Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Bring-Your-Own-Model Approach for ML-Driven Storage Placement in Warehouse-Scale Computers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.05651 v2 pith:2F5UR6QH submitted 2025-01-10 cs.DC cs.LG

classification cs.DCcs.LG
keywords storageapproachlayermodelsystemcomputersdatadeployments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Storage systems account for a major portion of the total cost of ownership (TCO) of warehouse-scale computers, and thus have a major impact on the overall system's efficiency. Machine learning (ML)-based methods for solving key problems in storage system efficiency, such as data placement, have shown significant promise. However, there are few known practical deployments of such methods. Studying this problem in the context of real-world hyperscale data centers at Google, we identify a number of challenges that we believe cause this lack of practical adoption. Specifically, prior work assumes a monolithic model that resides entirely within the storage layer, an unrealistic assumption in real-world deployments with frequently changing workloads. To address this problem, we introduce a cross-layer approach where workloads instead ''bring their own model''. This strategy moves ML out of the storage system and instead allows each workload to train its own lightweight model at the application layer, capturing the workload's specific characteristics. These small, interpretable models generate predictions that guide a co-designed scheduling heuristic at the storage layer, enabling adaptation to diverse online environments. We build a proof-of-concept of this approach in a production distributed computation framework at Google. Evaluations in a test deployment and large-scale simulation studies using production traces show improvements of as much as 3.47$\times$ in TCO savings compared to state-of-the-art baselines.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools