Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 51 references

Phase-matched electron-photon interactions enabled by 3D-printed helical waveguides

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A helically wound optical waveguide makes passing electrons emit collimated, circularly polarized light, with photon energy fixed by the helix geometry and electron speed.

desk verdict A genuinely new, parameter-free phase-matching geometry for electron-driven photon sources with a solid multi-modal experiment, but the straight-fiber dispersion assumption in a tight bend is the load-bearing link and the efficiency claim needs a shown baseline. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.16486 v2 pith:SXRREXF5 submitted 2025-01-27 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hall

Masoud Taleb , Mohsen Samadi , Nahid Talebi This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mes-hall
keywords Smith-Purcellradiationcathodoluminescencehelicalwaveguideplasmonicelectron-drivenphotonsourcecircularpolarizationtwo-photonpolymerizationphasematching
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a waveguide bent into a helix creates a durable phase-lock between a moving electron and the light it excites. As the electron passes each turn of the helix, it couples to the waveguide's plasmonic mode; the extra optical path along the coil keeps the interaction synchronized, so radiation emerges directionally and collinearly with the beam. The measured cathodoluminescence peak at 2.1 eV for 18 keV electrons matches a generalized phase-matching condition that reduces to the Smith-Purcell and Cherenkov limits. A sympathetic reader would care because this makes 3D-printed helices compact, tunable electron-driven photon sources with circular polarization, at reported rates two orders of magnitude above planar plasmonic sources.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the helix treated as a distributed phase-matching element. The central identity is Eq. (1), the phase balance $k_g(\omega)\sqrt{(2\pi r_h)^2+\Lambda^2}+2\pi m=\omega\Lambda/v_e$, where $k_g(\omega)$ is the propagation constant of the straight fiber's guided mode, $r_h$ the helix radius, $\Lambda$ the pitch, and $v_e$ the electron speed. It states that the phase the guided photon accumulates along one helical turn, plus an integer diffraction order, equals the phase the electron's near field accumulates over one pitch. This condition carries the argument: with the analytically computed dispersion of the gold-clad fiber, it predicts photon energies near 2.1 eV for 18 keV electrons and $m=0$, and it reduces to the Smith-Purcell condition when $r_h=0$ and to Cherenkov radiation when $m=0$ and $r_h=0$. The helix geometry also converts the guided plasmonic wave into free-space radiation through curvature-induced leakage.

What would settle it

Fabricate a set of helices with identical pitch (5.85 μm) but different helix radii, and measure the cathodoluminescence peak for 18 keV electrons. Equation (1) predicts a specific monotonic shift in photon energy with radius; if the peaks do not track that curve, the straight-fiber dispersion assumption or the phase-matching picture is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a new way to satisfy phase matching between an electron and a guided optical mode: replace the straight grating with a gold-coated polymer helix. In the reported structure, a 400-nm-radius fiber with a 40-nm gold shell is wound into a helix with radius 1.76 μm and pitch 5.85 μm; an 18 keV electron traveling parallel to the helix axis excites the fundamental hybrid plasmonic mode (azimuthal order n=1) of the fiber, and the sequential interaction at each turning point produces radiation at 2.1 eV. The emission is collimated at specific angles and right-handed circularly polarized, with the handedness following the helix handedness, and the measured peak agrees with Eq. (1). The paper further reports about 0.02 photons per electron for an 11-turn helix, roughly two orders of magnitude higher than planar plasmonic electron-driven photon sources, and numerical simulations reproduce a broad resonance near 2.2 eV with the same collimation. The authors emphasize that this is not pure Smith-Purcell radiation: for 18 keV electrons, pure grating diffraction would require diffraction orders m=13 to 35, while Eq. (1) with m=0 suffices.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction assumes that bending the fiber into a helix leaves the waveguide's optical modes exactly as they are in the straight fiber; if the coil changes the mode's phase velocity or the phase accumulated along the curved path, the agreement at 2.1 eV would no longer be evidence for Eq. (1).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The emitted photon energy can be tuned by changing the electron kinetic energy or the helix pitch and radius, just as Eq. (1) prescribes; the supplementary measurements show the peak following the predicted dispersion for 15, 17, and 20 keV electrons.
  • Directional, collinear, circularly polarized emission makes these helices suitable as internal light sources in electron microscopes for phase-locked photon-electron measurements, including chiral excitons in two-dimensional materials.
  • The reported rate of 0.02 photons per electron for an 11-turn helix is about two orders of magnitude higher than planar plasmonic electron-driven photon sources, enabling nonlinear or pump-probe experiments.
  • Because the helix is fabricated by two-photon polymerization 3D printing, the design can be scaled and varied across pitches, radii, and handedness without clean-room grating patterning.
  • Launching light into the waveguide in the inverse configuration could shape or accelerate electron beams, extending dielectric laser acceleration ideas to helical structures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A clean test of the geometric origin that the paper leaves implicit: fabricate right- and left-handed helices with identical pitch and radius; Eq. (1) predicts identical spectra while the measured Stokes parameter $S_3$ should flip sign. That would separate helix chirality from sample asymmetries.
  • The phase-matching formula suggests a broader design rule: because $r_h$ enters explicitly, scanning helix radius at fixed pitch should shift the emission energy in a predictable way, offering a direct way to benchmark the straight-fiber dispersion assumption across many structures.
  • If the reported photon rate holds at typical microscope beam currents, these helices could act as compact, laser-free ultrafast light sources inside scanning electron microscopes; this extension goes beyond what the paper demonstrates.
  • The combination of Cherenkov-like and Smith-Purcell-like coupling implies the same geometry might work at lower electron energies by increasing the helix radius, opening tabletop electron energies to phase-matched emission; this is an extrapolation, not a stated result.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a helically shaped optical waveguide as an electron-driven photon source. A 3D-printed polymer fiber (radius 400 nm) coated with a 40 nm gold layer is wound into a helix with radius 1.76 um and pitch 5.85 um. For an electron traveling parallel to the helix axis, the authors introduce a generalized Smith-Purcell phase-matching condition, Eq. (1), which balances the optical phase accumulated in the guided mode along one helix turn against the electron's phase advance over one pitch, plus an integer diffraction order m. Using the analytically computed straight-fiber mode dispersion, they predict emission near 2.1 eV for an 18 keV electron. Cathodoluminescence experiments show a spectral peak at 2.1 eV, a directional angular pattern, and circular polarization whose handedness follows the helix. The paper also reports an emission efficiency of about 0.02 photons per electron, claimed to be roughly 200 times higher than planar plasmonic sources, and a supplementary measurement of photon-energy dependence on electron kinetic energy. FDTD simulations of the full helix show a broad peak near 2.2 eV, cited as partial numerical support.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper introduces a new phase-matching geometry for electron-driven photon sources: a waveguide bent into a helix provides a long optical path and multiple sequential interactions, yielding collimated, circularly polarized visible light from a compact 3D-printed structure. The predicted emission energy is derived without a free parameter, using measured geometric dimensions and tabulated permittivities, which is a strong feature and makes the observation at 2.1 eV a genuine predictive test rather than a fit. The combination of analytical mode dispersion, fabrication, CL spectroscopy, polarimetry, and FDTD is a substantial experimental and theoretical effort. However, the central prediction rests on an unverified assumption that the helical waveguide's dispersion is identical to that of the straight fiber, and the efficiency advantage is stated without the supporting baseline measurement or error analysis. These concerns preclude acceptance in the current form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results, paragraph beginning 'For simplicity'] Equation (1) uses k_g(omega), the propagation constant of the straight fiber, but the fabricated structure is a helix whose true eigenmodes are Bloch modes of period Lambda. The manuscript explicitly states, 'For simplicity, we assume that the waveguiding modes remain unchanged when the straight fiber is transformed into a helix.' This is the load-bearing assumption behind the predicted 2.1 eV peak. The geometry is not in the small-curvature limit: with r_h = 1.76 um and Lambda = 5.85 um, the local bend radius is R_c = r_h + Lambda^2/(4*pi^2*r_h) approximately 2.25 um, so a/R_c is about 0.18, not the a/Lambda approximately 0.07 that the paper later cites as the justification ('relatively large helical pitch of the helix compared to the fiber's radius'). A few-percent curvature-induced shift in k_g/k_0 would shift the predicted photon energy by tens to hundreds of meV, which is well within the broad CL feature (roughly 2.1 to 2.5 eV in Fig. 3b). The single-point match at 2.1 eV is therefore not a discriminating test. I recommend that the authors verify the assumption by computing the Bloch-mode dispersion K(omega) of one helical pitch (or by extracting K(omega) from the FDTD simulation directly) and show that it differs from the straight-fiber k_g by a negligible amount over the relevant energy range.
  2. [Results, paragraph beginning 'The metallic layer serves a dual purpose'] The efficiency claim of 'approximately 0.02 photon per given electron' and the statement that this is 'significantly higher than the emission from planar, plasmonic-based electron-driven photon sources emitting at the rate of approximately 10^-4 per given electron' are presented without error bars and without a shown planar baseline measurement. The photon-counting calibration procedure is described, but the comparison measurement on a planar source is not reported, and no statistical uncertainty is given for the 0.02 value. Since the abstract and conclusion emphasize 'stronger electron-photon interactions' and a 'new paradigm,' this efficiency advantage is a central part of the paper's impact. Please provide the baseline CL measurement under identical detection conditions, or clearly indicate that the 10^-4 value is taken from the literature, and add an uncertainty estimate for the stated photon-per-electron rate.
  3. [Results, paragraph beginning 'The simulations of a moving electron' and Fig. 5] The FDTD validation is not yet strong enough to independently support the central phase-matching claim. The simulation uses a 15 nm grid for a structure whose gold film is approximately 40 nm thick, leaving only two to three cells across the metal, and the paper does not report a convergence check or an independent validation of the in-house solver for this geometry. The calculated spectrum shows a broad peak centered at 2.2 eV, which is consistent with the experimental 2.1 eV peak only within the broad linewidth; the simulation does not directly extract the Bloch wavenumber K(omega) or the phase advance along the helix, so it does not resolve the straight-fiber versus helical-dispersion question raised above. A converged simulation or a comparison with a commercial/independently benchmarked solver would substantially strengthen the evidence.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Supplementary Note 3 / Fig. S2] The energy-dependence comparison should state explicitly how the diffraction order m is selected for each electron energy. For 20 keV, the m=0 phase-matching condition gives 2.65 eV while the measured peak is 2.4 eV, and the text invokes the m=1 branch at 2.5 eV; a brief explanation of why m=1 is the relevant branch would avoid the appearance of post-hoc assignment.
  2. [Figure 5 caption] The caption states 'electron at the kinetic energy of 18 eV'; this should be 18 keV to be consistent with the main text.
  3. [Results, paragraph beginning 'A moving electron'] The notation '20nmhrb++' is ambiguous; please define the terms (presumably a 20 nm gap plus helix radius r_h plus fiber radius b, or similar) in the text or figure.
  4. [Fig. 3(c) and related polarimetry text] The manuscript defines S0, S1, and S3 but not S2; since the term 'Stokes parameters' is used in the plural, a complete definition of all four parameters with a short explanation of the detector convention would improve clarity.
  5. [Supplementary Note 1, Eq. (S9)-(S11)] The coefficient formulas contain terms that are not explicitly simplified, and the derivation jumps from the four coupled equations to the eigenvalue problem; a short step explaining how the determinant condition is obtained would help readers reproduce the dispersion plotted in Fig. 1(b).
  6. [References] Reference [36] states that the Supplemental Material includes Refs. [42-44], but the supplementary document as provided lists only three references; please renumber or correct the cross-reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (1) is a parameter-free phase-matching prediction; score 2 reflects only a minor self-citation and a post-hoc modal-assumption validation.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular. Eq. (1) follows from the phase balance k_g*sqrt((2*pi*r_h)^2 + Lambda^2) = omega*Lambda/v_e - 2*pi*m, with k_g(omega) taken from the analytic straight-fiber mode solution in Supplementary Note 1, which uses the standard Harrington/Cherin cylinder-mode formalism and the Johnson-Christy gold permittivity. The inputs are measured geometry (r_h = 1.76 um, Lambda = 5.85 um, a = 400 nm, 40 nm gold layer), the stated polymer refractive index, and the known electron energy; no free parameter is fitted to the CL spectrum. The observed 2.1 eV peak is therefore a genuine prediction. The paper explicitly flags its main approximation: 'For simplicity, we assume that the waveguiding modes remain unchanged when the straight fiber is transformed into a helix.' This is an admitted modeling assumption, not a hidden fit or a definition of the result. The later statement that the optical modes are 'only slightly modified' because the phase-matching prediction agrees is post-hoc validation rather than circular reduction: the agreement is consistent with the assumption but does not prove it, and the paper itself supplies the justification 'relatively large helical pitch... compared to the fiber's radius.' That dimensionless ratio is debatable and the bend is tight, but this is a correctness/fragility concern, not equivalence by construction. The only notable self-citation is the in-house FDTD solver [40] used for the full-helix simulation; that simulation is partial corroboration with a coarse 15 nm grid and is not the load-bearing claim, so it does not make the argument circular. No uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation: the straight-fiber modes are solved from first principles in the supplement. The 20 keV data are interpreted as the m = 1 diffraction order when m = 0 does not match; this is a discrete physical-order assignment based on angle and energy, not a continuous fit renamed as a prediction. Overall, the paper is self-contained against its main experimental benchmark, and no step reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central prediction rests on measured geometry and standard mode solutions. No new entities are introduced. The main burden is carried by the domain assumptions that a straight-fiber mode is preserved in the helix and that a simple path-length phase sum describes the interaction.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Straight-fiber modes apply to the helix
    Stated in the Results: 'For simplicity, we assume that the waveguiding modes remain unchanged when the straight fiber is transformed into a helix.' The dispersion k_g(omega) used in Eq. (1) comes from the straight-fiber solution.
  • domain assumption Sequential interaction model
    Phase-matching is derived by summing the optical path between two turning points of the helix and equating it with the electron phase advance. This assumes the electron's near field excites the guided mode only at turning points and that the accumulated phase is the geometric arc length.
  • domain assumption Bending induces radiation leakage
    The paper assumes the sharp curvature of the helix causes partial leakage of the guided energy into free space ('the curvature of the helix ... facilitates partial leakage'), which is necessary for far-field detection but is not derived from first principles.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phase-matched electron-photon interactions enabled by 3D-printed helical waveguides." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SXRREXF5

@misc{pith2026250116486,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phase-matched electron-photon interactions enabled by 3D-printed helical waveguides},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SXRREXF5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.16486}
}
read the original abstract

The Smith-Purcell effect enables electromagnetic radiation across arbitrary spectral ranges by phase-matching the diffraction orders of an optical grating with the near-field of a moving electron. In this work, we introduce a novel approach using a helically shaped waveguide, where phase-matching is achieved through guided light within a helical optical fiber fabricated via two-photon polymerization using a 3D printer. Our results demonstrate that radiation from these structures precisely satisfies the phase-matching condition and is emitted directionally at specific angles, contrasting with the broad angular distribution characteristic of the traditional Smith-Purcell effect. Helical electron-driven photon sources establish a new paradigm, enabling 3D-printed structures to control electron-beam-induced radiation and, inversely, to facilitate light-induced efficient electron beam shaping and acceleration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.16486 by the authors.

Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Merging transformation optics with electron -driven photon sources,

    N. Talebi et al. , "Merging transformation optics with electron -driven photon sources," Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 599, 2019/02/05 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08488-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08488-4 2019

  2. [2]

    Electr on-driven photon sources for correlative electron-photon spectroscopy with electron microscopes,

    J. Christopher, M. Taleb, A. Maity, M. Hentschel, H. Giessen, and N. Talebi, "Electr on-driven photon sources for correlative electron-photon spectroscopy with electron microscopes," Nanophotonics, vol. 9, no. 15, pp. 4381-4406, 2020, doi: doi:10.1515/nanoph-2020-0263

    doi:10.1515/nanoph-2020-0263 2020

  3. [3]

    Interaction of electron beams with optical nanostructur es and metamaterials: from coherent photon sources towards shaping the wave function,

    N. Talebi, "Interaction of electron beams with optical nanostructur es and metamaterials: from coherent photon sources towards shaping the wave function," Journal of Optics, vol. 19, no. 10, p. 103001, 2017/09/12 2017, doi: 10.1088/2040-8986/aa8041

    doi:10.1088/2040-8986/aa8041 2017

  4. [4]

    Light Well: A Tunable Free-Electron Light Source on a Chip,

    G. Adamo et al., "Light Well: A Tunable Free-Electron Light Source on a Chip," Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, no. 11, p. 113901, 09/09/ 2009, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.113901

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.113901 2009

  5. [5]

    Spectral Interferometry with Electron Microscopes,

    N. Talebi, "Spectral Interferometry with Electron Microscopes," Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 33874, 2016/09/21 2016, doi: 10.1038/srep33874

    work page doi:10.1038/srep33874 2016

  6. [6]

    Phase -locked photon –electron interaction without a laser,

    M. Taleb, M. Hentschel, K. Rossnagel, H. Giessen, and N. Talebi, "Phase -locked photon –electron interaction without a laser," Nature Physics, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 869 -876, 2023/06/01 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41567-023-01954-3

    doi:10.1038/s41567-023-01954-3 2023

  7. [7]

    Ultrafast phonon-mediated dephasing of color centers in hexagonal boron nitride probed by electron beams

    P. B. Masoud Taleb, Mximilian Black, Mario Hentschel, Wilfried Sigle, Benedikt Haas, Christoph Koch, Peter A. van Aken, Harald Giessen, Nahid Talebi, "Ultrafast phonon-mediated dephasing of color centers in hexagonal boron nitride probed by electron beams," arXiv:2404.09879 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Ultrafast phonon-mediated dephasing of color centers in hexagonal boron nitride probed by electron beams,

    M. Taleb et al., "Ultrafast phonon-mediated dephasing of color centers in hexagonal boron nitride probed by electron beams," Nature Communications, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 2326, 2025/03/08 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57584-1

    doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57584-1 2025

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Electrons Generate Self-Complementary Broadband Vortex Light Beams Using Chiral Photon Sieves,

    N. van Nielen, M . Hentschel, N. Schilder, H. Giessen, A. Polman, and N. Talebi, "Electrons Generate Self-Complementary Broadband Vortex Light Beams Using Chiral Photon Sieves," Nano Letters, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 5975-5981, 2020/08/12 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01964

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    Holographic free -electron light source,

    G. Li, B. P. Clarke, J. -K. So, K. F. MacDonald, and N. I. Zheludev, "Holographic free -electron light source," Nature Communications, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 13705, 2016/12/02 2016, doi: 10.1038/ncomms13705

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    Excitation of Mesoscopic Plasmonic Tapers by Relativistic Electrons: Phase Matching versus Eigenmode Resonances,

    N. Talebi et al., "Excitation of Mesoscopic Plasmonic Tapers by Relativistic Electrons: Phase Matching versus Eigenmode Resonances," ACS Nano, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 7641 -7648, 2015/07/28 2015, doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b03024

    2015 doi

  4. [12]

    Elements of a dielectric laser accelerator,

    J. McNeur et al. , "Elements of a dielectric laser accelerator," Optica, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 687 -690, 2018/06/20 2018, doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.5.000687

    2018 doi

  5. [13]

    Inverse Cherenkov dielectric laser accelerator with alternating phase focusing for subrelativistic particles,

    L. Zhang, H. Xu, and W. Liu, "Inverse Cherenkov dielectric laser accelerator with alternating phase focusing for subrelativistic particles," Physical Review Accelerators and Beams, vol. 27, no. 11, p. 110401, 11/13/ 2024, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.27.110401

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    Cavity-mediated electron-photon pairs,

    A. Feist et al., "Cavity-mediated electron-photon pairs," Science, vol. 377, no. 6607, pp. 777-780, 2022, doi: doi:10.1126/science.abo5037

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    Resonant phase -matching between a light wave and a free-electron wavefunction,

    R. Dahan et al. , "Resonant phase -matching between a light wave and a free-electron wavefunction," Nature Physics, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1123-1131, 2020/11/01 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41567-020-01042-w

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    Controlling free electrons with optical whispering -gallery modes,

    O. Kfir et al., "Controlling free electrons with optical whispering -gallery modes," Nature, vol. 582, no. 7810, pp. 46-49, 2020/06/01 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2320-y

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    A conceptual history of the Vavilov-Cherenkov radiation,

    I. M. Frank, "A conceptual history of the Vavilov-Cherenkov radiation," Soviet Physics Uspekhi, vol. 27, no. 5, p. 385, 1984/05/31 1984, doi: 10.1070/PU1984v027n05ABEH004300

    1984 doi

  10. [18]

    Visible Light from Localized Surface Charges Moving across a Grating,

    S. J. Smith and E. M. Purcell, "Visible Light from Localized Surface Charges Moving across a Grating," Physical Review, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 1069-1069, 11/15/ 1953, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.92.1069

    1953 doi

  11. [19]

    Optical excitations in electron microscopy,

    F. J. García de Abajo, "Optical excitations in electron microscopy," Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 209-275, 02/03/ 2010, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.209

    2010 doi

  12. [20]

    Observation of 2D Cherenkov Radiation,

    Y. Adiv et al., "Observation of 2D Cherenkov Radiation," Physical Review X, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 011002, 01/06/ 2023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011002

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    Boundary effects in Cherenkov radiation,

    F. J. G arcía de Abajo, A. Rivacoba, N. Zabala, and N. Yamamoto, "Boundary effects in Cherenkov radiation," Physical Review B, vol. 69, no. 15, p. 155420, 04/19/ 2004, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.155420

    2004 doi

  14. [22]

    Maximal quantum interaction between free electrons and photons,

    Z. C. Zetao Xie, Hao Li, Qinghui Yan, Hongsheng Chen, Xiao Lin, Ido Kaminer, Owen D. Miller, Yi Yang, "Maximal quantum interaction between free electrons and photons," arXiv:2404.00377 2024

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    A directional, ultrafast and integrated few -photon source utilizing the interaction of electron beams and plasmonic nanoantennas,

    N. Talebi, "A directional, ultrafast and integrated few -photon source utilizing the interaction of electron beams and plasmonic nanoantennas," New Journal of Physics, vol. 16, no. 5, p. 053021, 2014/05/09 2014, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/5/053021

    2014 doi

  16. [24]

    Space -Time Wave Packets from Smith - Purcell Radiation,

    Y. J. Tan, P. Pitchappa, N. Wang, R. Singh, and L. J. Wong, "Space -Time Wave Packets from Smith - Purcell Radiation," Advanced Science, vol. 8, no. 22, p. 2100925, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202100925

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    Enhanced THz Smith-Purcell radiation based on the grating grooves with holes array,

    P. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and M. Tang, "Enhanced THz Smith-Purcell radiation based on the grating grooves with holes array," Opt. Express, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 10901 -10910, 2017/05/15 2017, doi: 10.1364/OE.25.010901

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    Spontaneous Smith -Purcell radiation described through induced surface currents,

    J. H. Brownell, J. Walsh, and G. Doucas, "Spontaneous Smith -Purcell radiation described through induced surface currents," Physical Review E, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 1075 -1080, 01/01/ 1998, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.57.1075

    1998 doi

  19. [27]

    Spectral and spatial shaping of Smith -Purcell radiation,

    R. Remez et al., "Spectral and spatial shaping of Smith -Purcell radiation," Physical Review A, vol. 96, no. 6, p. 061801, 12/06/ 2017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.061801

    2017 doi

  20. [28]

    Start current and growth rate in Smith –Purcell free -electron laser with dielectric-loaded cylindrical grating,

    Z. Rez aei and B. Farokhi, "Start current and growth rate in Smith –Purcell free -electron laser with dielectric-loaded cylindrical grating," Journal of Theoretical and Applied Physics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 149- 158, 2020/06/01 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40094-019-00358-0

    2020 doi

  21. [29]

    The Interaction of 2D Materials With Circularly Polarized Light,

    R. Rong et al., "The Interaction of 2D Materials With Circularly Polarized Light," Advanced Science, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 2206191, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202206191

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    3D Microprinting of Iron Platinum Nanoparticle-Based Magnetic Mobile Microrobots,

    J. Giltina n, V. Sridhar, U. Bozuyuk, D. Sheehan, and M. Sitti, "3D Microprinting of Iron Platinum Nanoparticle-Based Magnetic Mobile Microrobots," Advanced Intelligent Systems, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 2000204, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202000204

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    Two -photon polymerization-based 4D printing and its applications,

    B. Jian, H. Li, X. He, R. Wang, H. Y. Yang, and Q. Ge, "Two -photon polymerization-based 4D printing and its applications," International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 012001, 2023/10/06 2024, doi: 10.1088/2631-7990/acfc03

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    Fabrication and Characterization of a Magnetic 3D -printed Microactuator,

    F. Rothermel et al. , "Fabrication and Characterization of a Magnetic 3D -printed Microactuator," Advanced Materials Technologies, vol. 9, no. 12, p. 2302196, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202302196

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    Complex aspherical singlet and doublet microoptics by grayscale 3D printing,

    L. Siegle, S. Ristok, and H. Giessen, "Complex aspherical singlet and doublet microoptics by grayscale 3D printing," Opt. Express, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 4179-4189, 2023/01/30 2023, doi: 10.1364/OE.480472

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    3D Two-Photon Microprinting of Nanoporous Architectures,

    F. Mayer et al., "3D Two-Photon Microprinting of Nanoporous Architectures," Advanced Materials, vol. 32, no. 32, p. 2002044, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202002044

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    Light-sheet 3D microprinting via two -colour two-step absorption,

    V. Hahn et al., "Light-sheet 3D microprinting via two -colour two-step absorption," Nature Photonics, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 784-791, 2022/11/01 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41566-022-01081-0

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    See Supplemental Material [url], which includes Refs. [42-44]

  29. [37]

    Cathodoluminescence microscopy: Optical imaging and spectroscopy with deep -subwavelength resolution,

    T. Coenen, B. J. M. Brenny, E. J. Vesseur, and A. Polman, "Cathodoluminescence microscopy: Optical imaging and spectroscopy with deep -subwavelength resolution," MRS Bulletin, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 359 - 365, 2015, doi: 10.1557/mrs.2015.64

    2015 doi

  30. [38]

    Energy –Momentum Cathodoluminescence Spectroscopy of Dielectric Nanostructures,

    S. Mignuzzi et al. , "Energy –Momentum Cathodoluminescence Spectroscopy of Dielectric Nanostructures," ACS Photonics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1381 -1387, 2018/04/18 2018, doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01404

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    Ele ctron Beam Induced Circularly Polarized Light Emission of Chiral Gold Nanohelices,

    R. Lingstädt et al. , "Ele ctron Beam Induced Circularly Polarized Light Emission of Chiral Gold Nanohelices," ACS Nano, vol. 17, no. 24, pp. 25496 -25506, 2023/12/26 2023, doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c09336

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    Numerical simulations of interference effects in photon-assisted electron energy -loss spectroscopy,

    N. Talebi, W. Sigle, R. Vogelgesang, and P. van Aken, "Numerical simulations of interference effects in photon-assisted electron energy -loss spectroscopy," New Journal of Physics, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 053013, 2013/05/08 2013, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/5/053013

    2013 doi

  33. [41]

    Smith–Purcell radiation from helical grating to generate wideband vortex beams,

    J.-F. Zhu, C.-H. Du, Z.-W. Zhang, P.-K. Liu, L. Zhang, and A. W. Cross, "Smith–Purcell radiation from helical grating to generate wideband vortex beams," Opt. Lett., vol. 46, no. 18, pp. 4682-4685, 2021/09/15 2021, doi: 10.1364/OL.434794

    2021 doi

  34. [42]

    Spiral Field Generation in Smith -Purcell Radiation by Helical Metagratings,

    L. Jing et al., "Spiral Field Generation in Smith -Purcell Radiation by Helical Metagratings," Research, vol. 2019, 2019, doi: doi:10.34133/2019/3806132

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    Smith -Purcell radiation from a narrow tape helix,

    A. R. Neureuther and R. Mittra, "Smith -Purcell radiation from a narrow tape helix," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 2134-2142, 1967, doi: 10.1109/PROC.1967.6091

    1967

  36. [44]

    Experimental evidence of the inverse Smith –Purcell effect,

    K. Mizuno, J. Pae, T. Nozokido, and K. Furuya, "Experimental evidence of the inverse Smith –Purcell effect," Nature, vol. 328, no. 6125, pp. 45-47, 1987/07/01 1987, doi: 10.1038/328045a0

    1987 doi

  37. [45]

    Schrödinger electrons interacting with optical gratings: quantum mechanical study of the inverse Smith–Purcell effect,

    N. Talebi, "Schrödinger electrons interacting with optical gratings: quantum mechanical study of the inverse Smith–Purcell effect," New Journal of Physics, vol. 18, no. 12, p. 123006, 2016/12/02 2016, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/18/12/123006

    2016 doi

  38. [46]

    Electron phase-space control in photonic chip-based particle acceleration,

    R. Shiloh et al., "Electron phase-space control in photonic chip-based particle acceleration," Nature, vol. 597, no. 7877, pp. 498-502, 2021/09/01 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03812-9. Supplementary Information for: Phase-matched electron-photon interactions enabled with 3D-p...

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    Images of the helical waveguide and sample holder FIG. S1. (a) The setup, consisting of a sample holder inside a scanning electron microscope and a parabolic mirror positioned below the sample. (b) The same setup with the parabolic mirror positioned above the sample. (c) A sca...

  40. [48]

    Dependence of the emission wavelength on the electron’s kinetic energy The phase -matching condition defined in Eq. (1) of the main text enables control over the photon energy and intensity for a specific helix through various parameters, including the electron's group velocit...

  41. [49]

    R. F. Harrington, Time-harmonic electromagnetic fields (mcGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1961)

    1961

  42. [50]

    A. H. Cherin, Introduction to Optical Fibers (McGraw-Hill, US, 1982)

    1982

  43. [51]

    P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, Physical Review B 6, 4370 (1972)

    1972

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.