Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Language Guided Concept Bottleneck Models for Interpretable Continual Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.23283 v1 pith:EHOMNYWL submitted 2025-03-30 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords learningconceptmodelsbottleneckcontinualinterpretableknowledgeacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Continual learning (CL) aims to enable learning systems to acquire new knowledge constantly without forgetting previously learned information. CL faces the challenge of mitigating catastrophic forgetting while maintaining interpretability across tasks. Most existing CL methods focus primarily on preserving learned knowledge to improve model performance. However, as new information is introduced, the interpretability of the learning process becomes crucial for understanding the evolving decision-making process, yet it is rarely explored. In this paper, we introduce a novel framework that integrates language-guided Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) to address both challenges. Our approach leverages the Concept Bottleneck Layer, aligning semantic consistency with CLIP models to learn human-understandable concepts that can generalize across tasks. By focusing on interpretable concepts, our method not only enhances the models ability to retain knowledge over time but also provides transparent decision-making insights. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by achieving superior performance on several datasets, outperforming state-of-the-art methods with an improvement of up to 3.06% in final average accuracy on ImageNet-subset. Additionally, we offer concept visualizations for model predictions, further advancing the understanding of interpretable continual learning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Continual Learning for VLMs: A Survey and Taxonomy Beyond Forgetting

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper offers a comprehensive survey and proposes a new taxonomy for continual learning strategies in VLMs and MLLMs to combat catastrophic forgetting beyond traditional methods.

  2. BRAIN: Bias-Mitigation Continual Learning Approach to Vision-Brain Understanding

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    BRAIN uses bias-mitigation continual learning with a new de-bias contrastive loss and angular forgetting mitigation to achieve SOTA performance on vision-brain understanding benchmarks despite brain signal inconsisten...

  3. Continual Learning for VLMs: A Survey and Taxonomy Beyond Forgetting

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A taxonomy survey of continual learning for vision-language models, grouping methods into multi-modal replay, cross-modal regularization, and parameter-efficient adaptation, with a review of benchmarks and metrics.

Pith tools