REVIEW 2 cited by
Deep-reinforcement-learning-based separation control in a two-dimensional airfoil
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The aim of this study is to discover new active-flow-control (AFC) techniques for separation mitigation in a two-dimensional NACA 0012 airfoil at a Reynolds number of 3000. To find these AFC strategies, a framework consisting of a deep-reinforcement-learning (DRL) agent has been used to determine the action strategies to apply to the flow. The actions involve blowing and suction through jets at the airfoil surface. The flow is simulated with the numerical code Alya, which is a low-dissipation finite-element code, on a high-performance computing system. Various control strategies obtained through DRL led to 43.9% drag reduction, while others yielded an increase in aerodynamic efficiency of 58.6%. In comparison, periodic-control strategies demonstrated lower energy efficiency while failing to achieve the same level of aerodynamic improvements as the DRL-based approach. These gains have been attained through the implementation of a dynamic, closed-loop, time-dependent, active control mechanism over the airfoil.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Plug-and-Play Benchmarking of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Large-Scale Flow Control
FluidGym is a PyTorch-only, fully differentiable benchmark with 13 flow-control environments, MARL support, and public baselines.
-
Deep Reinforcement Learning for Active Flow Control around a Three-Dimensional Flow-Separated Wing at Re = 1,000
First DRL-based active flow control on a 3D separated wing reports 21% drag reduction at Re=1000, but the lift-oscillation improvement of 124% is internally inconsistent.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.