pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.20345 · v3 · submitted 2025-02-27 · 📡 eess.SP

Cell-Free Integrated Sensing and Communication: Principles, Advances, and Future Directions

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 01:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords cell-free networksintegrated sensing and communicationISACmulti-static sensingresource allocationperformance analysiswireless securityfronthaul
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cell-free integrated sensing and communication merges distributed access points with unified radar and data functions to raise spectral and energy efficiency.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper surveys cell-free integrated sensing and communication as a way to combine cell-free networks, which remove cell boundaries through distributed access points, with integrated sensing and communication that shares spectrum and hardware for both data and environmental sensing. It first covers the separate principles of each technology, including cooperative transmission, radar cross-section, and sensing metrics, then shows how their merger supports multi-static sensing from multiple points and joint resource use. The survey groups recent work into performance analysis, resource allocation, security, and user or target centric designs, with case studies. It closes by listing open issues such as synchronization and fronthaul limits plus trends like antenna advances and machine learning. A reader would care because the organization makes clear how one system could handle both communication reliability and sensing without separate hardware.

Core claim

The paper claims that CF-ISAC, by pairing cell-free architecture that eliminates cell boundaries with ISAC that unifies radar sensing and communication on shared resources, improves spectral and energy efficiency, coverage, and sensing performance while enabling robust multi-user communication and distributed multi-static sensing. It fills the prior gap in comprehensive reviews by revisiting fundamentals, categorizing state-of-the-art results in performance, allocation, security, and design approaches, and outlining challenges including synchronization, multi-target detection, interference management, and fronthaul capacity along with emerging directions such as next-generation antennas,near

What carries the argument

The CF-ISAC architecture, which uses distributed access points without cell boundaries to enable simultaneous data transmission and environmental sensing on shared spectral and hardware resources.

If this is right

  • Multi-user communication gains robustness through cooperative transmission across distributed points.
  • Sensing improves via distributed multi-static observations from multiple access points.
  • Resource allocation becomes seamless by jointly optimizing shared spectrum and hardware for both functions.
  • Spectral and energy efficiency rise by removing cell boundaries and unifying operations.
  • Security designs address joint threats to communication and sensing data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Machine learning integration could dynamically adjust resources as network conditions change.
  • Near-field models would be needed when targets or users lie close to access points.
  • Real deployments would reveal whether fronthaul latency limits can be met at scale.
  • Security approaches might need to protect sensing waveforms from interception separately from data.

Load-bearing premise

No prior comprehensive survey on CF-ISAC existed and the paper's categorization of literature, challenges, and trends accurately captures the field without major omissions.

What would settle it

A major body of CF-ISAC papers or results on synchronization or multi-target detection that the survey omits or fails to address.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.20345 by Chintha Tellambura, Diluka Galappaththige, Gayan Aruma Baduge, Mohammadali Mohammadi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Outline of the main contributions of this paper. multi-static sensing can offer a diversity gain by utilizing mul￾tiple uncorrelated sensing observations at distributed sensing receivers. Also, multi-static sensing can improve performance by increasing joint transmit/receive beamforming gain through the use of many transmitters/receivers in the network [6]–[14]. A. Existing Survey Papers and Contribution W… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A CFMM system. vector and the absolute value of a complex scalar are denoted by k · k and | · |, respectively. Expectation, the real part of a complex number, and trace operation are denoted by E{·}, Re{·}, and Tr(·), respectively. A circularly symmetric complex Gaussian (CSCG) random vector with mean µ and covariance matrix C is denoted by ∼ CN (µ, C). Finally, [A]ij is the {i, j}-th element of A. II. FUN… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Channel hardening and favorable propagation versus the number of AP antennas, N, assuming i.i.d. Rayleigh fading. exchange of signals, especially for advanced applications like CoMP and CFMM. 3) Multiple Antenna Effects: When APs use multiple an￾tennas to communicate with distributed user terminals, two critical phenomena arise: Channel hardening and Favorable propagation [22]. 1) Channel Hardening: This r… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sum SE (left y-axis) and per-user SE (right y-axis) comparison between CFMM and co-located mMIMO systems with 100 antennas in a coverage area of 1 km2 . In the CF system, the 100 single-antenna APs are uniformly distributed whereas in the co￾located system, 100 antenna BS is placed in the cell center. The DL SEs are achieved by assuming conjugate beamforming and statistical CSI knowledge at the users. fair… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Types of radar/sensing. targets, such as the ground, buildings, trees, or weather phenomena like rain and snow [57]. These reflections can disrupt radar systems by masking or obscuring the identification of intended targets, particularly small or low￾RCS objects. Although the effect of clutter on detection can be comparable to that of noise, clutter is influenced by the environment, frequency, and transmit… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ISAC applications. sensing rate in surveillance radar systems allows for quick identification and tracking of fast-moving objects. In health￾care monitoring, sensing efficiency is crucial for accurate and continuous measurements of vital signs. In addition, the quality of target parameter estimation is also proportional to the sensing SE or corresponding sensing SINR [78], [80], [81]. Improved sensing SE e… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A CF-ISAC system setup with UL and DL APs. power allocation algorithm to maximize sensing SINR while ensuring minimum communication requirements. In [119], the performance of multi-user single-target CF￾ISAC with transmit APs using MRT precoding is analyzed. Each AP uses locally estimated CSI to design and transmit a superimposed ISAC waveform for user communication, while designated sensing APs process re… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Sensing SE versus the number of AP antennas. {4, 9, 16}. The accuracy of the analytical SEs is validated using Monte-Carlo simulation. In particular, the analytical communication and sensing SE curves and respective Monte￾Carlo simulation curves coincide regardless of the simulation setup, validating the accuracy of the derived analytical rate ex￾pressions. As observed from both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/f… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: A CF-ISAC system setup. satisfying sensing beampattern gains of multiple targets and per-AP transmit power constraints. 1) Case Study and Discussion: Herein, a beamforming design for a generalized CF-ISAC system ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Beampattern gain profiles over a ±90◦ angular spread at different APs, illustrating the gain variations and directivity in a color-coded scale for L = 8, M = 4, K = 2, and T = 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Communication SE comparison between CF-ISAC and co-located ISAC systems for M × L = 64. same number of users. This is because more system resources are allocated to sensing tasks with a high number of targets, such as transmit power for target detection and tracking, thereby reducing resources available for communication. This underscores the importance of balancing communication and sensing tasks in ISAC… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: compares beampattern gains between CF-ISAC and -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Communication SE and maximum leakage SE as functions of the number of APs. In [125], the security of both communication and sensing is examined in the presence of information and sensing eaves￾droppers, who seek to intercept confidential communications and extract target information, respectively. The study formu￾lates a transmit beamforming optimization problem aimed at maximizing the detection probabili… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Directional beampattern gain profiles over a ±90◦ angular spread at different APs. [128]. However, as the number of spatial distributed APs increases, achieving and maintaining precise synchronization becomes more complex. Non-ideal clock behaviors, such as phase noise and jitter, introduce additional errors that distort processed echo signals, degrading detection accuracy and overall system performance [… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Cell-free (CF) integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) combines CF architecture with ISAC. CF employs distributed access points, eliminates cell boundaries, and enhances coverage, spectral efficiency, and reliability. ISAC unifies radar sensing and communication, enabling simultaneous data transmission and environmental sensing within shared spectral and hardware resources. CF-ISAC leverages these strengths to improve spectral and energy efficiency while enhancing sensing in wireless networks. As a promising candidate for next-generation wireless systems, CF-ISAC supports robust multi-user communication, distributed multi-static sensing, and seamless resource optimization. However, a comprehensive survey on CF-ISAC has been lacking. This paper fills that gap by first revisiting CF and ISAC principles, covering cooperative transmission, radar cross-section, target parameter estimation, ISAC integration levels, sensing metrics, and applications. It then explores CF-ISAC systems, emphasizing their unique features and the benefits of multi-static sensing. State-of-the-art developments are categorized into performance analysis, resource allocation, security, and user/target-centric designs, offering a thorough literature review and case studies. Finally, the paper identifies key challenges such as synchronization, multi-target detection, interference management, and fronthaul capacity and latency. Emerging trends, including next-generation antenna technologies, network-assisted systems, near-field CF-ISAC, integration with other technologies, and machine learning approaches, are highlighted to outline the future trajectory of CF-ISAC research.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a survey on Cell-Free Integrated Sensing and Communication (CF-ISAC). It first revisits principles of cell-free architectures (cooperative transmission, coverage) and ISAC (radar cross-section, target estimation, integration levels, metrics), then describes CF-ISAC features and multi-static sensing benefits. State-of-the-art work is categorized into performance analysis, resource allocation, security, and user/target-centric designs with case studies. The paper concludes by listing challenges (synchronization, multi-target detection, interference, fronthaul) and trends (advanced antennas, near-field operation, ML integration).

Significance. If the four-way categorization accurately reflects the literature without major omissions, the survey would provide a useful entry point and reference for researchers in integrated sensing and communication, particularly those exploring cell-free deployments for 6G-era systems. The explicit listing of open challenges and trends supplies a clear research roadmap.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'a comprehensive survey on CF-ISAC has been lacking' is central to the paper's positioning; it would be strengthened by briefly citing the closest prior reviews on ISAC or cell-free systems to make the novelty claim verifiable.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'case studies' under the four categories but does not indicate their scope (e.g., whether they are numerical examples drawn from the reviewed papers or new simulations); clarifying this in the introduction would help readers gauge the depth of the review.
  3. The listed challenges (synchronization, fronthaul latency) and trends (near-field CF-ISAC, network-assisted systems) are presented at a high level; adding one or two concrete open questions or example references per item would make the future-directions section more actionable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary and recommendation of minor revision. The assessment that the survey provides a useful entry point and research roadmap is appreciated. No specific major comments were listed in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

This is a survey paper whose structure consists of literature review, categorization of external works into performance analysis/resource allocation/security/user-centric designs, and identification of open challenges/trends. No original derivations, equations, predictions, or fitted parameters appear; all technical content is attributed to cited prior literature. The claim that no prior comprehensive survey existed is a framing statement, not a load-bearing technical result that reduces to self-reference. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks with no self-citation chains or ansatzes that close on themselves.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a survey paper whose contribution is the compilation and organization of existing research; it introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5801 in / 1046 out tokens · 58682 ms · 2026-05-23T01:49:42.301857+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Space-Time-Frequency Synthetic Integrated Sensing and Communication Networks

    eess.SP 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    Space-time-frequency synthetic ISAC fuses multistatic and monostatic observations to tighten CRLBs on position and velocity estimates, with centralized MLE outperforming per-BS estimation plus fusion especially at low SNR.

  2. Holographic Surface Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communications

    eess.SP 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A tutorial on HISAC showing how reconfigurable holographic surfaces enable cost-efficient ultra-massive MIMO for joint communication and sensing in 6G under hardware constraints.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

156 extracted references · 156 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    A survey on fundamental limits of integrated sensing and communication,

    A. Liu et al. , “A survey on fundamental limits of integrated sensing and communication,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 994–1034, 2nd Quart. 2022

  2. [2]

    Integrated sensing and communication: Enabling techniques, applications, tools and data sets, standardiz ation, and future directions,

    J. Wang et al. , “Integrated sensing and communication: Enabling techniques, applications, tools and data sets, standardiz ation, and future directions,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 9, no. 23, pp. 23 416–23 440, Dec. 2022

  3. [3]

    Enabling joint communication and radar sensing in mobile networks — A survey,

    J. A. Zhang et al., “Enabling joint communication and radar sensing in mobile networks — A survey,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 306–345, 1st Quart. 2022

  4. [4]

    A road map for NF- ISAC in 6G: A comprehensive overview and tutorial,

    A. Hakimi, D. Galappaththige, and C. Tellambura, “A road map for NF- ISAC in 6G: A comprehensive overview and tutorial,” Entropy, vol. 26, no. 9, Sept. 2024

  5. [5]

    F. Liu, C. Masouros, and Y . Eldar, Eds., Integrated Sensing and Communications. Springer Singapore, Jul. 2023

  6. [6]

    Beamforming design in cell-free massive MIMO integrated sensing and communication systems,

    W. Mao et al. , “Beamforming design in cell-free massive MIMO integrated sensing and communication systems,” in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. , Dec. 2023, pp. 546–551

  7. [7]

    Cell-free joint sensing a nd communi- cation MIMO: A max-min fair beamforming approach,

    U. Demirhan and A. Alkhateeb, “Cell-free joint sensing a nd communi- cation MIMO: A max-min fair beamforming approach,” in Proc. IEEE Asilomar Conf. Signals, Syst., Comput. , Oct. 2023, pp. 381–386

  8. [8]

    Coordinated power con trol for network integrated sensing and communication,

    Y . Huang, Y . Fang, X. Li, and J. Xu, “Coordinated power con trol for network integrated sensing and communication,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 13 361–13 365, Dec. 2022

  9. [9]

    Design and performance analyses of V -OFDM integrated signal for cell-free massive MIMO joint communi cation and radar system,

    Y . Cao and Q.-Y . Y u, “Design and performance analyses of V -OFDM integrated signal for cell-free massive MIMO joint communi cation and radar system,” IEEE Syst. J. , vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 5943–5954, Dec. 2023

  10. [10]

    Semi-distributed hy brid beamforming design for cooperative cell-free dual-functi on radar- communication networks,

    B. Wang, L. Xu, Z. Cheng, and Z. He, “Semi-distributed hy brid beamforming design for cooperative cell-free dual-functi on radar- communication networks,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. W orkshops, Jun. 2023, pp. 1–5. 25 SINRCom k = L(L + 1) ∑M m=1 ζ2 hmk + L2 ∑M m=1 ∑M m′̸=m ζhmk ζhm′k L ∑K i̸=k ∑M m=1 ζhmk ζhmi + L ∑T t=1 ∑M m...

  11. [11]

    Uplink payload power control in cell-free communication a nd radar networks,

    A. Sakhnini, A. Bourdoux, M. Guenach, H. Sahli, and S. Po llin, “Uplink payload power control in cell-free communication a nd radar networks,” in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf., Dec. 2022, pp. 5111– 5116

  12. [12]

    Multi-s tatic ISAC in cell-free massive MIMO: Precoder design and privacy asse ssment,

    I. W. G. Da Silva, D. P . M. Osorio, and M. Juntti, “Multi-s tatic ISAC in cell-free massive MIMO: Precoder design and privacy asse ssment,” in Proc. IEEE Globecom W orkshops , Dec. 2023, pp. 461–466

  13. [13]

    Power allocation for joint communication and sensing in ce ll-free massive MIMO,

    Z. Behdad, ¨O. T. Demir, K. W. Sung, E. Bj¨ ornson, and C. Cavdar, “Power allocation for joint communication and sensing in ce ll-free massive MIMO,” in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. , Dec. 2022, pp. 4081–4086

  14. [14]

    Interplay between sensing and communication in cell-free massive MIMO with UR LLC users,

    Z. Behdad, ¨O. T. Demir, K. W. Sung, and C. Cavdar, “Interplay between sensing and communication in cell-free massive MIMO with UR LLC users,” in Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf. , Apr. 2024, pp. 1–6

  15. [15]

    Multi-cell MIMO cooperative networks: A new look at interference,

    D. Gesbert et al. , “Multi-cell MIMO cooperative networks: A new look at interference,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1380–1408, Dec. 2010

  16. [16]

    Coordinated beamforming for the m ulticell multi-antenna wireless system,

    H. Dahrouj and W. Y u, “Coordinated beamforming for the m ulticell multi-antenna wireless system,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1748–1759, May 2010

  17. [17]

    Cloud radio access n etwork (C-RAN): A primer,

    J. Wu, Z. Zhang, Y . Hong, and Y . Wen, “Cloud radio access n etwork (C-RAN): A primer,” IEEE Netw., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 35–41, Jan. 2015

  18. [18]

    Cell-free massive MIMO versus small cells,

    H. Q. Ngo, A. Ashikhmin, H. Y ang, E. G. Larsson, and T. L. M arzetta, “Cell-free massive MIMO versus small cells,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1834–1850, Mar. 2017

  19. [19]

    MIMO radar: An idea whose time has come,

    E. Fishler et al. , “MIMO radar: An idea whose time has come,” in Proc. IEEE Radar Conf. , Aug. 2004, pp. 71–78

  20. [20]

    MIMO radar with widely separated antennas,

    A. M. Haimovich, R. S. Blum, and L. J. Cimini, “MIMO radar with widely separated antennas,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag. , vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 116–129, Jan. 2008

  21. [21]

    M. A. Richards, Fundamentals Of Radar Signal Processing . McGraw- Hill Education (India) Pvt Limited, 2005

  22. [22]

    Demir, E

    ¨O. Demir, E. Bj¨ ornson, and L. Sanguinetti, F oundations of User- Centric Cell-Free Massive MIMO, ser. Foundations and trends in signal processing. Now Publishers, 2021

  23. [23]

    User-centric cell-free massive MIMO networks: A survey of opportunities, challenges and solutions,

    H. A. Ammar, R. Adve, S. Shahbazpanahi, G. Boudreau, and K. V . Srinivas, “User-centric cell-free massive MIMO networks: A survey of opportunities, challenges and solutions,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 611–652, 1st Quart. 2022

  24. [24]

    Ubiquitous cell-free massive MIMO communications,

    G. Interdonato, E. Bj¨ ornson, H. Q. Ngo, P . K. Frenger, a nd E. G. Lars- son, “Ubiquitous cell-free massive MIMO communications,” EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw. , vol. 2019, pp. 1687–1499, Aug. 2019

  25. [25]

    Prospective multiple antenna technologies for beyond 5G,

    J. Zhang et al. , “Prospective multiple antenna technologies for beyond 5G,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1637–1660, Aug. 2020

  26. [26]

    Cell-free mas sive MIMO: A survey,

    S. Elhoushy, M. Ibrahim, and W. Hamouda, “Cell-free mas sive MIMO: A survey,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 492–523, 1st Quart. 2022

  27. [27]

    Cell-free massive MIMO: A new next-generation paradigm,

    J. Zhang et al. , “Cell-free massive MIMO: A new next-generation paradigm,” IEEE Access , vol. 7, pp. 99 878–99 888, Aug. 2019

  28. [28]

    A su rvey on user-centric cell-free massive MIMO systems,

    S. Chen, J. Zhang, J. Zhang, E. Bj¨ ornson, and B. Ai, “A su rvey on user-centric cell-free massive MIMO systems,” Digital Commun. Netw., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 695–719, Dec. 2022

  29. [29]

    A review on cell-free massive MIMO systems,

    J. Kassam, D. Castanheira, A. a. Silva, R. Dinis, and A. G ameiro, “A review on cell-free massive MIMO systems,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 1001, Feb. 2023

  30. [30]

    Next- generation multiple access with cell-free massive MIMO,

    M. Mohammadi, Z. Mobini, H. Quoc Ngo, and M. Matthaiou, “ Next- generation multiple access with cell-free massive MIMO,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 112, no. 9, pp. 1372–1420, Sept. 2024

  31. [31]

    Cell-free mass ive MIMO with underlay spectrum-sharing,

    D. Galappaththige and G. Amarasuriya, “Cell-free mass ive MIMO with underlay spectrum-sharing,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. , May 2019, pp. 1–7

  32. [32]

    Exploiting cell-free massive MIMO for enabling simultaneous wireless informa- tion and power transfer,

    D. Galappaththige, R. Shrestha, and G. A. Aruma Baduge, “Exploiting cell-free massive MIMO for enabling simultaneous wireless informa- tion and power transfer,” IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw. , vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1541–1557, Sept. 2021

  33. [33]

    NOMA-aided cel l-free mas- sive MIMO with underlay spectrum-sharing,

    D. Galappaththige and G. Amarasuriya, “NOMA-aided cel l-free mas- sive MIMO with underlay spectrum-sharing,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., Jun. 2020, pp. 1–6

  34. [34]

    Sum rate maximiz ation for RSMA-assisted CF mMIMO networks with SWIPT users,

    D. Galappaththige and C. Tellambura, “Sum rate maximiz ation for RSMA-assisted CF mMIMO networks with SWIPT users,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1300–1304, May 2024

  35. [35]

    Per- formance analysis of IRS-assisted cell-free communicatio n,

    D. Galappaththige, D. Kudathanthirige, and G. Amarasu riya, “Per- formance analysis of IRS-assisted cell-free communicatio n,” in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. , Dec. 2021, pp. 1–6

  36. [36]

    Exploiting unde rlay spectrum sharing in cell-free massive MIMO systems,

    D. Galappaththige and G. A. A. Baduge, “Exploiting unde rlay spectrum sharing in cell-free massive MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 7470–7488, Nov. 2021

  37. [37]

    Bj¨ ornson, J

    E. Bj¨ ornson, J. Hoydis, and L. Sanguinetti, Massive MIMO Networks: Spectral, Energy, and Hardware Efficiency , 2017, vol. 11

  38. [38]

    T. L. Marzetta, E. G. Larsson, H. Y ang, and H. Q. Ngo, Fundamentals of Massive MIMO . Cambridge University Press, 2016

  39. [39]

    On the total energy efficiency of cell-free massive MIMO,

    H. Q. Ngo, L.-N. Tran, T. Q. Duong, M. Matthaiou, and E. G. Larsson, “On the total energy efficiency of cell-free massive MIMO,” IEEE Trans. Green Commu. and Networking , vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 25–39, Mar., 2018

  40. [40]

    Cell-free bistatic backscatter communication: Channel estimation, optimization, and performance analysis,

    D. Galappaththige, F. Rezaei, C. Tellambura, and A. Maa ref, “Cell-free bistatic backscatter communication: Channel estimation, optimization, and performance analysis,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 6617–6632, Oct. 2024

  41. [41]

    Scalable cell-free m assive MIMO systems,

    E. Bj¨ ornson and L. Sanguinetti, “Scalable cell-free m assive MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 4247–4261, Jul. 2020

  42. [42]

    Cell-free massive MIMO wit h finite fronthaul capacity: A stochastic geometry perspective,

    P . Parida and H. S. Dhillon, “Cell-free massive MIMO wit h finite fronthaul capacity: A stochastic geometry perspective,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1555–1572, Mar. 2023

  43. [43]

    A dimensioning framework for indoor DAS LTE networks,

    S. Elhoshy et al. , “A dimensioning framework for indoor DAS LTE networks,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Sel. Topics Mobile Wireless Netw. , Apr. 2016, pp. 1–8

  44. [44]

    Coordinated multipoint: Concepts, performance, and field trial results,

    R. Irmer et al. , “Coordinated multipoint: Concepts, performance, and field trial results,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 102–111, Feb. 2011

  45. [45]

    Network M IMO: Overcoming intercell interference in indoor wireless syst ems,

    S. V enkatesan, A. Lozano, and R. V alenzuela, “Network M IMO: Overcoming intercell interference in indoor wireless syst ems,” in Proc. IEEE Asilomar Conf. Signals, Syst., Comput. , Nov. 2007, pp. 83–87

  46. [46]

    D istributed MIMO in multi-cell wireless systems via finite-capacity lin ks,

    O. Simeone, O. Somekh, H. Vincent Poor, and S. Shamai, “D istributed MIMO in multi-cell wireless systems via finite-capacity lin ks,” in Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Commun., Control Signal Process. , Mar. 2008, pp. 203– 206

  47. [47]

    Exploring 5G fronthaul network architecture: Intelligence splits and connectivity,

    Intel Corporation, “Exploring 5G fronthaul network architecture: Intelligence splits and connectivity,” Int el Corporation, Tech. Rep., 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/white-papers/exploring-

  48. [48]

    System architectur e and key technologies for 5G heterogeneous cloud radio access netwo rks,

    M. Peng, Y . Li, Z. Zhao, and C. Wang, “System architectur e and key technologies for 5G heterogeneous cloud radio access netwo rks,” IEEE Netw., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 6–14, Apr. 2015

  49. [49]

    A su rvey on mobile edge computing: The communication perspective,

    Y . Mao, C. Y ou, J. Zhang, K. Huang, and K. B. Letaief, “A su rvey on mobile edge computing: The communication perspective,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2322–2358, 4th Quart. 2017

  50. [50]

    Channel hardening and favora ble propaga- tion in cell-free massive MIMO with stochastic geometry,

    Z. Chen and E. Bj¨ ornson, “Channel hardening and favora ble propaga- tion in cell-free massive MIMO with stochastic geometry,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 5205–5219, Nov. 2018. 26

  51. [51]

    Chan- nel hardening in cell-free and user-centric massive MIMO ne tworks with spatially correlated Ricean fading,

    A. A. Polegre, F. Riera-Palou, G. Femenias, and A. G. Arm ada, “Chan- nel hardening in cell-free and user-centric massive MIMO ne tworks with spatially correlated Ricean fading,” IEEE Access , vol. 8, pp. 139 827–139 845, Aug. 2020

  52. [52]

    Papoulis and S

    A. Papoulis and S. Pillai, Probability, Random V ariables, and Stochas- tic Processes , ser. McGraw-Hill series in electrical and computer engineering. McGraw-Hill, 2002

  53. [53]

    Communication-sensing region for cell-free massive MIMO ISAC systems,

    W. Mao et al. , “Communication-sensing region for cell-free massive MIMO ISAC systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , pp. 1–1, Sept. 2024

  54. [54]

    Energy efficiency optimization for cell-free massive MIMO ,

    H. Q. Ngo, L.-N. Tran, T. Q. Duong, M. Matthaiou, and E. G. Larsson, “Energy efficiency optimization for cell-free massive MIMO ,” in Proc. IEEE Int. W orkshop Signal Process. Adv. Wireless Commun., Jul. 2017, pp. 1–5

  55. [55]

    Performance analysis of cell-free massiv e MIMO systems: A stochastic geometry approach,

    A. Papazafeiropoulos, P . Kourtessis, M. D. Renzo, S. Ch atzinotas, and J. M. Senior, “Performance analysis of cell-free massiv e MIMO systems: A stochastic geometry approach,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 3523–3537, Apr. 2020

  56. [56]

    Energy efficiency of massive MIMO: Cell-free vs. cellular,

    H. Y ang and T. L. Marzetta, “Energy efficiency of massive MIMO: Cell-free vs. cellular,” in Proc. IEEE 87th V eh. Technol. Conf. , Jun. 2018, pp. 1–5

  57. [57]

    M. A. Richards, J. A. Scheer, and W. A. Holm, Eds., Principles of Modern Radar: Basic principles , ser. Radar, Sonar and Navigation. Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2010

  58. [58]

    Knott, J

    E. Knott, J. Schaeffer, and M. Tulley, Radar Cross Section , ser. Radar, Sonar and Navigation Series. Institution of Enginee ring and Technology, 2004

  59. [59]

    Radar cross section measurements (8-12 GHz) of magnetic an d dielectric microwave absorbing thin sheets,

    M. C. Rezende, I. M. Martin, M. A. S. Miacci, and E. L. Noha ra, “Radar cross section measurements (8-12 GHz) of magnetic an d dielectric microwave absorbing thin sheets,” in Proc. SBMO/IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Optoelectronics Conf. , Dec. 2002, pp. 439–443

  60. [60]

    Skolnik, Introduction to Radar Systems , ser

    M. Skolnik, Introduction to Radar Systems , ser. Electrical engineering series. McGraw-Hill, 2001

  61. [61]

    Weibull, log-Weibull and K-distributed ground clutter modeling analyzed by AIC,

    S. Sayama and H. Sekine, “Weibull, log-Weibull and K-distributed ground clutter modeling analyzed by AIC,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. , vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1108–1113, Apr. 2001

  62. [62]

    Levanon and E

    N. Levanon and E. Mozeson, Radar Signals , ser. IEEE Press. Wiley, 2004

  63. [63]

    Overview of radar waveform diversity,

    S. D. Blunt and E. L. Mokole, “Overview of radar waveform diversity,” IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. , vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 2–42, Jul. 2016

  64. [64]

    J. Li, J. Li, and P . Stoica, MIMO Radar Signal Processing , ser. IEEE Press. Wiley, 2009

  65. [65]

    A comprehensive survey on full-duplex communication: Cur rent so- lutions, future trends, and open issues,

    M. Mohammadi, Z. Mobini, D. Galappaththige, and C. Tell ambura, “A comprehensive survey on full-duplex communication: Cur rent so- lutions, future trends, and open issues,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , pp. 1–1, 2nd Quart. 2023

  66. [66]

    Cell-free full-duplex communication – An o verview,

    D. Galappaththige, M. Mohammadi, H. Q. Ngo, M. Matthaio u, and C. Tellambura, “Cell-free full-duplex communication – An o verview,” arXiv, 2024

  67. [67]

    Flowing t he information from Shannon to Fisher: Towards the fundamenta l tradeoff in ISAC,

    Y . Xiong, F. Liu, Y . Cui, W. Y uan, and T. X. Han, “Flowing t he information from Shannon to Fisher: Towards the fundamenta l tradeoff in ISAC,” in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. , Dec. 2022, pp. 5601– 5606

  68. [68]

    J oint radar- communication strategies for autonomous vehicles: Combin ing two key automotive technologies,

    D. Ma, N. Shlezinger, T. Huang, Y . Liu, and Y . C. Eldar, “J oint radar- communication strategies for autonomous vehicles: Combin ing two key automotive technologies,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag. , vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 85–97, Jun. 2020

  69. [69]

    FRaC: FMCW-based joint radar-communications sys tem via index modulation,

    ——, “FRaC: FMCW-based joint radar-communications sys tem via index modulation,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process. , vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1348–1364, Nov. 2021

  70. [70]

    Generalize d transceiver beamforming for DFRC with MIMO radar and MU-MIM O communication,

    L. Chen, Z. Wang, Y . Du, Y . Chen, and F. R. Y u, “Generalize d transceiver beamforming for DFRC with MIMO radar and MU-MIM O communication,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1795– 1808, Jun. 2022

  71. [71]

    Joint transmit beamforming for multiuser MIMO com- munications and MIMO radar,

    X. Liu et al. , “Joint transmit beamforming for multiuser MIMO com- munications and MIMO radar,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 68, pp. 3929–3944, Jul. 2020

  72. [72]

    Information theory and radar waveform design ,

    M. Bell, “Information theory and radar waveform design ,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1578–1597, Sept. 1993

  73. [73]

    MIMO radar waveform desig n in colored noise based on information theory,

    B. Tang, J. Tang, and Y . Peng, “MIMO radar waveform desig n in colored noise based on information theory,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 4684–4697, Sept. 2010

  74. [74]

    An overview of signal processing techniques for joint communication and radar sensing,

    J. A. Zhang et al. , “An overview of signal processing techniques for joint communication and radar sensing,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1295–1315, Nov. 2021

  75. [75]

    S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing, V ol. I: Estimation Theory . Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 1998

  76. [76]

    Energy effici ent beamforming optimization for integrated sensing and commu nication,

    Z. He, W. Xu, H. Shen, Y . Huang, and H. Xiao, “Energy effici ent beamforming optimization for integrated sensing and commu nication,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1374–1378, Jul. 2022

  77. [77]

    On probing signal design fo r MIMO radar,

    P . Stoica, J. Li, and Y . Xie, “On probing signal design fo r MIMO radar,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 4151–4161, Jul. 2007

  78. [78]

    MIMO radar waveform de sign with constant modulus and similarity constraints,

    G. Cui, H. Li, and M. Rangaswamy, “MIMO radar waveform de sign with constant modulus and similarity constraints,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 343–353, Jan. 2014

  79. [79]

    Optimal transmit beamformi ng for integrated sensing and communication,

    H. Hua, J. Xu, and T. X. Han, “Optimal transmit beamformi ng for integrated sensing and communication,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol. , vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 10 588–10 603, Mar. 2023

  80. [80]

    Spectrally constrained MIMO radar wa veform design based on mutual information,

    B. Tang and J. Li, “Spectrally constrained MIMO radar wa veform design based on mutual information,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 821–834, Feb. 2019

Showing first 80 references.