Pith. sign in

REVIEW

With random regressors, least squares inference is robust to correlated errors with unknown correlation structure

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.05567 v2 pith:ZCMLWO3F submitted 2024-10-08 math.ST stat.MEstat.TH

classification math.STstat.MEstat.TH
keywords correlationerrorslinearregressioncorrelatedinferenceregressorsstructure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Linear regression is arguably the most widely used statistical method. With fixed regressors and correlated errors, the conventional wisdom is to modify the variance-covariance estimator to accommodate the known correlation structure of the errors. We depart from the literature by showing that with random regressors, linear regression inference is robust to correlated errors with unknown correlation structure. The existing theoretical analyses for linear regression are no longer valid because even the asymptotic normality of the least-squares coefficients breaks down in this regime. We first prove the asymptotic normality of the t statistics by establishing their Berry-Esseen bounds based on a novel probabilistic analysis of self-normalized statistics. We then study the local power of the corresponding t tests and show that, perhaps surprisingly, error correlation can even enhance power in the regime of weak signals. Overall, our results show that linear regression is applicable more broadly than the conventional theory suggests, and further demonstrate the value of randomization to ensure robustness of inference.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools