Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Examining the Relationship Between the Persistent Emission and the Accretion Rate During a Type I X-ray Burst

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.05737 v2 pith:IMB7SRSH submitted 2024-09-09 astro-ph.HE

Examining the Relationship Between the Persistent Emission and the Accretion Rate During a Type I X-ray Burst

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords accretionrateburstdiskmassx-rayburstsduring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

The accretion flow onto a neutron star will be impacted due to irradiation by a Type I X-ray burst. The burst radiation exerts Poynting-Robertson (PR) drag on the accretion disk, leading to an enhanced mass accretion rate. Observations of X-ray bursts often find evidence that the normalization of the disk-generated persistent emission (commonly denoted by the factor $f_a$) increases during a burst, and changes in $f_a$ have been used to infer the evolution in the mass accretion rate due to PR drag. Here, we examine this proposed relationship between $f_a$ and mass accretion rate enhancement using time-resolved data from simulations of accretion disks impacted by Type I X-ray bursts. We consider bursts from both spinning and non-spinning neutron stars and track both the change in accretion rate due to PR grad and the disk emission spectra during the burst. Regardless of the neutron star spin, we find that $f_a$ strongly correlates with the disk temperature and only weakly follows the mass accretion rate (the Pearson correlation coefficients are $\leq 0.63$ in the latter case). Additionally, heating causes the disk to emit at higher energies, reducing its contribution to a soft excess. We conclude that $f_a$ cannot accurately capture the mass accretion rate enhancement and is rather a tracer of the disk temperature.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.