pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.06952 · v3 · submitted 2025-02-10 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Non-adiabatic dynamics of eccentric black-hole binaries in post-Newtonian theory

Giulia Fumagalli , Nicholas Loutrel , Davide Gerosa , Matteo Boschini This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 03:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords eccentric black-hole binariespost-Newtonian dynamicsgravitational wavesorbital evolutionradiation reactiongauge ambiguitiesnon-adiabatic effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

New non-orbit-averaged equations track eccentric black-hole binary evolution without radiation-reaction gauge ambiguities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives a new set of equations for how orbital elements change in eccentric, non-spinning black-hole binaries under post-Newtonian gravity. It does this by re-mapping the usual Keplerian elements to a fresh set of parameters defined through energy and angular momentum, then applying near-identity transformations to eliminate gauge problems that appear when radiation reaction is included. The resulting equations stay valid at any eccentricity, from nearly circular all the way to parabolic and hyperbolic fly-bys, and remain accurate through 2.5 post-Newtonian order. A reader would care because these equations expose observable, non-adiabatic effects of gravitational-wave emission on the orbit that orbit-averaged approximations miss, and they show that the classic Peters equations already fail at the first close approach.

Core claim

We derive a new set of non-orbit-averaged equations for the evolution of orbital elements in eccentric, non-spinning black-hole binaries by mapping Keplerian orbital elements to new characteristic parameters using energy and angular momentum definitions combined with near-identity transformations. The resulting framework is free from radiation-reaction gauge ambiguities and valid for arbitrary eccentricities, including parabolic and hyperbolic limits, up to 2.5 post-Newtonian order. Using this framework we demonstrate the strictly observable effects of non-adiabatic gravitational-wave emission on the orbital parameters and show that the widely used orbit-averaged equations break down at the,

What carries the argument

Mapping of Keplerian orbital elements to new characteristic parameters via energy and angular momentum definitions combined with near-identity transformations, which removes radiation-reaction gauge ambiguities.

If this is right

  • The equations remain accurate for parabolic and hyperbolic encounters as well as bound eccentric orbits.
  • Non-adiabatic gravitational-wave emission produces strictly observable shifts in orbital parameters that orbit-averaged treatments miss.
  • Orbit-averaged equations such as Peters 1964 break down at the first pericenter passage regardless of the binary's initial conditions.
  • The 2.5 post-Newtonian framework supplies a consistent tool for generating reliable astrophysical predictions and for interpreting gravitational-wave observations of eccentric binaries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mapping technique could be extended to include spin effects or higher post-Newtonian orders while preserving gauge freedom.
  • Direct insertion of these equations into waveform models would change eccentricity and pericenter estimates extracted from detected signals.
  • Comparison against numerical-relativity catalogs at high eccentricity would provide a clean test of where the post-Newtonian description ceases to be useful.

Load-bearing premise

The mapping of Keplerian orbital elements to new characteristic parameters via energy and angular momentum definitions combined with near-identity transformations removes radiation-reaction gauge ambiguities.

What would settle it

Numerical integration of the new equations for a highly eccentric binary through its first pericenter passage, followed by direct comparison of the predicted orbital-element changes against a numerical-relativity simulation of the same system to check whether gauge ambiguities appear or whether orbit-averaged results match.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06952 by Davide Gerosa, Giulia Fumagalli, Matteo Boschini, Nicholas Loutrel.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Derivation procedure for our new set of radiation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Evolution of the semi-latus rectum (top-left panel), eccentricity (top-right panel), true anomaly (bottom-left panel), and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Evolution of the semi-latus rectum for binary systems with different initial eccentricities: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Evolution of the ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Breakdown of the orbital-average approximation in eccentric binary evolution across the parameter space. The left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Time evolution of three binaries initially evolving [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Evolution of the timescale ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Eccentric black-hole binaries are among the most awaited sources of gravitational waves, yet their dynamics lack a consistent framework that provides a detailed and physically robust evolutionary description due to gauge issues. We present a new set of non-orbit-averaged equations, free from radiation-reaction gauge ambiguities, that accurately describe the evolution of orbital elements for eccentric, non-spinning black-hole binaries. We derive these equations by mapping the Keplerian orbital elements to a new set of characteristic parameters using energy and angular momentum definitions combined with near-identity transformations. The resulting framework is valid for arbitrary eccentricities, including parabolic and hyperbolic limits. Using this framework, we demonstrate the strictly observable effects of the non-adiabatic emission of gravitational waves -- characteristic of eccentric binaries -- on the orbital parameters. Furthermore, we assess the regime of validity of the widely used orbit-averaged equations first derived by Peters in 1964. Importantly, their breakdown becomes evident at the first pericenter passage, implying that the validity of the orbit-averaged approximation cannot be inferred solely from binary initial conditions. The formalism we introduce, accurate up to 2.5 post-Newtonian order, aims to provide a robust tool for making reliable astrophysical predictions and accurately interpreting current and future gravitational wave data, paving the way for deeper insights into the dynamics of eccentric black hole binaries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives a new set of non-orbit-averaged post-Newtonian equations (up to 2.5PN) for the evolution of orbital elements in eccentric, non-spinning black-hole binaries. The derivation maps Keplerian elements to new characteristic parameters via energy and angular momentum definitions combined with near-identity transformations; the resulting equations are asserted to be free from radiation-reaction gauge ambiguities and valid for arbitrary eccentricities (including parabolic and hyperbolic limits). The framework is used to exhibit strictly observable non-adiabatic gravitational-wave emission effects on orbital parameters and to demonstrate that the orbit-averaged equations of Peters (1964) break down at the first pericenter passage, so that their validity cannot be inferred from initial conditions alone.

Significance. If the gauge removal is rigorously shown and the equations are verified, the work would supply a practical, gauge-robust tool for modeling highly eccentric or unbound black-hole encounters. This is directly relevant to gravitational-wave astronomy, where non-adiabatic effects matter for waveform modeling and parameter estimation of eccentric sources.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / derivation paragraph] The headline claim that the energy/angular-momentum plus near-identity reparametrization renders the 2.5PN radiation-reaction contributions independent of gauge choice is load-bearing. The abstract asserts cancellation but supplies neither the transformed equations nor an explicit demonstration that all gauge-dependent pieces vanish at O(1/c^5). Without this check the central assertion cannot be evaluated.
  2. [Assessment of Peters (1964) equations] The statement that orbit-averaged equations break down at the first pericenter passage is presented as a key result. The manuscript should supply a concrete, quantitative comparison (e.g., difference in orbital-element evolution between averaged and non-averaged integrations over the first few passages) to substantiate the claim that validity cannot be inferred from initial conditions alone.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the equations are 'accurate' up to 2.5PN but does not indicate the truncation error or the order at which the near-identity transformation is performed; this should be clarified in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable suggestions. Below we respond to each major comment and outline the revisions we will make to address them.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / derivation paragraph] The headline claim that the energy/angular-momentum plus near-identity reparametrization renders the 2.5PN radiation-reaction contributions independent of gauge choice is load-bearing. The abstract asserts cancellation but supplies neither the transformed equations nor an explicit demonstration that all gauge-dependent pieces vanish at O(1/c^5). Without this check the central assertion cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. The derivation in the manuscript uses energy and angular momentum mappings combined with near-identity transformations to eliminate gauge ambiguities. However, we agree that an explicit step-by-step demonstration of the cancellation of all gauge-dependent terms at O(1/c^5) would strengthen the presentation. In the revised version, we will include the transformed equations and show the vanishing of these terms explicitly, perhaps in a new appendix. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Assessment of Peters (1964) equations] The statement that orbit-averaged equations break down at the first pericenter passage is presented as a key result. The manuscript should supply a concrete, quantitative comparison (e.g., difference in orbital-element evolution between averaged and non-averaged integrations over the first few passages) to substantiate the claim that validity cannot be inferred from initial conditions alone.

    Authors: We agree that providing a quantitative comparison will make the result more compelling. The manuscript already illustrates the breakdown qualitatively through the non-adiabatic effects, but we will add explicit numerical comparisons, such as plots of the evolution of semi-major axis and eccentricity over the first few pericenter passages for both the averaged and non-averaged cases, highlighting the discrepancies. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses standard PN mappings

full rationale

The paper's central derivation maps Keplerian orbital elements to new characteristic parameters via explicit energy and angular momentum definitions combined with near-identity transformations. This construction is presented as a direct reparametrization from post-Newtonian quantities and does not reduce any claimed result to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain. The gauge-independence claim is asserted to follow from the transformation itself rather than from any prior result by the same authors being invoked as an external theorem. No equations are shown to be equivalent to their inputs by construction, and the method remains self-contained against external PN benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full derivation details unavailable so ledger entries are inferred at high level from stated method.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Post-Newtonian expansion remains valid to 2.5 order for non-spinning binaries
    Abstract states accuracy level of the new equations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5776 in / 1137 out tokens · 30681 ms · 2026-05-23T03:20:41.238260+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A universal framework to identify eccentric binary mergers: GW200105 case study

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A reference-frequency-independent detection statistic for eccentric binary mergers is introduced and applied to GW200105, yielding ln B ≤ 0.9 in favor of the eccentric aligned-spin model over the quasi-circular preces...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    DePorzio, L

    N. DePorzio, L. Randall, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, (2024), arXiv:2402.09513 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Zeeshan and R

    M. Zeeshan and R. O’Shaughnessy, Phys. Rev. D110, 063009 (2024), arXiv:2404.08185 [gr-qc]. 17

    work page arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    D. J. D’Orazio and J. Samsing, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 481, 4775 (2018), arXiv:1805.06194 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  4. [5]

    How Post-Newtonian Dynamics Shape the Distribution of Stationary Binary Black Hole LISA Sources in nearby Globular Clusters

    J. Samsing and D. J. D’Orazio, Phys. Rev. D99, 063006 (2019), arXiv:1807.08864 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  5. [6]

    The Eccentric Behavior of Inspiraling Compact Binaries

    N. Loutrel, S. Liebersbach, N. Yunes, and N. Cor- nish, Class. Quantum Grav. 36, 025004 (2019), arXiv:1810.03521 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [7]

    Damour and N

    T. Damour and N. Deruelle, Annales de L’Institut Henri Poincare Section (A) Physique Theorique43, 107 (1985)

    work page 1985

  7. [10]

    Limitations of the adiabatic approximation to the gravitational self-force

    A. Pound, E. Poisson, and B. G. Nickel, Phys. Rev. D72, 124001 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0509122

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  8. [11]

    M. A. Shaikh, V. Varma, H. P. Pfeiffer, A. Ramos-Buades, and M. van de Meent, Phys. Rev. D108, 104007 (2023), arXiv:2302.11257 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [12]

    Boschini, N

    M. Boschini, N. Loutrel, D. Gerosa, and G. Fumagalli, Phys. Rev. D111, 024008 (2025), arXiv:2411.00098 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [13]

    Eccentric Black Hole Mergers Forming in Globular Clusters

    J. Samsing, Phys. Rev. D 97, 103014 (2018), arXiv:1711.07452 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [14]

    Tagawa, B

    H. Tagawa, B. Kocsis, Z. Haiman, I. Bartos, K. Omukai, and J. Samsing, Astrophys. J. Lett.907, L20 (2021), arXiv:2010.10526 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [15]

    Gond ´an and B

    L. Gondán and B. Kocsis, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.506, 1665 (2021), arXiv:2011.02507 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [16]

    B. Rom, R. Sari, and D. Lai, Astrophys. J.964, 43 (2024), arXiv:2310.03801 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [17]

    Dall’Amico, M

    M. Dall’Amico, M. Mapelli, S. Torniamenti, and M. A. Sedda, Astron. Astrophys. 683, A186 (2024), arXiv:2303.07421 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [18]

    Highly eccentric inspirals into a black hole

    T. Osburn, N. Warburton, and C. R. Evans, Phys. Rev. D 93, 064024 (2016), arXiv:1511.01498 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [19]

    I. M. Romero-Shaw, S. Goorachurn, M. Siwek, and C. J. Moore, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 534, L58 (2024), arXiv:2407.03869 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [20]

    Gravitational wave emission from binary supermassive black holes

    A. Sesana, Class. Quantum Grav. 30, 244009 (2013), arXiv:1307.4086 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  18. [21]

    Gualandris, F

    A. Gualandris, F. M. Khan, E. Bortolas, M. Bonetti, A. Sesana, P. Berczik, and K. Holley-Bockelmann, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.511, 4753 (2022), arXiv:2201.08646 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [22]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz,The Classical Theory of Fields: Volume 2(Elsevier Science, 1975)

    work page 1975

  20. [23]

    Misner, K

    C. Misner, K. Thorne, and J. Wheeler, Gravitation (Princeton University Press, 1973)

    work page 1973

  21. [24]

    Poisson and C

    E. Poisson and C. Will, Gravity: Newtonian, Post- Newtonian, Relativistic (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    work page 2014

  22. [25]

    Maggiore, Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory and Experiments(Oxford University Press, 2008)

    M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory and Experiments(Oxford University Press, 2008)

    work page 2008

  23. [26]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet, Living Rev. Relativ. 27, 4 (2024), arXiv:1310.1528v6 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [27]

    P. C. Peters, Phys. Rev.136, 1224 (1964)

    work page 1964

  25. [29]

    Numerically generated quasi-equilibrium orbits of black holes: Circular or eccentric?

    T. Mora and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D66, 101501 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0208089

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  26. [30]

    R. A. Isaacson, Phys. Rev.166, 1263 (1968)

    work page 1968

  27. [31]

    R. A. Isaacson, Phys. Rev.166, 1272 (1968)

    work page 1968

  28. [32]

    C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag,Advanced Mathemati- cal Methods for Scientists and Engineers(McGraw-Hill, 1978)

    work page 1978

  29. [33]

    Nature Abhors a Circle

    N. Loutrel, S. Liebersbach, N. Yunes, and N. Cor- nish, Class. Quantum Grav. 36, 01LT01 (2019), arXiv:1801.09009 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [34]

    Turner, Astrophys

    M. Turner, Astrophys. J.216, 610 (1977)

    work page 1977

  31. [35]

    Loutrel, Class

    N. Loutrel, Class. Quantum Grav.40, 215004 (2023), arXiv:2304.00836 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [36]

    Black hole mergers and blue stragglers from hierarchical triples formed in globular clusters

    F. Antonini, S. Chatterjee, C. L. Rodriguez, M. Morscher, B.Pattabiraman, V.Kalogera,andF.A.Rasio,Astrophys. J. 816, 65 (2016), arXiv:1509.05080 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [37]

    J. C. Neu, SIAM J. Appl. Math.38, 189 (1980)

    work page 1980

  34. [38]

    Krylov, N

    N. Krylov, N. Bogoliubov, and S. Lefschetz,Introduc- tion to Non-linear Mechanics(Princeton University Press, 1949)

    work page 1949

  35. [39]

    Smith,Singular-Perturbation Theory: An Introduction with Applications(Cambridge University Press, 1985)

    D. Smith,Singular-Perturbation Theory: An Introduction with Applications(Cambridge University Press, 1985)

    work page 1985

  36. [40]

    Chandrasekhar, Astrophys

    S. Chandrasekhar, Astrophys. J.142, 1488 (1965)

    work page 1965

  37. [41]

    Chandrasekhar and Y

    S. Chandrasekhar and Y. Nutku, Astrophys. J.158, 55 (1969)

    work page 1969

  38. [42]

    C. W. Lincoln and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D42, 1123 (1990)

    work page 1990

  39. [43]

    C. M. Will, Class. Quantum Grav.36, 195013 (2019), arXiv:1906.08064 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  40. [47]

    B. R. Iyer and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D52, 6882 (1995)

    work page 1995

  41. [48]

    Lynch, V

    P. Lynch, V. Witzany, M. van de Meent, and N. War- burton, Class. Quantum Grav. 41, 225002 (2024), arXiv:2405.21072 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [49]

    Witten, Gravitation: an Introduction to current re- search (Wiley, 1962)

    L. Witten, Gravitation: an Introduction to current re- search (Wiley, 1962)

    work page 1962

  43. [50]

    Kennefick, Traveling at the Speed of Thought: Ein- stein and the Quest for Gravitational Waves(Princeton University Press, 2007)

    D. Kennefick, Traveling at the Speed of Thought: Ein- stein and the Quest for Gravitational Waves(Princeton University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  44. [51]

    The Gravitational Wave Stress-Energy (pseudo)-Tensor in Modified Gravity

    A. Saffer, N. Yunes, and K. Yagi, Class. Quantum Grav. 35, 055011 (2018), arXiv:1710.08863 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [52]

    Energy Momentum Pseudo-Tensor of Relic Gravitational Wave in Expanding Universe

    D. Su and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D85, 104012 (2012), arXiv:1204.0089 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  46. [53]

    L. V. Verozub, Annalen Phys. 17, 28 (2008), arXiv:0801.3425 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  47. [54]

    K. S. Thorne, Rev. Mod. Phys.52, 299 (1980)

    work page 1980

  48. [55]

    D. R. Brill and J. B. Hartle, Phys. Rev.135, 271 (1964)

    work page 1964

  49. [56]

    Second post-Newtonian gravitational radiation reaction for two-body systems: Nonspinning bodies

    A. Gopakumar, B. R. Iyer, and S. Iyer, Phys. Rev. D55, 6030 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9703075 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  50. [57]

    Blanchet, Phys

    L. Blanchet, Phys. Rev. D 55, 714 (1997), arXiv:gr- qc/9609049 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 1997

  51. [58]

    K. G. Arun, L. Blanchet, B. R. Iyer, and S. Sinha, Phys. Rev. D80, 124018 (2009), arXiv:0908.3854 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  52. [59]

    Blanchet, Living Rev

    L. Blanchet, Living Rev. Relativ.5, 3 (2002), arXiv:gr- qc/0202016 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2002

  53. [60]

    B. R. Iyer and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 113 (1993)

    work page 1993

  54. [61]

    Junker and G

    W. Junker and G. Schaefer, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 254, 146 (1992)

    work page 1992

  55. [62]

    Damour and N

    T. Damour and N. Deruelle, Phys. Lett. A87, 81 (1981)

    work page 1981

  56. [63]

    Schaefer, Lett

    G. Schaefer, Lett. Nuovo Cim.36, 105 (1983)

    work page 1983

  57. [64]

    K. S. Thorne, Astrophys. J.158, 997 (1969)

    work page 1969

  58. [65]

    W. L. Burke, J. Math. Phys.12, 401 (1971)

    work page 1971

  59. [66]

    Phasing of gravitational waves from inspiralling eccentric binaries

    T. Damour, A. Gopakumar, and B. R. Iyer, Phys. Rev. D 70, 064028 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0404128 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  60. [67]

    Fumagalli and D

    G. Fumagalli and D. Gerosa, Phys. Rev. D108, 124055 (2023), arXiv:2310.16893 [gr-qc]. 18

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [68]

    Griffiths,Introduction to Electrodynamics(Pearson, 2014)

    D. Griffiths,Introduction to Electrodynamics(Pearson, 2014)

    work page 2014

  62. [69]

    Schott, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philo- sophical Magazine and Journal of Science29, 49 (1915)

    G. Schott, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philo- sophical Magazine and Journal of Science29, 49 (1915)

    work page 1915

  63. [70]

    Grøn, inSpringer Handbook of Spacetime(2014) p

    Ø. Grøn, inSpringer Handbook of Spacetime(2014) p. 165

    work page 2014

  64. [71]

    C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich, R. A. Porto, and A. Ross, Phys. Rev. D93, 124010 (2016), arXiv:1511.07379 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [72]

    Fast Self-forced Inspirals

    M. van de Meent and N. Warburton, Class. Quantum Grav. 35, 144003 (2018), arXiv:1802.05281 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  66. [73]

    Lynch, M

    P. Lynch, M. van de Meent, and N. Warburton, Class. Quantum Grav.39, 145004 (2022), arXiv:2112.05651 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  67. [74]

    Phasing of gravitational waves from inspiralling eccentric binaries at the third-and-a-half post-Newtonian order

    C. Königsdörffer and A. Gopakumar, Phys. Rev. D73, 124012 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0603056 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  68. [75]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Schafer, Nuovo Cim. B101, 127 (1988)

    work page 1988

  69. [76]

    Mora and C

    T. Mora and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D69, 104021 (2004), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 71, 129901 (2005)], arXiv:gr- qc/0312082

    work page arXiv 2004

  70. [77]

    Transition from inspiral to plunge in precessing binaries of spinning black holes

    A. Buonanno, Y. Chen, and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D 74, 104005 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0508067 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  71. [78]

    Comparison of Numerical and Post-Newtonian Waveforms for Generic Precessing Black-Hole Binaries

    M. Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, H. Nakano, and Y. Zlo- chower, Phys. Rev. D79, 084010 (2009), arXiv:0808.0713 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  72. [79]

    Comparison of post-Newtonian templates for compact binary inspiral signals in gravitational-wave detectors

    A. Buonanno, B. R. Iyer, E. Ochsner, Y. Pan, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D80, 084043 (2009), arXiv:0907.0700 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  73. [80]

    Zevin, I

    M. Zevin, I. M. Romero-Shaw, K. Kremer, E. Thrane, and P. D. Lasky, Astrophys. J. Lett.921, L43 (2021), arXiv:2106.09042 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  74. [81]

    Black Hole Mergers From Globular Clusters Observable by LISA I: Eccentric Sources Originating From Relativistic $N$-body Dynamics

    J. Samsing and D. J. D’Orazio, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 481, 5445 (2018), arXiv:1804.06519 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  75. [82]

    M. E. Pati and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D65, 104008 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0201001 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  76. [83]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, and D. Trestini, Class. Quantum Grav. 42, 065015 (2025), arXiv:2407.18295 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [84]

    Tanay, L

    S. Tanay, L. C. Stein, and J. T. Gálvez Ghersi, Phys. Rev. D 103, 064066 (2021), arXiv:2012.06586 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  78. [85]

    Action-angle variables of a binary black hole with arbitrary eccentricity, spins, and masses at 1.5 post-Newtonian order

    S. Tanay, L. C. Stein, and G. Cho, Phys. Rev. D107, 103040 (2023), arXiv:2110.15351 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  79. [86]

    Fumagalli, I

    G. Fumagalli, I. Romero-Shaw, D. Gerosa, V. De Renzis, K. Kritos, and A. Olejak, Phys. Rev. D110, 063012 (2024), arXiv:2405.14945 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024