REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 88 references
Kaon-induced production of strange hidden-charm molecular pentaquarks $P^\Lambda_{\psi s}$ from proton
T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Kaon beams can expose the strange pentaquark states Pψs(4338) and Pψs(4459).
desk verdict A legitimate extension of the authors' qBSE molecular framework to kaon-induced production with genuinely new cross-section predictions, but the headline peaks are fragile and the truncation of inelastic channels is asserted, not demonstrated. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central object is the scattering amplitude obtained from a nine-channel coupled-channel calculation: channels \bar{K}N, $Ξc^{{(*)}}$\bar{D}^{(*)}, Ξ′c\bar{D}^{(*)}, Λc\bar{D}$s^{{(*)}}$, and ΛJ/ψ interact through one-boson-exchange potentials, and the amplitudes are solved with the quasipotential Bethe-Salpeter equation after partial-wave projection. Poles are located by searching for zeros of |1 − V(z)G(z)| in the complex energy plane, and partial-wave cross sections are computed from the on-shell amplitudes, with a cutoff Λ = 1.04 GeV taken from a previous fit to the observed line shapes and varied by ±0.1 GeV to gauge sensitivity.
What would settle it
A kaon-beam measurement of K−p → Λc\bar{D}s and K−p → Ξ′c\bar{D} with nanobarn-level sensitivity across the 4250–4550 MeV invariant-mass region would settle it: no swing near the Ξc\bar{D} threshold in Λc\bar{D}s and no peak near the Ξc\bar{D}∗ threshold in Ξ′c\bar{D} would contradict the central prediction.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The authors claim that the strange hidden-charm pentaquarks seen in B-meson decays can also be produced in kaon-nucleon scattering, and that their molecular structure leaves identifiable marks in partial-wave cross sections. Solving the coupled-channel quasipotential Bethe-Salpeter equation with one-boson-exchange potentials, they find poles below the Ξc\bar{D} and Ξc\bar{D}∗ thresholds; these poles generate a stable swing structure around 4340 MeV in the Λc\bar{D}s channel for Pψs(4338), and cutoff-dependent peaks in the Ξ′c\bar{D} channel for the two spin-parity states associated with Pψs(4459). A separate J^P = 3/2^- state near the Ξ∗c\bar{D} threshold produces a broad peak in the Ξc\bar{D}∗ channel. The large Λc\bar{D}s and Λc\bar{D}∗s cross sections in the 4350–4550 MeV region show no resonance peaks beyond threshold cusps, so the discovery channels are the smaller Ξ′c\bar{D} and Ξc\bar{D} cross sections.
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that the many omitted inelastic channels only change the overall size of the cross sections and do not distort their energy dependence; if they add energy-dependent phases or shift the couplings, the predicted peak positions and shapes in the Ξ′c\bar{D} and Λc\bar{D}s channels could move or disappear.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- The Pψs(4338) state should appear as a roughly 5 MeV-wide swing structure around 4340 MeV in the Λc\bar{D}s partial-wave cross section, stable across the cutoff range studied.
- The two Pψs(4459)-associated molecular states, with J^P = 1/2^- and 3/2^-, should both produce peaks in the Ξ′c\bar{D} channel, though the 1/2^- peak nearly disappears at the preferred cutoff of 1.04 GeV.
- A separate J^P = 3/2^- state near the Ξ∗c\bar{D} threshold produces a broad, cutoff-insensitive peak in the Ξc\bar{D}∗ channel.
- In the higher-energy region from 4350 to 4550 MeV, Λc\bar{D}s and Λc\bar{D}∗s channels have large cross sections but no distinct molecular-state peaks, so total-rate measurements alone will not reveal the pentaquarks there.
- The ΛJ/ψ final state has a small cross section, at or below about 1 nb, consistent with earlier kaon-reaction estimates.
Reading between the lines
- Beyond the paper, the predicted spin-parity dependence suggests kaon beams could serve as a spin filter: measuring the Ξ′c\bar{D} peak shape across beam momenta could distinguish the 1/2^- and 3/2^- assignments for Pψs(4459) more directly than the decay data used so far.
- The strong cutoff sensitivity of the 1/2^- peak implies that a null result in the Ξ′c\bar{D} channel at one beam energy would not falsify the molecular interpretation; only a systematic scan of the full 4250–4550 MeV region with nanobarn sensitivity could do that.
- A testable extension would be to measure the ratio of the Ξ′c\bar{D} to Λc\bar{D}s cross sections, since that ratio is less sensitive to absolute normalization uncertainties than either peak height alone.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript investigates kaon-induced production of strange hidden-charm molecular pentaquarks by computing K^- p scattering into charmed-strange final states. The authors construct one-boson-exchange potentials from effective Lagrangians and solve a quasipotential Bethe-Salpeter equation for the coupled channels KbarN, Xi_c^(*) Dbar^(*), Xi'_c Dbar^(*), Lambda_c Dbar_s^(*), and Lambda J/psi. They locate molecular poles in the complex energy plane and predict partial-wave cross sections for J^P = 1/2^- and 3/2^-, claiming that structures in the Lambda_c Dbar_s and Xi'_c Dbar channels correspond to P_psi_s(4338) and P_psi_s(4459), with additional poles near the Xi_c^* Dbar and Xi'_c Dbar thresholds. The predictions are presented as order-of-magnitude estimates, with explicit variation of the cutoff Lambda = 1.04, 1.14, and 1.24 GeV.
Significance. The work provides genuinely new, falsifiable predictions for kaon-beam experiments at J-PARC and JLab, extending the molecular interpretation of the LHCb states to a production reaction. It is a strength that the cutoff is inherited from a previous fit to LHCb data rather than refitted to the new cross sections, and that the authors explicitly show how the results depend on the cutoff. The main value is as a guide for future experimental searches. However, the robustness of the central peak assignments is not established: the signals are interference structures that depend on subtle coupled-channel phases and on the cutoff, and the treatment of omitted inelastic channels is an unvalidated assumption. With those caveats addressed, the paper would be a useful phenomenological contribution.
major comments (4)
- [Sec. 2.1] The assertion that omitted inelastic channels such as pi-Lambda, pi-Sigma, K-Xi, eta-Lambda, and multi-meson states "primarily influence cross-section magnitudes rather than the fundamental production mechanisms" is load-bearing but not demonstrated. At W = 4.3-4.5 GeV the initial KbarN system is far above the thresholds of these channels, and in a unitary coupled-channel treatment they contribute the dominant absorptive parts and energy-dependent phases that feed the production amplitude. Since the predicted peaks are pole-background interference effects in Eq. (10), a change in the complex phase of the background from omitted channels can shift, suppress, or invert the structures, not merely rescale them. The near-vanishing of the 1/2^- peak in the Xi'_c Dbar channel at the preferred cutoff (Fig. 2) makes this sensitivity concrete. Please provide a numerical test, for example by including one or more representative inelastic channels, or substantially weaken the claim.
- [Sec. 3.2, Fig. 2] The abstract's claim that both molecular states near the Xi_c Dbar^* threshold with J^P = 1/2^- and 3/2^- "produce peaks in the Xi'_c Dbar channel" is not accurate at the preferred cutoff Lambda = 1.04 GeV: the text states that the 1/2^- peak is "nearly unobservable" there and only becomes a clear nb-level peak at 1.24 GeV. The central prediction should be stated at the preferred parameter point with its uncertainty quantified, and the abstract should be adjusted accordingly; otherwise the paper overstates the robustness of its headline signal.
- [Sec. 3.3, Fig. 3] For J^P = 3/2^-, the structure associated with P_psi_s(4459) appears as a peak in the Xi'_c Dbar channel at Lambda = 1.04 GeV, disappears at 1.14 GeV, and reappears in the Xi_c Dbar channel at 1.24 GeV, while also generating a small dip in Lambda_c Dbar_s. Because the predicted observable changes from peak to dip to a peak in a different channel across the adopted cutoff range, the association with the LHCb state is not robust unless the authors provide a criterion for selecting the physical cutoff or identify a feature that is stable over the entire range.
- [Sec. 3.4, Fig. 4] The "swing structure" in the Lambda_c Dbar_s cross section near 4340 MeV is attributed to the pole corresponding to P_psi_s(4338) interfering with background, but the same energy region contains the Xi_c Dbar threshold. A calculation with the pole artificially removed, or with the pole coupling strength set to zero, would demonstrate that the structure is actually resonance-driven rather than a threshold cusp. This is needed to support the abstract's claim of a structure "corresponding to P_psi_s(4338)".
minor comments (6)
- [Sec. 1] The Introduction mentions "P_psi_s(4438)" where P_psi_s(4338) is evidently intended; please correct this typo.
- [Eq. (15)] The quantities with tildes, \tilde{J}, \tilde{j}_1, and \tilde{j}_2, are not defined below the cross-section formula; please specify whether they denote the usual (2J+1) and (2j_i+1) factors.
- [Sec. 3.1] The phrase "The colorboxe represent" should read "The color boxes represent".
- [Sec. 2.1] The mass of the broad sigma meson is taken as 500 MeV without discussion of its influence; since sigma exchange contributes substantially to the potentials, a brief comment on this model parameter and its uncertainty would be helpful.
- [Sec. 3.2] The statement that the Lambda J/psi cross section is consistent with Refs. [56-59] would benefit from a caveat that those calculations employ different production mechanisms and parameter choices, so the comparison is only qualitative.
- [Data Availability Statement] The paper states that no data are associated with it; given that the main results are cross-section curves, a small supplementary table with representative numerical values for the key channels would improve reproducibility.
Circularity Check
The computed kaon-induced cross sections are new, un-fitted observables; the self-citations are backed by external LHCb data, so no circularity is present.
full rationale
The central quantities, the partial-wave cross sections for kaon-induced production, are not used to determine any parameter in the calculation. The potential kernels, coupling constants, and the cutoff value are fixed by literature values and by a previous fit to LHCb J/psi-Lambda invariant mass spectra [32], which is external data. The new Kbar N production vertices are implemented from effective Lagrangians and are not tuned to the predicted cross sections. The molecular poles enter the production amplitudes through the same T-matrix used to compute the cross sections, so seeing resonant structures in the new channels is model consistency rather than circularity: the nontrivial predictions are which final channels show peaks or dips, their relative magnitudes, and their sensitivity to the cutoff. The self-citations [31,32] are supported by external LHCb data, and the paper explicitly varies the cutoff, so the cited input is not an unverified premise. No equation reduces a predicted cross section to a fitted quantity, and no load-bearing step is defined in terms of the claimed result.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (2)
- Form-factor cutoff Λ =
1.04 GeV, varied to 1.14 and 1.24 GeV
- Broad σ meson mass =
500 MeV
assumptions (5)
- domain assumption The observed Pψs(4338) and Pψs(4459) are predominantly S-wave hadronic molecules composed of charmed baryons and anticharmed mesons.
- domain assumption One-boson-exchange potentials with exponential form factors and a common cutoff Λ accurately describe the coupled-channel dynamics in this energy region.
- standard math The spectator quasipotential approximation, which puts the heavier hadron on shell, is valid for these scattering amplitudes.
- ad hoc to paper Unmodeled inelastic channels such as πΣ, KΞ, and multi-meson states affect only the magnitudes of the cross sections, not the shapes or peak positions.
- domain assumption The ΛJ/ψ diagonal interaction can be neglected.
invented entities (1)
-
Unobserved additional molecular poles, e.g., Ξ'cDbar with J^P=1/2^- and Ξ*cDbar with J^P=3/2^-
independent evidence
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Kaon-induced production of strange hidden-charm molecular pentaquarks $P^\Lambda_{\psi s}$ from proton." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EQN6TANQ
@misc{pith2026250109914,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Kaon-induced production of strange hidden-charm molecular pentaquarks $P^\Lambda_\psi s$ from proton},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EQN6TANQ}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09914}
}
abstract
In this work, we investigate the kaon-induced production of strange hidden-charm pentaquark $P^\Lambda_{\psi s}$ states, including the $P^\Lambda_{\psi s}(4459)$ and $P^\Lambda_{\psi s}(4338)$ observed by the LHCb collaboration. Coupled-channel interactions involving the channels $\bar{K}N$, $\Xi_c^{(*)}\bar{D}^{(*)}$, $\Xi'_c\bar{D}^{(*)}$, $\Lambda_c\bar{D}_s^{(*)}$, and $\Lambda J/\psi$ are studied using effective Lagrangians to describe these interactions. The potential kernels are constructed within the one-boson-exchange model and implemented into the quasipotential Bethe-Salpeter equation to calculate the scattering amplitudes. From these amplitudes, the partial-wave cross sections for kaon-induced production are predicted alongside the poles corresponding to strange hidden-charm molecular pentaquarks. The analysis reveals complex structures in the cross sections due to molecular states. A structure near the $\Xi_c\bar{D}$ threshold is predicted in the $\Lambda_c\bar{D}_s$ channel, corresponding to $P^\Lambda_{\psi s}(4338)$. Both molecular states near the $\Xi_c\bar{D}^*$ threshold with $J^P = 1/2^-$ and $J^P = 3/2^-$, associated with $P^\Lambda_{\psi s}(4459)$, produce peaks in the $\Xi'_c\bar{D}$ channel, which vary significantly with the cutoff. Additionally, a molecular state with $J^P = 3/2^-$ near the $\Xi_c^*\bar{D}$ threshold gives rise to a peak in the $\Xi_c\bar{D}^*$ channel. In the higher energy region, from 4350 to 4550 MeV, although the cross sections in the $\Lambda_c\bar{D}_s^{(*)}$ channels are substantial, no distinct structures corresponding to strange hidden-charm pentaquarks are identified, apart from some threshold-related cusps. These results provide valuable theoretical insights and serve as a foundation for future experimental studies of strange hidden-charm pentaquarks using kaon beams at J-PARC and JLab.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Observation of J/ψp Reso- nances Consistent with Pentaquark States in Λ0 b→ J/ψK− p De- cays,
R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Observation of J/ψp Reso- nances Consistent with Pentaquark States in Λ0 b→ J/ψK− p De- cays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 072001 (2015)
2015
-
[2]
Prediction of nar row N∗ and Λ∗ resonances with hidden charm above 4 GeV ,
J. J. Wu, R. Molina, E. Oset and B. S. Zou, “Prediction of nar row N∗ and Λ∗ resonances with hidden charm above 4 GeV ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 232001 (2010)
2010
-
[3]
The possi- ble hidden-charm molecular baryons composed of anti-charm ed meson and charmed baryon,
Z. C. Y ang, Z. F. Sun, J. He, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, “The possi- ble hidden-charm molecular baryons composed of anti-charm ed meson and charmed baryon,” Chin. Phys. C 36, 6-13 (2012)
2012
-
[4]
Σc ¯D andΛc ¯D states in a chiral quark model,
W. L. Wang, F. Huang, Z. Y . Zhang and B. S. Zou, “ Σc ¯D andΛc ¯D states in a chiral quark model,” Phys. Rev. C 84, 015203 (2011)
2011
-
[5]
Combining heavy quark sp in and local hidden gauge symmetries in the dynamical generati on of hidden charm baryons,
C. W. Xiao, J. Nieves and E. Oset, “Combining heavy quark sp in and local hidden gauge symmetries in the dynamical generati on of hidden charm baryons,” Phys. Rev. D 88, 056012 (2013)
2013
-
[6]
The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states,
H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, “The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states,” Phys. Rept. 639, 1-121 (2016)
2016
-
[7]
Hadronic molecules,
F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao and B. S. Zou, “Hadronic molecules,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, no.1, 015004 (2018)
2018
-
[8]
Identifying exotic hidden-charm pentaquarks,
R. Chen, X. Liu, X. Q. Li and S. L. Zhu, “Identifying exotic hidden-charm pentaquarks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, no. 13, 132002 (2015)
2015
Show all 88 references
-
[9]
Towar ds exotic hidden-charm pentaquarks in QCD,
H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, T. G. Steele and S. L. Zhu, “Towar ds exotic hidden-charm pentaquarks in QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, no. 17, 172001 (2015) 9
2015
-
[10]
New Exotic Meson and Baryon Resonances from Doubly-Heavy Hadronic Molecules,
M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, “New Exotic Meson and Baryon Resonances from Doubly-Heavy Hadronic Molecules,” Phys. R ev. Lett. 115 no.12, 122001 (2015)
2015
-
[11]
LHCb pentaquark as a ¯D∗Σc− ¯D∗Σ∗ c molecular state,
L. Roca, J. Nieves and E. Oset, “LHCb pentaquark as a ¯D∗Σc− ¯D∗Σ∗ c molecular state,” Phys. Rev. D 92, no. 9, 094003 (2015)
2015
-
[12]
¯DΣ∗ c and ¯D∗Σc interactions and the LHCb hidden-charmed pentaquarks,
J. He, “ ¯DΣ∗ c and ¯D∗Σc interactions and the LHCb hidden-charmed pentaquarks,” Phys. Lett. B 753, 547 (2016)
2016
-
[13]
Phenomenology of Pc(4380)+, Pc(4450)+ and related states,
T. J. Burns, “Phenomenology of Pc(4380)+, Pc(4450)+ and related states,” Eur. Phys. J. A 51 no.11, 152(2015)
2015
-
[14]
Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of the Pc(4450)+,
R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of the Pc(4450)+,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 no.22, 222001 (2019)
2019
-
[15]
Emergence of a com- plete heavy-quark spin symmetry multiplet: seven molecula r pen- taquarks in light of the latest LHCb analysis,
M. Z. Liu, Y . W. Pan, F. Z. Peng, M. S´ anchez S´ anchez, L. S.Geng, A. Hosaka and M. Pavon V alderrama, “Emergence of a com- plete heavy-quark spin symmetry multiplet: seven molecula r pen- taquarks in light of the latest LHCb analysis,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, no.24, 242001 (2019)
2019
-
[16]
Strong LHCb ev- idence supporting the existence of the hidden-charm molecu lar pentaquarks,
R. Chen, Z. F. Sun, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, “Strong LHCb ev- idence supporting the existence of the hidden-charm molecu lar pentaquarks,” Phys. Rev. D 100, no.1, 011502 (2019)
2019
-
[17]
Heavy quark spin symmet ric molecular states from ¯D(∗)Σ(∗) c and other coupled channels in the light of the recent LHCb pentaquarks,
C. W. Xiao, J. Nieves and E. Oset, “Heavy quark spin symmet ric molecular states from ¯D(∗)Σ(∗) c and other coupled channels in the light of the recent LHCb pentaquarks,” Phys. Rev. D 100, no.1, 014021 (2019)
2019
-
[18]
Study of Pc(4457), Pc(4440), and Pc(4312) in a quasipo- tential Bethe-Salpeter equation approach,
J. He, “Study of Pc(4457), Pc(4440), and Pc(4312) in a quasipo- tential Bethe-Salpeter equation approach,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79, no.5, 393 (2019)
2019
-
[19]
Possible interpretatio ns of the Pc(4312), Pc(4440), and Pc(4457),
H. X. Chen, W. Chen and S. L. Zhu, “Possible interpretatio ns of the Pc(4312), Pc(4440), and Pc(4457),” Phys. Rev. D 100, no.5, 051501 (2019)
2019
-
[20]
Interpretation of the LHCb Pc States as Hadronic Molecules and Hints of a Narrow Pc(4380),
M. L. Du, V . Baru, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, J. A. Oller and Q. Wang, “Interpretation of the LHCb Pc States as Hadronic Molecules and Hints of a Narrow Pc(4380),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, no.7, 072001 (2020)
2020
-
[21]
V . V . Anisovich, M. A. Matveev, J. Nyiri, A. V . Sarantsev a nd A. N. Semenova, Nonstrange and strange pentaquarks with hidden charm, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, no.32, 1550190 (2015)
2015
-
[22]
Z. G. Wang, Analysis of the 1 2 ± pentaquark states in the di- quark–diquark–antiquark model with QCD sum rules, Eur. Phy s. J. C 76, no.3, 142 (2016)
2016
-
[23]
Feijoo, V
A. Feijoo, V . K. Magas, A. Ramos and E. Oset, A hidden-char m S =−1 pentaquark from the decay of Λb into J/ψ,ηΛ states, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, no.8, 446 (2016)
2016
-
[24]
J. X. Lu, E. Wang, J. J. Xie, L. S. Geng and E. Oset, The Λb→ J/ψK0Λ reaction and a hidden-charm pentaquark state with strangeness, Phys. Rev. D 93, 094009 (2016)
2016
-
[25]
Looking for a hidden-charm pentaquark state with strangeness S=-1 from Ξ− b decay into J/ψK−Λ,
H. X. Chen, L. S. Geng, W. H. Liang, E. Oset, E. Wang and J. J. Xie, “Looking for a hidden-charm pentaquark state with strangeness S=-1 from Ξ− b decay into J/ψK−Λ,” Phys. Rev. C 93, no.6, 065203 (2016)
2016
-
[26]
R. Chen, J. He and X. Liu, Possible strange hidden-charm p en- taquarks from Σ(∗) c ¯D∗ s andΞ(′,∗) c ¯D∗ interactions, Chin. Phys. C 41, no.10, 103105 (2017)
2017
-
[27]
C. W. Xiao, J. Nieves and E. Oset, Prediction of hidden cha rm strange molecular baryon states with heavy quark spin symme try, Phys. Lett. B 799, 135051 (2019)
2019
-
[28]
Zhang, B
Q. Zhang, B. R. He and J. L. Ping, Pentaquarks with the qqs ¯QQ configuration in the Chiral Quark Model, [arXiv:2006.01042 [hep- ph]]
2006 arXiv
-
[29]
Spectrum of the strange hid - den charm molecular pentaquarks in chiral e ffective field theory,
B. Wang, L. Meng and S. L. Zhu, “Spectrum of the strange hid - den charm molecular pentaquarks in chiral e ffective field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 101, no.3, 034018 (2020)
2020
-
[30]
Evidence of a J/ψΛ structure and observa- tion of excited Ξ− states in the Ξ− b → J/ψΛK− decay,
R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], “Evidence of a J/ψΛ structure and observa- tion of excited Ξ− states in the Ξ− b → J/ψΛK− decay,” Sci. Bull. 66, 1278-1287 (2021)
2021
-
[31]
Pcs(4459) and other possible molecular states fromΞ(∗) c ¯D(∗) andΞ′ c ¯D(∗) interactions,
J. T. Zhu, L. Q. Song and J. He, “ Pcs(4459) and other possible molecular states fromΞ(∗) c ¯D(∗) andΞ′ c ¯D(∗) interactions,” Phys. Rev. D 103, no.7, 074007 (2021)
2021
-
[32]
PΛ ψs(4459) and PΛ ψs(4338) as molecular states in J/ψΛ invariant mass spectra,
J. T. Zhu, S. Y . Kong and J. He, “ PΛ ψs(4459) and PΛ ψs(4338) as molecular states in J/ψΛ invariant mass spectra,” Phys. Rev. D 107, no.3, 034029 (2023)
2023
-
[33]
Establishing the first hidden-charm pentaquark with strangeness,
H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and X. H. Liu, “Establishing the first hidden-charm pentaquark with strangeness,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81, no.5, 409 (2021)
2021
-
[34]
Analysis of hidden-charm pentaqua rk molecular states with and without strangeness via the QCD su m rules *,
Z. G. Wang and Q. Xin, “Analysis of hidden-charm pentaqua rk molecular states with and without strangeness via the QCD su m rules *,” Chin. Phys. C 45, no.12, 123105 (2021)
2021
-
[35]
The Pcs(4459) pentaquark from a combined e ffective field theory and phenomenological perspective,
F. Z. Peng, M. J. Y an, M. S´ anchez S´ anchez and M. P . V alderrama, “The Pcs(4459) pentaquark from a combined e ffective field theory and phenomenological perspective,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81, no.7, 666 (2021)
2021
-
[36]
A new look at the Pcs states from a molecular perspective,
A. Feijoo, W. F. Wang, C. W. Xiao, J. J. Wu, E. Oset, J. Nieve s and B. S. Zou, “A new look at the Pcs states from a molecular perspective,” Phys. Lett. B 839, 137760 (2023)
2023
-
[37]
Observation of a J/ψΛ Resonance Con- sistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate in B−→ J/ψΛp De- cays,
R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], “Observation of a J/ψΛ Resonance Con- sistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate in B−→ J/ψΛp De- cays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, no.3, 031901 (2023)
2023
-
[38]
Analysis of Pcs(4338) and related pentaquark molecular states via QCD sum rules*,
X. W. Wang and Z. G. Wang, “Analysis of Pcs(4338) and related pentaquark molecular states via QCD sum rules*,” Chin. Phys . C 47, no.1, 013109 (2023)
2023
-
[39]
Emergence of molecular-type chara cteris- tic spectrum of hidden-charm pentaquark with strangeness embod- ied in the PΛ ψs(4338) and Pcs(4459),
F. L. Wang and X. Liu, “Emergence of molecular-type chara cteris- tic spectrum of hidden-charm pentaquark with strangeness embod- ied in the PΛ ψs(4338) and Pcs(4459),” Phys. Lett. B 835, 137583 (2022)
2022
-
[40]
PΛ ψs(4338) pentaquark and its partners in the molecular pic- ture,
M. J. Y an, F. Z. Peng, M. S´ anchez S´ anchez and M. Pavon V alder- rama, “ PΛ ψs(4338) pentaquark and its partners in the molecular pic- ture,” Phys. Rev. D 107, no.7, 7 (2023)
2023
-
[41]
Investigation of magnetic moment of Pcs(4338) and Pcs(4459) pentaquark states,
U. ¨Ozdem, “Investigation of magnetic moment of Pcs(4338) and Pcs(4459) pentaquark states,” Phys. Lett. B 836, 137635 (2023)
2023
-
[42]
What can we lear n from the electromagnetic properties of hidden-charm molec ular pentaquarks with single strangeness?,
F. L. Wang, H. Y . Zhou, Z. W. Liu and X. Liu, “What can we lear n from the electromagnetic properties of hidden-charm molec ular pentaquarks with single strangeness?,” Phys. Rev. D 106, no.5, 054020 (2022)
2022
-
[43]
Pole determination of PΛ ψs(4338) and possible PΛ ψs(4255) in B−→ J/ψΛp,
S. X. Nakamura and J. J. Wu, “Pole determination of PΛ ψs(4338) and possible PΛ ψs(4255) in B−→ J/ψΛp,” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.1, L011501 (2023)
2023
-
[44]
Rich structure of the hidden-charm pen- taquarks near threshold regions,
A. Giachino, A. Hosaka, E. Santopinto, S. Takeuchi, M. Ta kizawa and Y . Y amaguchi, “Rich structure of the hidden-charm pen- taquarks near threshold regions,” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.7, 074012 (2023)
2023
-
[45]
Strange hidde n- charm PΛ ψs(4459) and PΛ ψs(4338) pentaquarks and additional PΛ ψs, PΣ ψs and P N ψss candidates in a quark model approach,
P . G. Ortega, D. R. Entem and F. Fernandez, “Strange hidde n- charm PΛ ψs(4459) and PΛ ψs(4338) pentaquarks and additional PΛ ψs, PΣ ψs and P N ψss candidates in a quark model approach,” Phys. Lett. B 838, 137747 (2023)
2023
-
[46]
Discovery pote ntial of hidden charm baryon resonances via photoproduction,
Y . Huang, J. He, H. F. Zhang and X. R. Chen, “Discovery pote ntial of hidden charm baryon resonances via photoproduction,” J. Phys. G 41, no.11, 115004 (2014)
2014
-
[47]
Neutral hidden charm pentaquark states P0 c (4380) and P0 c(4450) inπ− p→ J/ψn reaction,
Q. F. L¨ u, X. Y . Wang, J. J. Xie, X. R. Chen and Y . B. Dong, “Neutral hidden charm pentaquark states P0 c (4380) and P0 c(4450) inπ− p→ J/ψn reaction,” Phys. Rev. D 93, no.3, 034009 (2016)
2016
-
[48]
Photopr o- duction of hidden-charm states in the γp→ ¯D∗0Λ+ c reaction near threshold,
Y . Huang, J. J. Xie, J. He, X. Chen and H. F. Zhang, “Photopr o- duction of hidden-charm states in the γp→ ¯D∗0Λ+ c reaction near threshold,” Chin. Phys. C 40, no.12, 124104 (2016)
2016
-
[49]
Heavy pentaquark state s Pc(4380) and Pc(4450) in the J/ψ production induced by pion beams offthe nucleon,
S. H. Kim, H. C. Kim and A. Hosaka, “Heavy pentaquark state s Pc(4380) and Pc(4450) in the J/ψ production induced by pion beams offthe nucleon,” Phys. Lett. B 763, 358-364 (2016)
2016
-
[50]
Photoproduction of hidden-bottom pentaquar k and related topics,
X. Cao, F. K. Guo, Y . T. Liang, J. J. Wu, J. J. Xie, Y . P . Xie, Z. Y ang and B. S. Zou, “Photoproduction of hidden-bottom pentaquar k and related topics,” Phys. Rev. D 101, no.7, 074010 (2020)
2020
-
[51]
Possibility to study pent aquark states Pc(4312), Pc(4440), and Pc(4457) inγp→ J/ψp reaction,
X. Y . Wang, X. R. Chen and J. He, “Possibility to study pent aquark states Pc(4312), Pc(4440), and Pc(4457) inγp→ J/ψp reaction,” Phys. Rev. D 99, no.11, 114007 (2019)
2019
-
[52]
Production of hidden- charm and hidden-bottom pentaquark states in electron-pro ton collisions,
Y . P . Xie, X. Cao, Y . T. Liang and X. Chen, “Production of hidden- charm and hidden-bottom pentaquark states in electron-pro ton collisions,” Chin. Phys. C 45, no.4, 043105 (2021) 10
2021
-
[53]
Semi-inclusive electrop ro- duction of hidden-charm and double-charm hadronic molecul es,
P . P . Shi, F. K. Guo and Z. Y ang, “Semi-inclusive electrop ro- duction of hidden-charm and double-charm hadronic molecul es,” Phys. Rev. D 106, no.11, 114026 (2022)
2022
-
[54]
Pion-induced production of hidden-charm pentaquarks Pc(4312), Pc(4440), and Pc(4457),
X. Y . Wang, J. He, X. R. Chen, Q. Wang and X. Zhu, “Pion-induced production of hidden-charm pentaquarks Pc(4312), Pc(4440), and Pc(4457),” Phys. Lett. B 797, 134862 (2019)
2019
-
[55]
Production of the superheavy ba ryon Λ∗ c¯c (4209) in kaon-induced reaction,
X. Y . Wang and X. R. Chen, “Production of the superheavy ba ryon Λ∗ c¯c (4209) in kaon-induced reaction,” Eur. Phys. J. A 51, no.7, 85 (2015)
2015
-
[56]
Production of hidden- charm strange pentaquarks Pcs from the K− p→ J/ψΛ reaction,
S. Clymton, H. J. Kim and H. C. Kim, “Production of hidden- charm strange pentaquarks Pcs from the K− p→ J/ψΛ reaction,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.1, 014023 (2021)
2021
-
[57]
E. Y . Paryev, “On the possibility of testing the two-peak struc- ture of the LHCb hidden-charm strange pentaquark Pcs(4459) 0 in near-threshold antikaon-induced charmonium production o n pro- tons and nuclei,” Nucl. Phys. A 1037, 122687 (2023)
2023
-
[58]
E. Y . Paryev, “Regarding the possibility to observe the L HCb hidden-charm strange pentaquark Pcs(4459)0 in antikaon-induced J/ψ meson production on protons and nuclei near the J/ψΛ pro- duction threshold,” Nucl. Phys. A 1023, 122452 (2022)
2022
-
[59]
The e ffect of hidden-charm strange pentaquarks Pcs on the K− p→ J/ψΛ reaction,
S. Clymton, H. J. Kim and H. C. Kim, “The e ffect of hidden-charm strange pentaquarks Pcs on the K− p→ J/ψΛ reaction,” Rev. Mex. Fis. Suppl. 3, no.3, 0308040 (2022)
2022
-
[60]
Searching for strange hid den- charm pentaquark state Pcs(4459) in γp → K+Pcs(4459) reac- tion,
C. Cheng, F. Y ang and Y . Huang, “Searching for strange hid den- charm pentaquark state Pcs(4459) in γp → K+Pcs(4459) reac- tion,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.11, 116007 (2021)
2021
-
[61]
Chiral Lagrangians for radiative decays of hea vy hadrons,
H. Y . Cheng, C. Y . Cheung, G. L. Lin, Y . C. Lin, T. M. Y an and H. L. Y u, “Chiral Lagrangians for radiative decays of hea vy hadrons,” Phys. Rev. D 47, 1030-1042 (1993)
1993
-
[62]
Heavy quark symmetry and chiral dynamics,
T. M. Y an, H. Y . Cheng, C. Y . Cheung, G. L. Lin, Y . C. Lin and H. L. Y u, “Heavy quark symmetry and chiral dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 46, 1148 (1992) Erratum: [Phys. Rev. D 55, 5851 (1997)]
1992
-
[63]
Chiral perturbation theory for hadrons cont aining a heavy quark,
M. B. Wise, “Chiral perturbation theory for hadrons cont aining a heavy quark,” Phys. Rev. D 45, 2188 (1992)
1992
-
[64]
Phenomenology of heavy meson chiral Lagrangians,
R. Casalbuoni, A. Deandrea, N. Di Bartolomeo, R. Gatto, F . Fer- uglio and G. Nardulli, “Phenomenology of heavy meson chiral Lagrangians,” Phys. Rept. 281, 145 (1997)
1997
-
[65]
Review of Particle Physics,
M. Tanabashi et al. [Particle Data Group], “Review of Particle Physics,” Phys. Rev. D 98, no. 3, 030001 (2018)
2018
-
[66]
Λc N bound states revisited,
Y . R. Liu and M. Oka, “ Λc N bound states revisited,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 014015 (2012)
2012
-
[67]
Char ming pen- guins in B→ K∗π, K(ρ,ω,φ ) decays,
C. Isola, M. Ladisa, G. Nardulli and P . Santorelli, “Char ming pen- guins in B→ K∗π, K(ρ,ω,φ ) decays,” Phys. Rev. D 68, 114001 (2003)
2003
-
[68]
Strong decays of excited heavy mesons in chiral perturbation theory,
A. F. Falk and M. E. Luke, “Strong decays of excited heavy mesons in chiral perturbation theory,” Phys. Lett. B 292, 119 (1992)
1992
-
[69]
Systematical st udy ofΩc like molecular states from interactions Ξ(′,∗) c K andΞ(∗) D(∗),
J. T. Zhu, S. Y . Kong, L. Q. Song and J. He, “Systematical st udy ofΩc like molecular states from interactions Ξ(′,∗) c K andΞ(∗) D(∗),” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.9, 094036 (2022)
2022
-
[70]
Coupled-channel dynamics in the reactions πN→πN,η N, KΛ, KΣ,
D. Ronchen, M. Doring, F. Huang, H. Haberzettl, J. Haiden - bauer, C. Hanhart, S. Krewald, U. G. Meissner and K. Nakayama, “Coupled-channel dynamics in the reactions πN→πN,η N, KΛ, KΣ,” Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 44 (2013)
2013
-
[71]
Dynamical coupled - channel model of meson production reactions in the nucleon r eso- nance region,
A. Matsuyama, T. Sato and T. S. H. Lee, “Dynamical coupled - channel model of meson production reactions in the nucleon r eso- nance region,” Phys. Rept. 439, 193-253 (2007)
2007
-
[72]
Possible molecular states from the N∆ interaction,
Z. T. Lu, H. Y . Jiang and J. He, “Possible molecular states from the N∆ interaction,” Phys. Rev. C 102, no.4, 045202 (2020)
2020
-
[73]
Role of Y(4630) in the p ¯p→Λc ¯Λc reaction near threshold,
Y . Y . Wang, Q. F. L¨ u, E. Wang and D. M. li, “Role of Y(4630) in the p ¯p→Λc ¯Λc reaction near threshold,” Phys. Rev. D 94, 014025 (2016)
2016
-
[74]
SU(4), SU(8) Mass Formulas and Weak Interacti ons,
S. Okubo, “SU(4), SU(8) Mass Formulas and Weak Interacti ons,” Phys. Rev. D 11, 3261-3269 (1975)
1975
-
[75]
Charmonium a b- sorption by nucleons,
A. Sibirtsev, K. Tsushima and A. W. Thomas, “Charmonium a b- sorption by nucleons,” Phys. Rev. C 63, 044906 (2001)
2001
-
[76]
Cross-section for charmoni um absorption by nucleons,
W. Liu, C. M. Ko and Z. W. Lin, “Cross-section for charmoni um absorption by nucleons,” Phys. Rev. C 65, 015203 (2002)
2002
-
[77]
Strong two-body decays of the Lambda(c)(2940)+ in a hadronic molecule picture,
Y . Dong, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche and V . E. Lyubovitskij, “ Strong two-body decays of the Lambda(c)(2940)+ in a hadronic molecule picture,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 014006 (2010)
2010
-
[78]
Strong decay mode J/ψp of hidden charm pentaquark states P+ c (4380) and P+ c (4450) inΣc ¯D∗ molecu- lar scenario,
Q. F. L¨ u and Y . B. Dong, “Strong decay mode J/ψp of hidden charm pentaquark states P+ c (4380) and P+ c (4450) inΣc ¯D∗ molecu- lar scenario,” Phys. Rev. D 93, no.7, 074020 (2016)
2016
-
[79]
How much charm can PANDA produce?,
A. Khodjamirian, C. Klein, T. Mannel and Y . M. Wang, “How much charm can PANDA produce?,” Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 31 (2012)
2012
-
[80]
E ffects of a N∗ c¯c resonance with hidden charm in the π− p→ D−Σ+ c reaction near threshold,
E. J. Garzon and J. J. Xie, “E ffects of a N∗ c¯c resonance with hidden charm in the π− p→ D−Σ+ c reaction near threshold,” Phys. Rev. C 92, no.3, 035201 (2015)
2015
-
[81]
Molecular states from Σ(∗) c ¯D(∗)−Λc ¯D(∗) interaction,
J. He and D. Y . Chen, “Molecular states from Σ(∗) c ¯D(∗)−Λc ¯D(∗) interaction,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79 no.11, 887 (2019)
2019
-
[82]
Covariant spectator theory of n p scatter- ing: Phase shifts obtained from precision fits to data below 3 50- MeV ,
F. Gross and A. Stadler, “Covariant spectator theory of n p scatter- ing: Phase shifts obtained from precision fits to data below 3 50- MeV ,” Phys. Rev. C78, 014005 (2008)
2008
-
[83]
The Zc(3900) as a resonance from the D ¯D∗ interaction,
J. He, “The Zc(3900) as a resonance from the D ¯D∗ interaction,” Phys. Rev. D 92, no.3, 034004 (2015)
2015
-
[84]
Study of the B ¯B∗/D ¯D∗ bound states in a Bethe-Salpeter approach,
J. He, “Study of the B ¯B∗/D ¯D∗ bound states in a Bethe-Salpeter approach,” Phys. Rev. D 90, no. 7, 076008 (2014)
2014
-
[85]
New Structure Around 3250 MeV in the Baryonic B Decay and the D∗ 0(2400)N Molecular Hadron,
J. He, D. Y . Chen and X. Liu, “New Structure Around 3250 MeV in the Baryonic B Decay and the D∗ 0(2400)N Molecular Hadron,” Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2121 (2012)
2012
-
[86]
Charge conjugation invariance of the spectat or equa- tions,
F. Gross, “Charge conjugation invariance of the spectat or equa- tions,” Few Body Syst. 30, 21-29 (2001)
2001
-
[87]
Low lying axial-vector mes ons as dynamically generated resonances,
L. Roca, E. Oset and J. Singh, “Low lying axial-vector mes ons as dynamically generated resonances,” Phys. Rev. D 72, 014002 (2005)
2005
-
[88]
The octet meson and octet baryon intera ction with strangeness and the Λ(1405),
J. He and P . L. Lu, “The octet meson and octet baryon intera ction with strangeness and the Λ(1405),” Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24, no.11, 1550088 (2015)
2015
Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.