studies have found large pre-trained models, such as CLIP, are effective for generalizable deepfake detection along with linear classifiers. However, two critical issues remain unresolved: 1) understanding why CLIP features are effective on deepfake detection through a linear classifier; and 2) exploring the detection potential of CLIP. In this study, we delve into the underlying mechanisms of CLIP's detection capabilities by decoding its detection features into text and performing word frequency analysis. Our finding indicates that CLIP detects deepfakes by recognizing similar concepts (Fig. \ref{fig:fig1} a). Building on this insight, we introduce Category Common Prompt CLIP, called C2P-CLIP, which integrates the category common prompt into the text encoder to inject category-related concepts into the image encoder, thereby enhancing detection performance (Fig. \ref{fig:fig1} b). Our method achieves a 12.41\% improvement in detection accuracy compared to the original CLIP, without introducing additional parameters during testing. Comprehensive experiments conducted on two widely-used datasets, encompassing 20 generation models, validate the efficacy of the proposed method, demonstrating state-of-the-art performance. The code is available at \url{https://github.com/chuangchuangtan/C2P-CLIP-DeepfakeDetection}
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
SPARK-IL: Spectral Retrieval-Augmented RAG for Knowledge-driven Deepfake Detection via Incremental Learning
SPARK-IL reaches 94.6% mean accuracy on deepfake detection across 19 generators by fusing multi-band spectral embeddings from ViT and RGB paths, retrieving nearest signatures for majority voting, and using incremental...
-
Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Image Detection
The Counter Turing Test competition finds F1-scores above 0.83 for binary real-vs-AI classification but only 0.4986 at best for identifying the specific generative model.
-
Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Image Detection
A competition using a new 50k-image dataset found high accuracy in binary real-vs-AI detection but only modest success in identifying the exact generative model.
-
Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Image Detection
Binary AI vs. real image classification reaches F1 > 0.83 while identifying the exact generative model achieves a highest F1 of 0.4986 on the MS COCOAI dataset.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.