pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.09962 · v2 · pith:ACU4XPXZnew · submitted 2024-10-13 · 💻 cs.CV

LongHalQA: Long-Context Hallucination Evaluation for MultiModal Large Language Models

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords hallucinationdatalonghalqamllmscomplexdiscriminativeevaluatorslong
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Hallucination, a phenomenon where multimodal large language models~(MLLMs) tend to generate textual responses that are plausible but unaligned with the image, has become one major hurdle in various MLLM-related applications. Several benchmarks have been created to gauge the hallucination levels of MLLMs, by either raising discriminative questions about the existence of objects or introducing LLM evaluators to score the generated text from MLLMs. However, the discriminative data largely involve simple questions that are not aligned with real-world text, while the generative data involve LLM evaluators that are computationally intensive and unstable due to their inherent randomness. We propose LongHalQA, an LLM-free hallucination benchmark that comprises 6K long and complex hallucination text. LongHalQA is featured by GPT4V-generated hallucinatory data that are well aligned with real-world scenarios, including object/image descriptions and multi-round conversations with 14/130 words and 189 words, respectively, on average. It introduces two new tasks, hallucination discrimination and hallucination completion, unifying both discriminative and generative evaluations in a single multiple-choice-question form and leading to more reliable and efficient evaluations without the need for LLM evaluators. Further, we propose an advanced pipeline that greatly facilitates the construction of future hallucination benchmarks with long and complex questions and descriptions. Extensive experiments over multiple recent MLLMs reveal various new challenges when they are handling hallucinations with long and complex textual data. Dataset and evaluation code are available at https://github.com/hanqiu-hq/LongHalQA.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DetailVerifyBench: A Benchmark for Dense Hallucination Localization in Long Image Captions

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DetailVerifyBench supplies 1,000 images and densely annotated long captions to evaluate precise hallucination localization in multimodal large language models.

  2. Once Correct, Still Wrong: Counterfactual Hallucination in Multilingual Vision-Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VLMs exhibit sharply higher counterfactual hallucination rates in Arabic and dialects despite high true-statement accuracy, revealed by the new M²CQA benchmark and CFHR metric.

  3. V2E: Validating Smart Contract Vulnerabilities through Profit-driven Exploit Generation and Execution

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    V2E automates PoC generation, triggerability and profitability validation, and iterative refinement using LLMs to confirm exploitable smart contract vulnerabilities, outperforming baselines on 264 labeled contracts.

  4. Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey

    cs.CV 2024-04 accept novelty 5.0

    The survey organizes causes of hallucinations in MLLMs, reviews evaluation benchmarks and metrics, and outlines mitigation approaches plus open questions.