The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2501.16988 · v2 · pith:77CLJJHZ · submitted 2025-01-28 · stat.ML · cs.LG

Marginal and Conditional Importance Measures from Machine Learning Models and Their Relationship with Conditional Average Treatment Effect

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:77CLJJHZrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords mvimconditionalimportancecitetmodelsaveragebiasblack-box
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Interpreting black-box machine learning models is challenging due to their strong dependence on data and inherently non-parametric nature. This paper reintroduces the concept of importance through "Marginal Variable Importance Metric" (MVIM), a model-agnostic measure of predictor importance based on the true conditional expectation function. MVIM evaluates predictors' influence on continuous or discrete outcomes. A permutation-based estimation approach, inspired by \citet{breiman2001random} and \citet{fisher2019all}, is proposed to estimate MVIM. MVIM estimator is biased when predictors are highly correlated, as black-box models struggle to extrapolate in low-probability regions. To address this, we investigated the bias-variance decomposition of MVIM to understand the source and pattern of the bias under high correlation. A Conditional Variable Importance Metric (CVIM), adapted from \citet{strobl2008conditional}, is introduced to reduce this bias. Both MVIM and CVIM exhibit a quadratic relationship with the conditional average treatment effect (CATE).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Causal Variance Decompositions for Measuring Health Inequalities

    stat.ME 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new causal variance decomposition attributes observed variation in care delivery to eight components including sociodemographic modification of hospital effects, hospital access or selection, and their correlation.