pith. sign in

arxiv: 2501.07557 · v1 · submitted 2025-01-13 · 💻 cs.SD · cs.CY· eess.AS· physics.soc-ph

Decoding Musical Evolution Through Network Science

Niccolo' Di Marco , Edoardo Loru , Alessandro Galeazzi , Matteo Cinelli , Walter Quattrociocchi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 05:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SD cs.CYeess.ASphysics.soc-ph
keywords musical networksMIDI complexitygenre evolutionmelodic diversitytemporal simplificationnetwork science in musicclassical vs modern musichomogenization trends
0
0 comments X

The pith

Classical and jazz compositions exhibit higher network complexity than modern genres, yet all show a trend toward simplification over time.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The study models about 20,000 MIDI compositions from six genres over four centuries as weighted directed networks. Structural properties of these networks serve as proxies for melodic diversity and overall complexity. Results indicate that classical and jazz pieces display richer structures than more recent genres. A time-based breakdown reveals that complexity has been decreasing across the board, bringing even older styles closer to contemporary levels. This points to broader changes in how music is produced and consumed.

Core claim

By converting MIDI files into weighted directed networks and measuring their structural features, the authors establish that classical and jazz music maintain higher complexity and diversity than newer genres, while documenting a consistent historical decline in these measures that affects all styles.

What carries the argument

Weighted directed networks derived from MIDI note sequences, with edges weighted by transition frequencies, whose graph-theoretic metrics quantify musical complexity.

If this is right

  • Musical output is becoming structurally simpler across genres.
  • Digital platforms appear to favor or produce more uniform compositions.
  • Traditional genres are evolving toward the complexity profile of modern ones.
  • Network representations can track long-term changes in artistic forms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Listeners might experience less variety in melodic patterns as simplification continues.
  • The approach could extend to analyzing other sequential arts like literature or film scores.
  • Data from live performances or non-MIDI sources would test if the trend holds beyond recorded digital files.
  • Industry practices around streaming could be adjusted if simplicity correlates with listener retention.

Load-bearing premise

Modeling music as networks from MIDI files gives a reliable and comparable gauge of complexity that holds across centuries and genres.

What would settle it

Finding that network complexity scores do not match independent human assessments of musical intricacy or fail to differentiate pieces known to vary in difficulty.

read the original abstract

Music has always been central to human culture, reflecting and shaping traditions, emotions, and societal changes. Technological advancements have transformed how music is created and consumed, influencing tastes and the music itself. In this study, we use Network Science to analyze musical complexity. Drawing on $\approx20,000$ MIDI files across six macro-genres spanning nearly four centuries, we represent each composition as a weighted directed network to study its structural properties. Our results show that Classical and Jazz compositions have higher complexity and melodic diversity than recently developed genres. However, a temporal analysis reveals a trend toward simplification, with even Classical and Jazz nearing the complexity levels of modern genres. This study highlights how digital tools and streaming platforms shape musical evolution, fostering new genres while driving homogenization and simplicity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes ~20,000 MIDI files across six macro-genres spanning nearly four centuries by representing each composition as a weighted directed network and extracting structural properties. It claims that Classical and Jazz compositions exhibit higher complexity and melodic diversity than recently developed genres, while a temporal analysis shows a trend toward simplification, with even Classical and Jazz approaching modern-genre complexity levels. The work attributes this to the influence of digital tools and streaming platforms.

Significance. If the network-derived quantities can be shown to be valid, unbiased proxies for musical complexity and diversity (with appropriate controls for MIDI encoding differences), the large-scale empirical comparison would offer quantitative evidence for technological influences on musical homogenization. The dataset scale is a potential asset for reproducibility if code and construction rules are supplied.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Methods] The manuscript supplies no information on network construction rules (node/edge definitions, weighting scheme, handling of polyphony or simultaneous notes), exact complexity metrics extracted, statistical controls, genre labeling criteria, or MIDI encoding variations. This absence is load-bearing for the central claims in the abstract, as systematic differences in transcription conventions across eras could produce the reported genre and temporal patterns without reflecting musical content.
  2. [Results / Discussion] No validation is provided that the weighted directed network properties serve as comparable measures of complexity and melodic diversity across genres/eras. MIDI files differ systematically in polyphony, rhythmic quantization, and transcription practices; without explicit controls or cross-checks against established MIR metrics, the observed simplification trend cannot be distinguished from encoding artifacts.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for highlighting key areas where our manuscript requires greater methodological transparency and empirical validation. These comments are well-taken, and we will revise the paper to address them fully. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Methods] The manuscript supplies no information on network construction rules (node/edge definitions, weighting scheme, handling of polyphony or simultaneous notes), exact complexity metrics extracted, statistical controls, genre labeling criteria, or MIDI encoding variations. This absence is load-bearing for the central claims in the abstract, as systematic differences in transcription conventions across eras could produce the reported genre and temporal patterns without reflecting musical content.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the Methods section in the submitted version lacked sufficient detail on these aspects. We will expand it substantially in the revision to describe: nodes as individual notes (with pitch and duration attributes), directed edges representing note transitions with weights as normalized frequencies, handling of polyphony by modeling simultaneous notes as parallel edges from a chord node or separate transitions, the specific complexity metrics (e.g., average degree, betweenness centrality, and entropy of edge weights as proxies for melodic diversity), statistical tests employed (e.g., ANOVA with post-hoc corrections), genre assignment based on MIDI file tags and metadata, and controls for MIDI encoding by standardizing quantization and velocity. This will allow assessment of potential artifacts from transcription practices. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results / Discussion] No validation is provided that the weighted directed network properties serve as comparable measures of complexity and melodic diversity across genres/eras. MIDI files differ systematically in polyphony, rhythmic quantization, and transcription practices; without explicit controls or cross-checks against established MIR metrics, the observed simplification trend cannot be distinguished from encoding artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that without validation, the interpretation remains tentative. In the revised manuscript, we will include a new subsection on validation, where we correlate our network metrics with established MIR measures such as note entropy, pitch class profile diversity, and rhythmic variability on a representative sample of 500 files per genre. We will also conduct sensitivity analyses varying the network construction parameters and discuss how MIDI encoding differences across historical periods might influence results, qualifying our claims on technological influences accordingly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical comparison of network metrics to external labels

full rationale

The paper performs an empirical analysis by converting MIDI files to weighted directed networks, extracting structural properties such as complexity and melodic diversity measures, and comparing these quantities against independent genre and temporal labels across ~20,000 files. No equations, definitions, or self-citations are presented that reduce the reported trends (e.g., higher complexity in Classical/Jazz or temporal simplification) to fitted parameters, self-referential quantities, or load-bearing prior results from the same authors. The derivation chain consists of standard network construction followed by direct statistical comparison to external metadata, remaining self-contained against the provided genre/time benchmarks without tautological reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the modeling choice of weighted directed networks is presented as a direct representation without further justification or additional postulates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5671 in / 1143 out tokens · 34415 ms · 2026-05-23T05:33:08.547592+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Charles Eliot Norton lectures, vol

    Bernstein, L.: The Unanswered Question: Six Talks at Harvard. Charles Eliot Norton lectures, vol. v. 1-3. Harvard University Press, ??? (1976) 27 U2 Radiohead Scorpions Johann Sebastian Bach Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Madonna They Might Be Giants Deep Purple Eric Clapton Red Hot Chili Peppers The Beatles Muse The Kinks KISS Rush Steve Vai Elvis Presley The R...

    work page 1976

  2. [2]

    Frontiers Media SA (2020)

    Welch, G.F., Biasutti, M., MacRitchie, J., McPherson, G.E., Himonides, E.: The impact of music on human development and well-being. Frontiers Media SA (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Annals of the New York Academy of sciences 930(1), 28–42 (2001)

    Cross, I.: Music, cognition, culture, and evolution. Annals of the New York Academy of sciences 930(1), 28–42 (2001)

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    Scientific reports 4(1), 6130 (2014)

    Wilkins, R.W., Hodges, D.A., Laurienti, P.J., Steen, M., Burdette, J.H.: Network science and the effects of music preference on functional brain connectivity: From beethoven to eminem. Scientific reports 4(1), 6130 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 999(1), 4–14 (2003)

    Zatorre, R.J.: Music and the brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 999(1), 4–14 (2003)

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 999(1), 106–111 (2003)

    Cross, I.: Music as a biocultural phenomenon. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 999(1), 106–111 (2003)

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    Nature reviews neuro- science 15(3), 170–180 (2014)

    Koelsch, S.: Brain correlates of music-evoked emotions. Nature reviews neuro- science 15(3), 170–180 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    The Royal Society (2015)

    Honing, H., Cate, C., Peretz, I., Trehub, S.E.: Without it no music: cognition, biology and evolution of musicality. The Royal Society (2015)

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(46), 7337–7345 (2016)

    Mart´ ınez-Molina, N., Mas-Herrero, E., Rodr´ ıguez-Fornells, A., Zatorre, R.J., 28 Marco-Pallar´ es, J.: Neural correlates of specific musical anhedonia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(46), 7337–7345 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    The emotional power of music, multidisciplinary perspectives on musical arousal, expression, and social control, 121–145 (2013)

    Scherer, K.R., Coutinho, E.: How music creates emotion: A multifactorial pro- cess approach. The emotional power of music, multidisciplinary perspectives on musical arousal, expression, and social control, 121–145 (2013)

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Science 366(6468), 0868 (2019)

    Mehr, S.A., Singh, M., Knox, D., Ketter, D.M., Pickens-Jones, D., Atwood, S., Lucas, C., Jacoby, N., Egner, A.A., Hopkins, E.J.,et al.: Universality and diversity in human song. Science 366(6468), 0868 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Harvard University Press, ??? (2006)

    Mithen, S.J.: The Singing Neanderthals: The Origins of Music, Language, Mind, and Body. Harvard University Press, ??? (2006)

    work page 2006

  13. [13]

    Popular Music

    Goodwin, A.: Rationalization and democratization in the new technologies of popular music. Popular Music. Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies 2, 147–169 (2004)

    work page 2004

  14. [14]

    Popular music and society 45(1), 1–12 (2022)

    Brusila, J., Cloonan, M., Ramstedt, K.: Music, digitalization, and democracy. Popular music and society 45(1), 1–12 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    : The evolution of the music industry in the digital age: From records to streaming

    Guo, X., et al. : The evolution of the music industry in the digital age: From records to streaming. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology 5(10), 7–12 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    DIY, Alternative Cultures & Society 1(2), 125–137 (2023)

    Frenneaux, R.: The rise of independent artists and the paradox of democratisation in the digital age: Challenges faced by music artists in the new music industry. DIY, Alternative Cultures & Society 1(2), 125–137 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    EPJ Data Science 12(1), 3 (2023)

    O’Toole, K., Horv´ at, E.-´A.: Novelty and cultural evolution in modern popular music. EPJ Data Science 12(1), 3 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems 11(5), 5871–5879 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2024.3379318

    Di Marco, N., Cinelli, M., Alipour, S., Quattrociocchi, W.: Users volatility on reddit and voat. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems 11(5), 5871–5879 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2024.3379318

    work page doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3379318 2024

  19. [19]

    Plos one 18(6), 0286150 (2023)

    Etta, G., Sangiorgio, E., Di Marco, N., Avalle, M., Scala, A., Cinelli, M., Quat- trociocchi, W.: Characterizing engagement dynamics across topics on facebook. Plos one 18(6), 0286150 (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Journal of Media Economics 22(2), 102–113 (2009)

    Curien, N., Moreau, F.: The music industry in the digital era: Toward new contracts. Journal of Media Economics 22(2), 102–113 (2009)

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    Information, Communication & Society 25(1), 74–92 (2022)

    Prey, R., Esteve Del Valle, M., Zwerwer, L.: Platform pop: disentangling spotify’s intermediary role in the music industry. Information, Communication & Society 25(1), 74–92 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Accessed: 2024-12-21 29

    billboard: What Happens When Spotify Gets Behind an Artist? A Case Study of Hozier and Major Lazer. Accessed: 2024-12-21 29

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Popular Music 40(1), 1–17 (2021)

    Hodgson, T.: Spotify and the democratisation of music. Popular Music 40(1), 1–17 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    International Library of Critical Writings in Economics 70, 187–202 (1996)

    Simon, H.A.: Designing organizations for an information-rich world. International Library of Critical Writings in Economics 70, 187–202 (1996)

    work page 1996

  25. [25]

    Journal of management & engineering integration 11(1) (2018)

    Carstens, D.S., Doss, S.K., Kies, S.C.: Social media impact on attention span. Journal of management & engineering integration 11(1) (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    In: Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020, pp

    Anderson, A., Maystre, L., Anderson, I., Mehrotra, R., Lalmas, M.: Algorithmic effects on the diversity of consumption on spotify. In: Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020, pp. 2155–2165 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol

    Mok, L., Way, S.F., Maystre, L., Anderson, A.: The dynamics of exploration on spotify. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 16, pp. 663–674 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Scientific Reports 14(1), 5531 (2024)

    Parada-Cabaleiro, E., Mayerl, M., Brandl, S., Skowron, M., Schedl, M., Lex, E., Zangerle, E.: Song lyrics have become simpler and more repetitive over the last five decades. Scientific Reports 14(1), 5531 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121(50), 2412105121 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2412105121 https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2412105121

    Di Marco, N., Loru, E., Bonetti, A., Serra, A.O.G., Cinelli, M., Quat- trociocchi, W.: Patterns of linguistic simplification on social media platforms over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121(50), 2412105121 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2412105121 https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2412105121

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2412105121 2024

  30. [30]

    PloS one 9(12), 115255 (2014)

    Percino, G., Klimek, P., Thurner, S.: Instrumentational complexity of music genres and why simplicity sells. PloS one 9(12), 115255 (2014)

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    PloS one 12(10), 0185757 (2017)

    Febres, G., Jaffe, K.: Music viewed by its entropy content: A novel window for comparative analysis. PloS one 12(10), 0185757 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    In: International Conference on Communication, Devices and Computing, pp

    Chakrabarty, S., Banik, S., Ruhul Islam, M., Deva Sarma, H.K.: Measur- ing song complexity by statistical techniques. In: International Conference on Communication, Devices and Computing, pp. 687–695 (2019). Springer

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Physical Review Research6(1), 013136 (2024)

    Kulkarni, S., David, S.U., Lynn, C.W., Bassett, D.S.: Information content of note transitions in the music of js bach. Physical Review Research6(1), 013136 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Zenodo (2021)

    Ens, J., Pasquier, P.: MetaMIDI Dataset. Zenodo (2021). https://doi.org/10. 5281/ZENODO.5142664 . https://zenodo.org/record/5142664

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    The annals of mathematical statistics, 50–60 (1947)

    Mann, H.B., Whitney, D.R.: On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The annals of mathematical statistics, 50–60 (1947)

    work page 1947

  36. [36]

    Scandinavian 30 journal of statistics, 65–70 (1979)

    Holm, S.: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian 30 journal of statistics, 65–70 (1979)

    work page 1979

  37. [37]

    The R Foundation (2018)

    Konopka, T.: umap: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection. The R Foundation (2018). https://doi.org/10.32614/cran.package.umap . http://dx.doi. org/10.32614/CRAN.package.umap

    work page doi:10.32614/cran.package.umap 2018

  38. [38]

    GitHub (2021)

    Ens, J., Pasquier, P.: MetaMIDIDataset. GitHub (2021)

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    The R Founda- tion (2004)

    Ligges, U., Krey, S., Mersmann, O., Schnackenberg, S., Gu´ enard, G., Ellis, D.P.W., Technologies, U.: tuneR: Analysis of Music and Speech. The R Founda- tion (2004). https://doi.org/10.32614/cran.package.tuner . http://dx.doi.org/10. 32614/CRAN.package.tuneR

    work page doi:10.32614/cran.package.tuner 2004

  40. [40]

    Thompson, C., Antal, D., Parry, J., Phipps, D., Wolff, T.: Spotifyr: R Wrap- per for the ’Spotify’ Web API. (2022). R package version 2.2.4.0001, com- mit 45ffa4eeb5ea36eef46fe429bb67313844a709cd. https://github.com/charlie86/ spotifyr

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Science 296(5569), 910–913 (2002)

    Maslov, S., Sneppen, K.: Specificity and stability in topology of protein networks. Science 296(5569), 910–913 (2002)

    work page 2002

  42. [42]

    Opsahl, T., Colizza, V., Panzarasa, P., Ramasco, J.J.: Prominence and control: The weighted rich-club effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 168702 (2008) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.168702

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.168702 2008

  43. [43]

    Scientific Reports 14(1), 1519 (2024)

    Alipour, S., Di Marco, N., Avalle, M., Etta, G., Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W.: The drivers of global news spreading patterns. Scientific Reports 14(1), 1519 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    graph2vec: Learning Distributed Representations of Graphs

    Narayanan, A., Chandramohan, M., Venkatesan, R., Chen, L., Liu, Y., Jaiswal, S.: graph2vec: Learning distributed representations of graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.05005 (2017)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Physical review letters 93(26), 268701 (2004)

    Garlaschelli, D., Loffredo, M.I.: Patterns of link reciprocity in directed networks. Physical review letters 93(26), 268701 (2004)

    work page 2004

  46. [46]

    Scientific reports 3(1), 2729 (2013)

    Squartini, T., Picciolo, F., Ruzzenenti, F., Garlaschelli, D.: Reciprocity of weighted networks. Scientific reports 3(1), 2729 (2013)

    work page 2013

  47. [47]

    ACM SIGMOBILE mobile computing and communications review 5(1), 3–55 (2001)

    Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. ACM SIGMOBILE mobile computing and communications review 5(1), 3–55 (2001)

    work page 2001

  48. [48]

    Physical review letters 87(19), 198701 (2001)

    Latora, V., Marchiori, M.: Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Physical review letters 87(19), 198701 (2001)

    work page 2001

  49. [49]

    The Bell system technical journal 27(3), 379–423 (1948) 31

    Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell system technical journal 27(3), 379–423 (1948) 31

    work page 1948

  50. [50]

    Springer, ??? (2012)

    Meyn, S.P., Tweedie, R.L.: Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability. Springer, ??? (2012)

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    Springer, ??? (2009)

    Serfozo, R.: Basics of Applied Stochastic Processes. Springer, ??? (2009)

    work page 2009

  52. [52]

    Computer networks and ISDN systems 30(1-7), 107–117 (1998) 32

    Brin, S., Page, L.: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer networks and ISDN systems 30(1-7), 107–117 (1998) 32

    work page 1998