Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 40 references

The impact of electrical contacts on the optical properties of a MoS$_{2}$ monolayer

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bismuth electrical contacts create a distinct defect emission band in MoS2 monolayers, and grounding those contacts quenches defect-bound excitons by draining charge.

desk verdict A solid experimental report with a genuine new observation — a defect PL band in Bi-contacted MoS2 and its partial suppression on grounding — but the Bi-diffusion attribution is speculative and the sample comparison is confounded. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.18305 v1 pith:F3RPR5BH submitted 2025-04-25 cond-mat.mes-hall

Agata Zielińska , Mateusz Dyksik , Alessandro Surrente , Jonathan Eroms , Dieter Weiss , Paulina P{l}ochocka , Mariusz Ciorga This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords MoS2monolayerbismuthcontactsphotoluminescencedefect-boundexcitonschargetransferohmicArrheniusanalysistransition-metaldichalcogenide
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the metal used to contact a monolayer of MoS2 changes its optical quality, and it answers yes for bismuth. On bismuth-contacted monolayers, photoluminescence at 4.5 K shows a new broad band, D, near 1.86 eV, between the charged-exciton (trion) line and the usual defect-related L band; the paper attributes D to a defect state produced when bismuth atoms enter the lattice during electron-beam evaporation. It also reports that grounding the bismuth contacts at 50 K suppresses emission from pre-existing defect-bound excitons, which it attributes to the contacts draining excess charge away from those defects. This matters because both effects, contact-induced defect emission and charge draining through the contact, are direct handles for tuning the optical response of atomically thin optoelectronic devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the micro-photoluminescence spectrum of the contacted monolayer, and in particular the newly labelled D band at about 1.86 eV. The argument is carried by two tools: an Arrhenius analysis of the intensities of the L and D bands between 5 K and 300 K, whose fitted activation energies are compared with calculated binding energies of excitonic complexes on defects, and a grounding switch that connects or disconnects the bismuth contacts while the sample is optically mapped, so the trion-to-defect ratio can be compared at the same spot with and without a path for charge to escape.

What would settle it

Look for bismuth inside the contacted monolayer with atomic-resolution electron microscopy and X-ray or XPS mapping: if no bismuth is found on sulfur sites, the D-line assignment fails. A complementary test is to insert a thin barrier between bismuth and MoS2 during evaporation; if band D still appears, it cannot require bismuth diffusion into the lattice.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the choice of contact metal leaves a spectroscopic fingerprint on a MoS2 monolayer. Bismuth-contacted samples display an additional photoluminescence band, labelled D, at roughly 1.86 eV, which has no counterpart in reflectivity and does not appear in gold-contacted or bare monolayers; the paper interprets D as recombination of excitons and biexcitons bound to acceptor states formed by bismuth diffusing into the lattice and substituting sulfur. Supporting this assignment, the Arrhenius activation energies extracted for D (2.5, 5.2, and 46 meV) match, within error, calculated binding energies for an exciton bound to an acceptor and for a biexciton bound to an acceptor. The second discovery is electrical: with the bismuth contacts grounded, the trion-to-defect ratio rises, especially near the contacts and at 50 K, which the paper reads as charge transfer through the contacts removing carriers trapped at defects; gold contacts, being Schottky-like, do not produce this effect.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that bismuth atoms move into the MoS2 monolayer during evaporation and replace sulfur atoms, forming the acceptors that emit band D; the authors state this premise explicitly and provide no direct chemical or structural picture of bismuth inside the lattice.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the assignment is correct, electron-beam evaporation of bismuth leaves a built-in population of acceptor-like defects in MoS2, so any optoelectronic device using bismuth contacts must treat the evaporation step as part of its optical design.
  • Because the D band is absent in reflectivity, it is a localized-defect transition rather than a free quasiparticle transition, which distinguishes its physics from the main exciton and trion lines.
  • Grounding the contacts raises the trion-to-defect ratio across the flake, with the largest effect near contacts and at 50 K, meaning the device's wiring state directly tunes its spatially resolved optical response.
  • Gold-contacted monolayers show neither the D band nor the grounding response, tying both effects to the semimetallic nature of the bismuth contact rather than to generic device processing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the bismuth-on-sulfur acceptor picture is right, the same evaporation step could act as a local p-type doping method in n-type MoS2, opening a route to lateral p-n junctions; the paper does not demonstrate this.
  • The grounding effect suggests a general contact-based strategy for depleting charge traps in semimetal-contacted transition-metal dichalcogenides; testing it on WSe2 or MoSe2 monolayers would show whether the mechanism is specific to MoS2.
  • The 46 meV quenching step specifically predicts an acceptor-bound biexciton; a power-dependent or magneto-optical photoluminescence study could confirm or rule out that complex more directly than the Arrhenius match alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports micro-photoluminescence and reflectivity measurements on exfoliated monolayer MoS2 flakes contacted with bismuth (sample A) and gold (sample B). The central observations are: (i) the Bi-contacted sample exhibits an additional low-energy PL band at about 1.86 eV, labeled D, that is absent in the Au-contacted reference; (ii) grounding the Bi contacts at 50 K reduces the intensity of the defect-related L band while leaving the trion and D bands nearly unchanged; and (iii) Arrhenius analysis of the temperature dependence yields activation energies for the L and D lines, which the authors compare with diffusion quantum Monte Carlo binding energies of excitonic complexes and interpret as evidence for Bi acceptor states formed by Bi substituting sulfur during electron-beam evaporation. The paper concludes that Bi contacts are strong candidates for high-quality TMD optoelectronic devices, provided their effect on the optical spectrum is further explored.

Significance. If the D band is genuinely caused by Bi diffusion into the MoS2 lattice and the grounding effect reflects charge removal through ohmic Bi contacts, the paper would provide a useful step toward combining low-resistance electrical contacts with preserved optical quality in monolayer TMDCs. The electrical characterization (ohmic behavior of Bi contacts, channel-dominated resistance) is competently done, and the temperature-dependent PL data are valuable. The paper is also commendably transparent in the Supplementary Material about the conditional nature of the Bi-diffusion assumption. However, the central attribution of the D line to a Bi acceptor defect currently rests on a confounded sample comparison and on activation-energy matches whose error bars overlap several candidate complexes; the manuscript does not provide direct chemical or structural evidence for Bi incorporation. The broader device-related claim therefore remains plausible but not established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Main text, Figs. 1-2 and Supplementary fabrication details] The only evidence that the D line is specific to bismuth contacts is the comparison between sample A (Bi) and sample B (Au). These samples differ in more than the contact metal: sample A has 20 nm Bi + 80 nm Au evaporated directly onto the MoS2 flake in UHV, whereas sample B uses a dry-transferred flake on pre-fabricated 5 nm Ti + 20 nm Au contacts and is subjected to AFM ironing. The D band in sample A could therefore arise from direct metal evaporation on the flake, e-beam exposure during lithography, different strain from a 100 nm metal stack, or other processing steps, rather than from Bi diffusion. The authors should provide control samples that isolate the metal species, for example a sample with an inert metal evaporated in the same geometry and thickness, or a sample with Bi contacts fabricated by transfer. Direct evidence of Bi inside the MoS2 lattice (STEM-EDX, XPS depth profiling, or similar) is also needed to support the proposed mechanism.
  2. [Supplementary Material, Arrhenius analysis and Fig. 4] The activation-energy assignments are not unique. For the L line, E1 = 4.6 ± 2.0 meV is said to be consistent with A−X dissociation (2.7 meV), but the same value also overlaps the D+X binding energy (7.2 meV) within error; similarly, E2 = 37 ± 14 meV could match either D0X (32.4 meV) or A0X (31.7 meV). For the D line, E2 = 5.2 ± 0.5 meV is assigned to A−X, but it also matches D+X. The identification of the D line with Bi acceptors relies on choosing the A−X candidate, which is not uniquely selected by the data. The authors should provide a more rigorous statistical comparison, including the error bars of the theoretical binding energies, or perform additional experiments (e.g., magnetic-field, power-dependent, or time-resolved PL) that can discriminate between donor- and acceptor-bound complexes.
  3. [Main text, 'To analyze in more depth...' and Fig. 4] The three-activation-energy model for the D line (Eq. 2) is fitted to a single temperature series without reporting goodness-of-fit, parameter correlations, or whether simpler models are rejected. With five free parameters (I0, A1, A2, A3 and a scale factor) and a limited number of temperature points, the extracted energies may not be robust. The manuscript should include an analysis of the fit stability, e.g., bootstrap resampling or a comparison of AIC/BIC for models with fewer terms, before using these energies as the basis for the physical assignment.
  4. [Main text, grounding experiment and Fig. 3] The conclusion that grounded Bi contacts remove charges bound to defects rests on maps measured on a single representative sample at a single temperature (50 K) where the effect is largest; at 4.5 K and 100 K the difference is described as smaller. No error bars, multiple measurements, or statistics over several samples are provided, so it is unclear whether the effect is reproducible or could be influenced by laser-induced drift, local heating, or contact instabilities. The authors should show reproducibility across several spots and at least two samples, and ideally correlate the magnitude of the effect with contact resistance.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Main text, Fig. 3 caption and text] The 'trion-to-defect ratio' is defined by integrating a range that includes the D line (1.86 eV) within the 'trion' window, so the ratio is actually (trion + D)/L. This should be stated explicitly in the text and figure caption to avoid confusion.
  2. [Supplementary Material, optical spectroscopy] There are several typos: 'spatiallz' should be 'spatially', 'litoghaphy' should be 'lithography', and 'nincresing' should be 'increasing'. Also, the text 'Figure 4 in the main text presents the corresponding Arrhenius plots' is imprecise because the main-text figure is Fig. 4; the reference should be to the main text.
  3. [Main text, Fig. 1(d)] The resistance versus channel-length plot does not show error bars or the number of measured devices; including this information would strengthen the claim that the resistance is channel-dominated.
  4. [Supplementary Material, Fig. S4 caption] The caption states that parts of the flake on the contacts show higher intensity, smaller centroid, and smaller FWHM, but the color scale and the meaning of the centroid axis are not fully defined. Please clarify the units and the extraction procedure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the D-band attribution is an openly conditional hypothesis, not a derived prediction, and the fitted activation energies are benchmarked against external DMC calculations.

full rationale

The paper's central experimental chain is not circular. The D band at ~1.86 eV is observed in the Bi-contacted sample and absent in the Au-contacted reference; its defect-related nature is supported by the absence of a corresponding reflectivity feature. The grounding experiment is a direct manipulation of the contact state, and the observed change in defect emission is compared between grounded and ungrounded configurations. The Arrhenius activation energies are fit parameters, but they are compared with independent Monte Carlo/DMC binding energies from Mostaani et al., which do not depend on the present data. The Bi-acceptor attribution is explicitly conditional in the Supplementary Material: 'if we assume the diffusion of Bi atoms during the evaporation process and substitution of sulphur atoms, then Bi atoms would serve as acceptors.' This is an untested working hypothesis, not a quantity derived from or defined by the target result. The only self-citation, Ref. [30], supplies the Au-contact control sample and fabrication details; it is not invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the justification for a mathematical claim. The paper's weaknesses are experimental confounds and underdetermination of the defect assignment, which are correctness risks, not examples of constructional circularity. No equation or fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation chain. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on fitted activation energies, on an assumed Arrhenius functional form, on external DMC binding energies used for assignment, and on an unverified assumption that Bi diffuses and substitutes S. The D-line explanation also postulates a Bi acceptor state without direct chemical evidence. These are the main ingredients the reader must accept to reach the paper's conclusions.

free parameters (6)
  • Activation energy E1 for L-line quenching = 4.6 +/- 2.0 meV
    Fitted from Arrhenius plot of L-line PL intensity (Fig. 4a) and compared to DMC binding energies of excitonic complexes.
  • Activation energy E2 for L-line quenching = 37 +/- 14 meV
    Fitted from the same Arrhenius plot; assigned to D0X dissociation.
  • Activation energy E1 for D-line PL increase = 2.5 +/- 0.8 meV
    Fitted from D-line Arrhenius plot (Fig. 4b); assigned to A-X dissociation.
  • Activation energy E2 for D-line quenching = 5.2 +/- 0.5 meV
    Fitted from D-line Arrhenius plot; assigned to D+X or A-X dissociation.
  • Activation energy E3 for D-line quenching = 46 +/- 10 meV
    Fitted from D-line Arrhenius plot; assigned to A-XX biexciton dissociation.
  • Trion-to-defect integration energy windows = 0.14 eV (trion) and 0.19 eV (defect) ranges, red-shifted with temperature
    Used to compute PL maps; ranges chosen by hand to cover the trion and D/L bands.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption PL quenching follows the Arrhenius-type models of Eq. (1) and Eq. (2)
    Used to extract activation energies; standard in semiconductor PL thermal quenching studies but an assumed functional form.
  • domain assumption DMC-calculated binding energies of excitonic complexes in TMDCs (Mostaani et al., Ref. 35) are accurate enough for assignment
    External benchmark; the paper compares its fitted activation energies to these values, and the identification of defects rests on the match.
  • ad hoc to paper Bi atoms diffuse into the MoS2 lattice during electron-gun evaporation and substitute sulfur
    Explicitly assumed in the discussion ('if we assume the diffusion of Bi atoms'); no direct chemical or structural evidence is provided.
  • domain assumption The bare MoS2 flake spectrum is a valid reference for the contacted samples
    The comparison assumes that differences are due to contacts, not sample-to-sample variation or processing.
invented entities (1)
  • Bi acceptor defect state (Bi substituting S)
    purpose: Explains the new D emission line at about 1.86 eV in Bi-contacted MoS2
    Suggested to result from Bi diffusion and S substitution; not directly observed (no STEM, EDX, or XPS) and the binding-energy matches are within broad error bars.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The impact of electrical contacts on the optical properties of a MoS$_{2}$ monolayer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F3RPR5BH

@misc{pith2026250418305,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The impact of electrical contacts on the optical properties of a MoS$_2$ monolayer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F3RPR5BH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.18305}
}
abstract

Achieving high performance in transition-metal-dichalcogenide-based optoelectronic devices is challenging -- the realization of an efficient electrical contacting scheme should not be obtained at the expense of their optical quality. Here we present the optical properties of MoS$_{2}$ monolayers which have been electrically contacted with bismuth and gold. The photoluminescence (PL) spectrum of the samples contacted with both materials is significantly broadened. In the case of the bismuth contacted sample we note an additional, low energy band in the PL spectrum, attributed to a defect state formed during the evaporation of Bi. Comparing the intensity of the excitonic peak and of the defect-related peak, we note that there is a correlation between the type of contacts and the optical properties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.18305 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) Optical micrograph of sample A. All contacts are 1 µm wide and 100 nm high, with 1 µm spacing between them. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (a) Optical microscope image of sample B. All contacts are 25 nm high. The MoS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a) Comparison of PL spectra of two different spots on the sample A for contacts grounded and ungrounded at 50 K. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The Arrhenius plot of peak L (a) and D (b) intensity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  2. [2]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  3. [3]

    merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  4. [4]

    Liu , author Y

    author author Y. Liu , author Y. Gao , author S. Zhang , author J. He , author J. Yu ,\ and\ author Z. Liu ,\ title title Valleytronics in transition metal dichalcogenides materials ,\ @noop journal journal Nano Research \ volume 12 ,\ pages 2695 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Avsar , author H

    author author A. Avsar , author H. Ochoa , author F. Guinea , author B. \"Ozyilmaz , author B. J. \ van Wees ,\ and\ author I. J. \ Vera-Marun ,\ title title Colloquium: Spintronics in graphene and other two-dimensional materials ,\ @noop journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 92 ,\ pages 021003 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Mueller \ and\ author E

    author author T. Mueller \ and\ author E. Malic ,\ title title Exciton physics and device application of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-018-0074-2 journal journal npj 2D Mater Appl \ volume 2 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2018 ) ,\ note publisher: Nature Publishing Group NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41699-018-0074-2

  7. [7]

    Zollner , author P

    author author K. Zollner , author P. E. \ Faria Junior ,\ and\ author J. Fabian ,\ title title Proximity exchange effects in MoSe _ 2 and WSe _ 2 heterostructures with CrI _ 3 : Twist angle, layer, and gate dependence ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 100 ,\ pages 085128 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    author author Z. M. \ Wang ,\ @noop title MoS2 \ ( publisher Springer Cham ,\ year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page 2013

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    author author A. V. \ Kolobov \ and\ author J. Tominaga ,\ @noop title Two-Dimensional Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  2. [10]

    author author A. T. \ Wee , author D. Chi ,\ and\ author K. Goh ,\ @noop title 2D Semiconductor Materials and Devices \ ( publisher Elsevier Science ,\ year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  3. [11]

    Chernikov , author T

    author author A. Chernikov , author T. C. \ Berkelbach , author H. M. \ Hill , author A. Rigosi , author Y. Li , author B. Aslan , author D. R. \ Reichman , author M. S. \ Hybertsen ,\ and\ author T. F. \ Heinz ,\ title title Exciton Binding Energy and Nonhydrogenic Rydberg Se...

    doi

  4. [12]

    Back , author S

    author author P. Back , author S. Zeytinoglu , author A. Ijaz , author M. Kroner ,\ and\ author A. Imamo g g lu ,\ title title Realization of an Electrically Tunable Narrow-Bandwidth Atomically Thin Mirror Using Monolayer MoSe _ 2 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.037...

    doi

  5. [13]

    author author K. F. \ Mak , author K. L. \ McGill , author J. Park ,\ and\ author P. L. \ McEuen ,\ title title The valley Hall effect in MoS _ 2 transistors ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250140 journal journal Science \ volume 344 ,\ pages 1489 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi

  6. [14]

    Habe \ and\ author M

    author author T. Habe \ and\ author M. Koshino ,\ title title Anomalous Hall effect in 2H -phase M X _ 2 transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers on ferromagnetic substrates ( M = Mo, W, and X = S, Se, Te) ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.085411 journal journal Phys. R...

    doi

  7. [15]

    author author D. S. \ Schulman , author A. J. \ Arnold ,\ and\ author S. Das ,\ title title Contact engineering for 2D materials and devices ,\ @noop journal journal Chemical Society Reviews \ volume 47 ,\ pages 3037 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  8. [16]

    Allain , author J

    author author A. Allain , author J. Kang , author K. Banerjee ,\ and\ author A. Kis ,\ title title Electrical contacts to two-dimensional semiconductors ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Materials \ volume 14 ,\ pages 1195 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  9. [17]

    Zheng , author J

    author author Y. Zheng , author J. Gao , author C. Han ,\ and\ author W. Chen ,\ title title Ohmic Contact Engineering for Two-Dimensional Materials ,\ @noop journal journal Cell Reports Physical Science \ volume 2 ,\ pages 100298 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  10. [18]

    \ Shen , author C

    author author P.-C. \ Shen , author C. Su , author Y. Lin , author A.-S. \ Chou , author C.-C. \ Cheng , author J.-H. \ Park , author M.-H. \ Chiu , author A.-Y. \ Lu , author H.-L. \ Tang , author M. M. \ Tavakoli , author G. Pitner , author X. Ji , author Z. Cai , author N. ...

    2021

  11. [19]

    Li , author X

    author author W. Li , author X. Gong , author Z. Yu , author L. Ma , author W. Sun , author S. Gao , author C. K\" o ro g lu , author W. Wang , author L. Liu , author T. Li , author H. Ning , author D. Fan , author Y. Xu , author X. Tu , author T. Xu , author L. Sun , author W...

  12. [20]

    Lee , author X

    author author S. Lee , author X. Wang , author H. Shin , author N. Ali , author T. D. \ Ngo , author E. Hwang , author G.-H. \ Kim , author G. Y. \ Yeom , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi ,\ and\ author W. J. \ Yoo ,\ title title Semi-Metal Edge Contact for Barrier-Fre...

    doi

  13. [21]

    Su , author Y

    author author T. Su , author Y. Li , author Q. Wang , author W. Zhao , author L. Cao ,\ and\ author Y. S. \ Ang ,\ title title Semimetal contacts to monolayer semiconductor: weak metalization as an effective mechanism to Schottky barrier lowering ,\ @noop journal journal Journ...

    2023

  14. [22]

    Turunen , author H

    author author M. Turunen , author H. Fernandez , author S.-T. \ Akkanen , author H. Seppänen ,\ and\ author Z. Sun ,\ title title Effects of atomic layer deposition on the optical properties of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers ,\ https://doi.org/10.10...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Fan , author C

    author author Y. Fan , author C. Guo , author Z. Zhu , author W. Xu , author F. Wu , author X. Yuan ,\ and\ author S. Qin ,\ title title Monolayer-graphene-based broadband and wide-angle perfect absorption structures in the near infrared ,\ @noop journal journal Scientific Rep...

    2018

  16. [24]

    author author P. B. \ Johnson \ and\ author R. W. \ Christy ,\ title title Optical Constants of the Noble Metals ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 6 ,\ pages 4370 ( year 1972 ) NoStop

    1972 doi

  17. [25]

    Ahmed , author K

    author author T. Ahmed , author K. Roy , author S. Kakkar , author A. Pradhan ,\ and\ author A. Ghosh ,\ title title Interplay of charge transfer and disorder in optoelectronic response in Graphene/hBN/MoS2 van der Waals heterostructures ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/ab...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Grzeszczyk , author M

    author author M. Grzeszczyk , author M. R. \ Molas , author K. Nogajewski , author M. Bartoš , author A. Bogucki , author C. Faugeras , author P. Kossacki , author A. Babiński ,\ and\ author M. Potemski ,\ title title The effect of metallic substrates on the optical properties...

    2020

  19. [27]

    Jadczak , author J

    author author J. Jadczak , author J. Kutrowska-Girzycka , author P. Kapuściński , author Y. S. \ Huang , author A. Wójs ,\ and\ author L. Bryja ,\ title title Probing of free and localized excitons and trions in atomically thin WSe2, WS2, MoSe2 and MoS2 in photoluminescence an...

    2017

  20. [28]

    author author K. T. \ Munson , author R. Torsi , author S. Mathela , author M. A. \ Feidler , author Y.-C. \ Lin , author J. A. \ Robinson ,\ and\ author J. B. \ Asbury ,\ title title Influence of Substrate-Induced Charge Doping on Defect-Related Excitonic Emission in Monolaye...

    doi

  21. [29]

    Park , author N

    author author Y. Park , author N. Li , author D. Jung , author L. T. \ Singh , author J. Baik , author E. Lee , author D. Oh , author Y. D. \ Kim , author J. Y. \ Lee , author J. Woo , author S. Park , author H. Kim , author G. Lee , author G. Lee ,\ and\ author C.-C. \ Hwang ...

    2023

  22. [30]

    Courtade , author M

    author author E. Courtade , author M. Semina , author M. Manca , author M. M. \ Glazov , author C. Robert , author F. Cadiz , author G. Wang , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Watanabe , author M. Pierre , author W. Escoffier , author E. L. \ Ivchenko , author P. Renucci , auth...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Sidler , author P

    author author M. Sidler , author P. Back , author O. Cotlet , author A. Srivastava , author T. Fink , author M. Kroner , author E. Demler ,\ and\ author A. Imamoglu ,\ title title Fermi polaron-polaritons in charge-tunable atomically thin semiconductors ,\ @noop journal journa...

    2017

  24. [32]

    author author M. D. \ Tran , author J.-H. \ Kim ,\ and\ author Y. H. \ Lee ,\ title title Tailoring photoluminescence of monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides ,\ @noop journal journal Current Applied Physics \ volume 16 ,\ pages 1159 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  25. [33]

    Zielińska , author J

    author author A. Zielińska , author J. Prażmowska-Czajka , author M. Dyksik , author J. Eroms , author D. Weiss , author R. Paszkiewicz ,\ and\ author M. Ciorga ,\ title title Study of gold and bismuth electrical contacts to a MoS2 monolayer ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/...

  26. [34]

    Feng , author Z

    author author X. Feng , author Z. G. \ Yu , author H. Guo , author Y. Li , author Y.-W. \ Zhang ,\ and\ author K.-W. \ Ang ,\ title title Direct Observation of Semimetal Contact Induced Charge Doping and Strain Effect in CVD - Grown Monolayer MoS2 Transistors ,\ https://doi.or...

    doi

  27. [35]

    Sovizi \ and\ author R

    author author S. Sovizi \ and\ author R. Szoszkiewicz ,\ title title Single atom doping in 2D layered MoS2 from a periodic table perspective ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfrep.2022.100567 journal journal Surface Science Reports \ volume 77 ,\ pages 100567 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022

  28. [36]

    Qumar , author M

    author author U. Qumar , author M. Ikram , author M. Imran , author A. Haider , author A. Ul-Hamid , author J. Haider , author K. Riaz ,\ and\ author S. Ali ,\ title title Synergistic effect of Bi-doped exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets on their bactericidal and dye degradation poten...

    doi

  29. [37]

    author author H. Shibata ,\ title title Negative thermal quenching curves in photoluminescence of solids ,\ https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.37.550 journal journal Japanese Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 37 ,\ pages 550 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    doi

  30. [38]

    Mostaani , author M

    author author E. Mostaani , author M. Szyniszewski , author C. H. \ Price , author R. Maezono , author M. Danovich , author R. J. \ Hunt , author N. D. \ Drummond ,\ and\ author V. I. \ Fal'ko ,\ title title Diffusion quantum monte carlo study of excitonic complexes in two-dim...

    doi

  31. [39]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number orga...

    2010

  32. [40]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number orga...

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.