Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Mind the Memory Gap: Unveiling GPU Bottlenecks in Large-Batch LLM Inference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.08311 v2 pith:UV5ZLYXK submitted 2025-03-11 cs.DC cs.LG

classification cs.DCcs.LG
keywords inferencememorymodelsthroughpututilizationbatchingcapabilitiescompute
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models have been widely adopted across different tasks, but their auto-regressive generation nature often leads to inefficient resource utilization during inference. While batching is commonly used to increase throughput, performance gains plateau beyond a certain batch size, especially with smaller models, a phenomenon that existing literature typically explains as a shift to the compute-bound regime. In this paper, through an in-depth GPU-level analysis, we reveal that large-batch inference remains memory-bound, with most GPU compute capabilities underutilized due to DRAM bandwidth saturation as the primary bottleneck. To address this, we propose a Batching Configuration Advisor (BCA) that optimizes memory allocation, reducing GPU memory requirements with minimal impact on throughput. The freed memory and underutilized GPU compute capabilities can then be leveraged by concurrent workloads. Specifically, we use model replication to improve serving throughput and GPU utilization. Our findings challenge conventional assumptions about LLM inference, offering new insights and practical strategies for improving resource utilization, particularly for smaller language models. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/FerranAgulloLopez/vLLMBatchingMemoryGap.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Think Before You Grid-Search: Floor-First Triage for LLM Serving

    cs.PF 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM serving should triage by five-resource analytical floors and wall ordering, not grid search; on 16×H20, TP16 is capacity-capped at ~70 while EP+DP attention reaches ~644 concurrent 8K requests.

  2. Characterizing LLM Kernel Access and Memory Interaction in Multi-Partition NUMA GPUs

    cs.AR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM kernel operands form private, globally shared, or partially shared workgroup access patterns, and memory-bound decode kernels lose up to about 1.8x to inter-partition NUMA traffic under default placement.

  3. The Economics of AI Decoding Chips: Rebalancing Compute, Capacity, and Bandwidth for Efficient LLM Inference

    cs.AR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A memory-heavy, compute-light decode accelerator can serve a 671B frontier model at roughly one-tenth the capital cost of an eight-GPU node, if the vendor's throughput figures hold.

  4. HAFM: Hierarchical Autoregressive Foundation Model for Music Accompaniment Generation

    cs.SD 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    HAFM uses a hierarchical autoregressive model with dual-rate HuBERT and EnCodec tokens to generate coherent instrumental music from vocals, achieving FAD 2.08 on MUSDB18 while matching prior systems with fewer parameters.

Pith tools