REVIEW
Semi-Automated Design of Data-Intensive Architectures
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Today, data guides the decision-making process of most companies. Effectively analyzing and manipulating data at scale to extract and exploit relevant knowledge is a challenging task, due to data characteristics such as its size, the rate at which it changes, and the heterogeneity of formats. To address this challenge, software architects resort to build complex data-intensive architectures that integrate highly heterogeneous software systems, each offering vertically specialized functionalities. Designing a suitable architecture for the application at hand is crucial to enable high quality of service and efficient exploitation of resources. However, the design process entails a series of decisions that demand technical expertise and in-depth knowledge of individual systems and their synergies. To assist software architects in this task, this paper introduces a development methodology for data-intensive architectures, which guides architects in (i) designing a suitable architecture for their specific application scenario, and (ii) selecting an appropriate set of concrete systems to implement the application. To do so, the methodology grounds on (1) a language to precisely define an application scenario in terms of characteristics of data and requirements of stakeholders; (2) an architecture description language for data-intensive architectures; (3) a classification of systems based on the functionalities they offer and their performance trade-offs. We show that the description languages we adopt can capture the key aspects of data-intensive architectures proposed by researchers and practitioners, and we validate our methodology by applying it to real-world case studies documented in literature.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.