Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 100 references

Precise Quantum Control of Molecular Rotation Toward a Desired Orientation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Pulse sequence formula steers molecules to 99% orientation

desk verdict Useful generalization of the pulse-area theorem with solid but unquantified numerical evidence; send to review but require the supplement and fidelity numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.10196 v1 pith:43Q473FZ submitted 2025-02-14 quant-ph physics.optics

Qian-Qian Hong , Daoyi Dong , Niels E. Henriksen , Franco Nori , Jun He , Chuan-Cun Shu This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.optics PACS 32.80.Qk
keywords molecularorientationpulse-areatheoremquantumcontrolrotationalwavepacketultracoldpolarmoleculesfield-freeterahertzpulsesequencequdit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes an analytical method, called a multi-level pulse-area theorem, that gives a direct and closed-form mapping from the amplitudes, phases, and time delays of a sequence of resonant laser subpulses to the amplitudes and phases of a finite rotational superposition of a polar molecule. This means a desired quantum state in a chosen rotational subspace can be designed through simple formulas instead of numerical search. As a demonstration, the authors show that for ultracold LiH molecules a sequence of 15 subpulses can steer the lowest 16 rotational states into a superposition with a field-free orientation value of $|\langle\cos\theta\rangle|_{\rm{max}}$ above 0.99, close to the perfect value of 1 attainable only in infinite-dimensional space. They validate the analytic pulses with a full numerical solution of the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation, without using the approximations employed in the derivation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the product-form wavefunction of Eq. (4), derived using the first-order Magnus expansion: each subpulse acts as an independent Rabi rotation on one adjacent transition, so the total propagator is a product of SU(2) rotations. The subpulse area $\theta_n(t)$ is the Rabi area of the $n$th pulse, and the phase factors $\exp[-i(\varphi_n - \omega_{n,n-1}\tau_n)]$ carry the control phase. This product structure turns pulse parameters into state amplitudes and phases, and it also yields the Lagrange-multiplier equations (7)–(9) for the optimal orientation and the corresponding optimal population and phase conditions. The pulse synthesis formula, Eq. (5), converts the designed areas into Gaussian subpulses with specified center frequency, amplitude, phase, and delay.

What would settle it

Take a molecule with a much smaller rotational constant (or a heavier diatomic), or push the pulse sequence to $J_{\rm{max}} > 15$, solve the full time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation, and check whether the achieved orientation matches the value predicted by Eq. (7) and whether the population of states outside the target subspace remains below the stated accuracy; alternatively, probe the rotational wavepacket phase with a delayed laser pulse and verify that the phase relation of Eq. (9) holds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Eq. (4): after $N$ resonant subpulses, each coupling only one adjacent rotational transition ($|J\rangle \leftrightarrow |J+1\rangle$) and well separated in time, the final wavefunction factorizes into a product of two-level rotation operators, giving an explicit analytic expression for every amplitude and phase in terms of the subpulse areas $\{\theta_n\}$ and phases $\{\varphi_n\}$. Combined with Eqs. (10) and (11), this yields a constructive recipe: choose the desired amplitudes $c_J$ and phases $\varphi_J$ (for example, those that maximize orientation for a given $J_{\rm{max}}$), invert the product formula to obtain the pulse areas, and read off the required field amplitudes and phases. The authors claim this extends the two-level pulse-area theorem to arbitrary finite rotational subspaces and constitutes a direct control-field-to-wavefunction map.

Load-bearing premise

Each subpulse acts on exactly one adjacent rotational transition as an isolated two-level system, with no off-resonant coupling to other states and no temporal overlap with neighboring subpulses; the paper enforces this through long subpulse durations and large separations, and validates it numerically only for the specific LiH parameters.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any desired rotational superposition within a finite subspace can be constructed analytically, not only orientation-maximizing states.
  • Field-free molecular orientation above 0.99 is achievable with the lowest 16 rotational states, approaching the global optimum of 1.
  • The same analytically designed pulses also produce alignment $\langle\cos^2\theta\rangle$ above 0.98, because the optimized phases serve both objectives.
  • The peak intensity for LiH is below $2.65\times10^5\ \mathrm{W/cm^2}$, so electronic excitation and ionization should be negligible.
  • The framework extends to other ultracold diatomic, linear, and polyatomic molecules, and to larger $J_{\rm{max}}$ by adjusting subpulse center frequencies to account for centrifugal distortion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The product-form mapping suggests a direct route to qudit gates in molecular rotational spaces: a sequence of subpulses implements generalized rotations, and error analysis analogous to composite pulse techniques could be applied.
  • The factorization assumption could be tested experimentally by measuring rotational populations after each subpulse; deviations would reveal off-resonant leakage, which may become significant for larger $J_{\rm{max}}$ as transition frequencies crowd together.
  • For molecules with small rotational constants, the requirement $T_n = 3T_{\rm{rot}}$ may become impractically long, so a bandwidth-constrained variant of the same analytic construction would be a natural extension.
  • The mapping applies to any ladder system with known dipole-like coupling matrix elements, such as vibrational states or cavity-coupled rotational states, where the same pulse-area factorization could be used.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proposes an analytic multi-level pulse-area theorem for rotational states of ultracold polar molecules. The central result is Eq. (4), which represents the final wavefunction after N resonant subpulses as a product of two-level cos/sin rotations acting on adjacent rotational transitions, thereby mapping pulse areas and phases onto the amplitudes and phases of the lowest Jmax+1 rotational states. The authors combine this mapping with the orientation-optimal amplitude and phase relations in Eqs. (7)-(9), construct Gaussian pulse sequences via Eq. (5), and test them against full time-dependent Schrödinger equation simulations for LiH with Jmax = 1,...,15. They report a maximum orientation |<cosθ>|max > 0.99 for Jmax = 15.

Significance. If fully established, the result is valuable: it provides an explicit analytic pulse-to-state map for rotational qudits, with low peak intensities and an independent numerical check that does not rely on the approximations used in the derivation. The paper's strength is that the full TDSE simulation is a no-approximation test of the pulse sequences, and the systematic sweep over 15 subspace sizes is a useful demonstration. The main weaknesses are that the validation is reported only qualitatively, the optimal-state equations are outsourced to a supplemental document, and the claimed generality to arbitrary superpositions and to other molecules is broader than the demonstrated evidence.

major comments (4)
  1. [Numerical Simulations for Ultracold Polar Molecules, Eq. (4)] The central factorization claim is validated only qualitatively. Figures 2 and 3 show orientation traces and populations, and the text states "excellent agreement" without reporting any fidelity or error metric. Because Eq. (4) neglects off-resonant J ↔ J±1 couplings and any residual overlap between subpulses, errors could accumulate with N. Please report the overlap |⟨ψ_TDSE(tf)|ψ_target⟩|^2, or an equivalent amplitude/phase error, for every N = 1,...,15, and explicitly state which small parameters justify Tn = 3Trot and τn = 5(n−1)Tn. This is needed to support the word "precise" in the paper's central claim.
  2. [Application to the Generation of Desired Molecular Orientation, Eqs. (7)-(9)] The maximum-orientation solution is load-bearing but is not derived in the paper. Equation (7) is presented with a complicated product/summation structure whose ranges are not fully specified, and Eqs. (8)-(9) are stated without proof; all are deferred to Supplemental Material [62], which is not included in arXiv v1. The reader therefore cannot verify the claimed optimality or reproduce the coefficients cJ and phases ϕJ. Please include the derivation in the paper or the supplemental file, and rewrite Eq. (7) with clear index definitions.
  3. [Conclusion and abstract, arbitrary-superposition claim] The paper claims the ability to construct "any desired rotational superposition" in the target subspace, but the numerical demonstrations cover only the 15 orientation-optimal states, whose phases satisfy the special relation in Eq. (9). To support the general claim, simulate several non-optimal target states with prescribed amplitudes and phases that do not satisfy Eq. (9) and report their fidelities. Otherwise, the claim should be restricted to orientation-optimal superpositions.
  4. [Discussion, universality claim] The statement that the method is "universally applicable to different diatomic, linear, and polyatomic molecules" goes beyond the single LiH example. The validity of Eq. (4) depends on the ratio of Rabi frequency to rotational level spacing, on the number of pulses, and on the pulse timing. Please either test at least one additional molecule with substantially different B and μ0, or provide an explicit validity condition (e.g., a bound on the neglected off-resonant couplings) before claiming universality.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title, Numerical Simulations] There are several typographical errors: "Desi red" in the title should be "Desired", "sufficient long duration" should be "sufficiently long duration", and "By talking into account" should be "By taking into account".
  2. [Eq. (7)] The notation for the nested sums and products in Eq. (7) is very difficult to parse; please introduce the summation variables explicitly and ensure the ranges are typeset unambiguously.
  3. [Figures 2 and 3] Panels in Figures 2 and 3 reuse labels such as (e)-(h) and (a')-(h') in different subfigures; please clarify the captions so each panel is uniquely identified.
  4. [Eq. (2)] The target state in Eq. (2) contains both an explicit phase exp(iϕJ) and a dynamical phase exp(−iωJtf); the text should state which part is absorbed into ϕJ when using Eq. (9).
  5. [Discussion, centrifugal distortion] The statement that the centrifugal distortion effect "was less than 10−3 for Jmax = 15" should specify whether this is a fractional change in transition frequency, in energy, or in the final orientation value.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the pulse-to-state mapping is an explicit construction independently checked by exact time-dependent Schrödinger simulation.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is not circular. Equation (3) is the standard two-level Magnus pulse-area result, and Eq. (4) is presented as a derived multi-level product form under an explicit approximation: each subpulse couples one adjacent pair independently, with non-overlapping subpulses and first-order Magnus expansion. The paper does not define the target state in terms of the pulse areas; instead it inverts Eq. (4) in Eqs. (10) and (11) to compute pulse areas and phases from desired amplitudes, which is the intended control construction rather than a circular prediction. The orientation optimum in Eqs. (7)-(9) is obtained by solving the Lagrange-multiplier/eigenvalue problem for cos(theta) in the truncated rotational subspace, independent of the pulse design. The central validation is the no-approximation numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, with the paper reporting that the simulations show 'excellent agreement' with the theoretical predictions. Although the derivations and some numerical values are cited to the authors' Supplemental Material [62], those equations are stated explicitly in the Letter and are checked by an independent simulation, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. The absence of a quantitative fidelity metric and the unavailability of the Supplemental Material are verification/completeness concerns, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central claim rests on standard rigid-rotor dynamics plus the assumption of independent resonant subpulses, and on optimization formulas taken from the authors' own supplemental material.

free parameters (2)
  • Subpulse duration Tn = 3 Trot = 6.6 ps for LiH
    Chosen by hand to satisfy resonance conditions and suppress off-resonant transitions; not determined by the target state.
  • Subpulse center-time spacing = tau_n = 5(n-1)Tn
    Chosen to keep subpulses well separated in time; not optimized.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Molecular rotation is governed by the rigid-rotor Hamiltonian H = B J^2 - mu0 E(t) cos(theta), with vibrational and electronic motion frozen.
    Used in the numerical time-dependent Schrodinger equation and in the analytic derivation; centrifugal distortion is stated to contribute less than 1e-3 for Jmax = 15.
  • domain assumption Each subpulse couples only the adjacent rotational states it is resonant with, and the pulses are separated enough that evolution factorizes into independent two-level rotations.
    Needed for Eq. (4); relies on long durations and center-time separation.
  • ad hoc to paper Equations (7)-(9) from Ref. 62 give the globally optimal amplitudes and phases for maximum orientation in the truncated subspace.
    These formulas are asserted through the Supplemental Material and are not derived in the Letter.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Precise Quantum Control of Molecular Rotation Toward a Desired Orientation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/43Q473FZ

@misc{pith2026250210196,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Precise Quantum Control of Molecular Rotation Toward a Desired Orientation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/43Q473FZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.10196}
}
abstract

The lack of a direct map between control fields and desired control objectives poses a significant challenge in applying quantum control theory to quantum technologies. Here, we propose an analytical framework to precisely control a limited set of quantum states and construct desired coherent superpositions using a well-designed laser pulse sequence with optimal amplitudes, phases, and delays. This theoretical framework that corresponds to a multi-level pulse-area theorem establishes a straightforward mapping between the control parameters of the pulse sequence and the amplitudes and phases of rotational states within a specific subspace. As an example, we utilize this approach to generate 15 distinct and desired rotational superpositions of ultracold polar molecules, leading to 15 desired field-free molecular orientations. By optimizing the superposition of the lowest 16 rotational states, we demonstrate that this approach can achieve a maximum orientation value of $|\langle\cos\theta\rangle|_{\rm{max}}$ above 0.99, which is very close to the global optimal value of 1 that could be achieved in an infinite-dimensional state space. This work marks a significant advancement in achieving precise control over multi-level subsystems within molecules. It holds potential applications in molecular alignment and orientation, as well as in various interdisciplinary fields related to the precise quantum control of ultracold polar molecules, opening up considerable opportunities in molecular-based quantum techniques.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.10196 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of generating a desired cohe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The analytically designed pulse sequence (a,c) and t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The population distributions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The degree of alignment [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [62]

    Fan and C.-C

    L.-B. Fan and C.-C. Shu, Pulse-area theorem for precisi on con- trol of the rotational motions of a single molecule in a cavit y, J. Phys. A-Math. Theor. 56, 365302 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    DeMille, Quantum computation with trapped polar molecules, Phys

    D. DeMille, Quantum computation with trapped polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 067901 (2002)

    2002

  3. [2]

    By combining the optimal amplitudes and phase conditions with the analytical wave function in Eq

    should satisfy the following relations cJ = λJ + ∑[J/ 2] k=1 (−1)k {∏k n=1 ∑J−2k+2(n−1) l1=0;ln=ln−1+2 M2 ln+1, ln } λJ−2k ∏J−1 l=0 Ml+1, l c0, (8) and ϕJ+1 −ϕJ = (J + 1) (ϕ1 −ϕ0) + 2kπ, (k = 0, ±1, ±2), (9) with the constraint ∑Jmax J=0 c2 J = 1. By combining the optimal amplitudes and phase conditions with the analytical wave function in Eq. ( 4), we ca...

  4. [3]

    Manai, R

    I. Manai, R. Horchani, H. Lignier, P . Pillet, D. Com- parat, A. Fioretti, and M. Allegrini, Rovibra- tional cooling of molecules by optical pumping, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 183001 (2012)

    2012

  5. [4]

    K. Wang, C. P . Williams, L. R. Picard, N. Y . Yao, and K.-K. Ni, Enriching the quantum toolbox of ultracold molecules wi th Rydberg atoms, PRX Quantum 3, 030339 (2022)

    2022

  6. [5]

    Y . Bao, S. S. Y u, L. Anderegg, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.- K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Dipolar spin-exchange and en- tanglement between molecules in an optical tweezer array, Science 382, 1138 (2023)

    2023

  7. [6]

    A. S. Chatterley, C. Schouder, L. Christiansen, B. Shepp erson, M. H. Rasmussen, and H. Stapelfeldt, Long-lasting field-fre e alignment of large molecules inside helium nanodroplets, N at. Commun. 10, 133 (2019)

    2019

  8. [7]

    C. P . Koch, M. Lemeshko, and D. Sugny, Quantum control of molecular rotation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035005 (2019)

    2019

Show all 100 references
  1. [8]

    E. J. Zak, A. Yachmenev, and J. K¨ upper, Controlling ro- tation in the molecular frame with an optical centrifuge, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023188 (2021)

    2021

  2. [9]

    Mullins, E

    T. Mullins, E. T. Karamatskos, J. Wiese, J. Onvlee, A. Rou z´ ee, A. Yachmenev, S. Trippel, and J. K¨ upper, Picosecond pulse- shaping for strong three-dimensional field-free alignment of generic asymmetric-top molecules, Nat. Commun. 13, 1431 (2022)

    2022

  3. [10]

    Qiang, L

    J. Qiang, L. Zhou, P . Lu, K. Lin, Y . Ma, S. Pan, C. Lu, W. Jiang, F. Sun, W. Zhang, et al. , Femtosecond rotational dynamics of D 2 molecules in superfluid helium nanodroplets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 243201 (2022)

    2022

  4. [11]

    A. A. Milner, I. MacPhail-Bartley, K. Preocanin, S. Das gupta, X. Peng, and V . Milner, Coherent control of molecular rotati on in superfluid helium, Phys. Rev. A 109, 013110 (2024)

    2024

  5. [12]

    Machholm and N

    M. Machholm and N. E. Henriksen, Field-free orientatio n of molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 193001 (2001)

    2001

  6. [13]

    K. Oda, M. Hita, S. Minemoto, and H. Sakai, All-optical m olec- ular orientation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 213901 (2010)

    2010

  7. [14]

    Fleischer, Y

    S. Fleischer, Y . Zhou, R. W. Field, and K. A. Nelson, Molecular orientation and alignment by intense single-cycle THz puls es, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 163603 (2011)

    2011

  8. [15]

    K. N. Egodapitiya, S. Li, and R. R. Jones, Terahertz- induced field-free orientation of rotationally excited mol ecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 103002 (2014)

    2014

  9. [16]

    K. Lin, I. Tutunnikov, J. Qiang, J. Ma, Q. Song, Q. Ji, W. Zhang, H. Li, F. Sun, X. Gong, et al. , All-optical field-free three- dimensional orientation of asymmetric-top molecules, Nat . Commun. 9, 5134 (2018)

    2018

  10. [17]

    L. Xu, I. Tutunnikov, E. Gershnabel, Y . Prior, and I. S. A ver- bukh, Long-lasting molecular orientation induced by a sing le terahertz pulse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 013201 (2020)

    2020

  11. [18]

    Fan, C.-C

    L.-B. Fan, C.-C. Shu, D. Dong, J. He, N. E. Henriksen, and F. Nori, Quantum coherent control of a single molecular- polariton rotation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 043604 (2023)

    2023

  12. [19]

    S. A. Moses, J. P . Covey, M. T. Miecnikowski, D. S. Jin, an d J. Ye, New frontiers for quantum gases of polar molecules, Na t. Phys. 13, 13 (2017)

    2017

  13. [20]

    Fukahori, T

    S. Fukahori, T. Otobe, H. Akagi, K. Yamanouchi, and R. Itakura, Orientation-angle-resolved photoelec- tron angular distribution in dissociative ionization of methanol induced by an intense ultraviolet laser pulse, Phys. Rev. A 107, 053118 (2023)

    2023

  14. [21]

    I. D. Leroux, M. H. Schleier-Smith, and V . Vuleti´ c, Orientation- dependent entanglement lifetime in a squeezed atomic clock , Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 250801 (2010)

    2010

  15. [22]

    Alighanbari, M

    S. Alighanbari, M. G. Hansen, V . Korobov, and S. Schille r, Ro- tational spectroscopy of cold and trapped molecular ions in the lamb–dicke regime, Nat. Phys. 14, 555 (2018)

    2018

  16. [23]

    W. Siu, F. Kelkensberg, G. Gademann, A. Rouz´ ee, P . Johnsson, D. Dowek, M. Lucchini, F. Calegari, U. De Giovannini, A. Ru- bio, et al. , Attosecond control of dissociative ionization of O 2 molecules, Phys. Rev. A 84, 063412 (2011)

    2011

  17. [24]

    J. Li, Q. Zhang, L. Li, X. Zhu, T. Huang, P . Lan, and P . Lu, Orientation dependence of high-order harmonic generation in nanowire, Phys. Rev. A 99, 033421 (2019)

    2019

  18. [25]

    J. Zhou, C. He, M.-M. Liu, E. Wang, S. Jia, A. Dorn, X. Ren, and Y . Liu, Real-time observation of ul- trafast molecular rotation in weakly bound dimers, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023050 (2021)

    2021

  19. [26]

    D. V . Rezvan, K. Klyssek, S. Grundmann, A. Pier, N. M. Novikovskiy, N. Strenger, D. Tsitsonis, M. Kircher, I. V ela-Per´ ez, K. Fehre, F. Trinter, M. S. Sch¨ o ffler, T. Jahnke, R. D¨ orner, and P . V . Demekhin, Observation of nondipole-induced asymmetry in the angular emissio...

    2022

  20. [27]

    J. D. Pickering, B. Shepperson, B. A. K. H¨ ubschmann, F. Thorning, and H. Stapelfeldt, Alignment and imag- 8 ing of the CS 2 dimer inside helium nanodroplets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 113202 (2018)

    2018

  21. [28]

    D. Qi, F. Cao, S. Xu, Y . Yao, Y . He, J. Yao, P . Ding, C. Jin, L. Deng, T. Jia, J. Liang, Z. Sun, and S. Zhang, 100-trillion- frame-per-second single-shot compressed ultrafast photography via molecular alignment, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 024051 (2021)

    2021

  22. [29]

    T. K. Begzjav, Z. Zhang, M. O. Scully, and G. S. Agarwal, E n- hanced signals from chiral molecules via molecular coheren ce, Opt. Express 27, 13965 (2019)

    2019

  23. [30]

    Shapiro, M

    E. Shapiro, M. Spanner, and M. Y . Ivanov, Quantum logic i n coarse grained control of wavepackets, J. Mod. Optic. 52, 897 (2005)

    2005

  24. [31]

    C. Wu, A. B. Khanikaev, R. Adato, N. Arju, A. A. Yanik, H. A l- tug, and G. Shvets, Fano-resonant asymmetric metamaterial s for ultrasensitive spectroscopy and identification of mole cular monolayers, Nature Mater. 11, 69 (2012)

    2012

  25. [32]

    Karle, A

    V . Karle, A. Ghazaryan, and M. Lemeshko, Topo- logical charges of periodically kicked molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 103202 (2023)

    2023

  26. [33]

    Zhang, Y .-x

    J. Zhang, Y .-x. Liu, R.-B. Wu, K. Jacobs, and F. Nori, Qua ntum feedback: theory, experiments, and applications, Phys. Re p. 679, 1 (2017)

    2017

  27. [34]

    V . V . Albert, J. P . Covey, and J. Preskill, Robust encoding of a qubit in a molecule, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031050 (2020)

    2020

  28. [35]

    Mishima and K

    K. Mishima and K. Yamashita, Quantum computing using ro - tational modes of two polar molecules, Chem. Phys. 361, 106 (2009)

    2009

  29. [36]

    I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum simulat ion, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014)

    2014

  30. [37]

    Hughes, M

    M. Hughes, M. D. Frye, R. Sawant, G. Bhole, J. A. Jones, S. L. Cornish, M. R. Tarbutt, J. M. Hutson, D. Jaksch, and J. Mur- Petit, Robust entangling gate for polar molecules using mag - netic and microwave fields, Phys. Rev. A 101, 062308 (2020)

    2020

  31. [38]

    P . O. Kofman, S. N. Shevchenko, and F. Nori, Tuning the initial phase to control the final state of a driven qubit, Phys. Rev. A 109, 022409 (2024)

    2024

  32. [39]

    Q. Wei, S. Kais, B. Friedrich, and D. Herschbach, Entang lement of polar symmetric top molecules as candidate qubits, J. Che m. Phys. 135 (2011)

    2011

  33. [40]

    J. A. Blackmore, L. Caldwell, P . D. Gregory, E. M. Bridge , R. Sawant, J. Aldegunde, J. Mur-Petit, D. Jaksch, J. M. Hutso n, B. Sauer, et al. , Ultracold molecules for quantum simulation: Rotational coherences in CaF and RbCs, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 014010 (2018)

    2018

  34. [41]

    K.-K. Ni, T. Rosenband, and D. D. Grimes, Dipolar exchan ge quantum logic gate with polar molecules, Chem. Sci. 9, 6830 (2018)

    2018

  35. [42]

    P . Y u, L. W. Cheuk, I. Kozyryev, and J. M. Doyle, A scalabl e quantum computing platform using symmetric-top molecules , New J. Phys. 21, 093049 (2019)

    2019

  36. [43]

    Wang and R.-B

    Z.-Y . Wang and R.-B. Liu, Extending quantum control of t ime- independent systems to time-dependent systems, Phys. Rev. A 83, 062313 (2011)

    2011

  37. [44]

    S. J. Glaser, U. Boscain, T. Calarco, C. P . Koch, W. K¨ ockenberger, R. Kosloff, I. Kuprov, B. Luy, S. Schirmer, T. Schulte-Herbr¨ uggen, et al. , Training Schr¨ odinger’s cat: Quantum optimal control: Strategic report on current statu s, vi- sions and goals for research in Eu...

    2015

  38. [45]

    C.-W. Chou, C. Kurz, D. B. Hume, P . N. Plessow, D. R. Leibrandt, and D. Leibfried, Preparation and coherent mani pu- lation of pure quantum states of a single molecular ion, Natu re 545, 203 (2017)

    2017

  39. [46]

    Kallush, R

    S. Kallush, R. Dann, and R. Koslo ff, Controlling the uncontrol- lable: Quantum control of open-system dynamics, Sci. Adv. 8, eadd0828 (2022)

    2022

  40. [47]

    Dong and I

    D. Dong and I. R. Petersen, Learning and robust control in quantum technology (Springer Nature, 2023)

    2023

  41. [48]

    Dominici, D

    L. Dominici, D. Colas, S. Donati, J. P . Restrepo Cuartas , M. De Giorgi, D. Ballarini, G. Guirales, J. C. L´ opez Carre˜ n o, A. Bramati, G. Gigli, E. del V alle, F. P . Laussy, and D. San- vitto, Ultrafast control and Rabi oscillations of polarito ns, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 2...

    2014

  42. [49]

    K. A. Fischer, L. Hanschke, M. Kremser, J. J. Finley, K. M ¨ uller, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Pulsed Rabi oscillations in quantum two-level systems: Beyond the area theorem, Quantum Sci. Technol. 3, 014006 (2017)

    2017

  43. [50]

    Shi, Y .-H

    Z.-C. Shi, Y .-H. Chen, W. Qin, Y . Xia, X. X. Yi, S.-B. Zhen g, and F. Nori, Two-level systems with periodic n-step driv- ing fields: Exact dynamics and quantum state manipulations, Phys. Rev. A 104, 053101 (2021)

    2021

  44. [51]

    O. V . Ivakhnenko, S. N. Shevchenko, and F. Nori, Nona- diabatic Landau–Zener–St¨ uckelberg–Majorana transitio ns, dy- namics, and interference, Phys. Rep. 995, 1 (2023)

    2023

  45. [52]

    Y . Guo, X. Gong, S. Ma, and C.-C. Shu, Cyclic three-level - pulse-area theorem for enantioselective state transfer of chiral molecules, Phys. Rev. A 105, 013102 (2022)

    2022

  46. [53]

    Judson, K

    R. Judson, K. Lehmann, H. Rabitz, and W. Warren, Optimal design of external fields for controlling molecular motion: ap- plication to rotation, J. Mol. Struct. 223, 425 (1990)

    1990

  47. [54]

    Ortigoso, Design of tailored microwave pulses to cre ate ro- tational coherent states for an asymmetric-top molecule, P hys

    J. Ortigoso, Design of tailored microwave pulses to cre ate ro- tational coherent states for an asymmetric-top molecule, P hys. Rev. A 57, 4592 (1998)

    1998

  48. [55]

    Salomon, C

    J. Salomon, C. M. Dion, and G. Turinici, Optimal molecul ar alignment and orientation through rotational ladder climb ing, J. Chem. Phys. 123 (2005)

    2005

  49. [56]

    Shu, T.-S

    C.-C. Shu, T.-S. Ho, and H. Rabitz, Monotonic con- vergent quantum optimal control method with exact equality constraints on the optimized control fields, Phys. Rev. A 93, 053418 (2016)

    2016

  50. [57]

    Y . Guo, X. Luo, S. Ma, and C.-C. Shu, All-optical generat ion of quantum entangled states with strictly constrained ultr afast laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A 100, 023409 (2019)

    2019

  51. [58]

    Montesinos and A

    M. Montesinos and A. P´ erez-Lorenzana, Exact so- lutions of n-level systems and gauge theories, Phys. Rev. A 60, 2554 (1999)

    1999

  52. [59]

    Groves, B

    E. Groves, B. Clader, and J. Eberly, Multipulse quantum con- trol: Exact solutions, Opt. Lett. 34, 2539 (2009)

    2009

  53. [60]

    Guo, C.-C

    Y . Guo, C.-C. Shu, D. Dong, and F. Nori, V an- ishing and revival of resonance Raman scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 223202 (2019)

    2019

  54. [61]

    Hong, L.-B

    Q.-Q. Hong, L.-B. Fan, C.-C. Shu, and N. E. Henriksen, Ge n- eration of maximal three-state field-free molecular orient ation with terahertz pulses, Phys. Rev. A 104, 013108 (2021)

    2021

  55. [63]

    See Supplemental Material

  56. [64]

    Sugny, A

    D. Sugny, A. Keller, O. Atabek, D. Daems, C. M. Dion, S. Gu´ erin, and H. R. Jauslin, Reaching op- timally oriented molecular states by laser kicks, Phys. Rev. A 69, 033402 (2004)

    2004

  57. [65]

    Wang and N

    S. Wang and N. E. Henriksen, Optimal field-free molecula r orientation with nonresonant two-color adiabatic-turn-o n and sudden-turn-offlaser pulses, Phys. Rev. A 102, 063120 (2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    E. S. Shuman, J. F. Barry, and D. DeMille, Laser cooling o f a diatomic molecule, Nature 467, 820 (2010)

    2010

  59. [67]

    C. Chin, R. Grimm, P . Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Feshbac h res- 9 onances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225 (2010)

    2010

  60. [68]

    M. Guo, B. Zhu, B. Lu, X. Ye, F. Wang, R. V exiau, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, G. Qu´ em´ ener, O. Dulieu, and D. Wang, Creation of an ultracold gas of ground-state dipolar 23Na87Rb molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 205303 (2016)

    2016

  61. [69]

    Shu, K.-J

    C.-C. Shu, K.-J. Y uan, W.-H. Hu, and S.-L. Cong, Field-f ree molecular orientation with terahertz few-cycle pulses, J. Chem. Phys. 132 (2010)

    2010

  62. [70]

    Trippel, T

    S. Trippel, T. Mullins, N. L. M. M¨ uller, J. S. Kienitz, R. Gonz´ alez-F´ erez, and J. K¨ upper, Two-state wave packet for strong field-free molecular orientation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 103003 (2015)

    2015

  63. [71]

    Tehini, M

    R. Tehini, M. Z. Hoque, O. Faucher, and D. Sugny, Field-f ree molecular orientation of 1Σand 2Πmolecules at high tempera- ture, Phys. Rev. A 85, 043423 (2012)

    2012

  64. [72]

    Shu and N

    C.-C. Shu and N. E. Henriksen, Field-free molecular ori entation induced by single-cycle THz pulses: The role of resonance an d quantum interference, Phys. Rev. A 87, 013408 (2013)

    2013

  65. [73]

    P . M. Kraus, D. Baykusheva, and H. J. W¨ orner, Two-pulse field-free orientation reveals anisotropy of molecular sha pe res- onance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 023001 (2014)

    2014

  66. [74]

    Zhang, S

    J.-P . Zhang, S. Wang, and N. E. Henriksen, Optimal field- free orientation of molecules with resonant tailored multi color fields, Phys. Rev. A 107, 033118 (2023)

    2023

  67. [75]

    Ortigoso, Conservation of molecular alignment for c yclic ro- tational wave packets in periodic pulse trains, Phys

    J. Ortigoso, Conservation of molecular alignment for c yclic ro- tational wave packets in periodic pulse trains, Phys. Rev. L ett. 93, 073001 (2004)

    2004

  68. [76]

    Nakajima, H

    K. Nakajima, H. Abe, and Y . Ohtsuki, Optimal control sim u- lation of field-free molecular orientation: Alignment-enh anced molecular orientation, J. Phys. Chem. A 116, 11219 (2012)

    2012

  69. [77]

    Liao, T.-S

    S.-L. Liao, T.-S. Ho, H. Rabitz, and S.-I. Chu, Maximum a ttain- able field-free molecular orientation of a thermal ensemble with near–single-cycle THz pulses, Phys. Rev. A 87, 013429 (2013)

    2013

  70. [78]

    C. K. M. Ndong and D. Sugny, Time optimization and state- dependent constraints in the quantum optimal control of mol ec- ular orientation, J. Mod. Opt. 61, 857 (2014)

    2014

  71. [79]

    S. Luo, R. Zhu, L. He, W. Hu, X. Li, P . Ma, C. Wang, F. Liu, W. G. Roeterdink, S. Stolte, and D. Ding, Nonadiabatic laser - induced orientation and alignment of rotational-state-se lected CH3Br molecules, Phys. Rev. A 91, 053408 (2015)

    2015

  72. [80]

    L. Xu, I. Tutunnikov, Y . Prior, and I. S. Averbukh, Enhanced persistent orientation of asymmetric-top molecules induced by cross-polarized terahertz pulses, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013201 (2024)

    2024

  73. [81]

    Spanner, S

    M. Spanner, S. Patchkovskii, E. Frumker, and P . Corkum, Mechanisms of two-color laser-induced field-free molecula r orientation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 113001 (2012)

    2012

  74. [82]

    Znakovskaya, M

    I. Znakovskaya, M. Spanner, S. De, H. Li, D. Ray, P . Corku m, I. V . Litvinyuk, C. L. Cocke, and M. F. Kling, Transition be- tween mechanisms of laser-induced field-free molecular ori en- tation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 113005 (2014)

    2014

  75. [83]

    Damari, S

    R. Damari, S. Kallush, and S. Fleischer, Rotational con trol of asymmetric molecules: Dipole- versus polarizability-dri ven ro- tational dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 103001 (2016)

    2016

  76. [84]

    Hong, Z.-Z

    Q.-Q. Hong, Z.-Z. Lian, C.-C. Shu, and N. E. Henriksen, Q uan- tum control of field-free molecular orientation, Phys. Chem . Chem. Phys. 25, 32763 (2023)

    2023

  77. [85]

    Goswami, Optical pulse shaping approaches to cohere nt control, Phys

    D. Goswami, Optical pulse shaping approaches to cohere nt control, Phys. Rep. 374, 385 (2003)

    2003

  78. [86]

    Yao, Photonic generation of microwave arbitrary wav eforms, Opt

    J. Yao, Photonic generation of microwave arbitrary wav eforms, Opt. Commun. 284, 3723 (2011)

    2011

  79. [87]

    Zhdanovich, A

    S. Zhdanovich, A. A. Milner, C. Bloomquist, J. Floß, I. S. Averbukh, J. W. Hepburn, and V . Milner, Control of molecular rotation with a chiral train of ultrashort pulses , Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 243004 (2011)

    2011

  80. [88]

    Merrill and K

    J. Merrill and K. Brown, Progress in compensating pulse se- quences for quantum computation, Adv. Chem. Phys. 154, 241 (2014)

    2014

  81. [89]

    Z. Zeng, L. Zhang, Y . Zhang, H. Tian, Z. Zhang, S. Zhang, H. Li, and Y . Liu, Microwave pulse generation via employing an electric signal modulator to achieve time-domain mode lock ing in an optoelectronic oscillator, Opt. Lett. 46, 2107 (2021)

    2021

  82. [90]

    J. E. Nkeck, L.-P . B´ eliveau, X. Ropagnol, D. Deslandes , D. Morris, and F. Blanchard, Parallel generation and coding of a terahertz pulse train, APL Photonics 7, 126105 (2022)

    2022

  83. [91]

    X. Zhou, Y . Lin, Y . Chan, F. Deng, and J. Zhang, Coherent gen- eration and control of tunable narrowband thz radiation fro m a laser-induced air-plasma filament, Opt. Lett. 48, 2881 (2023)

    2023

  84. [92]

    Seeßelberg, N

    F. Seeßelberg, N. Buchheim, Z.-K. Lu, T. Schneider, X.- Y . Luo, E. Tiemann, I. Bloch, and C. Gohle, Modeling the adiabatic creation of ultracold polar 23Na40K molecules, Phys. Rev. A 97, 013405 (2018)

    2018

  85. [93]

    H. Yang, J. Cao, Z. Su, J. Rui, B. Zhao, and J.-W. Pan, Cre- ation of an ultracold gas of triatomic molecules from an atom – diatomic molecule mixture, Science 378, 1009 (2022)

    2022

  86. [94]

    Langen, G

    T. Langen, G. V altolina, D. Wang, and J. Ye, Quantum stat e manipulation and cooling of ultracold molecules, Nat. Phys . , 1 (2024)

    2024

  87. [95]

    Y uan, S

    L. Y uan, S. W. Teitelbaum, A. Robinson, and A. S. Mullin, Dynamics of molecules in extreme rotational states, Proc. N at. Acad. Sci. 108, 6872 (2011)

    2011

  88. [96]

    Daems, S

    D. Daems, S. Gu´ erin, D. Sugny, and H. R. Jauslin, Efficient and long-lived field-free orientation of molecules by a single h ybrid short pulse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 153003 (2005)

    2005

  89. [97]

    Y . Wang, Z. Hu, B. C. Sanders, and S. Kais, Qudits and high-dimensional quantum computing, Front. Phys. 8, 589504 (2020)

    2020

  90. [98]

    Neves, G

    L. Neves, G. Lima, J. G. Aguirre G´ omez, C. H. Monken, C. Saavedra, and S. P´ adua, Generation of entangled states o f qudits using twin photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 100501 (2005)

    2005

  91. [99]

    Sawant, J

    R. Sawant, J. A. Blackmore, P . D. Gregory, J. Mur-Petit, D. Jaksch, J. Aldegunde, J. M. Hutson, M. R. Tarbutt, and S. L. Cornish, Ultracold polar molecules as qudits, New J. Phys. 22, 013027 (2020)

    2020

  92. [100]

    Ringbauer, M

    M. Ringbauer, M. Meth, L. Postler, R. Stricker, R. Blatt , P . Schindler, and T. Monz, A universal qudit quantum processor with trapped ions, Nat. Phys. 18, 1053–1057 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.