The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2410.03254 · v1 · pith:LQJWLGNI · submitted 2024-10-04 · cs.CL

Are Expert-Level Language Models Expert-Level Annotators?

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:LQJWLGNIrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL
keywords annotatorsdataexpert-levelllmsdomainsknowledgeacrossalternative
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Data annotation refers to the labeling or tagging of textual data with relevant information. A large body of works have reported positive results on leveraging LLMs as an alternative to human annotators. However, existing studies focus on classic NLP tasks, and the extent to which LLMs as data annotators perform in domains requiring expert knowledge remains underexplored. In this work, we investigate comprehensive approaches across three highly specialized domains and discuss practical suggestions from a cost-effectiveness perspective. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first systematic evaluation of LLMs as expert-level data annotators.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Large Language Models Are Effective Human Annotation Assistants, But Not Good Independent Annotators

    cs.CL 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LLMs outperform traditional methods in event annotation but remain unreliable as independent annotators while reducing human effort when used as assistants.

  2. LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods

    cs.CL 2024-12 accept novelty 3.0

    A survey that organizes LLMs-as-judges research into functionality, methodology, applications, meta-evaluation, and limitations.