pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.22701 · v2 · submitted 2025-03-17 · ⚛️ physics.pop-ph · physics.ed-ph· quant-ph

Quantum Port: Gamification of quantum teleportation for public engagement

Pak Shen Choong , Aqilah Rasat , Afiqa Nik Aimi , Nurisya Mohd Shah This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 00:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.pop-ph physics.ed-phquant-ph
keywords quantum teleportationgamificationcategorical quantum mechanicspublic engagementcard gameQuantum Port
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gamifying the diagrammatic rules of quantum teleportation produces a card game for public engagement.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes turning the diagrammatic rules of quantum teleportation, as formalized in categorical quantum mechanics, into the mechanics of a card game called Quantum Port. This gamification is described as the second level of transformation after the first level of replacing equations with diagrams. The work supplies moderator guidelines so the game can serve as a public engagement or learning module. A sympathetic reader would care because quantum concepts are typically hard to grasp without high mathematical literacy, and the game aims to embed those concepts in playable rules instead.

Core claim

The paper claims that the diagrammatic rules of quantum teleportation can be mapped directly into the rules of a card game called Quantum Port, creating a second-level transformation that lets non-experts engage with the quantum process through play while following provided moderator guidelines for educational use.

What carries the argument

The Quantum Port card game, which encodes the diagrammatic representation of quantum teleportation as card-drawing and matching mechanics that simulate the quantum protocol for players.

If this is right

  • Players can interact with quantum teleportation concepts through gameplay without requiring mathematical literacy.
  • The game functions as a public engagement module when used with the supplied moderator guidelines.
  • The approach extends the accessibility gains of the diagrammatic method by one further step into direct play.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Empirical playtests could check whether the chosen card mechanics avoid introducing new misconceptions about quantum processes.
  • The same mapping strategy might be applied to other protocols that have diagrammatic representations in categorical quantum mechanics.
  • Measuring changes in participants' understanding before and after play would provide a direct test of the game's educational value.

Load-bearing premise

The mapping from diagrammatic rules to card-game mechanics preserves the essential quantum behavior without creating systematic misconceptions for players.

What would settle it

A controlled observation that players who complete the game develop consistent incorrect intuitions about quantum teleportation, such as misunderstanding the role of entanglement or measurement, would show that the gamification does not preserve the intended behavior.

read the original abstract

Concepts on quantum physics are generally difficult for the general public to understand and grasp due to its counter-intuitive nature and requirement for higher level of mathematical literacy. With categorical quantum mechanics (CQM), quantum theory is re-formalized into a more intuitive diagrammatic approach, which we will refer to as the first level of transformation, to improve the accessibility and readability of quantum theory to a broader audience since the mathematical details are embedded into diagrammatic rules. Taking inspiration from this diagrammatic approach, we propose the second level of transformation by gamifying the diagrammatic rules of quantum teleportation into a quantum card game called Quantum Port. In this work, we discuss the gamification of quantum teleportation and provide a moderator guideline to use Quantum Port as a public engagement or learning module.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a second level of transformation beyond categorical quantum mechanics (CQM) diagrammatics by gamifying the rules of quantum teleportation into a card game called Quantum Port, and supplies moderator guidelines for its use in public engagement or learning modules.

Significance. The work supplies a concrete, ready-to-use outreach design that extends CQM diagrammatics into an interactive format. The explicit moderator guidelines constitute a practical strength for deployment in engagement settings. No machine-checked proofs or empirical data are provided, but the contribution lies in the explicit design proposal itself.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and their recommendation to accept. We appreciate the recognition that the contribution lies in the explicit design proposal and moderator guidelines for public engagement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in design proposal

full rationale

The manuscript is a pedagogical design proposal that describes gamifying CQM diagrammatics of quantum teleportation into a card game called Quantum Port, together with moderator guidelines. It advances no theorems, derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or empirical predictions. The central claim is simply that such a gamification can be constructed for outreach; this claim is self-contained as an act of design and does not reduce to any input by construction, self-citation, or renaming. No load-bearing step exists that could be circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented physical entities are present. The work is an educational design proposal rather than a theoretical or experimental physics paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5677 in / 1066 out tokens · 67372 ms · 2026-05-23T00:37:06.362359+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, Rhode Island (2003)

    Schr¨ odinger, E.: Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics, 3rd Ed. AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, Rhode Island (2003)

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    Dover Publications, United States of America (2015)

    Heisenberg, W.: The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory, 5th Ed. Dover Publications, United States of America (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Dowling, J.P., Milburn, G.J.: Quantum technology: The second quantum revolu- tion. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 361, 1655–1674 (2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    https://quantum2025.org/ (2025)

    Nations, T.U.: The International Year of Quantum Science and Technology 2025 (IYQ 2025). https://quantum2025.org/ (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Nature 574, 505–510 (2019)

    Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., al.: Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Nature (2024)

    AI, G.Q., Collaborators: Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold. Nature (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Nature 549, 195–202 (2017)

    Biamonte, J., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., Rebentrost, P., Wiebe, N., Lloyd, S.: Quantum machine learning. Nature 549, 195–202 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Cerezo, M., Verdon, G., Huang, H.Y., Cincio, L., Coles, P.J.: Challenges and opportunities in quantum machine learning. Nat. Comput. Sci 2, 567–576 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    GESDA, Institute, O.Q.: Intelligence report on quantum diplomacy for the sustainable development goals (SDGs), 2nd Ed. (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Digital Transformation Dialogue (2024)

    Vermaas, P., Mans, U.: Quantum technologies and their global impact: Discussion paper. Digital Transformation Dialogue (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47(777) (1935)

    work page 1935

  12. [12]

    Bell, J.S.: On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 38(3), 447–452 (1966)

    work page 1966

  13. [13]

    Indiana Univ

    Kochen, S., Specker, E.: The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 17(1), 59–87 (1968)

    work page 1968

  14. [14]

    ACM Trans

    Preskill, J.: Beyond nisq: The megaquop machine. ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 58–67 (2023) 15

    Violaris, M.: A physics lab inside your head: Quantum thought experiments as an educational tool. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 58–67 (2023) 15

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 21–32 (2023)

    D¨ undar-Coecke, S., Yeh, L., Puca, C., Pfaendler, S.M.-L., Waseem, M.H., Cer- voni, T., Kissinger, A., Gogioso, S., Coecke, B.: Quantum picturalism: Learning quantum theory in high school. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 21–32 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    arXiv:2308.14002v5 (2024)

    Sang, J., Yu, C.: Hands-on quantum programming labs for EECS students. arXiv:2308.14002v5 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    arXiv:2410.18307v1 (2024)

    Pati˜ no, L.T., Ca˜ nola, A.M., Bello, C.E.: Quantum computing education in Latin America: Experiences and strategies. arXiv:2410.18307v1 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    arXiv:2407.11570v1 (2024)

    Sanz, R.L., Mart´ ın, L.L., Cort´ es, A.B., Duocastella, M., Gomez, J.M., Juli´ a- D´ ıaz, B.: Undergraduate setup for measuring the Bell inequalities and performing quantum state tomography. arXiv:2407.11570v1 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Goorney, S., Bley, J., Heusler, S., Sherson, J.: A framework for curriculum trans- formation in quantum information science and technology education. Eur. J. Phys. 45, 065702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Levy, J., Singh, C.: Teaching quantum formalism and postulates to first-year undergraduates. Am. J. Phys. 93, 46–51 (2025)

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Goff, A.: Quantum tic-tac-toe: A teaching metaphor for superposition in quantum mechanics. Am. J. Phys. 74, 962 (2006)

    work page 2006

  23. [23]

    Academic Mindtrek ’21: Proceedings of the 24th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, 134–144 (2021)

    Kultima, A., Piispanen, L., Junnila, M.: Quantum game jam: Making games with quantum physicists. Academic Mindtrek ’21: Proceedings of the 24th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, 134–144 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    ICGJ ’23: Pro- ceedings of the 7th International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons and Game Creation events, 18–27 (2023)

    Piispanen, L., Anttila, D., Skult, N.: Online quantum game jam. ICGJ ’23: Pro- ceedings of the 7th International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons and Game Creation events, 18–27 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    arXiv:2406.11995 (2024)

    Evenbly, G.: Exploring gamification in quantum computing: The qubit factory. arXiv:2406.11995 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    arXiv:2402.13431v2 (2024)

    Gaunkar, S.P., Fischer, D., Rozp¸ edek, F., Bhatia, U., Verma, D., Tarhan, A.K., Zvi, U., Kawalek, N.: Game design inspired by quantum physics: A case study on the quantum photo booth. arXiv:2402.13431v2 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    EPJ Quantum Technol

    Piispanen, L., Pfaffhauser, M., Wootton, J., Togelius, J., Kultima, A.: Defining quantum games. EPJ Quantum Technol. 12(7) (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    arXiv:2501.10449v1 (2025)

    Armbruster, K., Duda, G., Wong, T.G.: Improving student self-efficacy in quan- tum computing with the qubit touchdown board game. arXiv:2501.10449v1 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Levy, J., Singh, C.: Hands-on quantum: Teaching core quantum concepts with 16 bloch cubes. Phys. Teach. 63, 85–89 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom (2017)

    Coecke, B., Kissinger, A.: Picturing Quantum Processes: A First Course in Quan- tum Theory and Diagrammatic Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom (2010)

    Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 10th Ed. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom (2010)

    work page 2010

  32. [32]

    Pro- ceedings of the 19th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 415–425 (2004)

    Abramsky, S., Coecke, B.: A categorical semantics of quantum protocols. Pro- ceedings of the 19th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 415–425 (2004)

    work page 2004

  33. [33]

    Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 170, 139–163 (2007)

    Selinger, P.: Dagger compact closed categories and completely positive maps. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 170, 139–163 (2007)

    work page 2007

  34. [34]

    Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 210, 3–13 (2008)

    Coecke, B.: Axiomatic description of mixed states from selinger’s cpm- construction. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 210, 3–13 (2008)

    work page 2008

  35. [35]

    Logical Methods in Computer Science 8(4) (2012)

    Coecke, B., Perdrix, S.: Environment and classical channels in categorical quantum mechanics. Logical Methods in Computer Science 8(4) (2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 210, 15–31 (2008)

    Coecke, B., Paquette, E.: Povms and naimark’s theorem without sums. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 210, 15–31 (2008)

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    Coecke, B., Duncan, R.: Interacting quantum observables: Categorical algebra and diagrammatics. New J. Phys. 13, 043016 (2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 23(3), 555–567 (2013)

    Coecke, B., Pavlovic, D., Vicary, J.: A new description of orthogonal bases. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 23(3), 555–567 (2013)

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    Quantum Information Processing 15(12), 5179–5209 (2014)

    Coecke, B., Heunen, C., Kissinger, A.: Categories of quantum and classical channels. Quantum Information Processing 15(12), 5179–5209 (2014)

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    EPTCS 172, 27–35 (2014)

    Coecke, B.: Terminality implies non-signalling. EPTCS 172, 27–35 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Logical Methods in Computer Science 15(3) (2019) 17

    Kissinger, A., Uijlen, S.: A categorical semantics for causal structure. Logical Methods in Computer Science 15(3) (2019) 17

    work page 2019