pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.05579 · v1 · submitted 2024-10-08 · 💻 cs.HC

A Survey on Annotations in Information Visualization: Empirical Insights, Applications, and Challenges

Md Dilshadur Rahman , Bhavana Doppalapudi , Ghulam Jilani Quadri , Paul Rosen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 19:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords annotationsinformation visualizationempirical studiesuser engagementcomprehensionmemorabilityvisualization toolsresearch challenges
0
0 comments X

The pith

Annotations enhance audience understanding and engagement with visual data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This survey examines how annotations in information visualizations affect users. Empirical studies indicate they boost engagement, interaction, comprehension, and memorability in various settings. The paper also reviews tools for creating annotations and their applications in different domains. It highlights research gaps and suggests future directions for the field.

Core claim

Annotations play a crucial role in improving audience understanding and engagement with visual data. Empirical studies demonstrate their impact on user engagement, interaction, comprehension, and memorability across various contexts. Existing tools and techniques support the creation of annotations for diverse applications.

What carries the argument

Annotations, which are marks or notes added to visualizations to explain or highlight data, act as the key mechanism for improving interpretation and user experience in information visualization.

If this is right

  • Annotations increase user engagement with visual data across contexts.
  • User comprehension and memorability of visualized information improve with annotations.
  • Tools and techniques enable the creation of annotations for practical use in visualization design.
  • Identifying gaps points to areas needing more research in annotation use.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Standard visualization platforms could benefit from built-in annotation features based on the reviewed evidence.
  • Future work might explore annotations in emerging visualization technologies like AR or VR.
  • Designers should consider annotations as a standard element when creating data visuals for broader audiences.

Load-bearing premise

The body of empirical studies, tools, and applications reviewed is representative of the field without major selection biases.

What would settle it

Finding a significant body of un-reviewed literature where annotations show no positive effect on user engagement or comprehension would challenge the survey's conclusions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2410.05579 by Bhavana Doppalapudi, Ghulam Jilani Quadri, Md Dilshadur Rahman, Paul Rosen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The chart of publications discussing the impor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A graphic that repays study. At first sight it is a time-line – but time cannot flow backwards. The x-axis is actually world oil consumption; time flows along the black wiggly line. New York Times, November 9th 2007. Reproduced courtesy of New York Times ollege, U Fig. 2: Connected scatterplot from the New York Times [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Prisma Framework for literature selection. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The design space by Rahman et al. [41] includes three sections: Why? identifies visualization tasks and relevant annotation types, How? details annotation usage with a frequency color-coding system: 6-25% , 26-50% , 51+% , and types of annotation ensembles, and What? categorizes annotation data sources. et al. further classified textual annotations based on their functional roles in visualizations: additiv… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (A) and (B) are examples of professionally annotated charts: (A) A bar chart from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (A) Chart of average monthly temperatures with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Information displays with varying amounts of visuals and text. (a) Chart presented with no text (beyond axes and ticks), (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A time-series chart depicting the number of acres burned in various California Wildfires between 2013 and 2020. We used the ALMANAC API to identify the prominent visual features of this chart (iethe peaks) and then annotate them with headlines from Fig. 8: Automatically generated annotations on a time-series chart of California wildfires (2013–2020) using the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Citigroup stock chart from June to Nov 2008. The user sketched two annotations (in black). A human viewer easily interprets the arrow annotation (left) as point￾ing to a peak and the line annotation (right) as referring to a declining slope. Our algorithm considers perceptual parts in the chart to infer these interpretations (in green). ing to a peak in a stock chart and write, “high volatility” and anothe… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a comprehensive survey on the use of annotations in information visualizations, highlighting their crucial role in improving audience understanding and engagement with visual data. Our investigation encompasses empirical studies on annotations, showcasing their impact on user engagement, interaction, comprehension, and memorability across various contexts. We also study the existing tools and techniques for creating annotations and their diverse applications, enhancing the understanding of both practical and theoretical aspects of annotations in data visualization. Additionally, we identify existing research gaps and propose potential future research directions, making our survey a valuable resource for researchers, visualization designers, and practitioners by providing a thorough understanding of the application of annotations in visualization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a survey on annotations in information visualization. It reviews empirical studies on their effects on user engagement, interaction, comprehension, and memorability; surveys tools, techniques, and applications for creating annotations; and identifies research gaps while proposing future directions.

Significance. If the literature selection is shown to be systematic and representative, the survey could usefully synthesize empirical findings and practical tools for the visualization community. The manuscript does not ship machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or parameter-free derivations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and (presumed) §2 or methodology section: no search strategy, databases, keywords, time bounds, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or counts of screened/included papers are reported. This is load-bearing for the central synthesis claims about empirical impacts and identified gaps, as it prevents evaluation of selection bias or coverage.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for highlighting the need for explicit methodology details in our survey. We agree this is important for transparency and will revise the manuscript to address it.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and (presumed) §2 or methodology section: no search strategy, databases, keywords, time bounds, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or counts of screened/included papers are reported. This is load-bearing for the central synthesis claims about empirical impacts and identified gaps, as it prevents evaluation of selection bias or coverage.

    Authors: We acknowledge the validity of this observation. The current manuscript does not include an explicit methodology section describing the literature search process. We will add a dedicated §2 (Literature Search Methodology) that reports the databases searched (ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, Google Scholar, and others), the keywords and Boolean queries used, the time bounds applied, inclusion/exclusion criteria (e.g., focus on empirical studies, tools, and applications in information visualization), and the counts of papers screened versus included. This addition will enable evaluation of coverage and selection bias. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Survey paper presents no derivations, predictions, or self-referential claims

full rationale

This paper is a literature survey reviewing empirical studies, tools, and applications of annotations in visualization. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, no predictions derived from inputs, and no load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claims to the paper's own definitions or prior outputs. The abstract and structure aggregate external work without any internal derivation chain that could be circular by construction. Literature selection criteria are not detailed, but that is a methodological limitation unrelated to circularity patterns such as self-definition or fitted-input renaming.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a literature survey, the paper introduces no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it relies on the existing body of visualization research without adding new foundational elements.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5645 in / 995 out tokens · 23490 ms · 2026-05-23T19:50:11.809346+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

231 extracted references · 231 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Munzner, Visualization analysis and design

    T. Munzner, Visualization analysis and design . Boca Raton FL: CRC press, 2014

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Procedural annotation of uncer- tain information,

    A. Cedilnik and P. Rheingans, “Procedural annotation of uncer- tain information,” in IEEE VIS, 2000, pp. 77–84

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Interactive dynamics for visual analysis,

    J. Heer and B. Shneiderman, “Interactive dynamics for visual analysis,” Communications of the ACM , vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 45– 54, 2012

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    An- notation graphs: A graph-based visualization for meta-analysis of data based on user-authored annotations,

    J. Zhao, M. Glueck, S. Breslav, F. Chevalier, and A. Khan, “An- notation graphs: A graph-based visualization for meta-analysis of data based on user-authored annotations,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 261–270, 2016

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Characterizing the intelligence anal- ysis process through a longitudinal field study: Implications for visual analytics,

    Y .-a. Kang and J. Stasko, “Characterizing the intelligence anal- ysis process through a longitudinal field study: Implications for visual analytics,” Inf. Visualization, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 134–158, 2014

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Visinreport: Complementing visual discourse analytics through personalized insight reports,

    R. Sevastjanova, M. El-Assady, A. Bradley, C. Collins, M. Butt, and D. Keim, “Visinreport: Complementing visual discourse analytics through personalized insight reports,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 4757–4769, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Note-taking in co- located collaborative visual analytics: Analysis of an observa- tional study,

    N. Mahyar, A. Sarvghad, and M. Tory, “Note-taking in co- located collaborative visual analytics: Analysis of an observa- tional study,” Inf. Visualization , vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 190–204, 2012

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Connecting the dots in visual analysis,

    Y . B. Shrinivasan, D. Gotzy, and J. Lu, “Connecting the dots in visual analysis,” in IEEE VAST, 2009, pp. 123–130

    work page 2009

  9. [9]

    Supporting the analytical reasoning process in information visualization,

    Y . B. Shrinivasan and J. J. Van Wijk, “Supporting the analytical reasoning process in information visualization,” in ACM CHI , 2008, pp. 1237–1246

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    Inking your insights: Investi- gating digital externalization behaviors during data analysis,

    Y .-S. Kim, N. Henry Riche, B. Lee, M. Brehmer, M. Pahud, K. Hinckley, and J. Hullman, “Inking your insights: Investi- gating digital externalization behaviors during data analysis,” in ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces, 2019, pp. 255–267

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Characterizing visualization insights from quantified selfers’ personal data presentations,

    E. K. Choe, B. Lee et al., “Characterizing visualization insights from quantified selfers’ personal data presentations,” IEEE Compt. Graph. and Appl. , vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 28–37, 2015

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Data hunches: Incorporating personal knowledge into visualizations,

    H. Lin, D. Akbaba, M. Meyer, and A. Lex, “Data hunches: Incorporating personal knowledge into visualizations,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics , vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 504– 514, 2022

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Activeink: (th) inking with data,

    H. Romat, N. Henry Riche, K. Hinckley, B. Lee, C. Appert, E. Pietriga, and C. Collins, “Activeink: (th) inking with data,” in ACM CHI, 2019, pp. 1–13

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Data abstraction elephants: The initial diversity of data representations and mental models,

    K. Williams, A. Bigelow, and K. E. Isaacs, “Data abstraction elephants: The initial diversity of data representations and mental models,” in ACM CHI, 2023, pp. 1–24

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Exploratory sequential data analysis: Foundations,

    P. M. Sanderson and C. Fisher, “Exploratory sequential data analysis: Foundations,” Human–Computer Interaction , vol. 9, no. 3-4, pp. 251–317, 1994

    work page 1994

  16. [16]

    Sup- porting effective common ground construction in asynchronous collaborative visual analytics,

    Y . Chen, J. Alsakran, S. Barlowe, J. Yang, and Y . Zhao, “Sup- porting effective common ground construction in asynchronous collaborative visual analytics,” in IEEE VAST, 2011, pp. 101– 110

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Click2annotate: Automated insight externalization with rich semantics,

    Y . Chen, S. Barlowe, and J. Yang, “Click2annotate: Automated insight externalization with rich semantics,” in IEEE VAST , 2010, pp. 155–162

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    Supporting communication and coor- dination in collaborative sensemaking,

    N. Mahyar and M. Tory, “Supporting communication and coor- dination in collaborative sensemaking,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1633–1642, 2014

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Interactive annotations on large, high-resolution informa- tion displays,

    T. Isenberg, P. Neumann, S. Carpendale, S. Nix, and S. Green- berg, “Interactive annotations on large, high-resolution informa- tion displays,” in Conference Compendium of IEEE VIS, IEEE InfoVis, and IEEE VAST , 2006, pp. 124–125

    work page 2006

  20. [20]

    Collaborative synthesis of visual analytic results,

    A. C. Robinson, “Collaborative synthesis of visual analytic results,” in IEEE VAST, 2008, pp. 67–74

    work page 2008

  21. [21]

    Perceptual interpretation of ink annotations on line charts,

    N. Kong and M. Agrawala, “Perceptual interpretation of ink annotations on line charts,” in ACM UIST, 2009, pp. 233–236

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    A collaborative annotation system for data visualization,

    S. Ellis and D. P. Groth, “A collaborative annotation system for data visualization,” in ACM Advanced Visual Interfaces , 2004, pp. 411–414

    work page 2004

  23. [23]

    Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data,

    E. Segel and J. Heer, “Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics , vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1139–1148, 2010

    work page 2010

  24. [24]

    More than telling a story: Transforming data into visually shared stories,

    B. Lee, N. H. Riche, P. Isenberg, and S. Carpendale, “More than telling a story: Transforming data into visually shared stories,” IEEE Compt. Graph. and Appl., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 84–90, 2015. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2021 16

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Storytelling: The next step for visualization,

    R. Kosara and J. Mackinlay, “Storytelling: The next step for visualization,” IEEE Computer, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 44–50, 2013

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Visualization rhetoric: Fram- ing effects in narrative visualization,

    J. Hullman and N. Diakopoulos, “Visualization rhetoric: Fram- ing effects in narrative visualization,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 2231–2240, 2011

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    Authoring narrative visualizations with ellipsis,

    A. Satyanarayan and J. Heer, “Authoring narrative visualizations with ellipsis,” Comput. Graphics Forum, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 361– 370, 2014

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    Canis: A high-level language for data-driven chart animations,

    T. Ge, Y . Zhao, B. Lee, D. Ren, B. Chen, and Y . Wang, “Canis: A high-level language for data-driven chart animations,” Comput. Graphics Forum, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 607–617, 2020

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Exploring an- notation strategies in professional visualizations: Insights from prominent us news portals,

    M. D. Rahman, G. J. Quadri, and P. Rosen, “Exploring an- notation strategies in professional visualizations: Insights from prominent us news portals,” VisComm Workshop at IEEE VIS , 2023

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    A., Hekker, S., Stello, D., Guti ´errez-Soto, J., Handberg, R., Huber, D., et al

    J. Champkin, “Amanda Cox,” Significance, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 28–31, 10 2012. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1740-9713.2012.00605.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j 2012

  31. [31]

    Oil prices reach a symbolic mark,

    A. Cox and V . Nguyen, “Oil prices reach a symbolic mark,” 2008, accessed: 2024-06-12. [Online]. Available: https://shorturl.at/iiA8w

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    Driving shifts into reverse,

    H. Fairfield, “Driving shifts into reverse,” 2010, accessed: 2024-06-12. [Online]. Available: https://shorturl.at/vDNjn

    work page 2010

  33. [33]

    The connected scatterplot for presenting paired time series,

    S. Haroz, R. Kosara, and S. L. Franconeri, “The connected scatterplot for presenting paired time series,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 2174–2186, 2015

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Seven features you’ll want in your next charting tool,

    G. Aisch, “Seven features you’ll want in your next charting tool,” 2015, accessed: 2024-06-14. [Online]. Available: https: //shorturl.at/9n92E

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    Chartaccent: Annotation for data-driven storytelling,

    D. Ren, M. Brehmer, B. Lee, T. H ¨ollerer, and E. K. Choe, “Chartaccent: Annotation for data-driven storytelling,” in IEEE PacificVis, 2017, pp. 230–239

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Integrating annotations into multidimensional visual dashboards,

    S. K. Badam, S. Chandrasegaran, and N. Elmqvist, “Integrating annotations into multidimensional visual dashboards,” Informa- tion Visualization, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 270–284, 2022

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Striking a balance: Reader takeaways and preferences when integrating text and charts,

    C. Stokes, V . Setlur, B. Cogley, A. Satyanarayan, and M. A. Hearst, “Striking a balance: Reader takeaways and preferences when integrating text and charts,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Com- put. Graphics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1233–1243, 2022

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Beyond memorability: Visualization recognition and recall,

    M. A. Borkin, Z. Bylinskii, N. W. Kim, C. M. Bainbridge, C. S. Yeh, D. Borkin, H. Pfister, and A. Oliva, “Beyond memorability: Visualization recognition and recall,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 519–528, 2015

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Vispubs. com: A visualization publications reposi- tory

    D. Lange, “Vispubs. com: A visualization publications reposi- tory.”

    work page

  40. [40]

    Contextifier: au- tomatic generation of annotated stock visualizations,

    J. Hullman, N. Diakopoulos, and E. Adar, “Contextifier: au- tomatic generation of annotated stock visualizations,” in ACM CHI, 2013, pp. 2707–2716

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    A qualitative analysis of common practices in annotations: A taxonomy and design space,

    M. D. Rahman, G. J. Quadri, B. Doppalapudi, D. A. Szafir, and P. Rosen, “A qualitative analysis of common practices in annotations: A taxonomy and design space,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics, 2024

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Collaborative visualization: Definition, challenges, and research agenda,

    P. Isenberg, N. Elmqvist, J. Scholtz, D. Cernea, K.-L. Ma, and H. Hagen, “Collaborative visualization: Definition, challenges, and research agenda,” Inf. Visualization, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 310– 326, 2011

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    Provenance and annotation for visual exploration systems,

    D. P. Groth and K. Streefkerk, “Provenance and annotation for visual exploration systems,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1500–1510, 2006

    work page 2006

  44. [44]

    Cartographic name placement with prolog,

    C. B. Jones, “Cartographic name placement with prolog,” IEEE Compt. Graph. and Appl. , vol. 9, no. 05, pp. 36–47, 1989

    work page 1989

  45. [45]

    An empirical study of algorithms for point-feature label placement,

    J. Christensen, J. Marks, and S. Shieber, “An empirical study of algorithms for point-feature label placement,” ACM Transac- tions on Graphics (TOG) , vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 203–232, 1995

    work page 1995

  46. [46]

    An annotation system for 3d fluid flow visualization,

    M. M. Loughlin and J. F. Hughes, “An annotation system for 3d fluid flow visualization,” in IEEE VIS, 1994, pp. 273–279

    work page 1994

  47. [47]

    Click- points: an expandable toolbox for scientific image annotation and analysis,

    R. C. Gerum, S. Richter, B. Fabry, and D. P. Zitterbart, “Click- points: an expandable toolbox for scientific image annotation and analysis,” Methods in Ecology and Evolution , vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 750–756, 2017

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    Touch and beyond: Comparing physical and virtual reality visualizations,

    K. Danyluk, T. T. Ulusoy, W. Wei, and W. Willett, “Touch and beyond: Comparing physical and virtual reality visualizations,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics , vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1930–1940, 2020

    work page 1930

  49. [49]

    Annotation in outdoor augmented reality,

    J. Wither, S. DiVerdi, and T. H ¨ollerer, “Annotation in outdoor augmented reality,” Computers & Graphics , vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 679–689, 2009

    work page 2009

  50. [50]

    Survey of annotations in extended reality systems,

    Z. Borhani, P. Sharma, and F. R. Ortega, “Survey of annotations in extended reality systems,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics, pp. 1–20, 2023

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Survey of immersive analytics,

    A. Fonnet and Y . Pri ´e, “Survey of immersive analytics,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics , vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 2101– 2122, 2021

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Modern genome annotation,

    D. Frishman and A. Valencia, “Modern genome annotation,” The BioSapiens Network , pp. 213–38, 2009

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    Unification of functional annotation descriptions using text mining,

    P. Queir ´os, P. Novikova, P. Wilmes, and P. May, “Unification of functional annotation descriptions using text mining,”Biological Chemistry, vol. 402, no. 8, pp. 983–990, 2021

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,

    J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei, “Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,” in IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2009, pp. 248–255

    work page 2009

  55. [55]

    Microsoft coco: Common objects in context,

    T.-Y . Lin, M. Maire, S. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ra- manan, P. Doll´ar, and C. L. Zitnick, “Microsoft coco: Common objects in context,” in European Conference Computer Vision (ECCV), 2014, pp. 740–755

    work page 2014

  56. [56]

    Svenonius, The intellectual foundation of information orga- nization

    E. Svenonius, The intellectual foundation of information orga- nization. MIT press, 2000

    work page 2000

  57. [57]

    A. G. Taylor and D. N. Joudrey, The organization of informa- tion. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2008

    work page 2008

  58. [58]

    M. T. Clanchy, From memory to written record: England 1066-

    work page

  59. [59]

    John Wiley & Sons, 2012

    work page 2012

  60. [60]

    A. M. Blair, Too much to know: Managing scholarly information before the modern age . Yale University Press, 2010

    work page 2010

  61. [61]

    Shapin, A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England

    S. Shapin, A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England . University of Chicago press, 1995

    work page 1995

  62. [62]

    Bloch, Effective java

    J. Bloch, Effective java. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2017

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    Using annotations for sensemaking about code,

    A. Horvath, B. Myers, A. Macvean, and I. Rahman, “Using annotations for sensemaking about code,” in ACM UIST, 2022, pp. 1–16

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    Building a large annotated corpus of english: The penn treebank,

    M. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. A. Marcinkiewicz, “Building a large annotated corpus of english: The penn treebank,” Com- putational linguistics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 313–330, 1993

    work page 1993

  65. [65]

    The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles,

    M. Palmer, D. Gildea, and P. Kingsbury, “The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles,” Computational linguistics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 71–106, 2005

    work page 2005

  66. [66]

    A systems view of annotations,

    S. B. Cousins, M. Baldonado, and A. Paepcke, “A systems view of annotations,” Xerox PARC, Tech. Rep. P9910022, 2000

    work page 2000

  67. [67]

    Internal and exter- nal visual cue preferences for visualizations in presentations,

    H.-K. Kong, Z. Liu, and K. Karahalios, “Internal and exter- nal visual cue preferences for visualizations in presentations,” Comput. Graphics Forum, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 515–525, 2017

    work page 2017

  68. [68]

    Graphical overlays: Using layered elements to aid chart reading,

    N. Kong and M. Agrawala, “Graphical overlays: Using layered elements to aid chart reading,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2631–2638, 2012

    work page 2012

  69. [69]

    How does automation shape the process of narrative visualization: A survey of tools,

    Q. Chen, S. Cao, J. Wang, and N. Cao, “How does automation shape the process of narrative visualization: A survey of tools,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics , vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 4429–4448, 2024

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    A multi-level typology of abstract visualization tasks,

    M. Brehmer and T. Munzner, “A multi-level typology of abstract visualization tasks,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics , vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2376–2385, 2013

    work page 2013

  71. [71]

    What is the difference between a mountain and a molehill? quantifying semantic labeling of visual features in line charts,

    D. Bromley and V . Setlur, “What is the difference between a mountain and a molehill? quantifying semantic labeling of visual features in line charts,” in IEEE VIS, 2023, pp. 161–165

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    Rising inflation looks less severe using pre-pandemic comparisons,

    K. Dapena and P. Santilli, “Rising inflation looks less severe using pre-pandemic comparisons,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://shorturl.at/Nlq79

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    India set to overtake china as world’s most populous country,

    A. Travelli and W. Cai, “India set to overtake china as world’s most populous country,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/ 04/19/world/asia/india-china-population.html

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    V oyager 2: Augmenting visual analysis with partial view specifications,

    K. Wongsuphasawat, Z. Qu, D. Moritz, R. Chang, F. Ouk, A. Anand, J. Mackinlay, B. Howe, and J. Heer, “V oyager 2: Augmenting visual analysis with partial view specifications,” in ACM CHI, 2017, pp. 2648–2659

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    Vistrails: Enabling interactive multiple-view visualizations,

    L. Bavoil, S. P. Callahan, P. J. Crossno, J. Freire, C. E. Scheidegger, C. T. Silva, and H. T. V o, “Vistrails: Enabling interactive multiple-view visualizations,” inIEEE VIS, 2005, pp. 135–142. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2021 17

    work page 2005

  76. [76]

    Chartstory: Automated partition- ing, layout, and captioning of charts into comic-style narratives,

    J. Zhao, S. Xu, S. Chandrasegaran, C. Bryan, F. Du, A. Mishra, X. Qian, Y . Li, and K.-L. Ma, “Chartstory: Automated partition- ing, layout, and captioning of charts into comic-style narratives,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics , vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1384–1399, 2021

    work page 2021

  77. [77]

    Understanding visual cues in visualizations accompanied by audio narrations,

    H.-K. Kong, W. Zhu, Z. Liu, and K. Karahalios, “Understanding visual cues in visualizations accompanied by audio narrations,” in ACM CHI, 2019, pp. 1–13

    work page 2019

  78. [78]

    Chartseer: Interactive steering exploratory visual analysis with machine intelligence,

    J. Zhao, M. Fan, and M. Feng, “Chartseer: Interactive steering exploratory visual analysis with machine intelligence,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics , vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1500– 1513, 2020

    work page 2020

  79. [79]

    Visu- alizing dataflow graphs of deep learning models in tensorflow,

    K. Wongsuphasawat, D. Smilkov, J. Wexler, J. Wilson, D. Mane, D. Fritz, D. Krishnan, F. B. Vi ´egas, and M. Wattenberg, “Visu- alizing dataflow graphs of deep learning models in tensorflow,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics , vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2017

    work page 2017

  80. [80]

    Geo-storylines: integrating maps into storyline visualizations,

    G. Hulstein, V . Pe˜na-Araya, and A. Bezerianos, “Geo-storylines: integrating maps into storyline visualizations,” IEEE Trans. on Visual Comput. Graphics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 994–1004, 2022

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.