Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 80 references

Specific heat at low temperatures in quasiplanar molecular crystals: Where do glassy anomalies in minimally disordered crystals come from?

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports that the quasiplanar molecular crystal TCMX, with only three frozen in-plane molecular orientations, exhibits the same low-temperature specific-heat anomalies as glasses, and that these anomalies do not scale with the…

desk verdict The TCMX specific-heat data are solid and the Granato correlation is a nice empirical observation, but the headline claim that TLS density does not correlate with orientational disorder rests on unmeasured site populations and n=3. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03335 v1 pith:PB2NT5RP submitted 2024-12-04 cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.soft

Daria Szewczyk , Manuel Moratalla , Grzegorz Chajewski , Jonathan F. Gebbia , Andrzej Jeżowski , Alexander I. Krivchikov , María Barrio , Josep Ll. Tamarit
show 1 more author
Miguel A. Ramos
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.soft
keywords low-temperaturespecificheattwo-levelsystemsbosonpeakorientationaldisordermolecularcrystalsDebyetemperatureglassyanomaliesquasiplanarmolecules
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports low-temperature specific-heat measurements on tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX), a crystal whose molecules can sit in three in-plane orientations that freeze into static disorder. The measurements show the two classic glass signatures: a linear contribution below 1 K attributed to tunneling two-level systems, and a boson peak around 6.6 K in $C_p/T^3$. Comparing TCMX with two related quasiplanar crystals with two and six orientations, the paper argues that the density of two-level systems does not grow with the number of available orientations; instead, molecular asymmetry seems to matter. It also finds that the ratio of Debye temperature to boson-peak temperature is close to 35 across many disordered crystals, supporting the idea that the boson peak marks hybridized quasilocalized vibrations and phonons. If correct, this shows that only minimal orientational disorder is needed for glass-like thermal anomalies, and that counting disorder configurations is not enough to predict them.

What carries the argument

The analysis rests on the Soft-Potential Model decomposition of the specific heat below about 2 K, $C_p = C_{\mathrm{TLS}}T + C_D T^3 + C_{\mathrm{sm}}T^5$, whose linear term isolates the two-level-system contribution and whose cubic coefficient gives the Debye temperature $\Theta_D$ through $C_D = (1944\alpha)/\Theta_D^3$ J/mol·K$^4$. The boson-peak temperature $T_{\mathrm{BP}}$ is read off as the maximum in $C_p/T^3$. The key comparative device is the pair (number of in-plane molecular orientations, $C_{\mathrm{TLS}}$, $T_{\mathrm{BP}}$) across p-CNB, TCMX, and PCNB, which shows no monotonic relation; the key ratio is $\Theta_D/T_{\mathrm{BP}}$, which falls near 35 for the quasiplanar crystals and bromo-benzophenones. The paper interprets these findings as evidence that the boson peak emerges from hybridization of quasilocalized vibrations with extended phonons, rather than from isolated tunneling defects.

What would settle it

Cool a TCMX sample slowly enough for the three in-plane orientations to equilibrate and measure $C_p$ below 1 K; if the linear term and the $C_p/T^3$ maximum persist in the fully ordered state, the glassy anomalies are not caused by frozen orientational disorder.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that TCMX, a monoclinic $P2_1/c$ crystal whose asymmetric unit has three in-plane orientations related by a three-fold-like axis, behaves like a glass at low temperatures despite being a crystal. Below about 1 K its specific heat contains a linear term $C_{\mathrm{TLS}}T$ with $C_{\mathrm{TLS}} = 0.371 \pm 0.015$ mJ/mol·K$^2$, which the authors attribute to two-level systems, and in the Debye-reduced representation $C_p/T^3$ it shows a broad maximum at $T_{\mathrm{BP}} \approx 6.6$ K, the boson peak. Across three quasiplanar molecular crystals with 2, 3, and 6 in-plane orientations, the linear coefficient is 0.507, 0.371, and 1.06 mJ/mol·K$^2$ respectively, so the density of two-level systems does not correlate with the number of orientational states. The paper therefore proposes that the driving factor is not the number of disorder configurations but the molecular asymmetry, specifically the replacement of a nitro group by substituents of similar van der Waals volume, which distorts the medium-range order. Finally, the paper reports that the ratio $\Theta_D/T_{\mathrm{BP}} \approx 35$ holds for the studied crystals and for a set of bromo-benzophenone crystals, matching a simple interstitialcy-model estimate and appearing as a lower bound for structural glasses.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the crystallographically possible molecular orientations are energetically equivalent and actually freeze into static disorder at low temperature, so that comparing the measured heat-signal defect density with the number of orientations is meaningful; if TCMX's true ground state is partially ordered, or its reorientation barriers differ strongly between sites, the no-correlation conclusion collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • TCMX is a new example where a crystal with only three in-plane molecular orientations displays both TLS and a boson peak, so minimal orientational disorder is sufficient for the glassy signature.
  • The absence of correlation between $C_{\mathrm{TLS}}$ and the number of orientations (2, 3, 6) implies that counting orientational states cannot predict the strength of the low-temperature anomalies.
  • Since p-CNB shows a linear TLS term but no boson peak, the two anomalies can be decoupled; a given material need not show both.
  • For the studied quasiplanar crystals and the bromo-benzophenone crystals, the ratio $\Theta_D/T_{\mathrm{BP}} \approx 35$ provides a quantitative rule connecting the boson-peak position to the Debye scale.
  • In structural glasses, the same ratio appears as a lower bound rather than a universal constant, suggesting that some additional mechanism raises the boson-peak temperature relative to the Debye scale.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If molecular asymmetry is the true control parameter, an immediate test is to measure $C_{\mathrm{TLS}}$ in a series of quasiplanar crystals with identical symmetry but substituents whose van der Waals volumes are varied systematically; one would expect $C_{\mathrm{TLS}}$ to track the volume mismatch rather than the number of orientations.
  • The $\Theta_D/T_{\mathrm{BP}} \approx 35$ relation observed even in fully ordered crystals suggests the boson-peak-like anomaly may be a generic feature of soft lattice dynamics, so extending the comparison to other weakly bonded ordered molecular crystals would sharpen whether the relation is a universal scale or a coincidence of this family.
  • Because p-CNB has TLS without a boson peak, measuring its thermal conductivity and acoustic attenuation would test whether the two anomalies have independent microscopic origins in minimally disordered crystals.
  • A practical extension would be to use the ratio as a screening rule for amorphous pharmaceuticals: a terahertz-spectroscopy estimate of $T_{\mathrm{BP}}$ could predict where the specific-heat anomaly sits without full low-temperature calorimetry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports low-temperature specific heat measurements (0.15–25 K) of TCMX, a monoclinic P2_1/c crystal formed by quasiplanar molecules with dynamic orientational disorder, measured in three independent setups. It finds a linear TLS contribution C_TLS = 0.371 ± 0.015 mJ/mol·K^2 and a boson-peak maximum in Cp/T^3 at ≈6.6 K. Using Soft-Potential Model fits, it compares these results with those for p-CNB and PCNB, concluding that the density of TLS does not correlate with the number of in-plane orientational states (2, 3, and 6) and that molecular asymmetry and global lattice distortion are more relevant. The paper then compiles literature data on many disordered crystals and glasses, finding that the ratio Θ_D/T_BP ≈ 35 holds for many systems, in agreement with Granato's interstitialcy prediction, with the ratio behaving as a lower bound for structural glasses.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper is significant because TCMX is a minimally disordered crystal with a diffraction-characterized disorder (three in-plane orientations) that nevertheless exhibits canonical glassy anomalies; the apparent absence of a simple correlation between TLS density and orientational multiplicity is a useful constraint on microscopic theories of glassy behavior. The broad compilation of Θ_D/T_BP values for disordered crystals and glasses provides a valuable empirical benchmark, and the ratio is not a fitted quantity: T_BP is read from raw Cp/T^3 data and Θ_D is obtained from the fitted Debye coefficient via Eq. (1), with the Granato prediction serving as an external consistency check. The main limitation is inferential: the no-correlation conclusion rests on only three materials and an unverified equal-population assumption, and the crystal histogram contains pronounced outliers that need quantitative discussion.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV.A and Table 1] The claim that the TLS density does not correlate with the degree of orientational disorder is not established by the data as presented. With only three materials, the C_TLS values per gram-atom (36.2, 20.6, and 75.7 μJ/g-at K^2 for 2, 3, and 6 orientations) are consistent with a nonmonotonic trend but also with noise or a U-shaped dependence; absence of correlation cannot be proven from n = 3. In addition, the premise that all crystallographic orientations are equally populated and remain frozen at low temperature is explicitly assumed in Section I ('Disregarding possible differences of fractional populations …'), with the only cited support (ref. [53]) referring to a different molecule, 1,2,3-trichloro-4,5,6-trimethylbenzene. The paper should either reframe the conclusion as 'no monotonic trend in these three compounds' and provide error bars or occupancy information for the orientation counts, or supply direct low-temperature evidence (e.g., site-occupancy refinement, NMR, or dielectric relaxation) that the multiplicity 3 is indeed the operative disorder count in TCMX.
  2. [Section IV.B and Tables 3–4] The text states that in disordered crystals the Granato ratio 'coincides well with the average value', but Table 3 contains pronounced outliers: CBr2Cl2 (16.6), CBrCl3 (21.0), CCl4 (19.0), and ThBr4 (11.6) lie far below 35, while cyclohexanol (54.1), TPD (53.1), and (NaCN)x(KCN)1−x mixtures (40.9–54.4) lie well above. The histograms in Fig. 6 should be supplemented with quantitative summaries (mean, median, standard deviation, and counts above/below 35) for both crystals and glasses, and the claimed lower-bound behavior for glasses should be tested statistically rather than asserted from visual inspection. As written, the correlation is supported for many systems, but the outliers are not discussed, so the generality of the claim is overstated.
  3. [Section III, Eq. (1), Table 2] The Debye temperature is obtained from the fitted cubic coefficient C_D via Eq. (1), which normalizes to the total number of atoms per molecule (α). In a molecular crystal, however, the low-temperature T^3 contribution arises from acoustic phonons only, while Eq. (1) implicitly assigns all 3α modes per molecule to the Debye term. This makes Θ_D a 'calorimetric' Debye temperature with a specific normalization convention, not the acoustic Debye temperature. The manuscript should state this convention explicitly and discuss whether the Θ_D/T_BP correlation is robust to alternative normalizations (e.g., acoustic-only mode count or elastic-constant Debye temperatures), especially because Table 2 mixes materials with different α and Z.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'a linear in contribution in Cp' should read 'a linear-in-T contribution to Cp'.
  2. [Section IV.A] 'with an accountable number of (in-plane) molecular orientations' should be 'with a countable number of (in-plane) molecular orientations'.
  3. [Table 1] The header 'per g-at' should be written out as 'per g-atom'; also, the missing value for ΔCp/T^3@BP for p-CNB should be explained in the caption.
  4. [Figure 4] No error bars are shown for Θ_D and T_BP; at least for the three main materials the uncertainties should be indicated or their absence justified.
  5. [Eq. (1)] The units of the constant 1944 and of C_D should be stated explicitly (e.g., C_D in J·mol^−1·K^−4, α atoms per molecule) to avoid confusion with the mJ units used in Table 1.
  6. [References] Reference [60] is incomplete: the entry for R. Li et al. trails off into '[61]' and should be completed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central claims are empirical comparisons of independently measured quantities.

full rationale

The paper's quantitative claims are not constructed from their own outputs. The TLS linear coefficient C_TLS is obtained from the intercept of a Cp/T vs T^2 fit; the Debye coefficient C_D is independently fitted from the cubic term and converted to Theta_D via the standard relation of Eq. (1); and T_BP is read directly from the maximum in Cp/T^3. The T_BP vs Theta_D ratio is then compared with Granato's external theoretical prediction Theta_D/T_BP ~ 35, rather than being used to generate that prediction. The claim that TLS density does not correlate with orientational disorder is also an empirical comparison: C_TLS values for p-CNB, TCMX and PCNB come from separate calorimetric datasets, while the orientation counts come from crystallographic studies. The admitted assumption in Section I that fractional populations are disregarded ('Disregarding the possible differences of fractional populations in the various orientations...') is an unverified modeling premise and a possible weakness, but it does not make the comparison circular. Author self-citations, such as using earlier published PCNB data from ref. [18] or the data compilation in ref. [15], supply independent experimental results rather than a self-referential justification. No equation or fitted parameter is defined in terms of the conclusion it is used to support, so no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on fitted specific-heat coefficients, on the Tunneling and Soft-Potential Models, and on the assumption that orientational disorder is frozen and countable. No new entities are postulated; the T_D-T_BP correlation is an empirical observation.

free parameters (9)
  • C_TLS (p-CNB) = 0.507 ± 0.081 mJ/(mol K^2)
    Linear specific-heat coefficient from SPM fit, attributed to two-level systems; used in no-correlation analysis.
  • C_D (p-CNB) = 9.42 ± 0.08 mJ/(mol K^4)
    Cubic Debye coefficient from SPM fit; used to compute Debye temperature.
  • C_sm (p-CNB) = -0.043 ± 0.012 mJ/(mol K^6)
    Fifth-order SPM coefficient; negative value indicates it is a mathematical correction for the missing boson peak, not a physical soft-mode term.
  • C_TLS (TCMX) = 0.371 ± 0.015 mJ/(mol K^2)
    Linear specific-heat coefficient from SPM fit, attributed to two-level systems; used in no-correlation analysis.
  • C_D (TCMX) = 3.59 ± 0.012 mJ/(mol K^4)
    Cubic Debye coefficient from SPM fit; used to compute Debye temperature.
  • C_sm (TCMX) = 0.142 ± 0.002 mJ/(mol K^6)
    Fifth-order SPM coefficient; used to reproduce the boson peak wing in the fit.
  • C_TLS (PCNB) = 1.06 ± 0.11 mJ/(mol K^2)
    Linear specific-heat coefficient from SPM fit, attributed to two-level systems; used in no-correlation analysis.
  • C_D (PCNB) = 6.82 ± 0.08 mJ/(mol K^4)
    Cubic Debye coefficient from SPM fit; used to compute Debye temperature.
  • C_sm (PCNB) = 0.072 ± 0.009 mJ/(mol K^6)
    Fifth-order SPM coefficient; used to reproduce the boson peak wing in the fit.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The linear term in Cp below 1 K is caused by two-level systems described by the Tunneling Model.
    Invoked in Section III when assigning the intercept in Cp/T vs T^2 to TLS; standard in glass physics but an interpretation, not a measurement, for this crystal.
  • domain assumption The Soft-Potential Model Cp = C_TLS T + C_D T^3 + C_sm T^5 describes the heat capacity over the fitted temperature range.
    Used in Section III and Appendix B; the negative C_sm for p-CNB shows the model is being applied beyond its physical scope.
  • domain assumption The crystallographically determined molecular orientations (2 for p-CNB, 3 for TCMX, 6 for PCNB) are energetically equivalent and frozen at low temperature.
    Assumed in Section IV.A when comparing TLS densities to the number of orientational states; the paper does not measure site populations or low-temperature dynamics.
  • domain assumption The Debye background is correctly given by C_D T^3 and the Debye temperature computed via Eq. (1) is a meaningful material property.
    Used in Section IV.B for the T_BP-T_D correlation; if optical modes contribute to the T^3 term, the correlation is distorted.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Specific heat at low temperatures in quasiplanar molecular crystals: Where do glassy anomalies in minimally disordered crystals come from?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PB2NT5RP

@misc{pith2026241203335,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Specific heat at low temperatures in quasiplanar molecular crystals: Where do glassy anomalies in minimally disordered crystals come from?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PB2NT5RP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03335}
}
read the original abstract

We present low-temperature specific heat (Cp) measurements of a monoclinic P2_{1}/c crystal formed by quasiplanar molecules of tetrachloro-m-xylene. The dynamic disorder frozen at low-temperature of the asymmetric unit (formed by a half molecule) consists of reorientation around a three-fold-like axis perpendicular to the benzene ring. Such a minimal disorder gives rise to typical glassy anomalies, as a linear in contribution in Cp ascribed to two-level systems and a broad maximum around 6.6 K in Cp/T^3 (the boson peak). We discuss these results in the framework of other quasiplanar molecular crystals with different accountable number of in-plane molecular orientations We find that the density of two-level systems does not correlate with the degree of orientational disorder. Rather, it is the molecular asymmetry that seems to play a relevant role in the thermal anomalies. Furthermore, we discuss the suggested correlation between the boson peak and Debye temperatures. We find that a linear correlation between the boson peak and Debye temperatures holds for many -- but not all -- structural glasses and strikingly holds even better for some disordered crystals, including our studied quasiplanar molecular crystals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.03335 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. shows the specific heat of TCMX crystals, plotted in the usual Debye-reduced Cp/T 3 representation. Data obtained utilizing different experimental setups and methods show an excellent agreement, which supports their high reliability and accuracy. Over the cubic Debye contribution (horizontal dashed line), an upturn at the lowest temperatures (due to TLS) and a broad maximum (BP) typical of glasses are clearly observ… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Relation of TBP vs D for all the crystals from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [53]

    Bräuniger, R

    T. Bräuniger, R. Poupko, Z. Luz, D. Reichert, H. Zimmermann, H. Schmitt, and U. Haeberlen. Orientational disorder in 1,2,3-trichloro-4,5,6-trimethylbenzene. A single crystal deuterium NMR study of the site populations and dynamics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 3, 1891−1903 (2001)

    work page 2001

  2. [1]

    R. C. Zeller and R. O. Pohl. Thermal Conductivity and Specific Heat of Noncrystalline Solids. Phys. Rev. B 4, 2029−2041 (1971)

    work page 1971

  3. [2]

    W. A. Phillips (ed.), Amorphous Solids: Low Temperature Properties (Springer, Berlin, 1981)

    work page 1981

  4. [3]

    R. O. Pohl, X. Liu and E. J. Thompson. Low-temperature thermal conductivity and acoustic attenuation in amorphous solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 991−1013 (2002)

    work page 2002

  5. [4]

    M. A. Ramos (ed.), Low-temperature thermal and vibrational properties of solids: a half-century of universal ‘‘anomalies’’ of glasses (World Scientific, London-Singapore, 2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [5]

    P. Debye. Zur Theorie der spezifischen Wärmen. Ann. d. Physik 39, 789−807 (1912)

    work page 1912

  7. [6]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Saunders, Philadelphia, 1976)

    work page 1976

  8. [7]

    Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics (8th edn., Wiley, USA, 2005)

    C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics (8th edn., Wiley, USA, 2005)

    work page 2005

Show all 80 references
  1. [8]

    Bonjour, R

    E. Bonjour, R. Calemczuk, R. Lagnier, and B. Salce. Low temperature thermal prop- 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 SPM fit p-CNB Cp/T (J mol- 1K-2) T 2 (K2) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 22 erties of cyclohexanol: a glassy...

    1981

  2. [9]

    J. J. De Yoreo, W. Knaak, M. Meissner, and R. O. Pohl. Low-temperature properties of Crystalline (KBr)1−x (KCN)x. Phys. Rev. B 34, 8828−8842 (1986)

    1986

  3. [10]

    M. A. Ramos, S. Vieira, F. J. Bermejo, J. Dawidowski, H. E. Fischer, H. Schober, M. A. González, C. K. Loong, and D. L. Price. Quantitative assessment of the effects of orientational and positional disorder on glassy dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 82−85 (1997)

    1997

  4. [11]

    Talón, M

    C. Talón, M. A. Ramos, S. Vieira, G. J. Cuello, F. J. Bermejo, A. Criado, M. L. Senent, S. M. Bennington, H. E. Fischer, and H. Schober. Low-temperature specific heat and glassy dynamics of a polymorphic molecular solid Phys. Rev. B 58, 745−755 (1998)

    1998

  5. [12]

    Esquinazi (ed.), Tunnelling Systems in Amorphous and Crystalline Solids, (Springer, Berlin, 1998)

    P. Esquinazi (ed.), Tunnelling Systems in Amorphous and Crystalline Solids, (Springer, Berlin, 1998)

    1998

  6. [13]

    Talón, M

    C. Talón, M. A. Ramos, and S. Vieira. Low-temperature specific heat of amorphous, orientational glass, and crystal phases of ethanol. Phys. Rev. B 66, 012201 (2002)

    2002

  7. [14]

    G. A. Vdovichenko, A. I. Krivchikov, O. A. Korolyuk, J. Ll. Tamarit, L. C. Pardo, M. Rovira-Esteva, F. J. Bermejo, M. Hassaine and M. A. Ramos. Thermal properties of halogen-ethane glassy crystals: Effects of orientational disorder and the role of internal molecular degrees of...

    2015

  8. [15]

    Anomalies

    M. A. Ramos, Low-Temperature Specific Heat of Glasses and Disordered Crystals, in Low-Temperature and Vibrational Properties of Disordered Solids: A Half-Century of “Anomalies” of Glasses, edited by M. A. Ramos (World Scientific, London/Singapore, 2022), Chapter 2

    2022

  9. [16]

    Anomalies

    A. I. Krivchikov and A. Jeżowski, Thermal Conductivity of Glasses and Disordered Crystals, in Low-Temperature and Vibrational Properties of Disordered Solids: A Half- Century of “Anomalies” of Glasses, edited by M. A. Ramos (World Scientific, London/Singapore, 2022), Chapter 3

    2022

  10. [17]

    Saito, H

    K. Saito, H. Kobayashi, Y. Miyazaki, and M. Sorai. Anomalous lattice heat capacity of orientationally glassy crystal of p-chloronitrobenzene at low temperatures. Solid State Commun. 118, 611−614 (2001)

    2001

  11. [18]

    J. F. Gebbia, M. A. Ramos, D. Szewczyk, A. Jeżowski, A. I. Krivchikov, Y. V. Horbatenko, T. Guidi, F. J. Bermejo, and J. Ll. Tamarit. Glassy Anomalies in the Low- Temperature Thermal Properties of a Minimally Disordered Crystalline Solid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 215506 (2017)

    2017

  12. [19]

    Moratalla, J

    M. Moratalla, J. F. Gebbia, M. A. Ramos, L. C. Pardo, S. Mukhopadhyay, S. Rudić, F. Fernandez-Alonso, F. J. Bermejo, and J. Ll. Tamarit. Emergence of glassy features in halomethane crystals. Phys. Rev. B 99, 024301 (2019)

    2019

  13. [20]

    A. I. Krivchikov, A. Jeżowski, D. Szewczyk, O. A. Korolyuk, O. O. Romantsova, L. M. Buravtseva, C. Cazorla, and J. Ll. Tamarit. Role of Optical Phonons and 23 Anharmonicity in the Appearance of the Heat Capacity Boson Peak-like Anomaly in Fully Ordered Molecular Crystals. J. P...

    2022

  14. [21]

    Miyazaki, M

    Y. Miyazaki, M. Nakano, A. I. Krivchikov, O. A. Koroyuk, J. F. Gebbia, C. Cazorla and J. Ll Tamarit. Low-Temperature Heat Capacity Anomalies in Ordered and Disordered Phases of Normal and Deuterated Thiophene. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 2112−2117 (2021)

    2021

  15. [22]

    Szewczyk, J

    D. Szewczyk, J. F. Gebbia, A. Jeżowski, A. I. Krivchikov, T. Guidi, C. Cazorla and J. Ll Tamarit. Heat capacity anomalies of the molecular crystal 1‑fluoro‑adamantane at low temperaturas. Sci. Rep. 11, 18640 (2021)

    2021

  16. [23]

    Hunklinger and W

    S. Hunklinger and W. Arnold , Ultrasonic Properties of Glasses at Low Temperatures, i n Physical Acoustics , edited by W. P. Mason and R. N. Thurston (Academic, New York, 1976), Vol. 12, pp. 155–215

    1976

  17. [24]

    W. A. Phillips. Two-level states in glasses. Rep. Prog. Phys. 50, 1657−1708 (1987)

    1987

  18. [25]

    Buchenau, G

    U. Buchenau, G. D’Angelo, G. Carini, X. Liu, and M. A. Ramos. Sound absorption in glasses. Reviews in Physics 9, 100078 (2022)

    2022

  19. [26]

    W. A. Phillips. Tunneling states in amorphous solids. J. Low Temp. Phys. 7, 351−360 (1972)

    1972

  20. [27]

    P. W. Anderson, B. I. Halperin, and C. M. Varma. Anomalous thermal properties of glasses and spin glasses. Philos. Mag. 25, 1−9 (1972)

    1972

  21. [28]

    Buchenau, N

    U. Buchenau, N. Nücker and A. J. Dianoux. Neutron scattering study of the low- frequency vibrations in vitreous silica. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2316−2319 (1984)

    1984

  22. [29]

    Buchenau, M

    U. Buchenau, M. Prager, N. Nücker, A. J. Dianoux, N. Ahmad and W. A. Phillips. Low frequency modes in vitreous silica. Phys. Rev. B 34, 5665−5673 (1986)

    1986

  23. [30]

    V. K. Malinovsky, V. N. Novikov, P. P. Parshin, A. P. Sokolov and M. G. Zemlyanov. Universal form of the low -energy (2 to 10 meV ) vibrational spectrum of glasses. Europhys. Lett. 11, 43−47 (1990)

    1990

  24. [31]

    M. A. Il’in, V. G. Karpov and D. A. Parshin. Parameters of soft potentials in glasses. Sov. Phys. JETP 65, 165−174 (1987)

    1987

  25. [32]

    Buchenau, Yu.M

    U. Buchenau, Yu.M. Galperin, V. L. Gurevich, D. A. Parshin, M. A. Ramos, and H. R. Schober. Interactions of soft modes and sound waves in glasses. Phys. Rev. B 46, 2798−2808 (1992)

    1992

  26. [33]

    T. S. Grigera, V. Martín-Mayor, G. Parisi, and P. Verrocchio. Phonon interpretation of the ‘boson peak’ in supercooled liquids. Nature (London) 422, 289−292 (2003)

    2003

  27. [34]

    V. L. Gurevich, D. A. Parshin, and H. R. Schober. Anharmonicity, vibrational instability, and the Boson peak in glasses. Phys. Rev. B 67, 094203 (2003)

    2003

  28. [35]

    D. A. Parshin, H. R. Schober, and V. L. Gurevich. Vibrational instability, two-level systems, and the Boson peak in glasses. Phys. Rev. B 76, 064206 (2007). 24

    2007

  29. [36]

    boson peak

    W. Schirmacher. Thermal conductivity of glassy materials and the “boson peak”. Europhys. Lett. 73, 892−898 (2006)

    2006

  30. [37]

    Schirmacher, G

    W. Schirmacher, G. Ruocco, and T. Scopigno. Acoustic Attenuation in Glasses and its Relation with the Boson Peak. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 025501 (2007)

    2007

  31. [38]

    Lubchenko and P

    V. Lubchenko and P. G. Wolynes. The origin of the boson peak and thermal conductivity plateau in low-temperature glasses. PNAS 100, 1515−1518 (2003)

    2003

  32. [39]

    A. I. Chumakov, G. Monaco, A. Monaco, W. A. Crichton, A. Bosak, R. Rüffer, A. Meyer, F. Kargl, L. Comez, D. Fioretto, H. Giefers, S. Roitsch, G. Wortmann, M. H. Manghnani, A. Hushur, Q. Williams, J. Balogh, K. Parliński, P. Jochym, and P. Piekarz. Equivalence of the Boson Peak...

    2011

  33. [40]

    Baggioli and A

    M. Baggioli and A. Zaccone. Universal origin of boson peak vibrational anomalies in ordered crystals and in amorphous materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 145501 (2019)

    2019

  34. [41]

    Lerner and E

    E. Lerner and E. Bouchbinder. Low-energy quasilocalized excitations in structural glasses. J. Chem. Phys. 155, 200901 (2021)

    2021

  35. [42]

    Lerner and E

    E. Lerner and E. Bouchbinder. Disordered Crystals Reveal Soft Quasilocalized Glassy Excitations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 095501 (2022)

    2022

  36. [43]

    Lerner and E

    E. Lerner and E. Bouchbinder. Boson-peak vibrational modes in glasses feature hybridized phononic and quasilocalized excitations. J. Chem. Phys. 158, 194503 (2023)

    2023

  37. [44]

    A. J. Leggett. Amorphous materials at low temperatures: why are they so similar? Phys. B 169, 322−327 (1991)

    1991

  38. [45]

    H. M. Carruzzo and C. C. Yu. Why Phonon Scattering in Glasses is Universally Small at Low Temperatures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 075902 (2020)

    2020

  39. [46]

    Anomalies

    For a recent review of the Soft-Potential Model, see U. Buchenau, The Soft-Potential Models and Its Extensions, in Low-Temperature and Vibrational Properties of Disordered Solids: A Half-Century of “Anomalies” of Glasses, ed. by M. A. Ramos (World Scientific, London/Singapore,...

    2022

  40. [47]

    M. A. Ramos. Are the calorimetric and elastic Debye temperatures of glasses really different? Phil. Mag. 84, 1313−1321 (2004)

    2004

  41. [48]

    T. R. Welberry and D. J. Goossens. The interpretation and analysis of diffuse scattering using Monte Carlo simulation methods. Acta Cryst. A 64, 23−32 (2008)

    2008

  42. [49]

    Romanini, M

    M. Romanini, M. Barrio, S. Capaccioli, R. Macovez, M. D. Ruiz-Martin, and J. Ll. Tamarit. Double Primary Relaxation in a Highly Anisotropic Orientational Glass-Former with Low-Dimensional Disorder. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 10614−10621 (2016)

    2016

  43. [50]

    T. C. W. Mak and J. Trotter. The crystal structure of p-chloronitrobenzene. Acta Cryst. 15, 1078−1080 (1962). 25

    1962

  44. [51]

    C. A. Meriles, J. F. Schneider, Y. P. Mascarenhas, and A. H. Brunetti. X-ray diffraction study of polycrystalline p-chloronitrobenzene. J. Appl. Cryst. 33, 71−81 (2000)

    2000

  45. [52]

    L. H. Thomas, J. M. Cole, and C. C. Wilson. Orientational disorder in 4-chloro- nitrobenzene Acta Cryst. C 64, 296−302 (2008)

    2008

  46. [54]

    Pérez-Enciso and M

    E. Pérez-Enciso and M. A. Ramos. Low-temperature calorimetry on molecular glasses and crystals. Thermochimica Acta 461, 50−56 (2007)

    2007

  47. [55]

    Pérez-Castañeda, J

    T. Pérez-Castañeda, J. Azpeitia, J. Hanko, A. Fente, H. Suderow, and M. A. Ramos. Low-Temperature Specific Heat of Graphite and CeSb2: Validation of a Quasi-adiabatic Continuous Method. J. Low Temp. Phys. 173, 4−20 (2013)

    2013

  48. [56]

    Tozuka, Y

    Y. Tozuka, Y. Yamamura, K. Saito, and M. Sorai. Thermodynamic study of a phase transition between the ordered and disordered phases and orientational disorder in crystalline p-chloronitrobenzene. J. Chem. Phys. 112, 2355−2360 (2000)

    2000

  49. [57]

    Pérez-Castañeda, C

    T. Pérez-Castañeda, C. Rodríguez-Tinoco, J. Rodríguez-Viejo, and M. A. Ramos. Suppression of tunneling two-level systems in ultrastable glasses of indomethacin. PNAS 111, 11275−11280 (2014)

    2014

  50. [58]

    J. A. Katerberg and A. C. Anderson. Low-temperature specific heat, thermal conductivity, and ultrasonic velocity of glassy carbons. J. Low Temp. Phys. 30, 739−745 (1978)

    1978

  51. [59]

    Etrillard, J

    J. Etrillard, J. C. Lasjaunias, B. Toudic, and H. Cailleau. Low-frequency excitations in incommensurate biphenyl as studied by very low-temperature specific heat. Europhys. Lett. 38, 347−352 (1997)

    1997

  52. [60]

    R. Li, H. Zheng, Y. Hua, R. Wei, Z. Tan, and Q. Shi. Low temperature heat capacity study of Zn, Cd and Mn based coordination compounds synthesized using phenanthroline

  53. [61]

    Takehara, N

    R. Takehara, N. Kubo, M. Ryu, S.Kitani, S. Imajo, Y. Shoji, H. Kawaji, J. Morikawa, and T. Fukushima. Insights into Thermal Transport through Molecular π‑Stacking. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 22115−22121 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    Romanini, I

    M. Romanini, I. B. Rietveld, M. Barrio, Ph. Negrier, D. Mondieig, R. Macovez, R. Céolin, and J.-Ll. Tamarit. Uniaxial Negative Thermal Expansion in Polymorphic 2‑Bromobenzophenone, Due to Aromatic Interactions? Cryst. Growth Des. 21, 2167−2175 (2021)

    2021

  55. [63]

    N. Mahé, B. Nicolaï, H. Allouchi, M. Barrio, B. Do, R. Céolin, J.-Ll. Tamarit, and I. B. Rietveld. Crystal Structure and Solid-State Properties of 3,4-Diaminopyridine Dihydrogen Phosphate and Their Comparison with Other Diaminopyridine Salts. Cryst. Growth Des. 13, 3028-3035 (...

    2013

  56. [64]

    Nicolaï, I

    B. Nicolaï, I. B. Rietveld, M. Barrio, N. Mahé, J.-Ll. Tamarit, and R. Céolin. Uniaxial negative thermal expansion in crystals of tienoxolol. Struct. Chem. 24, 279–283 (2013)

    2013

  57. [65]

    Červinka, V

    C. Červinka, V. Štejfa, V. Pokorný, P. Touš, and K. Růžička. Orientational Disorder in Crystalline Disubstituted Benzenes and Its Implications for Sublimation and Polymorphism. Cryst. Growth Des. 23, 9011-9024 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    R. N. Goldberg, J. Schliesser, A. Mittal, S. R. Decker, A.F.L. Santos, V. L. Freitas, and D. K. Johnson. A thermodynamic investigation of the cellulose allomorphs: Cellulose (am), cellulose Iβ (cr), cellulose II (cr), and cellulose III (cr). The J. Chem. Thermodyn. 81, 184-226 (2015)

    2015

  59. [67]

    M. Mohr, J. Maultzsch, E. Dobardžić, S. Reich, I. Milošević, M. Damnjanović, A. Bosak, M. Krisch, and C. Thomsen. Phonon dispersion of graphite by inelastic x-ray scattering. Phys. Rev. B 76, 035439 (2007)

    2007

  60. [68]

    Popovic, G

    M. Popovic, G. B. Stenning, A. Göttlein, and M. Minceva. Elemental composition, heat capacity from 2 to 300 K and derived thermodynamic functions of 5 microorganism species. J. biotech. 331, 99-107 (2021)

    2021

  61. [69]

    Taheri, S

    A. Taheri, S. Pisana, and Ch. Veer Singh. Importance of quadratic dispersion in acoustic flexural phonons for thermal transport of two-dimensional materials. Phys. Rev. B 103, 235426 (2021)

    2021

  62. [70]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz. Theory of Elasticity (Pergamon, Oxford, 1995)

    1995

  63. [71]

    Sibik and J

    J. Sibik and J. A. Zeitler. Direct measurement of molecular mobility and crystallisation of amorphous pharmaceuticals using terahertz spectroscopy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 100, 147−157 (2016). and halogenated benzoic acid. Thermochimica Acta 670, 76−86 (2018)

    2016

  64. [72]

    A.V. Granato. Interstitialcy model for condensed matter states of face-centered-cubic metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 974−977 (1992)

    1992

  65. [73]

    A.V. Granato. Interstitial resonance modes as a source of the boson peak in glasses and liquids. Physica B 219&220, 270−272 (1996)

    1996

  66. [74]

    A.V. Granato. The specific heat of simple liquids. J. Non Cryst. Solids 307–310, 376–386 (2002)

    2002

  67. [75]

    Carini, G

    G. Carini, G. D´Angelo, G. Tripodo, and G. A. Saunders. Specific heat and low- energy excitations of samarium phosphate glasses. Phil. Mag. 71, 539−545 (1995)

    1995

  68. [76]

    Zhu and H

    D.-M. Zhu and H. Chen. Low temperature specific heat and fragility of glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 224, 97−101 (1998)

    1998

  69. [77]

    M. A. Ramos, C. Talón, and S. Vieira. The Boson peak in structural and orientational glasses of simple alcohols: specific heat at low temperatures. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 307−310, 80−86 (2002). 27

    2002

  70. [78]

    Moratalla, M

    M. Moratalla, M. Rodríguez-López, C. Rodríguez-Tinoco, J. Rodríguez-Viejo, R. J. Jiménez-Riobóo, and M. A. Ramos. Depletion of two-level systems in highly stable glasses with different molecular ordering. Communications Physics 6, 274 (2023)

    2023

  71. [79]

    L. Wang, A. Ninarello, P. Guan, L. Berthier, G. Szamel, and E. Flenner. Low- frequency vibrational modes of stable glasses. Nature Communications 10, 26 (2019)

    2019

  72. [80]

    Mizuno, M

    H. Mizuno, M. Shimada, and A. Ikeda. Anharmonic properties of vibrational excitations in amorphous solids. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013215 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.