Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Spiking Neural Networks for Temporal Processing: Status Quo and Future Prospects

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.09449 v1 pith:RHCOEKJV submitted 2025-02-13 cs.NE

Spiking Neural Networks for Temporal Processing: Status Quo and Future Prospects

classification cs.NE
keywords temporalprocessingsnnscapabilitiesneuralspikingbenchmarkdynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Temporal processing is fundamental for both biological and artificial intelligence systems, as it enables the comprehension of dynamic environments and facilitates timely responses. Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) excel in handling such data with high efficiency, owing to their rich neuronal dynamics and sparse activity patterns. Given the recent surge in the development of SNNs, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive evaluation of their temporal processing capabilities. In this paper, we first conduct an in-depth assessment of commonly used neuromorphic benchmarks, revealing critical limitations in their ability to evaluate the temporal processing capabilities of SNNs. To bridge this gap, we further introduce a benchmark suite consisting of three temporal processing tasks characterized by rich temporal dynamics across multiple timescales. Utilizing this benchmark suite, we perform a thorough evaluation of recently introduced SNN approaches to elucidate the current status of SNNs in temporal processing. Our findings indicate significant advancements in recently developed spiking neuron models and neural architectures regarding their temporal processing capabilities, while also highlighting a performance gap in handling long-range dependencies when compared to state-of-the-art non-spiking models. Finally, we discuss the key challenges and outline potential avenues for future research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Detecting AI-Generated Videos with Spiking Neural Networks

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MAST with spiking neural networks achieves 93.14% mean accuracy detecting AI-generated videos from 10 unseen generators by exploiting smoother pixel residuals and compact semantic trajectories.

  2. Detecting AI-Generated Videos with Spiking Neural Networks

    cs.CV 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    An SNN-based detector combining multi-channel pseudo-event residuals with frozen semantic features reaches 93.14% mean accuracy on unseen generators under the Pika-trained GenVideo protocol.