Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparative Study of RF Heating in Deep Brain Stimulation Devices During MRI at 1.5 T and 0.55 T: Challenging the Assumption of Safety at Low Field Strengths

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.19943 v1 pith:MYIRYQ4R submitted 2024-10-25 physics.med-ph

Comparative Study of RF Heating in Deep Brain Stimulation Devices During MRI at 1.5 T and 0.55 T: Challenging the Assumption of Safety at Low Field Strengths

classification physics.med-ph
keywords heatingimplantconfigurationsduringimagingfieldfrequencieshigher
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Purpose: Low-field MRI has been assumed to be implant-friendly based on limited studies. However, RF-induced heating due to an implant is a complex resonance phenomenon, highly dependent on the implant's configurations and the applied RF frequencies. This study aims to evaluate the RF heating of DBS implants during MRI at low-field strengths compared to higher field 1.5 T MRI. Methods: A commercial deep brain stimulation (DBS) implant was used in full system as well as lead only configurations to evaluate and compare RF heating during MR imaging at 0.55 T and 1.5 T. The transfer function of the device at both configurations was measured and validated at each of the frequencies, which was then used for the in vivo prediction of RF heating for realistic DBS configurations at head, chest and abdomen imaging landmarks. Results: For the lead only case, the RF heating due to the DBS was substantially smaller during imaging at 0.55 T compared to that at 1.5 T. However, for the full DBS system (longer implant), the RF heating at 0.55 T was comparable to and for some cases even higher than that at 1.5 T, reaching a level that poses risk of tissue damage in patients. Conclusions: While RF heating generally tends to be lower at low-field MRI, the case with longer implanted leads demands extra caution, due to the higher possibility of matching resonant condition at low-field-strength frequencies. Thus, specific risk evaluation for each implant and configuration is required rather than assuming that lower field strength imaging is safer.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.