The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2502.08503 · v3 · pith:DAQE7THI · submitted 2025-02-12 · cs.AI

Revisiting 3D LLM Benchmarks: Are We Really Testing 3D Capabilities?

Reviewed by Pithpith:DAQE7THIopen to challenge →

classification cs.AI
keywords benchmarkscapabilitiesevaluationllmsabilitiesacrossadvocateaspects
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this work, we identify the "2D-Cheating" problem in 3D LLM evaluation, where these tasks might be easily solved by VLMs with rendered images of point clouds, exposing ineffective evaluation of 3D LLMs' unique 3D capabilities. We test VLM performance across multiple 3D LLM benchmarks and, using this as a reference, propose principles for better assessing genuine 3D understanding. We also advocate explicitly separating 3D abilities from 1D or 2D aspects when evaluating 3D LLMs. Code and data are available at https://github.com/LLM-class-group/Revisiting-3D-LLM-Benchmarks

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.