Pith. sign in

REVIEW

An Inexact Boosted Difference of Convex Algorithm for Nondifferentiable Functions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.05697 v1 pith:5K2AJ7QB submitted 2024-12-07 math.OC

classification math.OC
keywords algorithmbdcaconvexdifferencedirectionfunctionsinexactinmbdca
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we introduce an inexact approach to the Boosted Difference of Convex Functions Algorithm (BDCA) for solving nonconvex and nondifferentiable problems involving the difference of two convex functions (DC functions). Specifically, when the first DC component is differentiable and the second may be nondifferentiable, BDCA utilizes the solution from the subproblem of the DC Algorithm (DCA) to define a descent direction for the objective function. A monotone linesearch is then performed to find a new point that improves the objective function relative to the subproblem solution. This approach enhances the performance of DCA. However, if the first DC component is nondifferentiable, the BDCA direction may become an ascent direction, rendering the monotone linesearch ineffective. To address this, we propose an Inexact nonmonotone Boosted Difference of Convex Algorithm (InmBDCA). This algorithm incorporates two main features of inexactness: First, the subproblem therein is solved approximately allowing us for a controlled relative error tolerance in defining the linesearch direction. Second, an inexact nonmonotone linesearch scheme is used to determine the step size for the next iteration. Under suitable assumptions, we demonstrate that InmBDCA is well-defined, with any accumulation point of the sequence generated by InmBDCA being a critical point of the problem. We also provide iteration-complexity bounds for the algorithm. Numerical experiments show that InmBDCA outperforms both the nonsmooth BDCA (nmBDCA) and the monotone version of DCA in practical scenarios.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools