Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Great Contradiction Showdown: How Jailbreak and Stealth Wrestle in Vision-Language Models?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.01438 v2 pith:ROXJKU2B submitted 2024-10-02 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords attacksjailbreakmodelsstealthinessvision-languageachievedadversarialalgorithm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on a variety of tasks, yet they remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that compromise safety and reliability. In this paper, we provide an information-theoretic framework for understanding the fundamental trade-off between the effectiveness of these attacks and their stealthiness. Drawing on Fano's inequality, we demonstrate how an attacker's success probability is intrinsically linked to the stealthiness of generated prompts. Building on this, we propose an efficient algorithm for detecting non-stealthy jailbreak attacks, offering significant improvements in model robustness. Experimental results highlight the tension between strong attacks and their detectability, providing insights into both adversarial strategies and defense mechanisms.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools