Learning to engineer protein flexibility
read the original abstract
Generative machine learning models are increasingly being used to design novel proteins for therapeutic and biotechnological applications. However, the current methods mostly focus on the design of proteins with a fixed backbone structure, which leads to their limited ability to account for protein flexibility, one of the crucial properties for protein function. Learning to engineer protein flexibility is problematic because the available data are scarce, heterogeneous, and costly to obtain using computational as well as experimental methods. Our contributions to address this problem are three-fold. First, we comprehensively compare methods for quantifying protein flexibility and identify data relevant to learning. Second, we design and train flexibility predictors utilizing sequential or both sequential and structural information on the input. We overcome the data scarcity issue by leveraging a pre-trained protein language model. Third, we introduce a method for fine-tuning a protein inverse folding model to steer it toward desired flexibility in specified regions. We demonstrate that our method Flexpert-Design enables guidance of inverse folding models toward increased flexibility. This opens up new possibilities for protein flexibility engineering and the development of proteins with enhanced biological activities.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Sub-residue sharpness of protein helix-coil transitions reveals a spatial-spectral uncertainty limit
Helix-coil transitions in proteins have a median geometric width of 0.145 residues, indicating an inherent spatial-spectral uncertainty limit from the Gabor principle.
-
Learning residue level protein dynamics with multiscale Gaussians
DynaProt predicts per-residue 3x3 covariance matrices for local flexibility and scalar pairwise covariances for dynamic coupling from static protein structures using an SE(3)-invariant Gaussian framework, achieving hi...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.