pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.10121 · v2 · submitted 2025-02-14 · 🪐 quant-ph

Nonreciprocal routing induced by chirality in an atom-dimer waveguide-QED system

Shi-Yu Liu , Lin-Lin Jiang , Hai Zhu , Jie-Qiao Liao , Jin-Feng Huang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 03:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords waveguide-QEDsingle-photon routingchiral couplingnon-Markovian regimenonreciprocal transportatom-dimer systemquantum router
0
0 comments X

The pith

In the non-Markovian regime, chiral coupling allows on-demand single-photon routing in an atom-dimer waveguide-QED system without requiring ideal chirality.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that two coupled atoms placed between two waveguides can direct single photons to chosen output ports when photon travel time between the atoms is taken into account. Chiral coupling breaks the left-right symmetry of the waveguides, and the asymmetry coefficient is used to set the routing direction. Exact scattering amplitudes derived from the real-space approach remain valid in this delayed regime and demonstrate that full routing works even when the chirality is only partial. This matters for building quantum networks because it relaxes the usual requirement for perfect directional coupling between atoms and light.

Core claim

The central claim is that when the system operates in the non-Markovian regime, adjusting the asymmetry coefficient induced by chiral coupling permits the single photon to be transmitted on demand to any of the four ports, and that complete single-photon routing occurs without the need for ideal chiral coupling.

What carries the argument

The asymmetry coefficient arising from chiral coupling in the atom-dimer system, which controls the scattering amplitudes when photon propagation delays between coupling points are retained.

If this is right

  • Single photons can be routed to a chosen port simply by tuning the asymmetry coefficient.
  • Complete four-port routing remains possible when chiral coupling is only partial.
  • The same device works in both the Markovian limit and the non-Markovian regime with delayed propagation.
  • Nonreciprocal photon transport appears as soon as chirality breaks waveguide symmetry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The relaxation of the ideal-chirality requirement may allow existing waveguide platforms with moderate directionality to be used for routing tasks.
  • Propagation delays, usually treated as a complication, here become a resource that enables flexible control.
  • The four-port geometry suggests straightforward scaling to networks that combine several such dimers.

Load-bearing premise

The real-space method supplies exact scattering amplitudes that continue to hold once photon travel time between the two atoms and chiral coupling are both included.

What would settle it

Measure the four-port transmission probabilities for a single photon sent into one waveguide while varying the asymmetry coefficient and the atom separation; check whether probabilities reach zero in three ports and one in the target port for non-ideal chiral strengths when the delay is comparable to the atomic lifetime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.10121 by Hai Zhu, Jie-Qiao Liao, Jin-Feng Huang, Lin-Lin Jiang, Shi-Yu Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of the four-port waveguide-QED system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Contrast ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a, c) Transmission coefficients [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Transmission coefficients (a, b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Transmission coefficients (a, c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The implementation of quantum routers is an important and desired task in quantum information science, since quantum routers are important components of quantum networks. Here, we propose a scheme for implementing single-photon routers in a waveguide-QED system, which consists of two coupled two-level atoms coupled to two waveguides to form a four-port quantum device. We obtain the exact analytical expressions of the single-photon scattering amplitudes using the real-space method. By taking the propagating time of photons between two coupling points into account or not, we consider the system working in the Markovian and non-Markovian regimes, respectively. In addition, we introduce the chiral coupling, which breaks the symmetry of the waveguide model, to manipulate the transmission of single photons. We find that when the system works in the non-Markovian regime, the single photon can be transmitted on demand by adjusting the asymmetry coefficient. More interestingly, the complete single-photon routing in this device does not require an ideal chiral coupling, loosening the photon transport conditions. This work will motivate the studies concerning the nonreciprocal and chiral quantum devices in the waveguide-QED platform.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a four-port single-photon router consisting of two coupled two-level atoms interacting with two waveguides in a waveguide-QED system. Using the real-space method, the authors derive exact analytical expressions for the single-photon scattering amplitudes. They consider both Markovian (neglecting propagation delay) and non-Markovian (including finite travel time between coupling points) regimes, and introduce chiral coupling to break left-right symmetry. The central claim is that in the non-Markovian regime, on-demand transmission and complete routing can be achieved by tuning an asymmetry coefficient, without requiring ideal (perfect) chiral coupling.

Significance. If the reported closed-form scattering amplitudes are rigorously exact and remain valid for arbitrary propagation delays and chiral asymmetries, the work would be significant: it relaxes the stringent requirement of perfect chirality for nonreciprocal routing and supplies analytical expressions that could directly inform device design in waveguide-QED platforms. The provision of parameter-free analytical results for the non-Markovian case would constitute a concrete technical advance over prior Markovian treatments.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (non-Markovian derivation): the real-space method applied to two atoms with finite propagation delay and chiral asymmetry produces a system of delay differential equations; the manuscript presents closed-form scattering amplitudes, but does not demonstrate that the solution accounts for all multiple-reflection orders or that the ansatz remains valid for arbitrary delay times. This is load-bearing for the claim that routing works 'on demand' without ideal chirality.
  2. [§4] §4 and associated figures: no direct numerical integration of the delay differential equations or comparison to the analytical expressions is shown for finite delay and chiral parameters. Without this verification, it is impossible to confirm that the reported routing efficiencies (e.g., perfect transmission at specific asymmetry values) are not artifacts of an implicit Markovian approximation or truncation.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the asymmetry coefficient and chiral coupling strengths should be defined explicitly at first use and kept consistent between equations and figure captions.
  2. The abstract states 'exact analytical expressions' are obtained; the main text should include a brief statement of the boundary conditions and truncation (if any) used to close the equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (non-Markovian derivation): the real-space method applied to two atoms with finite propagation delay and chiral asymmetry produces a system of delay differential equations; the manuscript presents closed-form scattering amplitudes, but does not demonstrate that the solution accounts for all multiple-reflection orders or that the ansatz remains valid for arbitrary delay times. This is load-bearing for the claim that routing works 'on demand' without ideal chirality.

    Authors: The real-space method yields a set of linear equations for the photon wave function amplitudes in the frequency domain. The finite delays enter as phase factors e^{i k d} in the coupling terms, allowing an exact algebraic solution for the scattering amplitudes that incorporates all orders of multiple reflections through the self-consistent solution of the coupled system. The ansatz of plane-wave scattering states remains valid for arbitrary delays because the equations are solved exactly without perturbative approximations or truncation in the number of reflections. To make this explicit, we will include a detailed derivation in the revised manuscript or supplementary material showing how the multiple-scattering series is resummed. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 and associated figures: no direct numerical integration of the delay differential equations or comparison to the analytical expressions is shown for finite delay and chiral parameters. Without this verification, it is impossible to confirm that the reported routing efficiencies (e.g., perfect transmission at specific asymmetry values) are not artifacts of an implicit Markovian approximation or truncation.

    Authors: We agree that numerical verification is important for confirming the analytical results in the non-Markovian regime. In the revised version, we will add a new figure or section comparing the analytical scattering amplitudes with numerical solutions of the delay differential equations for several values of the propagation delay and asymmetry coefficient. This will be done using standard numerical methods for delay differential equations, such as the method of steps, to demonstrate agreement and rule out any artifacts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation self-contained via real-space method

full rationale

The paper applies the real-space method to derive exact analytical expressions for single-photon scattering amplitudes in the four-port atom-dimer system, considering both Markovian and non-Markovian regimes plus chiral asymmetry. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the routing results are presented as direct consequences of the obtained amplitudes without renaming known results or smuggling ansatze. The derivation stands as an independent calculation on the stated Hamiltonian and boundary conditions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the real-space scattering method applied to a chiral atom-dimer model; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Real-space method yields exact single-photon scattering amplitudes for the atom-dimer waveguide system
    Invoked to obtain analytical expressions in both Markovian and non-Markovian regimes

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5736 in / 1300 out tokens · 26992 ms · 2026-05-23T03:10:18.248678+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Routing single photons with quantum emitters coupled to nanostructures

    quant-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A review summarizing input-output methods, theoretical proposals, and experimental demonstrations of emitter-based single-photon switches in nanophotonic structures.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2(b), it is found that T (M ) b = 1 at (δ/γ1, θ/π) = ( −3.14, 0.82) and (1 .5, 1.22)

    As shown in Fig. 2(b), it is found that T (M ) b = 1 at (δ/γ1, θ/π) = ( −3.14, 0.82) and (1 .5, 1.22). This perfect routing T (M ) b = 1 is induced by the dipole coupling and the chirality. We point out that, the photon cannot be fully output from port 1 or 3. However, there is still some significant probability for the photon routing from port 1 to port ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    2(c) and 2(d), where G = 2.38

    We plot the transmission coefficient eT (M ) j as functions of δ/γ1 and θ/π in Figs. 2(c) and 2(d), where G = 2.38. It is found that the results in Figs. 2(c) and 2(d) are apparently different from those in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), though they are obtained under the same system param- eters. This is just the nonreciprocal routing. This non- reciprocal phenome...

    work page

  3. [3]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature (London) 453, 1023 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    C. W. Chou, J. Laurat, H. Deng, K. S. Choi, H. de Ried- matten, D. Felinto, and H. J. Kimble, Functional quan- tum nodes for entanglement distribution over scalable quantum networks, Science 316, 1316 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    T. Aoki, A. S. Parkins, D. J. Alton, C. A. Regal, B. Dayan, E. Ostby, K. J. Vahala, and H. J. Kimble, Effi- cient Routing of Single Photons by One Atom and a Mi- crotoroidal Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 083601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    Chudzicki and F

    C. Chudzicki and F. W. Strauch, Parallel State Transfer and Efficient Quantum Routing on Quantum Networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 260501 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    L. Zhou, L. P. Yang, Y. Li, and C. P. Sun, Quantum Routing of Single Photons with a Cyclic Three-Level Sys- tem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 103604 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Huang, T

    J.-F. Huang, T. Shi, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Controlling single photon transport in waveguides with finite cross section, Phys. Rev. A 88, 013836 (2013)

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    Huang, J.-Q

    J.-F. Huang, J.-Q. Liao, and C. P. Sun, Photon blockade induced by atoms with Rydberg coupling, Phys. Rev. A 87, 023822 (2013)

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Yan and H

    W.-B. Yan and H. Fan, Single-photon quantum router with multiple output ports, Sci Rep. 4, 4820 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Shomroni, S

    I. Shomroni, S. Rosenblum, Y. Lovsky, O. Bechler, G. Guendelman, and B. Dayan, All-optical routing of sin- gle photon by a one-atom switch controlled by a single photon, Science 94, 903 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Yang, M.-T

    D.-C. Yang, M.-T. Cheng, X.-S. Ma, J. Xu, C. Zhu, and X.-S.Huang, Phase-modulated single-photon router, Phys. Rev. A 98, 063809 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Y. T. Zhu and W. Z. Jia, Single-photon quantum router in the microwave regime utilizing double superconduct- ing resonators with tunable coupling, Phys. Rev. A 99, 063815 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    I.-C. Hoi, C. M. Wilson, G. Johansson, T. Palomaki, B. Peropadre, and P. Delsing, Demonstration of a Single- Photon Router in the Microwave Regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 073601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    Reiserer, N

    A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, G. Rempe, and S. Ritter, A quan- tum gate between a flying optical photon and a single trapped atom, Nature (London) 508, 237 (2014)

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    X. X. Yuan, J.-J. Ma, P.-Y. Hou, X.-Y. Chang, C. Zu, and L.-M. Duan, Experimental demonstration of a quan- tum router, Sci Rep. 5, 12452 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Cao, Y.-W

    C. Cao, Y.-W. Duan, X. Chen, R. Zhang, T.-J. Wang, 10 and C. Wang, Implementation of single-photon quantum routing and decoupling using a nitrogen-vacancy center and a whispering gallery-mode resonator-waveguide sys- tem, Opt. Express 25, 16931 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Webber, S

    M. Webber, S. Herbert, S. Weidt, and W. K. Hensinger, Efficient qubit routing for a globally connected trapped ion quantum computer, Adv. Quantum Technol. 3, 2000027 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Z. Wang, Y. Wu, Z. Bao, Y. Li, C. Ma, H. Wang, Y. Song, H. Zhang, and L. Duan, Experimental realization of a deterministic quantum router with superconducting quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 014049 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    J. Wang, F. Sciarrino, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson, Integrated photonic quantum technologies, Nat. Photon- ics 14, 273 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    J. Lu, L. Zhou, L.-M. Kuang, and F. Nori, Single-photon router: Coherent control of multichannel scattering for single photon with quantum interferences, Phys. Rev. A 89, 013805 (2014)

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Zheng, D

    H. Zheng, D. J. Gauthier, and H. U. Baranger, Cavity- Free Photon Blockade Induced by Many-Body Bound States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 223601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    G. A. Yan, Q. Y. Cai, and A. X. Chen, Information- holding quantum router of single photons using natural atom, Eur. Phys. J. D 70, 93 (2016)

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    G. A. Yan, H. X. Qiao, H. Lu, and A. X. Chen, Quan- tum information-holding single-photon router based on spontaneous emission, Sci. China Phys., Mech. Astron. 60, 090311 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Monroe and J

    C. Monroe and J. Kim, Scaling the ion trap quantum processor, Science 339, 1164 (2013)

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Y.-X. Liu, L. F. Wei, J. S. Tsai, and F. Nori, Control- lable Coupling between Flux Qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 067003 (2006)

    work page 2006

  27. [27]

    A. O. Niskanen, K. Harrabi, F. Yoshihara, Y. Nakamura, S. Lloyd, and J. S. Tsai, Quantum coherent tunable cou- pling of superconducting qubits, Science 316, 723 (2007)

    work page 2007

  28. [28]

    Liao, J.-F

    J.-Q. Liao, J.-F. Huang, Y.-X. Liu, L.-M. Kuang, and C. P. Sun, Quantum switch for single-photon transport in a coupled superconducting transmission-line-resonator array, Phys. Rev. A 80, 014301 (2009)

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    A. Kemp, S. Saito, William J. Munro, K. Nemoto, and K. Semba, Superconducting qubit as a quantum transformer routing entanglement between a microscopic quantum memory and a macroscopic resonator, Phys. Rev. B 84, 104505 (2011)

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    Xiong, D.-Y

    W. Xiong, D.-Y. Jin, J. Jing, C.-H. Lam, and J. Q. You, Controllable coupling between a nanomechanical resonator and a coplanarwaveguide resonator via a super- conducting flux qubit, Phys. Rev. A 92, 032318 (2015)

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    L Zhou, Z. R. Gong, Y.-X. Liu, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Controllable Scattering of a Single Photon inside a One Dimensional Resonator Waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 100501 (2008)

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    J.-Q. Liao, Z. R. Gong, L. Zhou, Y.-X. Liu, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Controlling the transport of single photons by tuning the frequency of either one or two cavities in an array of coupled cavities, Phys. Rev. A 81, 042304 (2010)

    work page 2010

  33. [33]

    Liao and C

    J.-Q. Liao and C. K. Law, Correlated two-photon trans- port in a one-dimensional waveguide side-coupled to a nonlinear cavity, Phys. Rev. A 82, 053836 (2010)

    work page 2010

  34. [34]

    T. Shi, S. Fan, and C. P. Sun, Two-photon transport in a waveguide coupled to a cavity in a two-level system, Phys. Rev. A 84, 063803 (2011)

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    Cheng, X.-S

    M.-T. Cheng, X.-S. Ma, M.-T. Ding, Y.-Q. Luo, and G.-X. Zhao, Single-photon transport in one-dimensional coupled resonator waveguide with local and nonlocal coupling to a nanocavity containing a two-level system, Phys. Rev. A 85, 053840 (2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Zheng, D

    H. Zheng, D. J. Gauthier, and H. U. Baranger, Strongly correlated photons generated by coupling a three-or four level system to a waveguide, Phys. Rev. A 85, 043832 (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    J. F. M. Werra, P. Longo, and K. Busch, Spectra of co- herent resonant light pulses interacting with a two-level atom in a waveguide, Phys. Rev. A 87, 063821 (2013)

    work page 2013

  38. [38]

    Bentham, I

    C. Bentham, I. E. Itskevich, R. J. Coles, B. Royall, E. Clarke, J. O’Hara, N. Prtljaga, A. M. Fox, M. S. Skolnick, and L. R. Wilson, On-chip electrically controlled routing of photons from a single quantum dot, Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 221101 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, Interfac- ing single photons and single quantum dots with pho- tonic nanostructures, Reviews of Modern Physics, 87, 347 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Mitsch, C

    R. Mitsch, C. Sayrin, B. Albrecht, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Quantum state-controlled directional spontaneous emission of photons into a nanophotonic waveguide, Nat. Commun. 5, 5713 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Petersen, J

    J. Petersen, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Chiral nanophotonic waveguide interface based on spin-orbit in- teraction of light, Science 346, 67 (2014)

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    S¨ ollner, S

    I. S¨ ollner, S. Mahmoodian, S. L. Hansen, L. Midolo, A. Javadi, G. Kiranske, T. Pregnolato, H. El-Ella, E. H. Lee, J. D. Song, S. Stobbe, and P. Lodahl, Deterministic photon–emitter coupling in chiral photonic circuits, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 775 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    A. B. Young, A. C. T. Thijssen, D. M. Beggs, P. An- drovitsaneas, L. Kuipers, J. G. Rarity, S. Hughes, and R. Oulton, Polarization Engineering in Photonic Crys- tal Waveguides for Spin-Photon Entanglers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 153901 (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Xu, A.-X

    X.-W. Xu, A.-X. Chen, Y. Li, and Y.-X. Liu, Single- photon nonreciprocal transport in one-dimensional cou- pled resonator waveguides, Phys. Rev. A 95, 063808 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Zheng, X.-L

    J.-C. Zheng, X.-L. Dong, J.-Q. Chen, X.-L. Hei, X.-F. Pan, X.-Y. Yao, Y.-M. Ren, Y.-F. Qiao, and P.-B. Li, Chiral and nonreciprocal transmission of single photons in coupled-resonator-waveguide systems, Phys. Rev. A. 109, 063709 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Yu and S

    Z. Yu and S. Fan, Complete optical isolation created by indirect interband photonic transitions, Nat. Photonics 3, 91 (2009)

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    Jalas, A

    D. Jalas, A. Petrov, M. Eich, W. Freude, S. Fan, Z. Yu, R. Baets, M. Popovi´ c, A. Melloni, J. D. Joannopoulos, M. Vanwolleghem, C. R. Doerr, and H. Renner, What is—and what is not—an optical isolator, Nat. Photonics 7, 579 (2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    K. M. Sliwa, M. Hatridge, A. Narla, S. Shankar, L. Frun- zio, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Reconfigurable Josephson Circulator/Directional Amplifier, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041020 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Leonardo Ranzani and Jos´ e Aumentado, Graph-based analysis of nonreciprocity in coupled-mode systems, New J. Phys. 17, 023024 (2015)

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal Photon 11 Transmission and Amplification via Reservoir Engineer- ing, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021025 (2015)

    work page 2015

  51. [51]

    Guimond, H

    P.-O. Guimond, H. Pichler, A. Rauschenbeutel, and P. Zoller, Chiral quantum optics with V-level atoms and coherent quantum feedback, Phys. Rev. A 94, 033829 (2016)

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Yan and L

    C.-H. Yan and L. F. Wei, Photonic switches with ideal switching contrasts for waveguide photon, Phys. Rev. A 94, 053816(2016)

    work page 2016

  53. [53]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeu- tel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Chi- ral quantum optics, Nature (London) 541, 473 (2017)

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    Grankin, P

    A. Grankin, P. O. Guimond, D. V. Vasilyev, B. Vermer- sch, and P. Zoller, Free-space photonic quantum link and chiral quantum optics, Phys. Rev. A 98, 043825 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Yan, W.-Y

    W.-B. Yan, W.-Y. Ni, J. Zhang, F.-Y. Zhang, and H. Fan, Tunable single-photon diode by chiral quantum physics, Phys. Rev. A 98, 043852 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    J. Zhou, X. L. Yin, and J. Q. Liao, Chiral and nonrecip- rocal single-photon scattering in a chiral-giant-molecule waveguide QED system, Phys. Rev. A 107, 063703 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    K. Fang, Z. Yu, and S. Fan, Realizing effective magnetic field for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation, Nat. Photonics 6, 782 (2012)

    work page 2012

  58. [58]

    Manipatruni, J

    S. Manipatruni, J. T. Robinson, and M. Lipson, Opti- cal Nonreciprocity in Optomechanical Structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 213903 (2009)

    work page 2009

  59. [59]

    Hafezi and P

    M. Hafezi and P. Rabl, Optomechanically induced non- reciprocity in microring resonators, Opt. Express 20, 7672 (2012)

    work page 2012

  60. [60]

    Xu and Y

    X.-W. Xu and Y. Li, Optical nonreciprocity and optome- chanical circulator in three-mode optomechanical sys- tems, Phys. Rev. A 91, 053854 (2015)

    work page 2015

  61. [61]

    G. Li, X. Xiao, Y. Li, and X. Wang, Tunable optical nonreciprocity and a phonon-photon router in an op- tomechanical system with coupled mechanical and op- tical modes, Phys. Rev. A 97, 023801 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    S´ anchez-Burillo, L

    E. S´ anchez-Burillo, L. Mart´ ın-Moreno, J. J. Garc´ ıa- Ripoll, and D. Zueco, Full two-photon down-conversion of a single photon, Phys. Rev. A 94, 053814 (2016)

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    C.-H. Yan, Y. Li, H. Yuan, and L. F. Wei, Targeted pho- tonic routers with chiral photon-atom interactions, Phys. Rev. A 97, 023821 (2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    N. M. Sundaresan, R. Lundgren, G. Zhu, A. V. Gorshkov, and A. A. Houck, Interacting Qubit-Photon Bound States with Superconducting Circuits, Phys. Rev. X 9, 011021 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    Song and L

    Y.-J. Song and L. Qiao, Controlling single-photon scat- tering in a rectangular waveguide by a V-type three-level emitter, Opt. Express 28, 37639 (2020)

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    Zhao and Z

    W. Zhao and Z. Wang, Single-photon scattering and bound states in an atom-waveguide system with two or multiple coupling points, Phys. Rev. A 101, 053855 (2020)

    work page 2020

  67. [67]

    A. F. Kockum, G. Johansson, and F. Nori, Decoherence- Free Interaction between Giant Atoms in Waveguide Quantum Electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 140404 (2018)

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    Carollo, D

    A. Carollo, D. Cilluffo, and F. Ciccarello, Mechanism of decoherence-free coupling between giant atoms, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 043184 (2020)

    work page 2020

  69. [69]

    Kannan, M

    B. Kannan, M. J. Ruckriegel, D. L. Campbell, A. F. Kockum, J. Braum¨ uller, D. K. Kim, M. Kjaergaard, P. Krantz, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski, A. Veps¨ al¨ ainen, R. Winik, J. L. Yoder, F. Nori, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavs- son, and W. D. Oliver, Waveguide quantum electrody- namics with superconducting artificial giant atoms, Na- ture (London) 583, 775 (2020)

    work page 2020

  70. [70]

    Du, M.-R

    L. Du, M.-R. Cai, J.-H. Wu, Z. Wang, and Y. Li, Single-photon nonreciprocal excitation transfer with non- Markovian retarded effects, Phys. Rev. A 103, 053701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  71. [71]

    L. Du, Y. Zhang, J.-H. Wu, A. F. Kockum, and Y. Li, Giant Atoms in a Synthetic Frequency Dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 223602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  72. [72]

    Yin and J.-Q

    X.-L. Yin and J.-Q. Liao, Generation of two-giant-atom entanglement in waveguide-qed systems, Phys. Rev. A 108, 023728 (2023)

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    Yin, W.-B

    X.-L. Yin, W.-B. Luo, and J.-Q. Liao, Non- Markovian disentanglement dynamics in double-giant- atom waveguide-QED systems, Phys. Rev. A 106, 063703 (2022)

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    R. J. Coles, D. M. Price, J. E. Dixon, B. Royall, E. Clarke, P. Kok, M. S. Skolnick, A. M. Fox, and M. N. Makhonin, Chirality of nanophotonic waveguide with embedded quantum emitter for unidirectional spin trans- fer, Nat. Commun. 7, 11183 (2016)

    work page 2016

  75. [75]

    Astafiev, Jr., A

    O. Astafiev, Jr., A. M. Zagoskin, A. A. Abdumalikov, Jr., Y. A. Pashkin, T. Yamamoto, K. Inomata, Y. Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, Resonance fluorescence of a single artificial atom, Science 327, 840 (2010)

    work page 2010

  76. [76]

    A. F. van Loo, A. Fedorov, K. Lalumi` ere, B. C. Sanders, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Photon-mediated interac- tions between distant artificial atoms, Science 342, 1494 (2013)

    work page 2013

  77. [77]

    Barends, J

    R. Barends, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, A. Veitia, D. Sank, E. Jeffrey, T. C. White, J. Mutus, A. G. Fowler, B. Camp- bell, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, C. Neill, P. O’Malley, P. Roushan et al ., Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance, Nature (London) 508, 500 (2014)

    work page 2014

  78. [78]

    Liu and A

    Y. Liu and A. A. Houck, Quantum electrodynamics near a photonic bandgap, Nat. Phys. 13, 48 (2017)

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    X. Gu, A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, Y.-X. Liu, and F. Nori, Microwave photonics with superconducting quan- tum circuits, Phys. Rep. 718, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  80. [80]

    DiCarlo, J

    L. DiCarlo, J. M. Chow, J. M. Gambetta, Lev S. Bishop, B. R. Johnson, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, L. Frun- zio, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor, Nature (London) 460, 240 (2009)

    work page 2009

Showing first 80 references.