Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

V-STaR: Benchmarking Video-LLMs on Video Spatio-Temporal Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.11495 v1 pith:KCFWQIZN submitted 2025-03-14 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords reasoningspatio-temporalvideovideo-llmslogicv-stareventshuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Human processes video reasoning in a sequential spatio-temporal reasoning logic, we first identify the relevant frames ("when") and then analyse the spatial relationships ("where") between key objects, and finally leverage these relationships to draw inferences ("what"). However, can Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) also "reason through a sequential spatio-temporal logic" in videos? Existing Video-LLM benchmarks primarily focus on assessing object presence, neglecting relational reasoning. Consequently, it is difficult to measure whether a model truly comprehends object interactions (actions/events) in videos or merely relies on pre-trained "memory" of co-occurrences as biases in generating answers. In this work, we introduce a Video Spatio-Temporal Reasoning (V-STaR) benchmark to address these shortcomings. The key idea is to decompose video understanding into a Reverse Spatio-Temporal Reasoning (RSTR) task that simultaneously evaluates what objects are present, when events occur, and where they are located while capturing the underlying Chain-of-thought (CoT) logic. To support this evaluation, we construct a dataset to elicit the spatial-temporal reasoning process of Video-LLMs. It contains coarse-to-fine CoT questions generated by a semi-automated GPT-4-powered pipeline, embedding explicit reasoning chains to mimic human cognition. Experiments from 14 Video-LLMs on our V-STaR reveal significant gaps between current Video-LLMs and the needs for robust and consistent spatio-temporal reasoning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. $M^3-Verse$: A "Spot the Difference" Challenge for Large Multimodal Models

    cs.CV 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark tests whether large multimodal models can compare paired 'before and after' videos to detect scene changes, and finds current models perform near random.

  2. Video Reasoning without Training

    cs.CV 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An entropy-guided, inference-time value-cache controller improves video reasoning accuracy and cuts output tokens versus RL-trained baselines.

  3. Position: Reasoning After Perception Means Reasoning Without Vision

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Reasoning in text space cannot recover visual information that was collapsed during perception, so multimodal models need architectures that reason within the visual representation.

  4. LanteRn: Latent Visual Structured Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 3B vision-language model trained to emit latent visual thought tokens interleaved with text, then refined by reinforcement learning, outperforms a matched text-only baseline on several visual reasoning benchmarks.

  5. Video-XL-2: Towards Very Long-Video Understanding Through Task-Aware KV Sparsification

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Video-XL-2 cuts long-video inference cost with chunked pre-filling and query-gated dense-or-sparse KV reloading, reporting half the FLOPs and a third less decoding memory at roughly equal benchmark scores.

Pith tools