pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.23997 · v2 · submitted 2024-10-31 · 🪐 quant-ph

Mutually Unbiased Bases in Composite Dimensions -- A Review

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 18:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords mutually unbiased basescomposite dimensionsexistence problemquantum informationHilbert spacesprime power dimensions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fourteen mathematically equivalent formulations recast the open question of whether complete sets of mutually unbiased bases exist in composite dimensions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review shows that it remains unknown whether maximal collections of mutually unbiased bases exist in Hilbert spaces whose dimension is not a prime power. It organises the literature around fourteen different but mathematically equivalent ways to state the existence problem. All published analytic constructions, computer searches and numerical evidence for dimensions such as six and ten are collected in one place, together with variants of the original question and suggested attack routes. A sympathetic reader cares because the answer governs which quantum measurements and information-processing tasks can be realised exactly in those dimensions.

Core claim

The existence of a complete set of mutually unbiased bases in a Hilbert space of composite dimension is an open problem that admits fourteen mathematically equivalent formulations; the review gathers every known partial result, modification and potential solution strategy under this organising principle.

What carries the argument

Mutually unbiased bases (sets of orthonormal bases in which vectors from distinct bases have constant inner-product modulus 1/sqrt(d)), together with the fourteen equivalent reformulations of the maximal-existence question that allow results from different mathematical domains to be compared directly.

If this is right

  • Any result obtained in one of the fourteen formulations immediately transfers to all the others.
  • Known non-existence results or exhaustive computer searches in small composite dimensions apply uniformly across all equivalent statements.
  • Modifications such as approximate unbiasedness or incomplete sets inherit the same equivalence structure and can be studied interchangeably.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If complete sets do not exist in dimension six, certain quantum tomography and cryptography protocols that presuppose them cannot be realised exactly with six-level systems.
  • The equivalence suggests that algebraic-geometry or combinatorial-design techniques may be as effective as direct linear-algebra attacks.
  • A general non-existence theorem would imply that the maximum number of mutually unbiased bases is strictly less than d+1 whenever d has at least two distinct prime factors.

Load-bearing premise

The fourteen formulations of the existence problem are mathematically equivalent.

What would settle it

An explicit construction of six mutually unbiased bases in dimension six, or a rigorous proof that no such set exists, would decide the central open question.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2410.23997 by Daniel McNulty, Stefan Weigert.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1: Number of preprints published annually in the sections computer sciences, mathematics and phys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Maximal sets of mutually unbiased bases are useful throughout quantum physics, both in a foundational context and for applications. To date, it remains unknown if complete sets of mutually unbiased bases exist in Hilbert spaces of dimensions different from a prime power, i.e. in composite dimensions such as six or ten. Fourteen mathematically equivalent formulations of the existence problem are presented. We comprehensively summarise analytic, computer-aided and numerical results relevant to the case of composite dimensions. Known modifications of the existence problem are reviewed and potential solution strategies are outlined.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review on mutually unbiased bases (MUBs) in quantum information. It states that the existence of complete sets of MUBs remains unknown in Hilbert spaces whose dimension is not a prime power (composite dimensions such as 6 or 10). The central organizing device is the presentation of fourteen mathematically equivalent formulations of the existence problem, followed by a comprehensive summary of analytic, computer-aided and numerical results relevant to composite dimensions, a review of known modifications of the problem, and an outline of potential solution strategies.

Significance. If the claimed equivalences among the fourteen formulations hold uniformly (including for composite dimensions) and the summary of results is accurate and complete, the review would provide a useful consolidation of the literature on this long-standing open question. Explicit credit is due for the review's attempt to organize disparate results around equivalent formulations rather than a single presentation; this structure, if rigorously supported, could help identify cross-formulation insights or obstructions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Introduction and the section(s) presenting the fourteen formulations] The claim that fourteen formulations are mathematically equivalent is load-bearing for the entire review structure (abstract and introduction). The manuscript must explicitly verify or re-derive the equivalences rather than relying solely on citations, particularly checking that no formulation introduces extra assumptions valid only for prime-power dimensions and that the equivalences survive in regimes with number-theoretic obstructions (e.g., d=6, d=10). Without such verification, the organizing principle of the review risks being incomplete.
minor comments (1)
  1. Ensure all cited analytic and numerical results for specific composite dimensions are accompanied by clear pointers to the original sources and any limitations of the methods used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for recognizing the potential value of organizing the literature around equivalent formulations. We address the single major comment below and agree that strengthening the presentation of the equivalences will improve the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Introduction and the section(s) presenting the fourteen formulations] The claim that fourteen formulations are mathematically equivalent is load-bearing for the entire review structure (abstract and introduction). The manuscript must explicitly verify or re-derive the equivalences rather than relying solely on citations, particularly checking that no formulation introduces extra assumptions valid only for prime-power dimensions and that the equivalences survive in regimes with number-theoretic obstructions (e.g., d=6, d=10). Without such verification, the organizing principle of the review risks being incomplete.

    Authors: We agree that the equivalences are central to the review's structure. While the manuscript presents the fourteen formulations and cites the literature establishing their equivalence, we acknowledge that an explicit verification tailored to composite dimensions would strengthen the exposition. In the revised version we will insert a short dedicated subsection (immediately following the list of formulations) that (i) sketches the chain of equivalences with references to the original derivations, (ii) confirms that none of the steps invoke the assumption that the dimension is a prime power, and (iii) explicitly checks the relevant number-theoretic conditions for the representative composite cases d=6 and d=10. This addition will be kept concise while making the load-bearing claim self-contained. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: review summarizes external literature without self-referential derivations

full rationale

This review paper presents no derivation chain, predictions, or fitted parameters. The statement that fourteen formulations are mathematically equivalent serves as an organizing principle drawn from the cited literature rather than a claim proven within the paper itself. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation, ansatz, or input by construction. The central observation (open existence question for non-prime-power dimensions) is reported as the current state of external results, not derived here.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors beyond the standard mathematical background of quantum information theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5602 in / 1034 out tokens · 38366 ms · 2026-05-23T18:49:32.277600+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. All pure entangled states can lead to fully nonlocal correlations

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Non-maximally entangled states exhibit full nonlocality under simple Schmidt coefficient conditions, and all pure entangled states can be activated to full nonlocality with multiple copies.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The new ten most annoy- ing questions in quantum computing,

    Aaronson, S. (2014), “The new ten most annoy- ing questions in quantum computing,” Shtetl- Optimized Blog

  2. [2]

    (2015), J

    Abdukhalikov, K. (2015), J. Algebr. Comb. 41, 1055

  3. [3]

    Bannai, and S

    Abdukhalikov, K., E. Bannai, and S. Suda (2009), J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A116, 434

  4. [4]

    (1984), in Quantum Probability and Applications to the Quantum Theory of Irreversible Processes, edited by L

    Accardi, L. (1984), in Quantum Probability and Applications to the Quantum Theory of Irreversible Processes, edited by L. Accardi, A. Frigerio, and V . Gorini (Springer) pp. 1–19

  5. [5]

    Adamson, R. B. A., and A. M. Steinberg (2010), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 030406

  6. [6]

    Agaian, S. S. (1985), Hadamard Matrices and Ap- plications (Springer LNM)

  7. [7]

    Aguilar, E. A., J. J. Borkała, P . Mironowicz, and M. Pawłowski (2018), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 050501

  8. [8]

    Charnes (2018), Phys

    Alber, G., and C. Charnes (2018), Phys. Scr. 94, 014007

  9. [9]

    (1980), IEEE Trans

    Alltop, W. (1980), IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 26, 350

  10. [10]

    Emerson (2007), in Twenty- Second Annual Conference on IEEE Computational Complexity (IEEE) pp

    Ambainis, A., and J. Emerson (2007), in Twenty- Second Annual Conference on IEEE Computational Complexity (IEEE) pp. 129–140

  11. [11]

    Nayak, A

    Ambainis, A., A. Nayak, A. Ta-Shma, and U. Vazirani (1999), in Proceedings of the thirty- first annual ACM symposium on Theory of comput- ing (Association for Computing Machinery) pp. 376–383

  12. [12]

    Sharma, D

    Amburg, I., R. Sharma, D. M. Sussman, and W. K. Wootters (2014), J. Math. Phys.55, 122206

  13. [13]

    Bengtsson (2017), Rep

    Andersson, O., and I. Bengtsson (2017), Rep. Math. Phys. 79, 33

  14. [14]

    Appleby, D. M. (2007), Opt. Spectrosc. 103, 416

  15. [15]

    Appleby, D. M., I. Bengtsson, and H. B. Dang (2014), arXiv:1409.7987

  16. [16]

    Appleby, D. M., H. B. Dang, and C. A. Fuchs (2014), Entropy 16, 1484

  17. [17]

    Bengtsson, M

    Appleby, M., I. Bengtsson, M. Grassl, M. Har- rison, and G. McConnell (2022), J. Math. Phys. 63, 112205

  18. [18]

    Chien, S

    Appleby, M., T.-Y. Chien, S. Flammia, and S. Waldron (2018), J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51, 165302

  19. [19]

    Aravind, P . K. (2003), Z. Naturforsch. A58, 85

  20. [20]

    (2005), J

    Archer, C. (2005), J. Math. Phys. 46, 022106

  21. [21]

    Aschbacher, M., A. M. Childs, and P . Wocjan (2007), J. Algebr. Comb. 25, 111

  22. [22]

    Avella, V . G., J. Czartowski, D. Goyeneche, and K. ˙Zyczkowski (2024), arXiv:2404.18847

  23. [23]
  24. [24]

    Square multiples n give in- finitely many cyclic n-roots,

    Backelin, J. (1989), “Square multiples n give in- finitely many cyclic n-roots,” Stockholms Uni- versitet

  25. [25]

    Bae, J., A. Bera, D. Chru´ sci ´ nski, B. C. Hiesmayr, and D. McNulty (2022), J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 15, 505303

  26. [26]

    Bae, J., B. C. Hiesmayr, and D. McNulty (2019), New J. Phys. 21, 013012

  27. [27]

    Sohbi, J

    Baek, K., A. Sohbi, J. Lee, J. Kim, and H. Nha (2020), New J. Phys. 22, 093019

  28. [28]

    Balan, R., B. G. Bodmann, P . G. Casazza, and D. Edidin (2009), J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 15, 488

  29. [29]

    A., and S

    Ballester, M. A., and S. Wehner (2007), Phys. Rev. A 75, 022319

  30. [30]

    Bandeira, A. S., N. Doppelbauer, and D. Kunisky (2022), Sampl. Theory Signal Process. Data Anal. 20, 18

  31. [31]

    Bandyopadhyay, S., P . O. Boykin, V . Roychow- dhury, and F. Vatan (2002), Algorithmica34, 512

  32. [32]

    Mandayam (2013), Phys

    Bandyopadhyay, S., and P . Mandayam (2013), Phys. Rev. A 87, 042120

  33. [33]

    (2019), arXiv:1910.06911

    Banica, T. (2019), arXiv:1910.06911

  34. [34]

    Bichon, and J.-M

    Banica, T., J. Bichon, and J.-M. Schlenker (2009), J. Funct. Anal. 257, 2864

  35. [35]

    Nicoara (2007), Panamer

    Banica, T., and R. Nicoara (2007), Panamer. Math. J. 17, 1

  36. [36]

    Dietrich, and C

    Barrera Acevedo, S., H. Dietrich, and C. Lionis (2024), Des. Codes Cryptogr. , 1

  37. [37]

    ˇCernoch, K

    Bartkiewicz, K., A. ˇCernoch, K. Lemr, A. Mir- anowicz, and F. Nori (2016), Phys. Rev. A 93, 062345

  38. [38]

    Cramer, and M

    Baumgratz, T., M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio (2014), Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401

  39. [39]

    Bavaresco, J., M. T. Quintino, L. Guerini, T. O. Maciel, D. Cavalcanti, and M. T. Cunha (2017), Phys. Rev. A 96, 022110

  40. [40]

    Mutually unbiased bases in multi-partite continuous- variable systems,

    Beales, A., and S. Weigert (2024), “Mutually unbiased bases in multi-partite continuous- variable systems,” Unpublished

  41. [41]

    Nicoara (2008), Lin

    Beauchamp, K., and R. Nicoara (2008), Lin. Alg. Appl. 428, 1833

  42. [42]

    Peres (2000), Phys

    Bechmann-Pasquinucci, H., and A. Peres (2000), Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3313

  43. [43]

    Smotrovs (2008), in Math- ematical Methods in Computer Science , edited by J

    Belovs, A., and J. Smotrovs (2008), in Math- ematical Methods in Computer Science , edited by J. Calmet, W. Geiselmann, and J. Müller-Quade (Springer) pp. 50–69

  44. [44]

    Pastawski, and J

    Bendersky, A., F. Pastawski, and J. P . Paz (2008), Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 190403

  45. [45]

    Beneduci, R., T. J. Bullock, P . Busch, C. Carmeli, T. Heinosaari, and A. Toigo (2013), Phys. Rev. A 88, 032312

  46. [46]

    (2005), AIP Conf

    Bengtsson, I. (2005), AIP Conf. Proc. 750, 63

  47. [47]

    (2007), AIP Conf

    Bengtsson, I. (2007), AIP Conf. Proc. 889, 40

  48. [48]

    (2010), J

    Bengtsson, I. (2010), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 254, 012007

  49. [49]

    Blanchfield, and A

    Bengtsson, I., K. Blanchfield, and A. Cabello (2012), Phys. Lett. A 376, 374. 69

  50. [50]

    Bruzda, Å

    Bengtsson, I., W. Bruzda, Å. Ericsson, J.-Å. Larsson, W. Tadej, and K. ˙Zyczkowski (2007), J. Math. Phys. 48, 052106

  51. [51]

    Ericsson (2005), Open Syst

    Bengtsson, I., and Å. Ericsson (2005), Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 12, 107

  52. [52]

    Grassl, and G

    Bengtsson, I., M. Grassl, and G. McConnell (2024), arXiv:2403.02872

  53. [53]

    On discrete structures in finite Hilbert spaces

    Bengtsson, I., and K. ˙Zyczkowski (2017), arXiv:1701.07902

  54. [54]

    H., and G

    Bennett, C. H., and G. Brassard (1984), in Pro- ceedings of IEEE International Conference on Com- puters, Systems and Signal Processing (IEEE) pp. 175–179

  55. [55]

    V ., and J

    Berry, M. V ., and J. P . Keating (1999), SIAM Rev. 41, 236

  56. [56]

    Kharaghani (2010), Cryptogr

    Best, D., and H. Kharaghani (2010), Cryptogr. Commun. 2, 199

  57. [57]

    Entov, and L

    Biran, P ., M. Entov, and L. Polterovich (2004), Commun. Contemp. Math. 6, 793

  58. [58]

    (1985), in Recent Advances in Four- ier Analysis and Its Applications , edited by J

    Björck, G. (1985), in Recent Advances in Four- ier Analysis and Its Applications , edited by J. S. Byrnes and J. L. Byrnes (Springer) pp. 131–140

  59. [59]

    Fröberg (1991), J

    Björck, G., and R. Fröberg (1991), J. Symbolic Comput. 12, 329

  60. [60]

    Saffari (1995), C

    Björck, G., and B. Saffari (1995), C. R. Acad. Sci. 320, 319

  61. [61]

    Jungnickel, and B

    Blokhuis, A., D. Jungnickel, and B. Schmidt (2002), Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 130, 1473

  62. [62]

    MUBs in infinite di- mensions: The problematic analogy between L2(R) and Cd,

    Blume-Kohout, R. (2008), “MUBs in infinite di- mensions: The problematic analogy between L2(R) and Cd,” Talk presented at “Seeking SICs: A Workshop on Quantum Frames and Designs” (Ontario, Canada)

  63. [63]

    Haas (2018), Proc

    Bodmann, B., and J. Haas (2018), Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 146, 2601

  64. [64]

    (1928), Nature 121, 580

    Bohr, N. (1928), Nature 121, 580

  65. [65]

    Zhdanovskiy (2016), J

    Bondal, A., and I. Zhdanovskiy (2016), J. Math. Sci. 216, 23

  66. [66]

    Borkała, J. J., C. Jebarathinam, S. Sarkar, and R. Augusiak (2022), Entropy 24, 350

  67. [67]

    (1926), Z

    Born, M. (1926), Z. Phys. 37, 863

  68. [68]

    The "mean king's problem" with continuous variables

    Botero, A., and Y. Aharonov (2007), arXiv:0710.2952

  69. [69]

    (2018), Quantum 2, 111

    Bouchard, F., et al. (2018), Quantum 2, 111

  70. [70]

    Boykin, P . O., M. Sitharam, M. Tarifi, and P . Woc- jan (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0502024

  71. [71]

    Boykin, P . O., M. Sitharam, P . H. Tiep, and P . Wocjan (2007), Quantum Inf. Comput.7, 371

  72. [72]

    Dall’Arno, and A

    Brandsen, S., M. Dall’Arno, and A. Szymusiak (2016), Phys. Rev. A 94, 022335

  73. [73]

    L., and P

    Braunstein, S. L., and P . Van Loock (2005), Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513

  74. [74]

    Bravyi, S., and J. A. Smolin (2011), Phys. Rev. A 84, 042306

  75. [75]

    Quantum Key Distribution Highly Sensitive to Eavesdropping

    Brierley, S. (2009), arXiv:0910.2578

  76. [76]

    Weigert (2008), Phys

    Brierley, S., and S. Weigert (2008), Phys. Rev. A 78, 042312

  77. [77]

    Weigert (2009), Phys

    Brierley, S., and S. Weigert (2009), Phys. Rev. A 79, 052316

  78. [78]

    Weigert (2010), J

    Brierley, S., and S. Weigert (2010), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 254, 012008

  79. [79]

    Weigert, and I

    Brierley, S., S. Weigert, and I. Bengtsson (2010), Quantum Inf. Comput. 10, 803

  80. [80]

    H., and H

    Bruck, R. H., and H. J. Ryser (1949), Canad. J. Math. 1, 9

Showing first 80 references.