Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Boolean Functions with Minimal Spectral Sensitivity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.16088 v2 pith:IBL6B2GL submitted 2024-12-20 cs.CC

Boolean Functions with Minimal Spectral Sensitivity

classification cs.CC
keywords sensitivitytextbooleanfunctionfunctionsminimalconstantfactor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We show examples of total Boolean functions that depend on $n$ variables and have spectral sensitivity $\Theta(\sqrt{\log n})$, which is asymptotically minimal. Our main new function combines the Hamming code with the Boolean address function and has $\lambda(f) = \sqrt{(1+o(1)) \log_2 n}$, which is optimal even up to a constant factor. By combining this function with itself in a specific way, we also obtain a family of functions with $\text{s}_0(f) = (c+o(1)) \log_2 n$ and $\text{s}_0(f) = (1-c+o(1)) \log_2 n$ for any $c \in [0,1]$. This is an optimal tradeoff for Boolean functions with low sensitivity, as the lower bound on sensitivity by Simon generalizes to \[\text{s}_0(f)+\text{s}_1(f)\geq\log_2 n - \log_2 \log_2 n + 2.\] As a corollary, this gives a new example of a function with minimal possible sensitivity (up to a constant factor), $\text{s}(f) = (\frac{1}{2}+o(1)) \log_2 n$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.