Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 60 references

Coherent control of solid-state defect spins via patterned boron-doped diamond circuit

T0 review · 2 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A heavily boron-doped diamond film patterned into an $\Omega$-shaped loop can itself serve as the microwave control circuit for NV spin qubits, without added metal or impedance matching.

desk verdict First demonstration of coherent NV control via monolithically integrated BDD circuit, with solid central data but overreaching 'minimal impact' claims that need controls. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15586 v2 pith:E5H5NYH2 submitted 2024-12-20 physics.app-ph quant-ph

Masahiro Ohkuma , Eikichi Kimura , Eunsang Lee , Ryo Matsumoto , Shumpei Ohyama , Saki Tsuchiya , Harim Lim , Yong Soo Lee
show 3 more authors
Yoshihiko Takano Junghyun Lee Keigo Arai
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-phquant-ph
keywords boron-dopeddiamondNVcentermonolithicintegrationmicrowavewaveguideRabioscillationsODMRquantumsensingspincoherence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a metallic boron-doped diamond film patterned into an $\Omega$-shaped loop on the diamond surface can replace the separate metal microwave antenna normally used to control nitrogen-vacancy (NV) spin qubits. The authors show that this monolithically integrated circuit delivers microwave fields strong enough to drive Rabi oscillations up to $10.6$ MHz, and that it does so without precise impedance matching. They also argue that the circuit barely disturbs the spins it controls: microwave-induced heating shifts the NV resonance by about $1$ MHz under a $10\,\mu$s, $11$ MHz drive, and the spin relaxation time $T_1$ stays flat across the loop, even a few micrometers from the diamond circuit. If the claim holds, quantum devices could be built from a single diamond material, with durable circuits that tolerate harsh environments where metal wires corrode, scratch, or delaminate.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the metallic boron-doped diamond film in an $\Omega$ shape, which acts simultaneously as resistive wire and parasitic capacitor. Electrically it is a parallel $R$–$C$ network: at $2.87$ GHz, BDD1 has impedance about $28.6\,\Omega$, from a parallel resistance of roughly $355\,\Omega$ and capacitance of $1.89$ pF, so microwave current is partly delivered through the resistive path to generate the oscillating magnetic field that drives NV spin transitions. The same monolithic structure is also the claimed heat sink and the source of magnetic Johnson noise, so its geometry and doping together determine both the Rabi drive strength and the disturbance to the spins.

What would settle it

Repeating the heating experiment at a detuning far from any NV transition (for example several gigahertz off resonance) with the same power and pulse length, or comparing $T_1$ for NV centers inside the $\Omega$ loop against identical centers on the same chip far from the BDD, would separate true thermal shifts and Johnson-noise relaxation from the effects the paper currently attributes to them.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that coherent control of NV centers can be achieved with a boron-doped diamond circuit alone, without precise impedance matching. Using heavily doped metallic BDD ($3\times10^{21}$ cm$^{-3}$ boron) patterned into a $140\,\mu$m-diameter $\Omega$ loop, the authors observe ODMR contrast and Rabi oscillations at $2.7$ GHz, with Rabi frequency scaling linearly with the square root of microwave power and reaching $10.6$ MHz at $1.68$ W input. The circuit's high-frequency behavior is captured by a simple parallel resistor–capacitor model, and its microwave field is strong enough for pulsed spin control while its impact on the NV ensemble is described as minimal: symmetric Rabi chevrons under $1\,\mu$s pulses, a small $\sim$1 MHz frequency shift after sustained off-resonant driving, and a $T_1$ that does not vary across the $\Omega$ loop including positions $5\,\mu$m from the BDD edge.

Load-bearing premise

The claims that heating is negligible and $T_1$ is unperturbed rely on two unverified background assumptions: that the observed $\sim1$ MHz Ramsey shift comes entirely from temperature-induced resonance drift and not from the microwave's own light-shift or spin-population effects, and that NV centers inside the $\Omega$ loop would not have shown a shorter $T_1$ even without the BDD nearby.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • NV coherent control works without on-chip impedance matching, so the circuit layout can be simplified and adapted to extreme environments.
  • Metallic BDD generates microwave fields comparable to conventional metal wires, with Rabi frequencies up to $10.6$ MHz at $1.68$ W, sufficient for pulsed quantum control.
  • Short ($1\,\mu$s) Rabi pulses leave the chevron pattern symmetric, indicating negligible thermal drift under fast driving.
  • A $10\,\mu$s, $11$ MHz off-resonant drive shifts the NV resonance by only $\sim1$ MHz, smaller than the $^{14}$N hyperfine splitting, so continuous-drive protocols such as spin locking remain practical.
  • The relaxation time $T_1$ is unperturbed across the loop, so NV centers can be placed close to the BDD circuit without paying a Johnson-noise penalty.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: because BDD can be overgrown with insulating undoped diamond, the $\Omega$-loop idea could be stacked vertically into multi-layer microwave-delivery networks, letting different qubit layers be addressed independently.
  • Editorial extension: the heating interpretation could be tested by repeating the off-resonant pulse sequence with the same power and duration but a detuning far outside any NV resonance; if the Ramsey shift persists, it is not thermal.
  • Editorial extension: the parallel $R$–$C$ model predicts that increasing boron concentration toward $10^{22}$ cm$^{-3}$ or reshaping the loop to raise the capacitive current should raise the Rabi frequency per watt; that prediction is directly measurable.
  • Editorial extension: BDD1 enters a superconducting state near $3$ K, so the same monolithic element might eventually serve both as a superconducting microwave component and as the spin-control antenna at cryogenic temperatures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports the fabrication and characterization of an Ω-shaped boron-doped diamond (BDD) circuit monolithically integrated on a diamond substrate hosting an ensemble of NV centers. The authors characterize the temperature-dependent resistivity and frequency-dependent impedance of three BDD samples with different boron concentrations, model the impedance with a parallel RC circuit, and use the metallic BDD1 sample to drive coherent Rabi oscillations and ODMR. They further report spatial mapping of the Rabi frequency, a Rabi chevron experiment, and Ramsey-based heating measurements, concluding that microwave-induced heating is negligible and that spin relaxation time T1 is unperturbed by the BDD circuit. The central experimental demonstration of coherent spin control via BDD is supported by the data; however, the 'minimal detrimental impact' claims rely on measurements that lack key control experiments, as detailed below.

Significance. If the central claims are fully substantiated, this work would represent a useful step toward fully monolithic integration of microwave control circuitry with diamond quantum devices, with potential advantages in chemical robustness and extreme-environment operation. The paper's strengths include the clear demonstration of Rabi oscillations with up to approximately 10.6 MHz at 1.68 W, the systematic impedance characterization and RC modeling, and the spatial uniformity mapping of the microwave field. These results are likely reproducible and will be of interest to the diamond quantum sensing community. The main limitation is that the 'negligible heating' and 'unperturbed T1' claims, which are part of the abstract's central message, are not yet backed by sufficient control measurements; the current data support spatial uniformity but not a baseline comparison.

major comments (2)
  1. [IV (Heating, Fig. 4b)] The attribution of the observed ~1 MHz Ramsey frequency shift entirely to temperature-induced shifts of the NV zero-phonon line is not justified by the data presented. The off-resonant microwave pulse (detuned by 400 MHz) can induce an AC Stark shift and potential slow charge-state or population dynamics that depend on power and duration; without a control experiment that separates thermal from non-thermal effects (e.g., applying the same pulse with a greatly reduced duty cycle, or measuring the Ramsey fringe phase in addition to frequency), the claim that the BDD antenna induces negligible heating is not established. A control measurement on a sample without the BDD circuit, or with the microwave pulse frequency far from any NV transition, would strengthen this claim.
  2. [IV (Fig. 5b)] The conclusion that the BDD circuit 'minimally perturb[s] NV spin relaxation' is not supported because all T1 measurements are performed at positions inside the Ω-loop, with no baseline measurement far from the antenna or on the same diamond substrate before BDD fabrication. The consistency of relaxation rates across positions and between ms = 0 and ms = −1 states demonstrates spatial uniformity but cannot exclude a global reduction of T1 due to Johnson noise from the BDD or the high NV density (4.5 ppm). The absolute T1 values are not reported, preventing comparison with intrinsic ensemble lifetimes. Adding a far-field T1 measurement on the same substrate would directly test the claim.
minor comments (8)
  1. [I (Introduction)] The sentence beginning 'therefore, replacing them...' should start with a capital 'Therefore'.
  2. [Table I and Section III] Boron concentration is given as 'cm−1' in Table I and in the text (e.g., '3 × 1021 cm−1' and '3 × 1020 cm−1'); the correct unit is cm−3.
  3. [IV (Heating)] In the sentence 'The total energy, shown on the horizontal axis, is calculated as E = P × t, where P is the applied microwave power, and is the pulse duration', the symbol for duration is missing; it should read 'where P is the applied microwave power and t is the pulse duration.'
  4. [V (Discussion)] The claim in the Introduction (key finding (ii)) that BDD generated microwave fields 'comparable in strength to those produced by conventional metal wires' is not directly supported by any comparative measurement in this manuscript; either a reference measurement or a citation to a quantitative benchmark should be provided, or the claim should be tempered.
  5. [IV (Fig. 5b)] The authors state that 'comparable T1 values are observed for both the ms = 0 and ms = −1 spin states' but do not report the actual decay times; quoting the fitted T1 values would allow readers to compare with literature values.
  6. [III (Impedance)] The text notes that data from 40 Hz to 110 MHz and from 1 MHz to 1 GHz overlap in the 1–110 MHz range, but no quantitative statement of agreement is given; a sentence quantifying the overlap would improve confidence in the combined dataset.
  7. [References] Reference [50] (S. Hu et al., 'Experimental realization of deep-subwavelength confinement in dielectric optical resonators') appears unrelated to the context of spin-locking for dynamic nuclear polarization; please verify the citation.
  8. [II (Device description)] The text states the BDD thickness is 700 nm, whereas Table I lists 780/640/690 nm for the three samples; please clarify whether 700 nm is an approximate nominal value.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity: the RC-model fit is empirical and the spin-control/heating/T1 claims are independently measured, not derived from fitted parameters.

full rationale

The only fitted model is the lumped parallel R-C impedance description in Sec. III (Fig. 2c-d), with fitted parameters in Table II. These fitted R and C values are used to characterize the circuit's high-frequency behavior, but the claimed spin-control results are direct measurements whose conclusions do not follow from the fitted parameters: Rabi oscillations (Fig. 3), chevron symmetry (Fig. 4a), Ramsey shift versus applied energy (Fig. 4b), and T1 curves at multiple positions (Fig. 5b). No equation defines a target quantity in terms of that same target quantity, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The observed Rabi-frequency proportionality to sqrt(P) is a standard external relation, not an output of the RC fit. Self-citations to BDD growth and metallic transport ([2,4,40]) are background or methods citations; they do not carry a load-bearing uniqueness claim that forces the present results. Two experimental-rigor limitations exist but are not circularity: the T1 'unperturbed' conclusion in Sec. IV / Fig. 5b lacks a no-antenna or far-field baseline, and the heating analysis in Fig. 4b attributes the entire Ramsey frequency shift to temperature without explicitly excluding AC Stark or population-leakage contributions. These affect confidence in the 'minimal detrimental impact' claim but do not constitute a circular derivation, so they do not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities or forces. Its central result is an experimental demonstration. The free parameters are the fitted resistance and capacitance values in the lumped impedance model. The key assumptions are domain assumptions about NV physics and the interpretation of the heating and T1 experiments.

free parameters (6)
  • R_BDD1 = 354.7 Ω
    Fitted parallel resistance from impedance vs frequency data (Table II).
  • C_BDD1 = 1.890 pF
    Fitted parasitic capacitance from impedance data (Table II).
  • R_BDD2 = 1552 Ω
    Fitted parallel resistance from impedance vs frequency data (Table II).
  • C_BDD2 = 1.778 pF
    Fitted parasitic capacitance from impedance data (Table II).
  • R_BDD3 = 1.668e5 Ω
    Fitted parallel resistance from impedance vs frequency data (Table II).
  • C_BDD3 = 1.854 pF
    Fitted parasitic capacitance from impedance data (Table II).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Lumped element model is valid for the BDD circuit up to 3 GHz because the circuit dimension (~200 µm) is much smaller than the microwave wavelength (~10 cm).
    Invoked in Section III to justify the parallel R-C model and its frequency dependence.
  • domain assumption The microwave field that drives the NV spins is generated by the BDD circuit itself, with negligible contribution from the gold wire bonds and silver paste connections.
    Implicitly assumed in the spatial Rabi mapping (Fig. 5) and in attributing the observed control to the BDD.
  • domain assumption The observed Ramsey frequency shift after an off-resonant microwave pulse is entirely due to temperature-induced shifts of the NV zero-phonon line.
    Used in Section IV to conclude that a ~1 MHz shift means negligible heating; AC Stark shifts or population effects are not ruled out.
  • domain assumption Absence of position-dependent and spin-state-dependent T1 variations within the Ω-loop indicates negligible magnetic Johnson noise from the BDD.
    Used in Section IV to conclude that the BDD does not perturb spin relaxation; no far-field control measurement is reported.
  • standard math Standard NV center ground-state triplet physics and ODMR detection principles, including the Zeeman splitting and spin-dependent fluorescence.
    Background for interpreting all NV measurements, assumed throughout.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coherent control of solid-state defect spins via patterned boron-doped diamond circuit." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E5H5NYH2

@misc{pith2026241215586,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coherent control of solid-state defect spins via patterned boron-doped diamond circuit},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E5H5NYH2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15586}
}
abstract

Monolithic integration, which refers to the incorporation of all device functionalities within a single material, shows significant potential for creating scalable solid-state quantum devices. This study demonstrated the coherent control of nitrogen-vacancy (NV) spins using an electronic circuit monolithically integrated within diamond: a patterned, conductive boron-doped diamond (BDD) microwave waveguide. First, we validated the high-frequency performance of the circuit by characterizing its impedance up to the microwave range, confirming its capability for efficient microwave transmission. Then, using this monolithically integrated BDD--NV hybrid system, we performed optically detected magnetic resonance and observed noticeable Rabi oscillations driven by the metallic BDD circuit. Importantly, we verified that the BDD antenna has a minimal detrimental impact on the NV spins; microwave-induced heating is negligible under both pulsed and continuous driving, and the spin relaxation time ($T_1$) remains unperturbed. This approach paves the way for a new class of compact, robust, and versatile quantum platforms suitable for sensing and information processing in various environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15586 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) (Top) Overview of BDD–NV system compris [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Temperature dependence of electrical resistivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) ODMR spectra measurement result using differ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Spatial distribution of the measured Rabi fre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    E. A. Ekimov, V. A. Sidorov, E. D. Bauer, N. N. Mel’nik, N. J. Curro, J. D. Thompson, and S. M. Stishov, Super- conductivity in diamond, Nature 428, 542 (2004)

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    Takano, M

    Y. Takano, M. Nagao, I. Sakaguchi, M. Tachiki, T. Hatano, K. Kobayashi, H. Umezawa, and H. Kawarada, Superconductivity in diamond thin films well above liquid helium temperature, Applied Physics Letters 85, 2851 (2004)

    2004

  3. [3]

    Yokoya, T

    T. Yokoya, T. Nakamura, T. Matsushita, T. Muro, Y. Takano, M. Nagao, T. Takenouchi, H. Kawarada, and T. Oguchi, Origin of the metallic properties of heavily boron-doped superconducting diamond, Nature 438, 647 (2005)

    2005

  4. [4]

    Takano, Superconductivity in CVD diamond films, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 21, 253201 (2009)

    Y. Takano, Superconductivity in CVD diamond films, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 21, 253201 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Mandal, T

    S. Mandal, T. Bautze, O. A. Williams, C. Naud, ´E. Bus- tarret, F. Omn` es, P. Rodi` ere, T. Meunier, C. B¨ auerle, and L. Saminadayar, The Diamond Superconducting Quantum Interference Device, ACS Nano 5, 7144 (2011)

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Kageura, M

    T. Kageura, M. Hideko, I. Tsuyuzaki, A. Morishita, A. Kawano, Y. Sasama, T. Yamaguchi, Y. Takano, M. Tachiki, S. Ooi, K. Hirata, S. Arisawa, and H. Kawarada, Single-crystalline boron-doped diamond superconducting quantum interference devices with regrowth-induced step edge structure, Scientific Reports 9, 15214 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Oripov, D

    B. Oripov, D. Kumar, C. Garcia, P. Hemmer, T. Venkate- san, M. S. Ramachandra Rao, and S. M. Anlage, Large microwave inductance of granular boron-doped diamond superconducting films, Applied Physics Letters 118, 242601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    J. A. Cuenca, T. Brien, S. Mandal, S. Manifold, S. Doyle, A. Porch, G. M. Klemencic, and O. A. Williams, Su- perconducting boron doped nanocrystalline diamond mi- crowave coplanar resonator, Carbon 201, 251 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Isberg, J

    J. Isberg, J. Hammersberg, E. Johansson, T. Wik- str¨ om, D. J. Twitchen, A. J. Whitehead, S. E. Coe, and G. A. Scarsbrook, High Carrier Mobility in Single-Crystal Plasma-Deposited Diamond, Science 297, 1670 (2002)

    2002

  2. [10]

    M. W. Geis, T. C. Wade, C. H. Wuorio, T. H. Fe- dynyshyn, B. Duncan, M. E. Plaut, J. O. Varghese, S. M. Warnock, S. A. Vitale, and M. A. Hollis, Progress Toward Diamond Power Field-Effect Transistors, physica status solidi (a) 215, 1800681 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Donato, N

    N. Donato, N. Rouger, J. Pernot, G. Longobardi, and F. Udrea, Diamond power devices: State of the art, mod- elling, figures of merit and future perspective, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 53, 093001 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    D. Das, R. Raj, J. Jana, S. Chatterjee, K. L. Ganapathi, M. Chandran, and M. S. R. Rao, Diamond—the ultimate material for exploring physics of spin-defects for quantum technologies and diamondtronics, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 55, 333002 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Jelezko, T

    F. Jelezko, T. Gaebel, I. Popa, A. Gruber, and J. Wrachtrup, Observation of Coherent Oscillations in a Single Electron Spin, Physical Review Letters 92, 076401 (2004)

    2004

  6. [14]

    Gaebel, M

    T. Gaebel, M. Domhan, I. Popa, C. Wittmann, P. Neu- mann, F. Jelezko, J. R. Rabeau, N. Stavrias, A. D. Greentree, S. Prawer, J. Meijer, J. Twamley, P. R. Hem- mer, and J. Wrachtrup, Room-temperature coherent cou- pling of single spins in diamond, Nature Physics 2, 408 (2006)

    2006

  7. [15]

    Jelezko, T

    F. Jelezko, T. Gaebel, I. Popa, M. Domhan, A. Gruber, and J. Wrachtrup, Observation of Coherent Oscillation of a Single Nuclear Spin and Realization of a Two-Qubit Conditional Quantum Gate, Physical Review Letters 93, 130501 (2004)

    2004

  8. [16]

    Hanson, F

    R. Hanson, F. M. Mendoza, R. J. Epstein, and D. D. Awschalom, Polarization and Readout of Coupled Single Spins in Diamond, Physical Review Letters 97, 087601 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    M. V. G. Dutt, L. Childress, L. Jiang, E. Togan, J. Maze, F. Jelezko, A. S. Zibrov, P. R. Hemmer, and M. D. 8 Lukin, Quantum Register Based on Individual Electronic and Nuclear Spin Qubits in Diamond, Science 316, 1312 (2007)

    2007

  10. [18]

    J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Childress, L. Jiang, D. Budker, P. R. Hemmer, A. Yacoby, R. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin, High-sensitivity diamond magnetometer with nanoscale resolution, Nature Physics 4, 810 (2008)

    2008

  11. [19]

    C. L. Degen, Scanning magnetic field microscope with a diamond single-spin sensor, Applied Physics Letters 92, 243111 (2008)

    2008

  12. [20]

    Balasubramanian, I

    G. Balasubramanian, I. Y. Chan, R. Kolesov, M. Al- Hmoud, J. Tisler, C. Shin, C. Kim, A. Wojcik, P. R. Hem- mer, A. Krueger, T. Hanke, A. Leitenstorfer, R. Brats- chitsch, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Nanoscale imaging magnetometry with diamond spins under ambient condi- tion...

    2008

  13. [21]

    J. R. Maze, P. L. Stanwix, J. S. Hodges, S. Hong, J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Jiang, M. V. G. Dutt, E. Togan, A. S. Zibrov, A. Yacoby, R. L. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin, Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond, Nature 455, 644 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    V. M. Acosta, E. Bauch, M. P. Ledbetter, C. Santori, K.-M. C. Fu, P. E. Barclay, R. G. Beausoleil, H. Linget, J. F. Roch, F. Treussart, S. Chemerisov, W. Gawlik, and D. Budker, Diamonds with a high density of nitrogen- vacancy centers for magnetometry applications, Physical Re...

    2009

  15. [23]

    Schaefer-Nolte, F

    E. Schaefer-Nolte, F. Reinhard, M. Ternes, J. Wrachtrup, and K. Kern, A diamond-based scanning probe spin sen- sor operating at low temperature in ultra-high vacuum, Review of Scientific Instruments 85, 013701 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    Bhattacharyya, W

    P. Bhattacharyya, W. Chen, X. Huang, S. Chatter- jee, B. Huang, B. Kobrin, Y. Lyu, T. J. Smart, M. Block, E. Wang, Z. Wang, W. Wu, S. Hsieh, H. Ma, S. Mandyam, B. Chen, E. Davis, Z. M. Geballe, C. Zu, V. Struzhkin, R. Jeanloz, J. E. Moore, T. Cui, G. Galli, B. I. Halperin, C. ...

    2024

  17. [25]

    M. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Liu, G. Xu, B. Yang, P. Yu, H. Sun, X. Ye, J. Zhou, A. F. Goncharov, Y. Wang, and J. Du, Imaging magnetic transition of magnetite to megabar pressures using quantum sensors in diamond anvil cell, Nature Communications 15, 8843 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    P. J. Scheidegger, S. Diesch, M. L. Palm, and C. L. De- gen, Scanning nitrogen-vacancy magnetometry down to 350 mK, Applied Physics Letters 120, 224001 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    G.-Q. Liu, X. Feng, N. Wang, Q. Li, and R.-B. Liu, Coherent quantum control of nitrogen-vacancy center spins near 1000 kelvin, Nature Communications 10, 1344 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Kubota, Y

    K. Kubota, Y. Hatano, Y. Kainuma, J. Shin, D. Nishi- tani, C. Shinei, T. Taniguchi, T. Teraji, S. Onoda, T. Ohshima, T. Iwasaki, and M. Hatano, Wide temper- ature operation of diamond quantum sensor for electric vehicle battery monitoring, Diamond and Related Mate- rials 135, ...

    2023

  21. [29]

    Fan, S.-W

    J.-W. Fan, S.-W. Guo, C. Lin, N. Wang, G.-Q. Liu, Q. Li, and R.-B. Liu, Quantum Coherence Control at Temper- atures up to 1400 K, Nano Letters 24, 14806 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    D. Kim, M. I. Ibrahim, C. Foy, M. E. Trusheim, R. Han, and D. R. Englund, A CMOS-integrated quantum sensor based on nitrogen–vacancy centres, Nature Electronics2, 284 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    F. M. St¨ urner, A. Brenneis, T. Buck, J. Kassel, R. R¨ olver, T. Fuchs, A. Savitsky, D. Suter, J. Grimmel, S. Henges- bach, M. F¨ ortsch, K. Nakamura, H. Sumiya, S. On- oda, J. Isoya, and F. Jelezko, Integrated and Portable Magnetometer Based on Nitrogen-Vacancy Ensembles in ...

    2021

  24. [32]

    Omirzakhov, M

    K. Omirzakhov, M. H. Idjadi, T.-Y. Huang, S. A. Bre- itweiser, D. A. Hopper, L. C. Bassett, and F. Aflatouni, An Integrated Reconfigurable Spin Control System on 180 nm CMOS for Diamond NV Centers, IEEE Trans- actions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 71, 4052 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Kumar, S

    H. Kumar, S. Dasika, M. Mangat, S. Tallur, and K. Saha, High dynamic-range and portable magnetometer using ensemble nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Review of Scientific Instruments 95, 075002 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, The nitrogen- vacancy colour centre in diamond, Physics Reports The Nitrogen-Vacancy Colour Centre in Diamond, 528, 1 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    Jiang, J

    L. Jiang, J. S. Hodges, J. R. Maze, P. Maurer, J. M. Taylor, D. G. Cory, P. R. Hemmer, R. L. Walsworth, A. Yacoby, A. S. Zibrov, and M. D. Lukin, Repetitive Readout of a Single Electronic Spin via Quantum Logic with Nuclear Spin Ancillae, Science 326, 267 (2009)

    2009

  28. [36]

    Neumann, J

    P. Neumann, J. Beck, M. Steiner, F. Rempp, H. Fed- der, P. R. Hemmer, J. Wrachtrup, and F. Jelezko, Single- Shot Readout of a Single Nuclear Spin, Science 329, 542 (2010)

    2010

  29. [37]

    Lovchinsky, A

    I. Lovchinsky, A. O. Sushkov, E. Urbach, N. P. de Leon, S. Choi, K. De Greve, R. Evans, R. Gertner, E. Bersin, C. M¨ uller, L. McGuinness, F. Jelezko, R. L. Walsworth, H. Park, and M. D. Lukin, Nuclear magnetic resonance detection and spectroscopy of single proteins using quan...

    2016

  30. [38]

    K. Arai, C. Belthangady, H. Zhang, N. Bar-Gill, S. J. De- Vience, P. Cappellaro, A. Yacoby, and R. L. Walsworth, Fourier magnetic imaging with nanoscale resolution and compressed sensing speed-up using electronic spins in di- amond, Nature Nanotechnology 10, 859 (2015)

    2015

  31. [39]

    Zhang, K

    H. Zhang, K. Arai, C. Belthangady, J.-C. Jaskula, and R. L. Walsworth, Selective addressing of solid-state spins at the nanoscale via magnetic resonance frequency en- coding, npj Quantum Information 3, 31 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Matsumoto, Y

    R. Matsumoto, Y. Sasama, M. Fujioka, T. Irifune, M. Tanaka, T. Yamaguchi, H. Takeya, and Y. Takano, Note: Novel diamond anvil cell for electrical measure- ments using boron-doped metallic diamond electrodes, Review of Scientific Instruments 87, 076103 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    van Oort, N

    E. van Oort, N. B. Manson, and M. Glasbeek, Optically detected spin coherence of the diamond N-V centre in its triplet ground state, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 21, 4385 (1988)

    1988

  34. [42]

    Gruber, A

    A. Gruber, A. Dr¨ abenstedt, C. Tietz, L. Fleury, J. Wrachtrup, and C. von Borczyskowski, Scanning Con- focal Optical Microscopy and Magnetic Resonance on Single Defect Centers, Science 276, 2012 (1997)

    1997

  35. [43]

    R. J. Zhang, S. T. Lee, and Y. W. Lam, Characteriza- tion of heavily boron-doped diamond films, Diamond and Related Materials 5, 1288 (1996)

    1996

  36. [44]

    J. P. Lagrange, A. Deneuville, and E. Gheeraert, Acti- vation energy in low compensated homoepitaxial boron- 9 doped diamond films1, Diamond and Related Materials 7, 1390 (1998)

    1998

  37. [45]

    V. M. Acosta, E. Bauch, M. P. Ledbetter, A. Waxman, L.-S. Bouchard, and D. Budker, Temperature Depen- dence of the Nitrogen-Vacancy Magnetic Resonance in Diamond, Physical Review Letters 104, 070801 (2010)

    2010

  38. [46]

    Z. Wang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, and L. Xing, Microwave Heating Effect on Diamond Samples of Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers, ACS Omega 7, 31538 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Boyers, M

    E. Boyers, M. Pandey, D. K. Campbell, A. Polkovnikov, D. Sels, and A. O. Sushkov, Floquet-engineered quantum state manipulation in a noisy qubit, Physical Review A 100, 012341 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    Nishimura, K

    S. Nishimura, K. M. Itoh, J. Ishi-Hayase, K. Sasaki, and K. Kobayashi, Floquet Engineering Using Pulse Driving in a Diamond Two-Level System Under Large-Amplitude Modulation, Physical Review Applied 18, 064023 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Rizzato, F

    R. Rizzato, F. Bruckmaier, K. Liu, S. Glaser, and D. Bucher, Polarization Transfer from Optically Pumped Ensembles of N-$V$ Centers to Multinuclear Spin Baths, Physical Review Applied 17, 024067 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    S. Hu, M. Khater, R. Salas-Montiel, E. Kratschmer, S. Engelmann, W. M. J. Green, and S. M. Weiss, Ex- perimental realization of deep-subwavelength confine- ment in dielectric optical resonators, Science Advances 4, eaat2355 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Kolkowitz, A

    S. Kolkowitz, A. Safira, A. A. High, R. C. Devlin, S. Choi, Q. P. Unterreithmeier, D. Patterson, A. S. Zibrov, V. E. Manucharyan, H. Park, and M. D. Lukin, Probing John- son noise and ballistic transport in normal metals with a single-spin qubit, Science 347, 1129 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    Kawano, H

    A. Kawano, H. Ishiwata, S. Iriyama, R. Okada, T. Yam- aguchi, Y. Takano, and H. Kawarada, Superconductor- to-insulator transition in boron-doped diamond films grown using chemical vapor deposition, Physical Review B 82, 085318 (2010)

    2010

  45. [53]

    T. Yano, D. A. Tryk, K. Hashimoto, and A. Fujishima, Electrochemical Behavior of Highly Conductive Boron- Doped Diamond Electrodes for Oxygen Reduction in Al- kaline Solution, Journal of The Electrochemical Society 145, 1870 (1998)

    1998

  46. [54]

    Gandini, E

    D. Gandini, E. Mah´ e, P. Michaud, W. Haenni, A. Per- ret, and Ch. Comninellis, Oxidation of carboxylic acids at boron-doped diamond electrodes for wastewater treat- ment, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 30, 1345 (2000)

    2000

  47. [55]

    Matsumoto, M

    R. Matsumoto, M. Einaga, S. Adachi, S. Yamamoto, T. Irifune, K. Terashima, H. Takeya, Y. Nakamoto, K. Shimizu, and Y. Takano, Electrical transport measure- ments for superconducting sulfur hydrides using boron- doped diamond electrodes on beveled diamond anvil, Su- perconducto...

    2020

  48. [56]

    Matsumoto, K

    R. Matsumoto, K. Yamane, T. Tadano, K. Terashima, T. Shinmei, T. Irifune, and Y. Takano, Emer- gence of Superconductivity at 20 K in Th $ 3$P$ 4$- type In $ {3-x}$S$ 4$ Synthesized by Diamond Anvil Cell with Boron-doped Diamond Electrodes (2024), arXiv:2409.03409 [cond-mat]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    K.-M. C. Fu, G. Z. Iwata, A. Wickenbrock, and D. Bud- ker, Sensitive magnetometry in challenging environ- ments, A VS Quantum Science2, 044702 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    Zhang, Y

    G. Zhang, Y. Liu, J. J. Raftery, and A. A. Houck, Sup- pression of photon shot noise dephasing in a tunable cou- pling superconducting qubit, npj Quantum Information 3, 1 (2017)

    2017

  51. [59]

    Bruckmaier, R

    F. Bruckmaier, R. D. Allert, N. R. Neuling, P. Amrein, S. Littin, K. D. Briegel, P. Sch¨ atzle, P. Knittel, M. Za- itsev, and D. B. Bucher, Imaging local diffusion in mi- crostructures using NV-based pulsed field gradient NMR, Science Advances 9, eadh3484 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Prikhodko, S

    D. Prikhodko, S. Tarelkin, V. Bormashov, A. Golovanov, M. Kuznetsov, D. Teteruk, N. Kornilov, A. Volkov, and A. Buga, Low Temperature Thermal Conductivity of Heavily Boron-Doped Synthetic Diamond: Influence of Boron-Related Structure Defects, Journal of Superhard Materials 41,...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.