Are the Latent Representations of Foundation Models for Pathology Invariant to Rotation?
read the original abstract
Self-supervised foundation models for digital pathology encode small patches from H\&E whole slide images into latent representations used for downstream tasks. However, the invariance of these representations to patch rotation remains unexplored. This study investigates the rotational invariance of latent representations across twelve foundation models by quantifying the alignment between non-rotated and rotated patches using mutual $k$-nearest neighbours and cosine distance. Models that incorporated rotation augmentation during self-supervised training exhibited significantly greater invariance to rotations. We hypothesise that the absence of rotational inductive bias in the transformer architecture necessitates rotation augmentation during training to achieve learned invariance. Code: https://github.com/MatousE/rot-invariance-analysis.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Beyond the Failures: Rethinking Foundation Models in Pathology
Foundation models stumble in pathology due to conceptual mismatches with biological tissue, requiring explicitly designed models rather than adaptations of natural-image methods.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.