Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Dual-criterion Dose Finding Designs Based on Dose-Limiting Toxicity and Tolerability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.17392 v1 pith:3JJY3DNX submitted 2024-08-30 stat.ME

Dual-criterion Dose Finding Designs Based on Dose-Limiting Toxicity and Tolerability

classification stat.ME
keywords doseintolerancemethodsprimarytherapiescharacteristicsdesigndesigns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The primary objective of Phase I oncology trials is to assess the safety and tolerability of novel therapeutics. Conventional dose escalation methods identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). However, as cancer therapies have evolved from chemotherapy to targeted therapies, these traditional methods have become problematic. Many targeted therapies rarely produce DLT and are administered over multiple cycles, potentially resulting in the accumulation of lower-grade toxicities, which can lead to intolerance, such as dose reduction or interruption. To address this issue, we proposed dual-criterion designs that find the MTD based on both DLT and non-DLT-caused intolerance. We considered the model-based design and model-assisted design that allow real-time decision-making in the presence of pending data due to long event assessment windows. Compared to DLT-based methods, our approaches exhibit superior operating characteristics when intolerance is the primary driver for determining the MTD and comparable operating characteristics when DLT is the primary driver.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.